Overpower

The Intel Core i5-14400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER combination delivers a playable experience across all tested resolutions in Overpower, but the performance curve reveals a system that is firmly GPU-bound at higher settings. The data shows a clear and consistent scaling pattern: as resolution increases, frame rates drop significantly, which points directly to the graphics card as the limiting factor. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo reaches 143 FPS, but this falls to 127 FPS at 1440p and 108 FPS at 4K. This 35 FPS drop from 1080p to 4K at Low settings indicates that even when the graphical load is light, the RTX 2070 SUPER’s processing capacity is being stretched by the pixel count. Moving to High settings, the spread tightens: 83 FPS at 1080p, 74 FPS at 1440p, and 63 FPS at 4K. The difference between Low and High at 4K is substantial—45 FPS—which shows that the GPU’s memory bandwidth and shading power are the primary constraints. The pattern is consistent across all settings, confirming that the i5-14400F with its 10 cores and 16 threads is not the bottleneck in this pairing for this title.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS degradation from 1080p to 4K follows a predictable curve that emphasizes the RTX 2070 SUPER’s role in this system. At Medium settings, the measured averages are 89 FPS at 1920x1080, 79 FPS at 2560x1440, and 68 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a 21 FPS drop between the lowest and highest resolutions, which is a 23.6% reduction from the 1080p baseline. The Ultra preset shows a similar relative decline: 69 FPS at 1080p drops to 61 FPS at 1440p and then to 52 FPS at 4K. The 17 FPS difference between 1080p and 4K on Ultra is smaller in absolute terms than on Low, but proportionally it is a 24.6% loss. This scaling behavior is typical of a GPU with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 256-bit bus, as the data shows that the card’s 448.0 GB/s bandwidth becomes increasingly taxed as pixel throughput demands rise. The fact that the 1080p to 1440p transition at Ultra only costs 8 FPS, while the 1440p to 4K transition costs 9 FPS, suggests that the card handles moderate resolution increases well but hits a steeper wall at 4K. At Low settings, the system maintains a playable 108 FPS at 4K, which indicates that the CPU can feed the GPU adequately even at high frame rates, but the GPU’s raw compute limits the ceiling. The benchmark results indicate that this combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where the GPU can maintain higher headroom, while 4K is viable only on lower presets.

How This Combo Ranks

In the broader database of tested combinations for Overpower, this specific pairing of the Intel Core i5-14400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER ranks at 2146 out of 3713 combos. This places it in the 57.8th percentile, meaning it outperforms a slight majority of systems tested but sits firmly in the middle of the pack. The CPU itself has an 83rd percentile ranking among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 65th percentile among all graphics cards. This disparity suggests that the processor is comparatively stronger than the graphics card in this system, which aligns with the resolution scaling data showing GPU-bound behavior. The combo’s rank is likely held back by the GPU’s mid-tier position relative to the CPU’s higher standing. When looking at the GPU’s nearest rivals, the RTX 2070 SUPER’s average benchmark score of 20282 is only 1% lower than the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, 1.2% lower than the RTX 3070 Mobile, and 1.3% lower than the Intel Arc B570. These small deltas indicate that the 2070 SUPER is competitive with these parts, but none of them represent a significant leap forward. The CPU’s nearest rivals show a tighter grouping, with the i5-14400F scoring 32279, which is just 0.1% above the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and 0.5% above the Intel Core i7-12800H. This data suggests that the combo’s overall rank is a reflection of a balanced but not exceptional pairing, where the CPU’s strength compensates for the GPU’s age. The 3713 total combos tested means that 1567 configurations perform better, which contextualizes the system as a solid mid-range option rather than a high-end contender.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Overpower?*

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 offers the highest frame rates across all settings, with averages ranging from 69 FPS on Ultra to 143 FPS on Low. At 2560x1440, the averages drop to between 61 FPS on Ultra and 127 FPS on Low, which remains playable. The 4K results are the weakest, with Ultra dipping to 52 FPS, so 1440p represents the sweet spot for balancing visual quality and performance.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest competitors?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F has an average benchmark score of 32279, which is 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, 0.2% higher than the Intel Core i9-11900, and 0.5% higher than the Intel Core i7-12800H. It also posts a 21645 score in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3055 in single-core, indicating strong multi-threaded capability.

Q: Is the GPU a bottleneck at any resolution?

A: Yes, the benchmark results indicate that the RTX 2070 SUPER becomes the limiting factor as resolution increases. At 4K Medium, the average FPS is 68, while at 1080p Medium it is 89, showing a clear GPU constraint. The CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads are sufficient to feed the GPU, but the card’s 8 GB memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth limit high-resolution performance.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings?

A: At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 74 FPS (143 vs. 69). At 1440p, the gap narrows to 66 FPS (127 vs. 61). At 4K, the difference is 56 FPS (108 vs. 52). This shows that the performance cost of Ultra settings is significant but consistent across resolutions.

Q: How does this GPU rank among all tested graphics cards?

A: The RTX 2070 SUPER has a 65th percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20282. It trails the RTX 3070 Mobile by 1.2% and the Intel Arc B570 by 1.3%, but it outperforms the Quadro M4000M by 1%. This places it in the lower-middle tier of modern graphics hardware.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: It can, but only on lower presets. The data shows 4K High averages 63 FPS, while 4K Ultra drops to 52 FPS. For smoother gameplay, 4K Low provides 108 FPS, but this sacrifices visual fidelity. The 4K Medium preset offers a balanced 68 FPS average, which is playable for most titles.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured data provides a comprehensive view of the combo’s performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the system delivers its best results: Low settings produce an average of 143 FPS, Medium hits 89 FPS with a minimum of 76 FPS and a maximum of 102 FPS, High reaches 83 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 69 FPS. The 54 FPS gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p highlights the dramatic impact of settings on frame rate. Moving to 2560x1440, the averages are 127 FPS on Low, 79 FPS on Medium (with a 67-91 FPS range), 74 FPS on High, and 61 FPS on Ultra. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is consistent at roughly 5-8 FPS per preset, showing that the resolution increase has a moderate but predictable cost. At 3840x2160, the system’s limits become apparent: Low averages 108 FPS, Medium averages 68 FPS (with a 57-78 FPS range), High averages 63 FPS, and Ultra averages 52 FPS. The 4K Medium result is notable because it is the only preset at this resolution with recorded minimum and maximum values, indicating a wider variance in frame times. The Ultra preset at 4K is the weakest result in the entire dataset, at 52 FPS, which is just below the 60 FPS threshold many players consider ideal. The data shows a clear hierarchy: 1080p is the most comfortable resolution, 1440p is a strong middle ground, and 4K is only viable on Low or Medium settings.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-14400F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. Its 20 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel memory support for DDR4 and DDR5 provide ample bandwidth for feeding the GPU. In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU scores 21645 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3055 in single-core, which are strong results for a mid-range desktop part. The 9090 score in Cinebench R20 multi-core and 2181 in Cinebench R15 multi-core further confirm its multi-threaded prowess. In this game, the CPU’s role is to maintain a stable frame pipeline, and the data suggests it does so effectively. The fact that the system achieves 143 FPS at 1080p Low indicates that the CPU is not holding back the GPU at lower resolutions. Even at 4K, where the GPU is clearly the bottleneck, the CPU’s performance allows the card to reach its limits without stuttering. The processor’s 83rd percentile ranking among all CPUs places it well above average, and its nearest rivals—the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, Intel Core i9-11900, and AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS—all score within 0.5% of it, showing that it is a competitive part. The 65W TDP and Intel Socket 1700 compatibility make it a practical choice for a gaming system, and its integrated graphics are marked as N/A, so a discrete GPU is mandatory. The benchmark results indicate that the i5-14400F provides sufficient headroom for the RTX 2070 SUPER across all tested settings, meaning that any frame rate limitations are attributable to the graphics card rather than the processor.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings preset depends on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For players using a 1920x1080 display, the Medium preset offers the best balance, with an average of 89 FPS and a minimum of 76 FPS that ensures smooth gameplay without drops below 60 FPS. The High preset at 83 FPS is also viable, but the 6 FPS difference between Medium and High is small, while Ultra’s 69 FPS average introduces a noticeable reduction in headroom. At 2560x1440, the same logic applies: Medium provides 79 FPS with a 67 FPS minimum, which is the safest choice for consistent performance. High at 74 FPS is acceptable, but Ultra drops to 61 FPS, which is borderline for fast-paced action. The data suggests that 1440p Ultra is playable but leaves little margin for frame time spikes, as evidenced by the 91 FPS maximum on Medium. For 4K gaming, the options are more constrained. The Low preset at 108 FPS is the only setting that provides a high refresh rate experience, but it sacrifices most visual effects. Medium at 68 FPS is the recommended compromise, as it delivers a stable 57-78 FPS range that stays above 60 FPS on average. High at 63 FPS is playable but close to the edge, and Ultra at 52 FPS should be avoided for competitive play. Overall, the Medium preset is the most consistent performer across all resolutions, offering the best mix of visual quality and frame rate stability. Players prioritizing frame rate over fidelity should select Low at 1440p or 4K, while those with 1080p monitors can safely use High or Ultra without significant risk of dropping below 60 FPS.