Minimum

Minimum

AVERAGE FPS
85
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 85 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 30 39 47 61
1440p QHD 56 73 87 114
1080p Full HD 87 114 135 177

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 61
3840x2160 Medium 47
3840x2160 High 39
3840x2160 Ultra 30
2560x1440 Low 114
2560x1440 Medium 87
2560x1440 High 73
2560x1440 Ultra 56
1920x1080 Low 177
1920x1080 Medium 135
1920x1080 High 114
1920x1080 Ultra 87

Minimum with AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT combination delivers a highly playable experience in Minimum, a Third-Person Shooter from 2014. The data shows a classic balance between a modern 6-core CPU and a mid-range RDNA 2 GPU, with performance scaling predictably across resolutions. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS, component roles, and settings recommendations based strictly on the provided benchmark data.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear and consistent decline in performance as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At 1080p with High settings, the combo achieves 114 FPS average. Moving to 1440p High reduces that to 73 FPS, a drop of 41 FPS, and finally at 4K High, the average falls to 39 FPS. This steep scaling curve, particularly the 34 FPS drop from 1440p to 4K, indicates that the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT becomes the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions, as the pixel throughput demand outpaces the GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 280.3 GB/s bandwidth.

The pattern is consistent across all settings presets. For example, at Low settings, the combo produces 177 FPS at 1080p, 114 FPS at 1440p, and 61 FPS at 4K. The percentage decrease from 1080p to 4K is substantial in every case, suggesting that the GPU's compute resources (10.79 TFLOPS FP32) and memory subsystem are saturated well before the CPU's capabilities are exhausted. The Ryzen 5 7400F, with its 6 cores and 12 threads boosting up to 4.70 GHz, does not appear to bottleneck the frame rate even at lower resolutions, as evidenced by the high 1080p numbers.

At 4K, the gap between Low (61 FPS) and Ultra (30 FPS) settings is a stark 31 FPS, which is a 51% performance penalty for enabling maximum visual fidelity. This confirms that resolution scaling in Minimum is heavily GPU-bound; the RX 6650 XT's 128-bit memory interface and 64 ROPs simply cannot maintain high frame rates when the pixel count quadruples from 1080p to 4K. The 1440p results show a more balanced scenario, where the GPU still has enough headroom to provide a smooth experience at Medium (87 FPS) and High (73 FPS), but struggles to maintain 60 FPS at Ultra (56 FPS).

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, built on a 5 nm process. With a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, it provides substantial single-thread performance, as reflected in its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3072. This single-thread strength is critical for Minimum, a Third-Person Shooter, which typically relies on a primary game thread for physics and game logic. The data shows that this CPU does not bottleneck the GPU in this title, as the 1080p Low setting yields 177 FPS, a number that would be unattainable if the CPU were the limiting factor.

The processor's multi-core capabilities, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765, ensure that background tasks and secondary threads do not interfere with frame pacing. In the benchmark hierarchy, the 7400F ranks in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32750. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14600T, scores 32707, a delta of just 0.1%, indicating that the 7400F is performing at a level consistent with other strong mid-range desktop processors. The PassMark multithread score of 25645 further supports its capability to handle the game's demands without introducing CPU-related stutters.

The 32 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support (83.2 GB/s bandwidth) contribute to low latency access to game assets. While the GPU is clearly the bottleneck at higher resolutions, the CPU's role becomes more apparent at 1080p, where the high frame rates (177 FPS at Low) demonstrate that the processor can feed the GPU efficiently. The boost clock of 4.70 GHz is particularly effective in this scenario, as it allows the CPU to quickly process draw calls and game state updates. The data suggests that for this game, the 7400F provides ample headroom, and any further performance gains at 1080p would likely require a more powerful GPU, not a faster CPU.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT is the definitive performance limiter in this configuration, especially as resolution increases. The GPU is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with the Navi 23 chip, manufactured on a 7 nm process. Its specifications include 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, with a boost clock of 2635 MHz. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus provides 280.3 GB/s of bandwidth, which is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming but becomes strained at 4K.

The benchmark results confirm this limitation. At 4K Ultra, the combo averages only 30 FPS, which is below the threshold for smooth gameplay. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 17166 places it in the 65th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19765. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA Tesla K40m, scores 19885, a delta of -0.6%, indicating the RX 6650 XT is slightly below that professional-grade card in synthetic tests. The GPU's 10.79 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power is sufficient for older titles like Minimum, but the 4K results show it cannot handle the full pixel load.

The VRAM capacity of 8 GB is a notable factor. While Minimum is a 2014 title and may not require excessive memory, the drop from 61 FPS at 4K Low to 47 FPS at 4K Medium suggests that texture and shader complexity increases quickly with settings. The GPU's memory clock of 17.5 Gbps effective and 280.3 GB/s bandwidth are not sufficient to maintain high frame rates at 4K, as the GPU becomes memory-bandwidth limited. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1859 reflects modest modern performance, but for Minimum, the GPU is clearly the component that dictates the playable settings and resolution ceiling. The 176W TDP and PCIe 4.0 x8 interface are adequate for this class of card, but the data shows that for a smooth 60 FPS experience, users should target 1440p or lower.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of performance across twelve distinct configurations. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its best results. Low settings achieve an average of 177 FPS, Medium 135 FPS, High 114 FPS, and Ultra 87 FPS. The Medium preset includes a minimum FPS of 115 and a maximum of 156, indicating some frame variance but generally stable performance.

Moving to 2560x1440, the averages drop significantly. Low settings produce 114 FPS, Medium 87 FPS, High 73 FPS, and Ultra 56 FPS. The Medium preset at this resolution shows a minimum of 74 FPS and a maximum of 100 FPS, which means the experience remains fluid even during intense action sequences. The 1440p Ultra result of 56 FPS is borderline for a smooth experience, as it falls below the 60 FPS target that many players prefer.

At 3840x2160, the GPU struggles to keep up. Low settings average 61 FPS, which is playable, but Medium drops to 47 FPS (min 40, max 54), High falls to 39 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 30 FPS. The 4K results clearly indicate that the RX 6650 XT is not suited for maximum settings at this resolution. The data shows a consistent pattern: each settings tier at a given resolution costs roughly 20-30 FPS, with the gap widening at higher resolutions. For example, at 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 90 FPS, while at 4K, that same difference is only 31 FPS, as the GPU hits its absolute performance ceiling.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU/GPU combo in Minimum?*

A: The data shows that 2560x1440 offers the best balance of visual quality and performance. At Medium settings, the combo averages 87 FPS, and at High settings, 73 FPS, both of which are above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. While 1080p provides higher frame rates (up to 177 FPS at Low), 1440p utilizes the GPU more effectively without the severe performance penalties seen at 4K.

*Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Minimum?*

A: Yes, but only at Low settings, where it averages 61 FPS. Medium settings drop to 47 FPS, and High and Ultra fall to 39 FPS and 30 FPS, respectively. The 8 GB VRAM and 280.3 GB/s bandwidth of the RX 6650 XT are insufficient for high-fidelity 4K in this title, making 4K only viable for players willing to sacrifice visual quality.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7400F compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The 7400F has an average benchmark score of 32750, placing it in the 83rd percentile. Its closest rival, the Intel Core i5-14600T, scores 32707, a 0.1% difference. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812, which is 0.2% higher, showing the 7400F performs competitively within its peer group.

Q: Is the RX 6650 XT a bottleneck at 1080p?

A: No, the data suggests the GPU is not the bottleneck at 1080p, as it delivers up to 177 FPS at Low settings. The CPU, with its 4.70 GHz boost clock, is capable of feeding the GPU. However, the GPU becomes the limiting factor as resolution increases, particularly at 4K where the pixel fill rate and memory bandwidth are insufficient.

Q: What is the combo's ranking among all tested configurations?

A: The combo ranks 2422 out of 3712 tested combinations in Minimum. This places it in the lower half of tested systems, reflecting the mid-range nature of both components. The ranking suggests that while the combo is capable for 1080p and 1440p gaming, it is not a top-tier performer for this title.

Q: What are the minimum FPS figures for the Medium preset?

A: The data shows minimum FPS values for Medium settings at each resolution: 115 FPS at 1080p, 74 FPS at 1440p, and 40 FPS at 4K. These minimums indicate that the 1440p Medium preset remains above the 60 FPS threshold, while the 4K Medium preset experiences noticeable frame drops.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the user's resolution target. For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset at 87 FPS average is the best choice, as it provides the highest visual fidelity while maintaining a frame rate well above the 60 FPS target. The High preset at 114 FPS is also viable for players prioritizing frame rate, but Ultra offers a more immersive experience without sacrificing playability.

At 2560x1440, the Medium preset is the recommended choice, delivering an average of 87 FPS with a minimum of 74 FPS. This ensures smooth gameplay with no drops below 60 FPS. The High preset at 73 FPS is acceptable, but the lower minimum frame rate (not specified, but implied by the average) could lead to occasional stutters. The Ultra preset at 56 FPS is not recommended, as it falls below the 60 FPS threshold and may result in a less fluid experience.

For 3840x2160, the data suggests that only the Low preset, at 61 FPS, is suitable for a playable experience. The Medium preset at 47 FPS (min 40) is borderline, and High (39 FPS) and Ultra (30 FPS) are not recommended for any gameplay scenario. Users who insist on 4K should stick to Low settings, but the 1440p Medium preset offers a far superior balance of visual quality and performance, making it the overall best experience for this hardware combination.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT combination ranks 2422 out of 3712 tested combos in Minimum, placing it in the 65th percentile of all tested systems. This ranking reflects the mid-range positioning of both components. The CPU, with its 83rd percentile ranking among all processors, is a strong performer, but the GPU's 65th percentile ranking drags the overall combo down in a game that is heavily GPU-bound, especially at higher resolutions.

The ranking indicates that this combo is capable of delivering solid 1080p and 1440p performance, as evidenced by the measured FPS data, but it is not competitive with high-end systems that can maintain 60+ FPS at 4K Ultra. The GPU's nearest rivals, such as the NVIDIA Tesla K40m with a score of 19885, show that the RX 6650 XT is a competent mid-range card, but it lacks the raw power of top-tier GPUs. The CPU's position among its rivals, with a 0.1% delta from the Intel Core i5-14600T, confirms that the 7400F is not the limiting factor in this configuration. Ultimately, this combo is best suited for gamers targeting 1080p or 1440p with medium-to-high settings, where it provides a smooth and enjoyable experience without the need for extreme hardware.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 7400F

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 3700 MHz
Boost Clock 4700 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2635 MHz MHz
TDP 176 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT in Minimum

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 61.0
3840x2160 Medium 47.0
3840x2160 High 39.0
3840x2160 Ultra 30.0
2560x1440 Low 114.0
2560x1440 Medium 87.0
2560x1440 High 73.0
2560x1440 Ultra 56.0
1920x1080 Low 177.0
1920x1080 Medium 135.0
1920x1080 High 114.0
1920x1080 Ultra 87.0

Minimum with Ryzen 5 7400F + Other GPUs

See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Minimum with RX 6650 XT + Other CPUs

See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 7400F + RX 6650 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.