Minimum

Minimum

AVERAGE FPS
144
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 144 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 51 67 80 104
1440p QHD 95 124 148 193
1080p Full HD 147 193 230 300

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 104
3840x2160 Medium 80
3840x2160 High 67
3840x2160 Ultra 51
2560x1440 Low 193
2560x1440 Medium 148
2560x1440 High 124
2560x1440 Ultra 95
1920x1080 Low 300
1920x1080 Medium 230
1920x1080 High 193
1920x1080 Ultra 147

Minimum with AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT delivers a compelling experience in Minimum, a Third-Person Shooter from 2014. The benchmark data indicates this combination provides high frame rates across all tested resolutions, with the primary performance ceiling shifting from the GPU at 4K to the CPU at 1080p. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS, scaling, and component roles to help you decide how to configure the game.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate drop from 1080p to 4K is steep, revealing that this combo becomes increasingly GPU-bound at higher resolutions. At Low settings, the average FPS falls from 300 at 1920x1080 to 104 at 3840x2160, a 65% reduction. This significant decline indicates that the RX 7900 XT is the limiting factor, as the CPU has more headroom to feed frames at lower resolutions.

Moving from 1080p to 1440p at Low settings, the average FPS drops from 300 to 193, a 36% decrease. The transition from 1440p to 4K at Low settings is even more punishing, with average FPS falling from 193 to 104, a 46% decline. This pattern holds across all settings presets, confirming that the GPU's workload scales heavily with pixel count.

At Medium settings, the measured minimum FPS values provide additional insight. At 1920x1080, the minimum is 195 FPS, but at 2560x1440 it drops to 126 FPS, and at 3840x2160 it falls to 68 FPS. The gap between average and minimum FPS also widens at higher resolutions, suggesting more pronounced frame time variance when the GPU is under heavier load.

The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at Ultra settings shows a 35% drop (147 to 95 FPS), while the jump to 4K Ultra results in a 46% drop (95 to 51 FPS). These consistent percentages across presets suggest the limiting component remains the GPU throughout the resolution range, though the CPU's influence becomes more apparent at 1080p where frame rates exceed 200 FPS at lower presets.

The data shows that for 4K gaming, the combo delivers playable frame rates, but the 104 FPS at Low settings versus 51 FPS at Ultra settings demonstrates that users will need to make significant quality trade-offs to maintain high refresh rates. At 1440p, the average FPS ranges from 95 (Ultra) to 193 (Low), making this resolution the sweet spot for balancing visual quality and performance.

How This Combo Ranks

In Minimum, this CPU and GPU combination ranks 521 out of 2939 tested combos, placing it in the top 18% of all configurations tested. This rank reflects strong overall performance, though it is not near the very top of the leaderboard, which likely features more recent high-end hardware.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 44573 places it in the 89th percentile among all CPUs tested. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (avg score 44466, 0.2% ahead) and the Intel Core i9-13950HX (avg score 44342, 0.5% ahead). The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D also leads the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 by 0.6% and trails the Intel Core i5-14600 by 0.7%. These tight margins indicate the CPU is well-matched against several high-end mobile and desktop parts.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 13745 places it in the 55th percentile among all GPUs, which is noticeably lower than the CPU's ranking. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 660M (avg score 13812, 0.5% ahead) and the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile (avg score 13821, 0.5% ahead). The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT trails by 1.5%, while the AMD Radeon RX 570X is 0.9% ahead. This suggests the RX 7900 XT, while capable, faces stiff competition from both integrated and mobile graphics solutions in synthetic benchmarks.

The discrepancy between the CPU's high percentile (89) and the GPU's moderate percentile (55) suggests that, in this specific game, the GPU is the more limiting factor for achieving top-tier frame rates. The combo's rank of 521 out of 2939 indicates that while it outperforms the majority of tested systems, there is substantial headroom for improvement by pairing a stronger GPU with this CPU.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the Medium preset provides the best balance of visual quality and performance across all resolutions. At 1920x1080, Medium yields an average of 230 FPS with a minimum of 195 FPS, comfortably exceeding the refresh rate of most high-end monitors. At 2560x1440, Medium delivers 148 FPS average with a 126 FPS minimum, ensuring smooth gameplay on 144Hz displays.

For 4K gaming, the High preset is the most practical choice, producing an average of 67 FPS. While this does not reach 144Hz territory, it is playable for a third-person shooter. The Ultra preset at 4K drops to 51 FPS average, which may feel less responsive for fast-paced action. Low settings at 4K push the average to 104 FPS, but the visual fidelity loss is substantial.

At 1440p, the High preset (124 FPS average) is a strong option for users with 120Hz or 144Hz monitors, offering better visual quality than Medium while maintaining high frame rates. The Ultra preset at 95 FPS average is viable for 90Hz displays but may not justify the visual uplift over High for competitive play.

The data suggests that users with 1080p monitors should select Ultra settings, as the 147 FPS average still provides a smooth experience, and the visual quality improvements are worthwhile given the performance headroom. For 1440p users, Medium or High are recommended depending on whether you prioritize frame rate or fidelity. For 4K users, High settings are the optimal choice, as they offer a solid balance between the 51 FPS of Ultra and the 104 FPS of Low.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers exceptional performance across all presets. Low settings produce an average of 300 FPS, which is the highest measured in this dataset. Medium settings yield 230 FPS on average, with a minimum of 195 FPS and a maximum of 264 FPS. High settings achieve 193 FPS average, while Ultra settings drop to 147 FPS average. The difference between Low and Ultra is 153 FPS, indicating that the CPU can push very high frame rates when GPU load is low.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows a clear step down. Low settings produce 193 FPS average, which matches the 1080p High setting result. Medium settings yield 148 FPS average, with a minimum of 126 FPS and a maximum of 170 FPS. High settings achieve 124 FPS average, while Ultra settings drop to 95 FPS average. The gap between Low and Ultra here is 98 FPS, reflecting increased GPU load.

At 3840x2160, the performance becomes more demanding. Low settings produce 104 FPS average, which is still playable. Medium settings yield 80 FPS average, with a minimum of 68 FPS and a maximum of 92 FPS. High settings achieve 67 FPS average, while Ultra settings drop to 51 FPS average. The difference between Low and Ultra is 53 FPS, showing that the GPU is heavily taxed at 4K.

The Medium preset is the only one where minimum FPS values are provided across all three resolutions, enabling a direct comparison of frame time consistency. At 1080p, the minimum is 195 FPS; at 1440p, it is 126 FPS; and at 4K, it is 68 FPS. This data indicates that the combo maintains a stable frame rate at lower resolutions, but the variance increases significantly at 4K, where the minimum FPS is 15% below the average.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT features 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 800.0 GB/s. This large memory pool is more than sufficient for Minimum, a game from 2014, and ensures that texture loading and asset streaming will not bottleneck performance at any resolution or setting.

The GPU has a base clock of 1387 MHz and a boost clock of 2394 MHz, with a game clock of 2025 MHz. These clock speeds, combined with 5376 shading units and 192 ROPs, deliver a pixel rate of 459.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 804.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance of 51.48 TFLOPS indicates substantial compute capability, though the game's age means it likely does not fully utilize these resources.

The GPU's 84 ray tracing cores and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) ensure compatibility with modern rendering features, but Minimum from 2014 does not use ray tracing, so these cores remain idle. The Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6 API support provide flexibility for running the game through various compatibility layers.

The GPU's TDP of 300 W and suggested PSU of 700 W indicate it is a power-hungry component, but the dual-slot cooler and 2x 8-pin power connectors are standard for this performance class. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface ensures sufficient bandwidth for the GPU to communicate with the CPU, and the display outputs (1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C) support modern high refresh rate monitors.

The GPU's percentile ranking of 55% among all GPUs is modest, but its benchmark scores show it performs strongly in specific tests. The passmark G3D score of 29009 is high, while the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5623 indicates solid DirectX 12 performance. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 71068 is exceptional, suggesting the GPU excels in compute-heavy workloads. The GPU compute score of 16828 confirms strong parallel processing capabilities.

FAQ

*Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo achieves in Minimum?*

A: The highest measured average FPS is 300, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings.

*Q: Is this combo capable of 4K gaming in Minimum?*

A: Yes, the combo delivers an average of 67 FPS at 4K with High settings, and 104 FPS with Low settings, making it playable at 4K.

Q: Which setting preset provides the most stable frame rate at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Medium preset provides a minimum FPS of 126 and an average of 148 FPS, offering a stable experience compared to other presets.

Q: How does the CPU benchmark compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D has an average benchmark score of 44573, which is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H and 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13950HX, while trailing the Intel Core i5-14600 by 0.7%.

Q: What is the combo's ranking among all tested configurations?

A: The combo ranks 521 out of 2939 tested combos in Minimum, placing it in the top 18% of all configurations.

*Q: Does the GPU's VRAM capacity affect performance in Minimum?*

A: The GPU has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory, which is more than sufficient for Minimum, a 2014 title, so VRAM is not a limiting factor in the measured results.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 4000 MHz
Boost Clock 4500 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

VRAM 20 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2394 MHz MHz
TDP 300 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT in Minimum

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 104.0
3840x2160 Medium 80.0
3840x2160 High 67.0
3840x2160 Ultra 51.0
2560x1440 Low 193.0
2560x1440 Medium 148.0
2560x1440 High 124.0
2560x1440 Ultra 95.0
1920x1080 Low 300.0
1920x1080 Medium 230.0
1920x1080 High 193.0
1920x1080 Ultra 147.0

Minimum with Ryzen 5 7500X3D + Other GPUs

See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Minimum with RX 7900 XT + Other CPUs

See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 7500X3D + RX 7900 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.