Minimum

The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 delivers a robust 1080p and 1440p experience in Minimum, a third-person shooter released in 2014, with 4K remaining playable only at lower presets. This combination ranks 1298th out of 2939 tested combos for this game, placing it in the upper-middle tier of the database, and the measured frame rates show a clear scaling pattern across resolutions and settings that favors high refresh rate monitors at 1080p.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings?

A: The measured average frame rate is 214 FPS, which is the highest result recorded for this CPU-GPU combo in the entire test suite for Minimum.

Q: Does this combo achieve 60 FPS at 4K resolution?

A: Yes, but only with Low settings, where the average FPS is 74. At Medium settings, the average drops to 57 FPS, while High yields 48 FPS and Ultra produces 36 FPS, based on the measured data.

Q: How does the RX 7700 compare to its nearest rival, the RTX 3060 Ti?

A: The RX 7700 has an average benchmark score of 15852, while the RTX 3060 Ti scores 16129, representing a delta of -1.7 percent. The RX 7700 is slightly behind, but the difference is within a narrow margin.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming?

A: High settings at 2560x1440 produce an average of 89 FPS, which balances visual quality with performance. Medium settings yield 106 FPS, but High offers a better visual experience while still clearing the 60 FPS threshold comfortably.

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 7800X3D a strong performer in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The CPU scores 16817 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 1713 in single-core tests. Its average benchmark score is 33079, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs tested, indicating above-average performance.

Q: What is the VRAM capacity of the RX 7700?

A: The GPU features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s. This generous allocation supports high-resolution textures without capacity constraints.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 serves as the primary rendering engine in this configuration, and its specifications directly influence the measured frame rates. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1900 MHz, a boost clock of 2459 MHz, and a game clock of 2041 MHz. These clock speeds, combined with 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs, determine how efficiently the card processes the geometry and effects in Minimum. The GPU’s pixel rate is 236.1 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 393.4 GTexel/s, which are key metrics for filling the screen with detailed textures and post-processing effects.

The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory is a notable asset for this title. With a 256-bit bus width and bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s, the card can feed data to the GPU cores rapidly, preventing bottlenecks that might otherwise occur at higher resolutions. In Minimum, the VRAM capacity becomes relevant at 4K, where texture detail and draw distances demand more memory. The measured results show that the GPU’s memory subsystem is not a limiting factor, as the frame rate drops are more closely tied to compute load than to memory capacity exhaustion.

The GPU’s architecture, RDNA 3.0 on a 5 nm process, includes 40 ray tracing cores, though Minimum from 2014 does not heavily utilize such features. The FP32 performance of 25.18 TFLOPS provides ample raw compute for the game’s shader work, which is reflected in the high frame rates at 1080p. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the average FPS reaches 214, demonstrating that the GPU has headroom even when pushed to high refresh rates. The card’s DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4 compatibility ensure it can handle modern API paths, although the game’s age means older rendering paths are also used.

The GPU’s benchmark profile shows a Passmark G3D score of 20974 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 106028. These scores place the RX 7700 in the 58th percentile of all GPUs, which is modest, but the measured performance in Minimum is strong due to the game’s relatively low graphical demands. The nearest rival data shows the RX 7700 (avg score 15852) is within 1.7 percent of the RTX 3060 Ti (16129), and it slightly outperforms the Radeon Pro W5500 (15679, delta 1.1 percent). This indicates that the GPU is competitive with mid-range offerings, and its 16 GB VRAM gives it an edge in memory-heavy scenarios.

Settings Recommendations

For the best experience, the data points to 1920x1080 with High settings as the sweet spot, delivering an average of 137 FPS. This preset provides a substantial visual upgrade over Low (214 FPS) while still maintaining frame rates well above the 144 Hz refresh rate common on gaming monitors. Low settings at 1080p are only necessary for extreme refresh rate displays, where 214 FPS could be utilized, but the visual compromise is significant. Medium settings at 1080p yield 164 FPS, which is also excellent, but High offers better image quality with only a 27 FPS penalty.

At 2560x1440, High settings produce 89 FPS average, which is ideal for 60 Hz or 75 Hz monitors and provides crisp detail. Medium settings at 1440p average 106 FPS with a minimum of 90 FPS and a maximum of 121 FPS, making it the best choice for 100 Hz displays. The min FPS data for Medium at 1440p (90 FPS) ensures that frame pacing remains smooth even in demanding scenes. Ultra settings at 1440p drop to 68 FPS, which is still playable but not recommended given the marginal visual gains over High.

For 4K, the recommendation is Low settings, which average 74 FPS. This is the only preset at 3840x2160 that consistently exceeds 60 FPS. Medium at 4K averages 57 FPS with a min of 48 FPS and max of 65 FPS, which may be acceptable for slower-paced moments but risks noticeable stutters. High and Ultra at 4K average 48 FPS and 36 FPS respectively, making them unsuitable for smooth gameplay. Users with 4K displays should prioritize frame rate over settings, as the visual difference between Low and Medium is often less critical than maintaining a fluid experience.

The measured FPS rows indicate that the GPU scales predictably with settings changes. At 1080p, the jump from Low to Medium reduces the average by 50 FPS (from 214 to 164), while High to Ultra reduces it by 32 FPS (from 137 to 105). This suggests that the game’s Ultra preset imposes a heavy load on the GPU, likely due to excessive post-processing or shadow quality, without proportional visual benefits. The most efficient settings are High at 1080p and 1440p, where the performance-to-quality ratio is highest.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D and AMD Radeon RX 7700 combination ranks 1298th out of 2939 tested combos for Minimum, placing it in the 44th percentile of all configurations. This rank reflects a mid-tier position in the database, which is consistent with the GPU’s overall standing (58th percentile) and the CPU’s high placement (83rd percentile). The combo’s rank is influenced by the fact that many higher-ranked combos feature more powerful GPUs, as the CPU is already a top-tier performer.

In the context of the CPU’s rivals, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D (avg benchmark score 33079) is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G (33089, delta 0 percent) and the Intel Core i7-13650HX (33089, delta 0 percent). It slightly trails the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (33091, delta 0 percent) and is only 0.4 percent behind the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H (33201). This means the CPU is not the limiting factor in this combo; its processing power is sufficient to feed the GPU in almost all scenarios.

The GPU’s rivals show a similar pattern. The RX 7700 (15852) is 0.1 percent behind the Radeon R9 370X (15862) and 1 percent behind the RX 9060 (16014). It is 1.7 percent behind the RTX 3060 Ti (16129) but 1.1 percent ahead of the Radeon Pro W5500 (15679). These small deltas indicate that the RX 7700 sits in a crowded performance band, and in Minimum, the game’s modest requirements allow the combo to achieve frame rates that are competitive with systems using more expensive GPUs.

The combo’s rank of 1298 out of 2939 suggests that while it is not a top-tier configuration, it outperforms more than half of the tested systems. For a game like Minimum, which is not graphically intensive, this rank is more than adequate for a smooth experience. The data shows that the combo’s performance is limited primarily by the GPU, as evidenced by the significant FPS drops at 4K Ultra (36 FPS) compared to 1080p Low (214 FPS), which is a 83 percent reduction.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a 7000 series processor built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Raphael codename. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The CPU’s cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 96 MB L3 cache. This large L3 cache is a defining feature of the X3D series and provides a significant advantage in gaming workloads that benefit from high-speed data access.

In Minimum, the CPU’s role is to handle game logic, physics, and draw call processing. The 8 cores and 16 threads are more than sufficient for this title, which was released in 2014 and likely does not scale beyond a few threads. The CPU’s high single-thread performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1713 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2426, ensures that the main game thread does not become a bottleneck. The boost clock of 5.00 GHz is particularly beneficial for such workloads, as higher clocks reduce latency in single-threaded tasks.

The CPU’s memory support includes DDR5 with dual-channel configuration and a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. This memory bandwidth is ample for feeding the GPU and CPU cores, and the ECC memory support is a bonus for system stability. The CPU uses an AMD Socket AM5 and has a TDP of 120 W, which requires a capable cooling solution but is not excessive. The 5 nm process node from TSMC, with 11,270 million transistors on a 71 mm² die, contributes to the CPU’s efficiency.

Benchmark data shows the CPU’s multi-threaded prowess: a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16817 and a Passmark multithread score of 34293. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7980 and max-thread score of 7967 indicate consistent scaling across threads. However, in Minimum, the CPU’s full multi-threaded capability is unlikely to be taxed, as the game’s engine is from an era when quad-core CPUs were the norm. The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms that it is a high-end part, and its performance in this game will be limited only by the GPU’s rendering speed.

The CPU’s nearest rivals, such as the Ryzen 7 8700G and Core i7-13650HX, have nearly identical average scores (33089 vs 33079), but the 7800X3D’s unique 3D V-Cache (96 MB L3) gives it an edge in gaming scenarios that the benchmarks do not fully capture. In Minimum, the CPU is not a limiting factor at any resolution, as evidenced by the fact that FPS scales with resolution, which is a GPU-bound behavior.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its highest performance. Low settings produce an average of 214 FPS, with no minimum or maximum data recorded. Medium settings average 164 FPS, with a minimum of 139 FPS and a maximum of 188 FPS, indicating smooth frame delivery. High settings average 137 FPS, and Ultra settings average 105 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a 51 percent reduction in frame rate (from 214 to 105 FPS), but even the lowest 1080p result remains highly playable.

At 2560x1440, the performance drops but remains strong. Low settings average 138 FPS, Medium averages 106 FPS (min 90, max 121), High averages 89 FPS, and Ultra averages 68 FPS. The Medium preset’s minimum of 90 FPS is notable, as it ensures that the frame rate does not drop below the 90 FPS threshold during intense action sequences. The difference between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 70 FPS (from 138 to 68), a 51 percent reduction, mirroring the 1080p scaling pattern.

At 3840x2160, the GPU begins to strain. Low settings average 74 FPS, which is still above 60 FPS. Medium settings average 57 FPS, with a minimum of 48 FPS and a maximum of 65 FPS, showing variability that could cause perceptible stutter on a 60 Hz display. High settings average 48 FPS, and Ultra settings average 36 FPS. The drop from Low to Ultra at 4K is 38 FPS (from 74 to 36), a 51 percent reduction, consistent with the other resolutions. This indicates that the GPU’s rendering load scales uniformly with settings, and the 4K resolution demands more from the shading units and memory bandwidth.

The min FPS data is only available for Medium settings at each resolution. At 1080p Medium, the min is 139 FPS; at 1440p Medium, the min is 90 FPS; and at 4K Medium, the min is 48 FPS. This suggests that Medium settings provide a more stable frame rate than other presets, which may be due to the game’s engine handling certain effects better at this level. The max FPS at Medium is 188 FPS at 1080p, 121 FPS at 1440p, and 65 FPS at 4K, showing that the combo can reach higher peaks when the scene is less demanding.

Overall, the measured FPS breakdown shows that the combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming. At 1080p, even Ultra settings exceed 100 FPS, making this an excellent choice for high refresh rate monitors. At 1440p, High settings provide a balanced experience with 89 FPS, while Medium offers 106 FPS for those who prioritize smoothness. At 4K, Low settings are the only viable option for 60 FPS gameplay, and users should consider lowering to 1440p if they want to use higher quality presets. The data also reveals that the GPU is the primary bottleneck, as the CPU’s high performance does not prevent frame rate drops at higher resolutions.