Minimum

Minimum

AVERAGE FPS
82
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 82 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 29 38 45 59
1440p QHD 54 71 84 110
1080p Full HD 83 109 130 170

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 59
3840x2160 Medium 45
3840x2160 High 38
3840x2160 Ultra 29
2560x1440 Low 110
2560x1440 Medium 84
2560x1440 High 71
2560x1440 Ultra 54
1920x1080 Low 170
1920x1080 Medium 130
1920x1080 High 109
1920x1080 Ultra 83

Minimum with AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER combination ranks 2047th out of 2939 tested combos for Minimum, placing it in the 30th percentile of all systems evaluated. This is a mid-pack result, indicating that while the hardware can run the game, it does so at performance levels that are overshadowed by the majority of other configurations in the database. The pairing of a high-end 2026 processor with an end-of-life 2019 graphics card creates a significant bottleneck, and the measured frame rates reflect this imbalance, with the GPU consistently limiting the overall experience.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 2047 out of 2939 places it in the lower-to-middle tier of tested systems, a position that is almost entirely dictated by the graphics card rather than the processor. The RTX 2060 SUPER, with an average benchmark score of 18093, ranks in the 62nd percentile of all GPUs, which is a modest standing. Its nearest rivals in terms of average score include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile (18159, -0.4% delta) and the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 (18189, -0.5% delta), showing that the desktop 2060 SUPER is functionally equivalent to a mobile RTX 3060 in raw compute potential. The data shows that the GPU is not a top-tier performer; it sits in a cluster with other mid-range cards, and this directly caps the frame rates in Minimum.

In contrast, the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D is an exceptionally powerful processor. Its average benchmark score of 58386 places it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, with nearest rivals like the Intel Core i9-14900 (58115, +0.5% delta) and the Intel Xeon w5-2545 (58504, -0.2% delta) showing that the 9850X3D is at the very top of the CPU performance charts. The processor’s capability far exceeds what the RTX 2060 SUPER can utilize in this game, meaning the CPU is never the limiting factor. This mismatch is the core reason for the combo’s overall ranking; the system is only as strong as its weakest link, and that link is the GPU. The benchmark results indicate that upgrading the graphics card would yield a dramatic improvement in the combo’s rank, while swapping the processor would yield almost no change in game performance.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER is built on the 12 nm Turing architecture, featuring 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The card’s base clock is 1470 MHz, which boosts to 1650 MHz, and it operates with a 175 W TDP. These specifications are the primary determinants of the measured frame rates in Minimum, as the game’s demands are heavily weighted toward GPU throughput. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is sufficient for the game’s textures at 1080p and 1440p, but it becomes a limiting factor at 4K, where the data shows average frame rates dropping below 60 FPS even on Low settings.

The GPU’s memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s is a key metric. At 1080p, the card can maintain high frame rates, but as resolution increases, the pixel fill rate and memory bandwidth requirements grow, exposing the card’s limitations. The card’s FP32 performance of 7.181 TFLOPS is modest by modern standards, and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2011 confirms its position as a mid-range part. The benchmark results indicate that the GPU is the principal bottleneck in this configuration; the CPU is effectively idle in comparison. The GPU’s direct competitors, such as the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 (18189, -0.5% delta) and the Intel Arc A770M (18383, -1.6% delta), have similar average scores, reinforcing that the 2060 SUPER is a known quantity with predictable performance ceilings.

FAQ

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D overkill for this game with the RTX 2060 SUPER?

A: Yes. The CPU has an average benchmark score of 58386 and ranks in the 92nd percentile, while the GPU’s average benchmark score is 18093, ranking in the 62nd percentile. The data shows that the GPU is the limiting factor at all resolutions, so the processor’s extra headroom is unused.

Q: What is the best resolution to play at with this combo?

A: Based on the measured FPS, 1920x1080 is the only resolution where the combo consistently exceeds 60 FPS on High settings (109 FPS average). At 2560x1440, High settings drop to a 71 FPS average, which is playable but less comfortable. At 3840x2160, even Low settings only average 59 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 2060 SUPER compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 2060 SUPER has an average score of 18093. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile with a score of 18159, which is 0.4% higher. The AMD Radeon Pro 5700 scores 18189, which is 0.5% higher, placing the 2060 SUPER at the lower end of its performance cluster.

Q: Will the CPU’s 96 MB of L3 cache help with frame pacing?

A: The CPU’s L3 cache is 96 MB shared, and it ranks in the 92nd percentile for all CPUs. However, the measured FPS data shows that the GPU is the bottleneck, so any potential CPU-side frame pacing advantages are not realized because the GPU cannot deliver frames fast enough.

Q: Should I use the High or Ultra preset for the best visual experience?

A: The data shows that the Ultra preset yields an average FPS of 83 at 1080p and 54 at 1440p. The High preset yields 109 FPS at 1080p and 71 at 1440p. The High preset offers a better balance of visual fidelity and smoothness, as the Ultra preset’s framerate drops are more noticeable.

Q: Is this combo capable of 4K gaming?

A: Only at the Low settings preset, where it averages 59 FPS. On Medium settings, the average drops to 45 FPS, and on High it is 38 FPS. The Ultra preset averages just 29 FPS, indicating that 4K is not a viable option for this GPU.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of the combo’s performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its strongest results. On Low settings, it achieves an average of 170 FPS. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 130 FPS, with a minimum of 111 FPS and a maximum of 150 FPS. High settings yield an average of 109 FPS, while Ultra settings bring the average down to 83 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the combo is capable of high refresh-rate gaming on Low and Medium presets, and remains comfortably above 60 FPS on High.

At 2560x1440, the performance scales down predictably. The Low preset averages 110 FPS, which is still excellent. The Medium preset averages 84 FPS, with a minimum of 71 FPS and a maximum of 97 FPS. The High preset drops to an average of 71 FPS, which is right at the threshold for smooth gameplay. The Ultra preset averages 54 FPS, which is below the ideal 60 FPS mark, indicating that the GPU is starting to struggle with the increased pixel count.

At 3840x2160, the combo’s limitations are fully exposed. The Low preset averages 59 FPS, which is technically playable but not smooth. The Medium preset averages 45 FPS, with a minimum of 38 FPS and a maximum of 52 FPS. The High preset averages 38 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages only 29 FPS. The data shows a consistent pattern: the RTX 2060 SUPER is a 1080p-class card that can handle 1440p with reduced settings, but it is out of its depth at 4K.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate drops from 1080p to 4K are steep and reveal the GPU-bound nature of this configuration. At High settings, the average FPS goes from 109 at 1920x1080, to 71 at 2560x1440, to 38 at 3840x2160. This represents a 35% drop from 1080p to 1440p, and a 65% drop from 1080p to 4K. The scaling is not linear, as the pixel count increases by 78% from 1080p to 1440p, and by 300% from 1080p to 4K, but the frame rates do not drop proportionally, indicating that other bottlenecks are at play.

The data suggests that the GPU’s memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s and its 8 GB VRAM capacity are the primary constraints at higher resolutions. The card’s pixel rate of 105.6 GPixel/s is also a factor, as it cannot fill the 4K frame buffer quickly enough. Conversely, the CPU’s performance is consistent across resolutions, as its 96 MB of L3 cache and high single-thread score (4704 in Passmark) are more than sufficient for the game’s logic. The benchmark results indicate that the limiting component is unequivocally the GPU; the CPU’s performance headroom is never fully utilized. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see similar frame rates across all resolutions, but the data shows a clear degradation as resolution increases.

Settings Recommendations

For the best playable experience, the High settings preset at 1920x1080 is the recommended starting point, as it delivers an average of 109 FPS, providing a smooth and responsive experience that is well above the 60 FPS threshold. If the user prefers maximum visual fidelity, the Ultra preset at 1080p, with an average of 83 FPS, is still viable, though it sacrifices the high refresh rate headroom. At 2560x1440, the High preset is the highest quality option that maintains an average of 71 FPS, which is acceptable for most players, but the Medium preset at 84 FPS is the safer choice for ensuring consistent frame pacing.

The data shows that the Low preset is the only viable option at 3840x2160, with an average of 59 FPS. However, the visual quality reduction is substantial, and the frame rate is still borderline. Therefore, the analysis suggests that 4K gaming with this combo is not recommended. For users targeting 1440p, the Medium preset provides a good balance between visual quality and performance, with a minimum FPS of 71 that prevents major stutters. The Ultra preset is only recommended for 1080p, as its 83 FPS average is still playable, but the jump to 1440p makes it untenable. The measured data is clear: the RTX 2060 SUPER is best paired with a 1080p monitor to fully utilize its capabilities in Minimum.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D

Cores / Threads 8 / 16
Base Clock 4700 MHz
Boost Clock 5600 MHz
TDP 120W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 1650 MHz MHz
TDP 175 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER in Minimum

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 59.0
3840x2160 Medium 45.0
3840x2160 High 38.0
3840x2160 Ultra 29.0
2560x1440 Low 110.0
2560x1440 Medium 84.0
2560x1440 High 71.0
2560x1440 Ultra 54.0
1920x1080 Low 170.0
1920x1080 Medium 130.0
1920x1080 High 109.0
1920x1080 Ultra 83.0

Minimum with Ryzen 7 9850X3D + Other GPUs

See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Minimum with RTX 2060 SUPER + Other CPUs

See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 7 9850X3D + RTX 2060 SUPER

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.