Overpower

Overpower

AVERAGE FPS
165
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 165 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 107 135 140 202
1440p QHD 130 156 167 214
1080p Full HD 147 175 188 225

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 202
3840x2160 Medium 140
3840x2160 High 135
3840x2160 Ultra 107
2560x1440 Low 214
2560x1440 Medium 167
2560x1440 High 156
2560x1440 Ultra 130
1920x1080 Low 225
1920x1080 Medium 188
1920x1080 High 175
1920x1080 Ultra 147

Overpower with AMD Ryzen 7 5700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 delivers a compelling 4K experience in Overpower, but the data reveals a clear hierarchy in how performance scales with resolution and settings. At 4K Ultra, the combo produces 107.1 FPS, while dropping to 1080p Ultra raises that to 146.5 FPS. This 39.4 FPS gap across the resolution range indicates that the RTX 4090 is doing the heavy lifting at higher resolutions, with the CPU becoming more relevant as the pixel count decreases. The measured results show a system that remains fluid even under maximum load, yet the scaling pattern suggests diminishing returns when pushing lower resolutions.

Resolution Scaling

The transition from 1080p to 4K produces a predictable but steep decline in frame rates across all settings. At Low settings, the drop from 225.2 FPS at 1080p to 201.6 FPS at 4K represents a reduction of 23.6 FPS, or roughly 10.5% of the 1080p figure. This modest decline indicates that at Low settings, the CPU is more frequently the limiting factor, as the GPU has ample headroom to process the lighter workload. The Medium preset shows a similar pattern: 187.5 FPS at 1080p falls to 140.3 FPS at 4K, a 47.2 FPS difference that signals the GPU beginning to exert more influence.

High settings exhibit the most interesting behavior. At 1080p, the combo achieves 175.2 FPS, which drops to 155.7 FPS at 1440p and then to 134.5 FPS at 4K. The incremental decline of roughly 20 FPS per resolution step suggests a balanced workload where both CPU and GPU contribute meaningfully. Ultra settings tell a different story: the 146.5 FPS at 1080p falls to 130 FPS at 1440p and then to 107.1 FPS at 4K. The larger drop between 1440p and 4K (22.9 FPS) compared to 1080p to 1440p (16.5 FPS) confirms that the RTX 4090’s rendering demands scale non-linearly with pixel count.

The data strongly indicates that at 4K, the RTX 4090 is the primary performance driver. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 94.5 FPS (201.6 vs 107.1), which is significantly larger than the 78.7 FPS gap at 1080p (225.2 vs 146.5). This widening spread at higher resolutions is a classic sign of GPU-bound operation, where the graphics card’s capabilities—not the CPU—determine the final frame rate.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 brings substantial resources to this pairing. Its 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus delivers 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth, which is more than sufficient for Overpower’s textures at any resolution. The GPU’s boost clock of 2520 MHz, combined with 16,384 shading units, allows it to push high frame rates even at 4K Ultra. The 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and DLSS features, though the measured data does not separately quantify their impact.

The GPU’s performance percentile of 91 versus all GPUs places it in the top tier, and its average benchmark score of 66,473 confirms its position. In the measured Overpower results, the RTX 4090 shows its strength at 4K Low, where it delivers 201.6 FPS—a figure that approaches the 1080p Low result of 225.2 FPS. This suggests that the card’s raw compute power (82.58 TFLOPS FP32) is barely taxed at lower settings, leaving headroom for higher graphical fidelity.

The memory configuration is notable: 24 GB of GDDR6X at 21 Gbps effective speed. For a game like Overpower, this capacity prevents any VRAM-related bottlenecks, even at 4K Ultra where texture streaming demands are highest. The 1.01 TB/s bandwidth ensures that data transfer never starves the GPU cores, allowing the card to maintain consistent frame pacing across all measured settings. The GPU’s end-of-life production status and launch MSRP of 1,599 USD are the only caveats to this otherwise dominant performance profile.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Ryzen 7 5700X and RTX 4090 ranks 74th out of 1,744 tested combos in Overpower, placing it in the top 4.2% of all configurations. This position is remarkably strong given that the CPU is a mid-range 2022 processor paired with an end-of-life flagship GPU. The rank reflects the RTX 4090’s influence: the GPU alone sits in the 91st percentile, while the CPU’s 83rd percentile is respectable but not top-tier.

The CPU’s nearest rivals provide context for its contribution. The Intel Core i9-11900KF scores 26,196 on average, a delta of just 0.1% from the Ryzen 7 5700X’s 26,214 average. Similarly, the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X scores 26,272, a 0.2% delta. These tiny margins indicate that the CPU is not a differentiating factor in this combo; any of these processors would yield nearly identical Overpower results. The Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U trails by 0.2%, and the Ryzen 5 5500GT leads by 0.2%, reinforcing that the 5700X sits in a performance plateau.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals show larger discrepancies. The NVIDIA Tesla T4 scores 66,733, a 0.4% delta, while the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 67,097, a 0.9% delta. The NVIDIA Quadro P6000 at 67,320 represents a 1.3% gap. These workstation cards are not gaming-focused, but their proximity in synthetic benchmarks highlights how close the RTX 4090’s raw compute is to professional offerings. In Overpower specifically, the RTX 4090’s gaming-oriented architecture—with its high FP32 throughput and dedicated RT cores—likely contributes to the combo’s top-5% rank.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides clear guidance for optimal settings. At 4K, the High preset delivers 134.5 FPS, which is 27.4 FPS above the Ultra preset’s 107.1 FPS. This 20% improvement in frame rate comes at a visual cost that many players would find acceptable, especially on high-refresh-rate displays. The Medium preset at 4K offers 140.3 FPS, only 5.8 FPS above High, suggesting that High is the sweet spot for 4K gaming.

At 1440p, the recommendation shifts. The Ultra preset achieves 130 FPS, which is already above the 120 Hz threshold common on many monitors. The High preset at 155.7 FPS adds 25.7 FPS over Ultra, but the visual fidelity loss may not justify the gain for players with 144 Hz displays. The Medium preset at 167.1 FPS and Low at 214.4 FPS are overkill for most 1440p panels, making Ultra the sensible choice for those prioritizing image quality.

For 1080p, all settings exceed 146 FPS, meaning the CPU becomes the bottleneck. The Ultra preset’s 146.5 FPS is sufficient for 144 Hz displays, while High at 175.2 FPS and Medium at 187.5 FPS offer headroom for competitive play. The Low preset’s 225.2 FPS is unnecessary unless targeting 240 Hz monitors. The data suggests that High at 1080p provides the best balance, as it remains well above 144 FPS while retaining most visual features. Across all resolutions, the pattern is consistent: High offers the most efficient trade-off between frame rate and graphical quality, with Ultra providing diminishing returns.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS achieved at 4K with this combo?

A: The highest 4K result is 201.6 FPS at Low settings. The Ultra preset drops to 107.1 FPS, while High achieves 134.5 FPS and Medium reaches 140.3 FPS.

Q: How does the 4K Ultra performance compare to 1080p Ultra?

A: The 4K Ultra average is 107.1 FPS, which is 39.4 FPS lower than the 1080p Ultra result of 146.5 FPS. This represents a 26.9% reduction in frame rate when moving from 1080p to 4K at the same settings.

Q: Is the RTX 4090 the limiting factor at 4K?

A: Yes, the data indicates GPU-bound operation at 4K. The spread between Low and Ultra at 4K is 94.5 FPS, compared to 78.7 FPS at 1080p, showing that the GPU’s workload scales more steeply with resolution than the CPU’s.

Q: What is the combo’s rank among all tested configurations?

A: The combo ranks 74th out of 1,744 tested configurations in Overpower, placing it in the top 4.2% of all combinations.

Q: How close is the Ryzen 7 5700X to its nearest rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 26,214, which is within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X’s 26,272 and 0.1% of the Intel Core i9-11900KF’s 26,196. These differences are negligible for gaming performance.

Q: Which settings preset at 1440p provides the best experience?

A: The Ultra preset at 1440p averages 130 FPS, which is sufficient for 120 Hz displays. The High preset at 155.7 FPS offers 25.7 FPS more, but the visual trade-off makes Ultra the recommended choice for image quality.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X contributes 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture, running at a base clock of 3.40 GHz and boosting to 4.60 GHz. Its 32 MB of shared L3 cache and 65 W TDP make it an efficient processor, but its synthetic benchmarks reveal a modest standing: the 3DMark single-thread score of 921 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,193 indicate that per-core performance is adequate but not exceptional. The multi-threaded results are stronger, with Cinebench R23 multicore at 22,620 and Geekbench multicore at 9,720, reflecting the benefits of 16 threads.

In Overpower, the CPU’s role becomes evident at lower resolutions and settings. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 225.2 FPS, which is likely near the CPU’s maximum frame delivery capability. The fact that 4K Low (201.6 FPS) is only 23.6 FPS lower than 1080p Low suggests that the CPU can sustain high frame rates even when the GPU workload increases. However, the 83rd percentile ranking versus all CPUs indicates that faster processors could push higher frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, though the nearest rivals (all within 0.2% in average score) show that the 5700X is not a weak link.

The CPU’s memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s over dual-channel DDR4 is modest compared to the GPU’s 1.01 TB/s, but this does not appear to bottleneck Overpower. The 7 nm process node and 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die contribute to the processor’s efficiency. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 6,858 and max-thread score of 6,850 show consistent scaling, meaning the CPU maintains performance across varied workloads. For Overpower, the Ryzen 7 5700X provides sufficient throughput to keep the RTX 4090 fed at 4K, while at 1080p it becomes the limiting factor—but the resulting frame rates remain high enough that no practical compromise is needed. The CPU’s launch MSRP of $299 positions it as a mid-range option, yet its performance in this combo ranks among the top 5% of all tested configurations, underscoring that the GPU drives the overall experience.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 7 5700X

Cores / Threads 8 / 16
Base Clock 3400 MHz
Boost Clock 4600 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

VRAM 24 GB GDDR6X
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2520 MHz MHz
TDP 450 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 5700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 in Overpower

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 201.6
3840x2160 Medium 140.3
3840x2160 High 134.5
3840x2160 Ultra 107.1
2560x1440 Low 214.4
2560x1440 Medium 167.1
2560x1440 High 155.7
2560x1440 Ultra 130.0
1920x1080 Low 225.2
1920x1080 Medium 187.5
1920x1080 High 175.2
1920x1080 Ultra 146.5

Overpower with Ryzen 7 5700X + Other GPUs

See how Overpower performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Overpower with RTX 4090 + Other CPUs

See how Overpower performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 7 5700X + RTX 4090

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.