Minimum
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 133 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 47 | 62 | 74 | 96 |
| 1440p QHD | 87 | 115 | 137 | 179 |
| 1080p Full HD | 136 | 178 | 212 | 277 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Minimum with AMD Ryzen 7 7700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 combined with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti delivers a compelling 1080p and 1440p experience in Minimum, though 4K Ultra demands significant compromises. Benchmark data shows this pairing sits at rank 961 out of 3712 tested combos, placing it in the top 26% of all systems for this title. The measured frames per second (FPS) reveal a configuration that is heavily GPU-bound at higher resolutions but capable of exceptional frame rates when settings are tuned appropriately.
Settings Recommendations
For this specific hardware pairing, the Medium preset provides the most balanced experience across all resolutions. At 3840x2160, Medium delivers 74 FPS average with a minimum of 63 FPS and maximum of 85 FPS — this is the only 4K setting where the frame pacing stays consistently above the 60 FPS threshold. The data shows a clear pattern: High settings at 4K drop to 62 FPS average, which is technically playable but leaves no headroom for demanding scenes, while Ultra falls to 47 FPS, which is below the smoothness standard for a third-person shooter.
At 2560x1440, Medium again emerges as the sweet spot, producing 137 FPS average with a 116 FPS minimum. This provides a substantial cushion for competitive play while maintaining visual fidelity. High at 1440p reaches 115 FPS average, which is still excellent, but the Medium preset's minimum of 116 FPS versus High's unspecified floor suggests better consistency. The 179 FPS Low setting at 1440p demonstrates that the RTX 3080 Ti has enormous headroom when visual effects are stripped back, but sacrificing Medium's visual quality for 42 additional frames is unnecessary on a 144Hz display.
For 1920x1080, the recommendation shifts to High at 178 FPS average. The RTX 3080 Ti's 12 GB GDDR6X memory and 912.4 GB/s bandwidth are more than sufficient for 1080p, so the bottleneck moves to the CPU. The Ryzen 7 7700's 8 cores and 16 threads at boost clocks up to 5.30 GHz keep frame rates high, but the 277 FPS Low setting versus 212 FPS Medium versus 178 FPS High shows diminishing returns. Ultra at 1080p drops to 136 FPS, which is still smooth but represents a 24% reduction from High for marginal visual gains. The 212 FPS Medium at 1080p with a 180 FPS minimum is the competitive choice, but High offers the best visual-to-performance ratio for most players.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is the dominant performance driver in this pairing, particularly as resolution increases. Its 12 GB GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus delivers 912.4 GB/s of bandwidth, which directly supports the frame rate scaling observed across resolutions. The GA102 chip with 10,240 shading units, 320 TMUs, and 112 ROPs provides the raw fill rate necessary for high-resolution rendering. The boost clock of 1665 MHz and base clock of 1365 MHz keep the Ampere architecture fed, though the 350 W TDP indicates this is a power-hungry component that requires adequate cooling.
The GPU's benchmark scores contextualize its position. The PassMark G3D score of 26,896 places it at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs, with nearest rivals including the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 at 40,377 (2% faster) and the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 at 40,870 (0.8% faster). The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,077 further confirms its DirectX 12 capabilities. In Minimum, the GPU's role becomes evident when comparing resolution scaling: at 1080p Low, the 277 FPS average suggests the GPU is not fully saturated, but at 4K Ultra, the 47 FPS average indicates the rendering pipeline is completely GPU-limited.
The RTX 3080 Ti's memory configuration is particularly relevant for Minimum's texture-heavy environments. The 12 GB capacity prevents VRAM spillover at 4K, which would otherwise cause severe stuttering. The GDDR6X memory type and 384-bit bus width provide the bandwidth headroom needed to maintain 74 FPS at 4K Medium, where the 63 FPS minimum shows the GPU is working hard but not overwhelmed. The 80 RT cores and 320 tensor cores are underutilized in this title, but they contribute to the overall compute throughput measured by the 34.10 TFLOPS FP32 performance.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS data across 1080p, 1440p, and 4K reveals a classic GPU-bound scaling curve. At Low settings, the progression is 277 FPS at 1080p, 179 FPS at 1440p, and 96 FPS at 4K. This represents a 35% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a further 46% drop from 1440p to 4K — a scaling pattern consistent with pixel-count increases of 78% and 125% respectively. The GPU is the limiting component throughout, as the Ryzen 7 7700's 16 threads at 5.30 GHz boost provide ample CPU headroom even at 277 FPS.
Medium settings show a similar pattern: 212 FPS at 1080p, 137 FPS at 1440p, and 74 FPS at 4K. The 1080p-to-1440p drop of 35% matches Low settings exactly, confirming the GPU-bound nature. The 1440p-to-4K drop of 46% is also consistent. High settings scale from 178 FPS at 1080p to 115 FPS at 1440p (35% drop) to 62 FPS at 4K (46% drop from 1440p). Ultra settings follow: 136 FPS at 1080p, 87 FPS at 1440p (36% drop), and 47 FPS at 4K (46% drop).
This consistent scaling pattern indicates that Minimum is not CPU-limited at any tested resolution. The Ryzen 7 7700's cinebench R23 multicore score of 18,760 and passmark multithread score of 34,470 far exceed what this game requires. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 8,484 compared to the 2-thread score of 2,043 shows strong multi-threading, but the game's engine appears to scale primarily with GPU resources. The 4K Ultra result of 47 FPS is the only configuration that falls below 60 FPS, and the 4K High result of 62 FPS is borderline — both cases where the RTX 3080 Ti's 34.10 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is insufficient for maximum settings.
Measured FPS Breakdown
1920x1080: Low settings produce 277 FPS average — the highest score in the entire dataset. Medium settings yield 212 FPS average with a 180 FPS minimum and 244 FPS maximum, showing excellent consistency. High settings deliver 178 FPS average, maintaining smooth gameplay for high-refresh monitors. Ultra settings drop to 136 FPS average, still well above the 60 FPS threshold but representing a 51% reduction from Low.
2560x1440: Low settings achieve 179 FPS average, nearly matching the 1080p High result. Medium settings produce 137 FPS average with a 116 FPS minimum and 157 FPS maximum — the minimum stays above 100 FPS, making this ideal for 144Hz displays. High settings deliver 115 FPS average, suitable for high refresh rates. Ultra settings drop to 87 FPS average, which is still playable but shows the GPU's limitations as pixel count increases.
3840x2160: Low settings yield 96 FPS average, crossing the 4K60 threshold with headroom. Medium settings produce 74 FPS average with a 63 FPS minimum and 85 FPS maximum — the minimum dips close to 60 FPS, but the average remains solid. High settings deliver 62 FPS average, technically playable but with no margin for demanding scenes. Ultra settings drop to 47 FPS average, below the smoothness standard for a third-person shooter and indicating the GPU is fully saturated.
The delta between settings narrows as resolution increases: at 1080p, Low-to-Ultra spans 141 FPS (277 to 136); at 1440p, the span is 92 FPS (179 to 87); at 4K, the span is 49 FPS (96 to 47). This compression confirms the GPU becomes the sole bottleneck at higher resolutions, with settings having proportionally less impact on absolute frame rates.
FAQ
*Q: Can this system run Minimum at 4K 60 FPS?*
A: Yes, but only at Low settings (96 FPS average) or Medium settings (74 FPS average with 63 FPS minimum). High settings drop to 62 FPS average, which is borderline, while Ultra falls to 47 FPS average.
Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming?
A: Medium settings provide the best balance at 137 FPS average with a 116 FPS minimum. This keeps frame rates above 100 FPS consistently while maintaining visual quality. High settings at 115 FPS average are also viable, but the Medium preset's higher minimum ensures smoother frame pacing.
Q: Is the RTX 3080 Ti or the Ryzen 7 7700 the limiting factor?
A: The GPU is the limiting component at all tested resolutions. The consistent 35% FPS drop from 1080p to 1440p and 46% drop from 1440p to 4K across all settings indicates GPU-bound scaling. The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads at 5.30 GHz boost provide ample headroom, as evidenced by the 277 FPS at 1080p Low.
Q: How does the RTX 3080 Ti compare to its nearest rivals in this game?
A: The RTX 3080 Ti's PassMark G3D score of 26,896 places it at the 83rd percentile. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 is 2% faster in average benchmark score, while the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 is 0.8% faster. The NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB is 1.2% slower, and the standard Tesla M40 is 1.7% slower.
Q: What frame rates can I expect at 1080p with maximum settings?
A: Ultra settings at 1080p produce 136 FPS average. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold and suitable for high-refresh monitors, though it represents a 51% reduction compared to Low settings (277 FPS). High settings at 178 FPS offer a better balance.
Q: Does the Ryzen 7 7700's performance hold up in this game?
A: Yes. The CPU's average benchmark score of 40,081 places it at the 87th percentile among all processors, with the nearest rival being the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 at 40,048 (0.1% faster). The 3DMark single-thread score of 1,049 and multicore score of 8,479 demonstrate sufficient processing power for Minimum's engine.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 serves as the supporting component in this pairing, providing enough processing power to keep the RTX 3080 Ti fed at all tested settings. Its 8 cores and 16 threads operate at a base clock of 3.80 GHz and boost to 5.30 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that keeps thermals manageable. The Zen 4 architecture on TSMC's 5 nm process node houses 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die, with 32 MB of shared L3 cache and 1 MB L2 per core.
Benchmark results show the 7700's capabilities: the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18,760 and single-core score of 1,930 indicate strong both-threaded and single-threaded performance. The Geekbench multicore score of 15,371 and single-core score of 2,525 further confirm its capability. The PassMark multithread score of 34,470 and single-thread score of 4,063 demonstrate that the CPU can handle both heavily threaded workloads and the lighter single-threaded tasks typical of game logic.
In Minimum, the CPU's role is evident from the FPS scaling. At 1080p Low, the 277 FPS average suggests the CPU is working but not saturated — the 3DMark 16-thread score of 8,484 versus the 2-thread score of 2,043 shows the processor scales well with thread count, but the game's engine does not appear to stress all 16 threads simultaneously. The 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth on DDR5 dual-channel provides sufficient data throughput to avoid stalling the GPU.
The 7700's position among rivals is solid: its average benchmark score of 40,081 places it 0.1% above the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (40,048) and 0.2% below the Intel Core 5 221E (40,144). The AMD Ryzen 9 270 scores 40,246 (0.4% higher), and the Intel Core i9-13905H scores 40,313 (0.6% higher). This tight grouping shows the 7700 is competitively positioned for gaming workloads, though its 87th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 83rd percentile suggests the CPU has slightly more headroom relative to its peers.
The 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide ample bandwidth for the RTX 3080 Ti's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, and the integrated Radeon Graphics serve as a fallback but are not utilized in this configuration. The 7700's production status is Active, and its launch MSRP of $329 positions it as a mainstream option, though this analysis does not consider pricing. For Minimum, the CPU's 5.30 GHz boost clock ensures that even the highest FPS scenarios at 1080p Low (277 FPS) do not encounter CPU bottlenecks, making the RTX 3080 Ti the definitive performance limiter across all measured configurations.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 7700
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 7700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti in Minimum
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 96.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 74.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 62.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 47.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 179.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 137.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 115.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 87.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 277.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 212.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 178.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 136.0 |
Minimum with Ryzen 7 7700 + Other GPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Minimum with RTX 3080 Ti + Other CPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 7700 + RTX 3080 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.