Minimum

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i5-13400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT lands at rank 1129 out of 1733 tested combos in Minimum. That places this configuration in the 35th percentile of all tested pairings, meaning roughly two-thirds of the combos in the database deliver higher average frame rates in this title. For a mid-range desktop pairing, the position reflects a system that is competent but not exceptional in this specific third-person shooter.

The CPU itself sits in the 82nd percentile against all processors, with an average benchmark score of 25236. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core i7-13620H scores 25201 (0.1% lower), the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D scores 25365 (0.5% higher), and the AMD EPYC 9474F scores 25103 (0.5% lower). The i5-13400F is effectively dead-even with these alternatives, indicating that processor performance is not a differentiator at this tier—any of these CPUs would yield nearly identical results in Minimum.

The GPU side is similarly unremarkable in relative terms. The RX 6650 XT holds the 72nd percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 29024. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6800M at 29011 (0.0% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 470 at 28996 (0.1% higher), and the Intel Arc A370M at 29175 (0.5% lower). The RX 6650 XT is essentially interchangeable with these cards in aggregate benchmarks, though the measured FPS in Minimum tells a more nuanced story.

The 1129th overall rank, when compared against the component-level percentiles, suggests the pairing is slightly held back by the GPU in this title. The CPU's 82nd percentile standing is notably higher than the GPU's 72nd percentile, and the combo rank reflects that imbalance. The data indicates a system where the processor has headroom that the graphics card cannot fully exploit at higher resolutions.

FAQ

Q: How does this combo compare to the nearest rival CPU pairing?

A: The Intel Core i5-13400F scores 25236 on average, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i7-13620H (25201) and 0.5% lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D (25365). In practical terms, these processors are statistically indistinguishable in Minimum.

Q: What is the GPU's standing relative to similar cards?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT has an average benchmark score of 29024, placing it at 72nd percentile among all GPUs. It sits within 0.5% of the AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Radeon RX 470, and Intel Arc A370M, making it a middle-of-the-pack performer.

Q: Does the RX 6650 XT bottleneck the i5-13400F in this game?

A: The evidence suggests yes. At 1080p Ultra, the combo delivers 88.4 FPS, while at 1080p Low it reaches 178.3 FPS. The CPU's 82nd percentile rank versus the GPU's 72nd percentile indicates the graphics card is the limiting factor, especially at higher settings.

Q: What is the playable frame rate at 1440p with High settings?

A: The measured average at 2560x1440 High is 72.4 FPS, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. This is the highest resolution where the combo maintains a solid playable experience on High settings.

Q: How does the combo perform at 4K?

A: At 3840x2160, only Low settings (60.6 FPS) achieve playable frame rates. Medium drops to 49.1 FPS, High to 37.1 FPS, and Ultra to 28.2 FPS. The 4K Ultra result is less than half the 1080p Ultra figure, highlighting the GPU's limitations at high pixel counts.

Q: What is the best resolution-to-settings balance for this combo?

A: The data shows 1440p Medium at 89.8 FPS offers the best balance of visual quality and performance. It delivers 24% more frames than 1440p High while still maintaining a substantial visual upgrade over 1080p.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear scaling pattern across resolutions. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 178.3 FPS, but this drops to 112.5 FPS at 1440p Low—a 37% reduction. Moving to 4K Low, the frame rate falls to 60.6 FPS, another 46% drop from 1440p. This steep decline at Low settings indicates the GPU is the primary constraint, as the CPU has ample headroom to feed frames at lower resolutions.

The scaling pattern becomes even more pronounced at higher settings. At Ultra, the combo delivers 88.4 FPS at 1080p, 54.2 FPS at 1440p (a 39% drop), and just 28.2 FPS at 4K (a 48% drop from 1440p). The consistent ~40-50% reduction per resolution step suggests a GPU-bound scenario across all settings, with the RX 6650 XT's 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 128-bit bus struggling to maintain throughput as pixel count increases.

The limiting component is clearly the GPU. The i5-13400F's benchmark scores—particularly the Cinebench R23 multicore result of 21279 and the 3DMark max threads score of 7307—indicate a processor capable of sustaining high frame rates. Yet the RX 6650 XT's 10.79 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 280.3 GB/s memory bandwidth become the bottleneck as resolution climbs. The data shows that at 1080p, the combo can push past 178 FPS on Low settings, but at 4K even Low settings barely reach 60 FPS, a 66% reduction that points squarely at the GPU's limitations.

Interestingly, the scaling from 1080p to 1440p is relatively consistent across settings, with drops ranging from 37% (Low) to 39% (Ultra). However, the 1440p to 4K transition shows more variation: Low drops 46%, Medium drops 45%, High drops 49%, and Ultra drops 48%. This widening gap at 4K reinforces that the RX 6650 XT's memory bandwidth—at 280.3 GB/s—is insufficient for the higher resolution demands, particularly when texture and shading workloads increase.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its strongest results. Low settings produce an average of 178.3 FPS, which is more than double the 4K Low result. Medium settings hit 136.7 FPS, High reaches 114.3 FPS, and Ultra drops to 88.4 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 89.9 FPS, representing a 50% reduction in frame rate when maxing out settings. This resolution is clearly where the combo shines, with every setting tier except Ultra maintaining well above 100 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains respectable but the GPU's strain becomes evident. Low settings average 112.5 FPS, which is still highly playable. Medium delivers 89.8 FPS, High hits 72.4 FPS, and Ultra falls to 54.2 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p ranges from 37% at Low to 39% at Ultra, showing a uniform penalty across settings. At 1440p, only Ultra dips below 60 FPS, making this resolution viable for most settings configurations.

At 3840x2160, the combo struggles to maintain playable frame rates. Low settings average 60.6 FPS, barely crossing the 60 FPS threshold. Medium drops to 49.1 FPS, High falls to 37.1 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 28.2 FPS. The 4K Ultra result is less than one-third of the 1080p Low figure, demonstrating the GPU's inability to handle 4K with high visual fidelity. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is more severe than the 1080p to 1440p transition, with drops ranging from 45% to 49%.

Across all resolutions, the relationship between settings tiers remains consistent. Low to Medium typically yields a 20-25% performance penalty, Medium to High another 15-20%, and High to Ultra a further 20-25%. This consistent pattern indicates that each settings tier imposes a similar computational load on the GPU, regardless of resolution.

Settings Recommendations

For 1080p gaming, the data strongly favors Medium or High settings. Medium delivers 136.7 FPS, which provides a substantial margin above the 60 FPS threshold and leaves headroom for demanding scenes. High at 114.3 FPS still offers excellent smoothness while improving visual fidelity. Ultra at 88.4 FPS is playable but the 50% reduction from Low makes it less appealing when High offers a 29% improvement over Ultra's frame rate at a modest visual cost. The sweet spot is High: it maintains triple-digit frame rates while providing near-maximum visual quality.

At 1440p, Medium settings at 89.8 FPS represent the best balance. High at 72.4 FPS is still smooth but the drop below 90 FPS may be noticeable on high-refresh displays. Ultra at 54.2 FPS falls below the 60 FPS threshold, making it a poor choice for competitive play. Low at 112.5 FPS is fast but sacrifices too much visual quality for the resolution's benefits. Medium offers 89.8 FPS—24% more than High—while still delivering the visual upgrades that justify 1440p over 1080p.

At 4K, only Low settings at 60.6 FPS are truly playable. Medium at 49.1 FPS and High at 37.1 FPS are below the smoothness threshold, and Ultra at 28.2 FPS is effectively unplayable for a third-person shooter. The data suggests that 4K is only viable with Low settings, and even then the margin above 60 FPS is thin. Players prioritizing 4K should expect to compromise heavily on visual quality.

The overall recommendation is 1440p Medium as the primary configuration, offering 89.8 FPS with a solid visual uplift over 1080p. For players with 1080p displays, High settings at 114.3 FPS provide the best experience. The combo is not suited for 4K beyond Low settings, and even that configuration barely maintains playable frame rates.