Minimum

The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile delivers a compelling performance profile in Minimum, a Third-Person Shooter released in 2014. The measured data shows that this combination is not merely capable of running the game, but is positioned to exploit high refresh rates at mainstream resolutions and maintain smooth gameplay at 4K. The benchmark results indicate a system that scales predictably with settings, offering a clear hierarchy of performance that allows for precise tuning based on display capabilities and user preference. This analysis explores the measured FPS data to provide concrete settings recommendations and a detailed breakdown of how this hardware duo behaves in this specific title.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data suggests a clear "sweet spot" for the Medium preset across all tested resolutions. At 1920x1080, the Medium preset yields an average of 210 FPS, with a minimum of 178 FPS and a maximum of 241 FPS. This frame rate is exceptionally high and will fully saturate any 144Hz or even 240Hz display, providing a fluid and responsive experience. The jump from High to Medium is substantial, from 176 FPS to 210 FPS, representing a significant performance headroom gain without a massive visual compromise in a fast-paced shooter where clarity of motion often matters more than fine texture detail.

At 2560x1440, the Medium preset again provides the most balanced experience, with an average of 135 FPS. The minimum of 115 FPS and maximum of 156 FPS show that the frame time is stable, ensuring consistent gameplay without sudden hitches. While the High preset at 114 FPS is also playable, the Medium preset offers a more comfortable margin above the 100 FPS threshold, which is beneficial for maintaining a high level of input responsiveness. The Ultra preset at 87 FPS is still viable for a 60Hz display, but the Medium preset's higher average and minimum frame rates make it the better choice for competitive play.

For 3840x2160, the recommendation shifts to the High preset. The data shows an average of 61 FPS, which is perfectly aligned with a standard 60Hz display. While the Medium preset achieves a higher average of 73 FPS, the High preset offers a superior visual experience at a frame rate that is still smooth and consistent. The Ultra preset at 47 FPS dips below the ideal 60 FPS target and is not recommended for a consistently fluid experience. The Low preset at 95 FPS is an option for those prioritizing frame rate above all else, but the visual downgrade is likely too severe for a game that can run at 60 FPS with High settings.

The data implies that the Medium preset is the most versatile, offering an excellent balance of visual quality and performance that scales well from 1080p to 4K. It provides the highest minimum FPS values, which is the most critical metric for avoiding stutter and ensuring a smooth experience.

FAQ

*Q: What is the maximum average frame rate this combo can achieve in Minimum?*

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 274, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low settings preset. This demonstrates the system's capability to push frame rates far beyond the refresh rate of most monitors.

*Q: Can this hardware combination handle 4K gaming in Minimum?*

A: Yes, the data shows it can. At 3840x2160, the High settings preset delivers an average of 61 FPS, which is right at the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay. The Medium preset is also viable at 73 FPS, indicating solid 4K performance.

Q: How does the performance scale between the Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: The difference is significant. At 2560x1440, the Low preset achieves an average of 177 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 87 FPS. This represents a performance drop of roughly half when moving from the lowest to the highest visual fidelity settings.

Q: Is there a significant difference in minimum FPS between the Medium and High presets?

A: Yes, the data shows a notable difference. At 1920x1080, the Medium preset has a minimum FPS of 178, while the High preset averages 176 FPS. At 2560x1440, the Medium preset's minimum is 115 FPS, compared to the High preset's average of 114 FPS. This suggests the Medium preset provides a more stable frame rate floor.

Q: Does the game's release date from 2014 have an impact on the measured performance?

A: The game's age is a factor in the extremely high frame rates observed. The benchmark results show that the modern, high-end components in this combo are able to render the game at very high speeds, particularly at lower resolutions, indicating the game is not heavily demanding by current standards.

Q: What is the performance difference between the High and Ultra presets at 1080p?

A: The High preset averages 176 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 134 FPS. This shows that the Ultra preset, while providing the highest visual quality, comes at a cost of 42 FPS compared to the High preset.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile is the primary driver of the high frame rates observed in the measured data. With 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, the GPU has ample memory bandwidth and capacity for Minimum at any resolution. The memory clock is listed as 1750 MHz with a 28 Gbps effective data rate, which contributes to the 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is more than sufficient for a game from 2014, even at 4K resolution, which is why the GPU is not bottlenecked by memory constraints.

The GPU's architecture, Blackwell 2.0, is built on a 5 nm process and features 7680 shading units. Its boost clock of 1500 MHz and base clock of 975 MHz are the primary drivers of its compute performance. The measured FPS data shows a clear relationship between the GPU load and settings. As the resolution and graphical fidelity increase, the GPU works harder, and the frame rate decreases accordingly. For instance, at 1920x1080, the GPU can produce 274 FPS on Low, but at 3840x2160 on Ultra, it drops to 47 FPS. This scaling is classic GPU-bound behavior, where the pixel fill rate and shader complexity become the limiting factors.

The GPU's benchmark scores also contextualize its performance. Its Passmark G3D score is 27711, and it holds a percentile rank of 81 among all GPUs. While its nearest rivals in the database are listed as the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile, with deltaPct values of 0.1 and 0.6 respectively, these are based on average benchmark scores and do not reflect its gaming performance in Minimum. The data from the game itself shows a very capable mobile GPU that can easily handle the game's demands, delivering 4K High settings at 61 FPS and 1080p Medium at 210 FPS.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the combo's performance across a matrix of resolutions and settings.

At 1920x1080, the results are as follows:

• Low: 274 FPS average.
• Medium: 210 FPS average, with a minimum of 178 FPS and a maximum of 241 FPS.
• High: 176 FPS average.
• Ultra: 134 FPS average.

This shows that at 1080p, the system is heavily GPU-bound and delivers exceptionally high frame rates. The spread from Low to Ultra is 140 FPS, indicating that the settings have a significant impact on performance.

At 2560x1440, the performance scales down as expected:

• Low: 177 FPS average.
• Medium: 135 FPS average, with a minimum of 115 FPS and a maximum of 156 FPS.
• High: 114 FPS average.
• Ultra: 87 FPS average.

The frame rates remain high, with even the Ultra preset staying above 60 FPS. The Medium preset's minimum FPS of 115 is a strong indicator of smooth, consistent performance.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is pushed harder:

• Low: 95 FPS average.
• Medium: 73 FPS average, with a minimum of 62 FPS and a maximum of 84 FPS.
• High: 61 FPS average.
• Ultra: 47 FPS average.

The 4K results show that the RTX 5080 Mobile is still capable of providing a playable experience at the highest resolution. The High preset at 61 FPS is the most balanced for 4K, offering a good visual experience while staying at the 60 FPS target. The Ultra preset, at 47 FPS, is the only configuration that falls below the 60 FPS threshold, suggesting it is too demanding for a consistently smooth experience.

Resolution Scaling

The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is substantial and reveals the nature of the limiting component. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 on the Medium preset reduces the average FPS from 210 to 135, a decrease of 75 FPS. This is a 35.7% reduction in performance for a resolution increase of 77.8% in pixel count. This suggests the scaling is not perfectly linear, but it is in the expected range for a GPU-bound workload.

The jump from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160 is even more demanding. The Medium preset's average FPS drops from 135 to 73, a decrease of 62 FPS. This represents a 45.9% reduction in performance for a 125% increase in pixel count. The data indicates that the RTX 5080 Mobile's rendering capabilities are being taxed significantly at 4K, as the sheer number of pixels being processed begins to overwhelm the GPU's compute and bandwidth resources.

This scaling pattern clearly identifies the GPU as the primary limiting component at higher resolutions. The CPU's performance is sufficient to feed the GPU at 1080p, as evidenced by the very high frame rates, but the GPU's workload increases exponentially with resolution. The fact that the frame rate doesn't halve exactly with a doubling of pixel count suggests that other factors, such as memory bandwidth and texture fill rate, also play a role. The 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth is a high figure, but the demands of 4K rendering with high-detail textures can still create a bottleneck. The data implies that for a 4K experience, users should expect to use the High or Medium presets, while for maximum frame rates at 1080p, the Low or Medium presets are the most effective.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture. Its boost clock of 5.40 GHz and base clock of 2.50 GHz are key to its performance. In Minimum, a game from 2014, the CPU's role is to handle game logic, physics, and draw calls. The benchmark results show that this CPU is more than capable of this task.

The data suggests that the CPU is not a bottleneck at any resolution. At 1920x1080, the GPU is able to produce 274 FPS on Low settings, which is an extremely high frame rate that would place significant stress on the CPU to process game state updates. The fact that the CPU can keep up with this reflects its power. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42713 and single-core score of 6030 indicate a very strong processor. The single-core performance is particularly important for gaming, and the high score ensures that the main game thread is handled efficiently.

The CPU's nearest rivals, based on average benchmark scores, include the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX with a deltaPct of 0.1, and the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D with a deltaPct of 0.6. These are all high-end processors, and the 8945HX is firmly in this performance tier. In the context of Minimum, the CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads are more than sufficient. The game is unlikely to utilize all of them, but the high clock speeds and strong single-threaded performance are what matter most. The data shows that the CPU is providing a stable platform for the GPU to perform at its best, as the frame rate scaling with resolution is consistent with a GPU-bound scenario. The CPU's role is to ensure that the GPU is never waiting for data, and the measured FPS figures confirm this is the case.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database for Minimum, this combination of the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile is ranked 1022 out of 3712 tested combos. This places it in the top 27.5% of all configurations tested for this game. This is a strong ranking, indicating that this hardware is well above average for running Minimum.

The rank is a holistic measure that considers the combo's overall performance across all settings and resolutions. The fact that it ranks in the top third is consistent with the high FPS figures seen in the measured data. The CPU and GPU are both high-end components, and their combined performance places them in a strong position relative to the wider database. The rank of 1022 also suggests that while this is a very capable system, there are many other combos that perform even better, likely featuring more powerful desktop-class components or top-tier variants of the same hardware. The data shows that this combo is a high-performing mobile solution that delivers an excellent gaming experience in Minimum, with the ability to handle 4K at high settings and achieve very high frame rates at lower resolutions.