Minimum

Minimum

AVERAGE FPS
134
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 134 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 46 65 73 95
1440p QHD 90 116 137 177
1080p Full HD 134 181 212 279

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 95
3840x2160 Medium 73
3840x2160 High 65
3840x2160 Ultra 46
2560x1440 Low 177
2560x1440 Medium 137
2560x1440 High 116
2560x1440 Ultra 90
1920x1080 Low 279
1920x1080 Medium 212
1920x1080 High 181
1920x1080 Ultra 134

Minimum with AMD Ryzen 7 5700G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti presents a fascinating case study in bottleneck dynamics within the 2014 third-person shooter, Minimum. The dataset offers a clear view of how this combination scales across resolutions and settings, revealing a system where the GPU's immense power is progressively constrained by the CPU's architecture as resolution drops. This analysis breaks down the measured frames per second (FPS) to understand the limiting factors and overall performance ranking.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS data reveals a classic inverse relationship between resolution and frame rate, but the magnitude of the drop tells a compelling story. Moving from 1080p to 1440p at Ultra settings, the average FPS falls from 134.3 to 89.5, a significant 33.4% reduction. The trend continues when scaling up to 4K, where the Ultra preset yields just 45.8 FPS. This steep decline at higher resolutions points directly to the GPU becoming the primary limiting component, as the pixel-pushing demands of 4K far outweigh the CPU's ability to feed frames at lower resolutions.

The pattern is consistent across all settings. At High settings, the drop from 1080p (180.6 FPS) to 1440p (116.3 FPS) is a 35.6% decrease, and then to 4K (64.5 FPS) is another 44.5% drop from 1440p. This consistent ~35-45% reduction per step up in resolution strongly suggests that the RTX 3080 Ti's rendering capabilities are being saturated. The data implies that at 1080p, the system is not GPU-limited; the high frame rates are likely capped by the CPU's single-thread performance. However, as resolution climbs, the GPU's workload increases exponentially, and the FPS figures become a direct measure of the RTX 3080 Ti's raw throughput.

Interestingly, the gap between Low and Ultra settings widens dramatically at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the difference between Low (278.7 FPS) and Ultra (134.3 FPS) is 144.4 FPS. At 4K, this gap shrinks to 49.4 FPS (95.2 vs 45.8). This indicates that at 4K, the GPU is so heavily loaded that even reducing the graphical fidelity to Low cannot fully compensate for the pixel count, whereas at 1080p, the CPU's limitations are the ceiling, and lowering settings allows the GPU to run more freely up to that ceiling.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is a formidable piece of hardware, and the benchmark results show it is the star of the show at higher resolutions. With 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, providing 912.4 GB/s of bandwidth, the card has ample resources for Minimum's textures and geometry. The measured FPS at 4K High (64.5) and 4K Ultra (45.8) are respectable figures for a demanding resolution, demonstrating the card's ability to handle significant graphical loads.

The GPU's clock speeds, with a base of 1365 MHz and a boost of 1665 MHz, are standard for the Ampere architecture. The data suggests that these clocks are being utilized effectively. When the resolution increases, the GPU's shading units (10,240) and texture mapping units (320) are kept busy, which is why we see such a significant performance drop from 1080p to 4K. The card's 34.10 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power is clearly the primary driver of performance in the 4K benchmarks. The GPU's percentile rank of 83 against all GPUs and its position among rivals, like being just 0.5% behind the RTX 3090 in average benchmark score, confirm its high-end status, which is reflected in the playable frame rates at 4K.

How This Combo Ranks

In the grand scheme of tested configurations, this specific pairing of the Ryzen 7 5700G and RTX 3080 Ti holds a solid position. The combo ranks 455th out of 1733 tested combos specifically for Minimum. This places it in the top 26.3% of all combinations, which is a strong showing. The rank reflects the balance between the CPU and GPU, and the raw FPS numbers we see in the 1440p and 4K tests are the primary contributors to this standing.

The ranking is not higher, likely due to the CPU's performance ceiling at lower resolutions. While the GPU is a top-tier component (ranking in the 83rd percentile), the CPU is also in the 83rd percentile, but its absolute performance in single-threaded tasks is where it lags. This means that in a game like Minimum, which may not be heavily multi-threaded, the 5700G can hold back the RTX 3080 Ti at 1080p, preventing the combo from achieving even higher frame rates and a better rank. However, the overall position at 455 is respectable, and the data shows a system that excels in high-resolution gaming scenarios.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive look at performance across twelve different configurations of resolution and settings.

At 1920x1080, the system is exceptionally fast. The Low preset achieves an average of 278.7 FPS, which is likely near the CPU's limit. Medium follows at 212 FPS, High at 180.6 FPS, and Ultra at 134.3 FPS. These figures show that the CPU is the bottleneck, as the GPU could likely render more frames if the CPU could process the game logic faster.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance remains very high. The Low preset delivers 177 FPS, Medium 137 FPS, High 116.3 FPS, and Ultra 89.5 FPS. These numbers are excellent for high-refresh-rate 1440p monitors. The scaling here is more linear, suggesting the balance between CPU and GPU is shifting.

At 3840x2160, the GPU takes over as the primary limiter. The Ultra preset yields 45.8 FPS, which is a demanding but playable experience. High settings provide a more comfortable 64.5 FPS, Medium 73.3 FPS, and Low 95.2 FPS. This resolution showcases the raw power of the RTX 3080 Ti, with the FPS drop being almost entirely attributable to the GPU's rendering workload.

FAQ

*Q: Is this combo better suited for 1440p or 4K gaming in Minimum?*

A: The data shows excellent performance at both. At 2560x1440 High, the system averages 116.3 FPS, while at 3840x2160 High it averages 64.5 FPS. If targeting high refresh rates, 1440p is the better choice; for maximum visual fidelity at a playable frame rate, 4K is viable.

Q: How much of a performance hit does Ultra settings incur at 4K compared to Low?

A: The difference is substantial. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset averages 45.8 FPS, which is 49.4 FPS lower than the Low preset's 95.2 FPS. This indicates a significant increase in GPU workload from the higher graphical fidelity.

Q: Why is the frame rate at 1080p not much higher than at 1440p for the Low preset?

A: At 1920x1080 Low, the average FPS is 278.7, compared to 177 at 2560x1440 Low. The difference of 101.7 FPS is large, but the 1080p number is likely capped by the CPU's processing speed, whereas the 1440p number is more limited by the GPU.

Q: What is the best resolution for a high-refresh-rate monitor?

A: The 2560x1440 resolution is ideal. At High settings, the system produces 116.3 FPS, and at Low settings, it reaches 177 FPS. These frame rates are well-suited for 144Hz or 165Hz monitors, offering a smooth experience.

Q: Is the RTX 3080 Ti being fully utilized at 1080p?

A: The evidence suggests it is not. The large jumps in FPS when lowering settings from Ultra (134.3 FPS) to Low (278.7 FPS) at 1080p indicate that the GPU has headroom to render more frames, but the CPU cannot supply the data fast enough to keep up.

Q: How does the CPU's performance compare to its closest rivals in general benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700G's average benchmark score is 25626. Its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, scores 25706, which is 0.3% higher. The Intel Xeon D-2752TER is 0.4% lower, and the Intel Core 5 210H is 0.5% lower, showing a tight grouping in general compute performance.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. It features 16 MB of L3 cache and has a 65W TDP. This CPU is a capable performer, ranking in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. However, its role in this specific game is clearly as a supporting actor to the GPU.

The benchmark data shows that the CPU's performance ceiling is reached at 1080p. The fact that the FPS at 1080p Low (278.7) is significantly higher than at 1080p Ultra (134.3) demonstrates that the CPU can process the game's logic at a very high rate, but the GPU is still able to produce frames faster than the CPU can feed it in lower-detail settings. In contrast, at 4K, the CPU's job is easier, as the GPU's rendering time gives the CPU ample time to prepare the next frame. The 5700G's single-thread performance, as evidenced by a 3DMark single-thread score of 899, is likely the limiting factor in the 1080p scenario. The data implies that for this game, the CPU is more than sufficient for high-resolution gaming but prevents the GPU from reaching its absolute maximum potential at lower resolutions. The 8 cores and 16 threads are more than adequate for a title from 2014, and the CPU is not a source of stuttering or frame drops in the higher-resolution tests.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the ideal settings depend on the user's display and performance goals. For a 4K display, the High preset is the clear winner, providing an average of 64.5 FPS. This is a significant improvement over the Ultra preset's 45.8 FPS, which may feel less smooth. The Medium preset at 73.3 FPS is also a viable option for a slight performance boost with a moderate visual quality reduction.

For 1440p gaming, the High preset offers an excellent balance with 116.3 FPS. For users with high-refresh-rate monitors (144Hz+), dropping to the Medium preset (137 FPS) or even Low (177 FPS) will ensure the display is fully utilized. The Ultra preset at 89.5 FPS is still very playable and offers the best visual quality, but it does sacrifice some smoothness.

At 1080p, the Ultra preset (134.3 FPS) provides a great experience for standard 60Hz or 144Hz monitors. For competitive play or extremely high refresh rates (240Hz+), the High preset at 180.6 FPS is a strong choice. The data shows that the High preset is generally the most balanced across all resolutions, offering a substantial FPS increase over Ultra with a minimal visual compromise, making it the recommended starting point for most users.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 7 5700G

Cores / Threads 8 / 16
Base Clock 3800 MHz
Boost Clock 4600 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

VRAM 12 GB GDDR6X
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 1665 MHz MHz
TDP 350 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 5700G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti in Minimum

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 95.2
3840x2160 Medium 73.3
3840x2160 High 64.5
3840x2160 Ultra 45.8
2560x1440 Low 177.0
2560x1440 Medium 137.0
2560x1440 High 116.3
2560x1440 Ultra 89.5
1920x1080 Low 278.7
1920x1080 Medium 212.0
1920x1080 High 180.6
1920x1080 Ultra 134.3

Minimum with Ryzen 7 5700G + Other GPUs

See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Minimum with RTX 3080 Ti + Other CPUs

See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 7 5700G + RTX 3080 Ti

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.