Minimum
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 133 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 47 | 62 | 74 | 96 |
| 1440p QHD | 87 | 115 | 137 | 179 |
| 1080p Full HD | 136 | 178 | 212 | 277 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Minimum with Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti delivers a robust experience in Minimum, a 2014 third-person shooter. The benchmark data shows this combination handles the game decisively at most settings, with the primary trade-off occurring between visual fidelity and raw frame rate at higher resolutions. The measured results indicate a clear hierarchy across presets, with performance scaling predictably as resolution increases.
Settings Recommendations
The benchmark results provide a clear picture of how this combo behaves across the four available presets. At 1920x1080, the data shows that every preset is playable, but the differences are stark. The Low preset delivers an average of 277 FPS, which is exceptionally high and suitable for competitive play. The Medium preset still offers a very high 212 FPS average, with a minimum of 180 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay even in demanding scenes. The High preset drops to 178 FPS, while Ultra falls to 136 FPS. Given that the game is a third-person shooter, the extra visual polish of High or Ultra might be tempting, but the data indicates that Medium provides the best balance of high frame rates and improved visuals over Low.
Moving to 2560x1440, the pattern remains consistent. Low produces 179 FPS, Medium 137 FPS, and High 115 FPS. The Ultra preset at this resolution drops to 87 FPS, which is still above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth play but shows a significant cost. At 3840x2160, the landscape changes. The Low preset still manages 96 FPS, and Medium yields a solid 74 FPS with a minimum of 63 FPS, which is the only row in the entire data set with both min and max values recorded. High drops to 62 FPS, which is borderline for a smooth experience, and Ultra falls to 47 FPS, which may feel stuttery.
Based on the measured rows, the Medium preset is the recommended choice for the best overall experience. At both 1080p and 1440p, it provides a substantial frame rate buffer over High and Ultra while offering better visual quality than Low. At 4K, Medium is the only preset that consistently stays above the 60 FPS mark, making it the most reliable option for a fluid experience. For players prioritizing maximum frame rates, the Low preset is the fallback, but for a balance of quality and performance, Medium is the clear winner in this data.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is the primary driver of the frame rates seen in these benchmarks. Its specifications within the data show a 12 GB GDDR6X memory pool on a 384-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 912.4 GB/s. The GPU also features a boost clock of 1665 MHz and a base clock of 1365 MHz. These figures are critical because they dictate how quickly the card can process textures and geometry, which is directly reflected in the FPS numbers.
The data shows that the GPU is the limiting factor as resolution increases. At 1080p, the CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU, resulting in extremely high frame rates. However, the gap between the Low and Ultra presets at 1080p is 141 FPS (277 vs. 136), which is a massive spread. This indicates that the GPU is heavily utilized even at lower resolutions, and the increased visual workload of higher presets significantly impacts its output. At 4K, the GPU is clearly saturated. The Ultra preset manages only 47 FPS, while Low achieves 96 FPS. This 49 FPS difference shows that the RTX 3080 Ti's raw compute power, measured at 34.10 TFLOPS FP32, is being pushed to its limits.
The GPU's memory subsystem also plays a role. The 12 GB frame buffer is ample for a game from 2014, but the high bandwidth is what allows for consistent performance at 4K Medium, where the card still delivers a minimum of 63 FPS. Benchmark results indicate that the RTX 3080 Ti is capable, but its performance is heavily dependent on the chosen settings. The card's percentile ranking of 83rd among all GPUs and an average benchmark score of 41187 place it in a strong position, but the data from Minimum shows that it is not invincible at 4K Ultra, where it falls below the 60 FPS target.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti ranks 961st out of 3712 tested combinations in this game. This places it in the top 26% of all tested systems, which is a respectable position given the age of the game and the number of potential hardware configurations. The ranking suggests that while this is not a top-tier setup for Minimum, it is far from a weak one.
The CPU itself is a strong performer, sitting in the 94th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 70879. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon 6511P, which scores a delta of -0.2%, and the Intel Core i7-14700KF, which is 1% behind. This indicates that the Ultra 7 265K is a high-end processor that should not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios. However, the combo’s rank of 961 suggests that other factors, such as the GPU’s relative performance compared to newer cards, are holding it back from a higher position.
For context, the RTX 3080 Ti’s nearest rivals in the GPU benchmark data include the AMD Radeon Pro 5300, which is 0.8% faster, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070, which is 2% slower. This shows that while the 3080 Ti is older, it still competes with modern mid-range offerings. The combo’s rank of 961 out of 3712 means there are 960 configurations that perform better in Minimum, likely featuring newer GPUs or higher-end processors, but it also means there are 2751 configurations that perform worse. The data shows that this pairing is a capable one, offering a solid foundation for playing the game at high settings without significant compromise.
FAQ
*Q: What is the maximum average frame rate achieved by this combo in Minimum?*
A: The highest average frame rate recorded in the data is 277 FPS, which occurs at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low preset.
Q: Can this system maintain 60 FPS at 4K resolution?
A: Yes, the data shows that at 3840x2160, the Medium preset achieves an average of 74 FPS with a minimum of 63 FPS. The Low preset also stays above 60 FPS with a 96 FPS average, but the High and Ultra presets fall to 62 FPS and 47 FPS, respectively.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-14700KF?
A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K has an average benchmark score of 70879, while the Intel Core i7-14700KF scores 70163. This puts the Ultra 7 265K approximately 1% ahead of the i7-14700KF in the provided data.
Q: What is the difference in performance between the Low and Ultra presets at 2560x1440?
A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset delivers 179 FPS, while the Ultra preset delivers 87 FPS. This represents a performance drop of 92 FPS when moving from the lowest to the highest visual quality setting.
Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and how does it relate to performance?
A: The RTX 3080 Ti has a memory bandwidth of 912.4 GB/s. This high bandwidth allows the GPU to feed its 10240 shading units efficiently, which helps maintain the frame rates seen in the benchmark data, particularly at higher resolutions where data throughput is critical.
Q: What is the combo's rank out of all tested configurations?
A: The combo ranks 961st out of 3712 total combinations tested for this game, placing it in the upper quartile of all tested systems.
Resolution Scaling
The data shows a clear and expected trend: as resolution increases, average frame rates decrease. At 1080p, the Low preset hits 277 FPS. Moving to 1440p, that same preset drops to 179 FPS, a reduction of 98 FPS. At 4K, it further drops to 96 FPS, which is a 65 FPS reduction from 1440p. This pattern is consistent across all presets, but the magnitude of the drop varies.
For the Medium preset, the frame rates are 212 FPS at 1080p, 137 FPS at 1440p, and 74 FPS at 4K. This shows a drop of 75 FPS from 1080p to 1440p and a further drop of 63 FPS from 1440p to 4K. The High preset follows a similar trajectory: 178 FPS at 1080p, 115 FPS at 1440p, and 62 FPS at 4K. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, falling from 136 FPS at 1080p to 87 FPS at 1440p and finally to 47 FPS at 4K.
These scaling patterns reveal that the system is heavily GPU-bound. The consistent proportional drops in frame rate with increased pixel count indicate that the RTX 3080 Ti’s rendering capabilities are the primary constraint. The CPU’s role is less pronounced here; if the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect frame rates to stay more stable across resolutions, as the CPU workload does not scale as dramatically with pixel count. Instead, the data shows a sharp decline, confirming that the GPU is working harder at higher resolutions. The fact that the 4K Medium preset still manages a minimum of 63 FPS suggests that the GPU has enough headroom to handle a moderate workload, but the Ultra preset at 47 FPS shows its limits.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is a 20-core, 20-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It has a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, with a 30 MB shared L3 cache. These specifications make it a formidable processor for gaming, and the benchmark data for Minimum reflects that. The game, released in 2014, is not likely to stress all 20 cores, but the CPU’s high single-thread performance is crucial for maintaining high frame rates.
The CPU's benchmark scores support this. It scores 2020 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 35850 in multi-core, with an average benchmark score of 70879. This places it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, which is a strong indicator of its capability. In the context of Minimum, the CPU has more than enough power to feed the GPU. The evidence for this is that at 1080p, the frame rates are exceptionally high, reaching 277 FPS on Low. If the CPU were a bottleneck, we would see frame rates plateau at a lower level regardless of the resolution.
The CPU's performance relative to its rivals also confirms its strength. It is 1% faster than the Intel Core i7-14700KF and 1.3% faster than the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F. This small margin suggests that in CPU-bound scenarios, the Ultra 7 265K holds its own. However, the data from Minimum shows that the CPU is not the limiting factor; the GPU is. The high core count and boost clock ensure that the CPU can process the game's logic and draw calls without introducing stutter, allowing the RTX 3080 Ti to operate at its full potential. The result is a system where the CPU provides a stable foundation, and the GPU dictates the final performance ceiling.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti in Minimum
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 96.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 74.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 62.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 47.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 179.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 137.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 115.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 87.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 277.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 212.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 178.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 136.0 |
Minimum with iUltra 7 265K + Other GPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Minimum with RTX 3080 Ti + Other CPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 7 265K + RTX 3080 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.