Minimum

FAQ

Q: What is the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F's position among all tested CPUs?

A: The Ryzen 5 7400F sits in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs tested, with an average benchmark score of 32750. Its closest rivals include the Intel Core i5-14600T (32707, 0.1% slower) and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (32662, 0.3% slower), while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H edges it out by 0.2% with a score of 32812.

Q: How does the RX 5700 XT's performance compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The RX 5700 XT has an average benchmark score of 16361, placing it in the 59th percentile of all GPUs. It essentially trades blows with the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M (16351, 0.1% behind), while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell (16408) and AMD Radeon PRO W7500 (16415) are both just 0.3% ahead. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 leads the group by 0.9% with a score of 16504.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1080p gaming with this combo?

A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers 166 FPS average, High hits 107 FPS, Medium achieves 127 FPS, and Ultra drops to 82 FPS. If targeting a 60 FPS baseline, even Ultra is playable, but for high-refresh displays, Low or Medium provide the headroom needed.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming?

A: At 3840x2160, the results are mixed. Low settings yield 58 FPS average, Medium drops to 44 FPS (with a min of 38 and max of 51), High falls to 37 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 28 FPS. For smooth 4K play, Low settings are the only viable option, and even then frame pacing may feel inconsistent.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested combinations?

A: This specific pairing of Ryzen 5 7400F and RX 5700 XT ranks 2758 out of 3712 tested combos in this game. That places it in the lower-middle portion of the field, which aligns with the GPU's 59th percentile standing — the graphics card is the limiting factor.

Q: What are the CPU's key specifications?

A: The Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from AMD's 7000 series, built on Zen 4 (Raphael) architecture using a 5 nm process at TSMC. It has a base clock of 3.70 GHz, boost clock of 4.70 GHz, 65 W TDP, and features 32 MB of shared L3 cache plus 1 MB L2 per core.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT is built on the Navi 10 chip with RDNA 1.0 architecture, manufactured on a 7 nm process at TSMC. Its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) across a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The GPU's base clock is 1605 MHz, with a game clock of 1755 MHz and a boost clock of 1905 MHz.

In this game, the GPU's role becomes increasingly dominant as resolution rises. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is sufficient for the tested settings, but the compute throughput — 9.754 TFLOPS FP32 from 2560 shading units — is what drives the frame rate differences. At 1080p, the GPU has enough headroom to push over 160 FPS on Low settings, but the frame rate drops sharply as pixel count increases.

The 64 ROPs and 160 TMUs process textures and output pixels at a theoretical rate of 121.9 GPixel/s and 304.8 GTexel/s respectively. These figures explain why High settings at 1080p (107 FPS) are nearly double the frame rate of High at 4K (37 FPS) — the pixel fill rate requirement scales with resolution, and the RDNA 1.0 architecture struggles to keep pace at higher resolutions.

Interestingly, the GPU's benchmark scores show a wide spread across APIs: PassMark DirectX 11 scores 116, DirectX 12 scores 64, and DirectX 9 scores 226. This suggests the card performs relatively better in older API workloads, which may influence how this title — released in 2014 — utilizes the hardware. The game's engine predates the GPU by five years, so its rendering paths may not fully exploit RDNA 1.0 features.

Resolution Scaling

The measured data reveals a clear pattern of GPU-bound scaling. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo produces 166 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 drops that to 107 FPS — a 35.5% reduction. At 3840x2160, the frame rate falls further to 58 FPS, which is a 65.1% reduction from 1080p.

This scaling behavior points to the GPU as the primary limiter. The CPU is capable of far higher frame rates, as evidenced by the 166 FPS result at 1080p Low. The Ryzen 5 7400F's multi-threaded performance — 21765 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1290 in Cinebench R20 single-core — is more than sufficient to feed the GPU at lower resolutions.

The Medium settings preset provides a more complete picture with min/max frame data. At 1080p Medium, the range is 108-147 FPS with an average of 127. At 1440p Medium, it drops to 70-94 FPS with an 82 average. At 4K Medium, the range compresses to 38-51 FPS with a 44 average. The shrinking min-to-max spread at higher resolutions indicates the GPU is consistently saturated, leaving less variability in frame delivery.

Ultra settings tell the most dramatic story. The frame rate at 1080p Ultra (82 FPS) is nearly identical to 1440p High (69 FPS) and 4K Low (58 FPS), showing that the GPU's ceiling is reached across multiple resolution/settings combinations. The 4K Ultra result of 28 FPS is the only sub-30 FPS figure in the entire dataset, confirming that this combo is not suited for maximum fidelity at 4K.

How This Combo Ranks

This pairing of AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT ranks 2758 out of 3712 tested combos for this game. That places it in the 25.7th percentile of all tested system combinations — meaning roughly three-quarters of tested combos deliver higher frame rates in this title.

The ranking is heavily influenced by the GPU's 59th percentile standing among all GPUs. The CPU, by contrast, sits in the 83rd percentile, which is a significant gap. This imbalance suggests that if the GPU were upgraded, the CPU could support substantially higher performance without becoming a bottleneck. The CPU's nearest rivals — all within 0.3% in either direction — would not meaningfully change the overall combo ranking if swapped in.

The low combo rank is not surprising given the game's age and the GPU's mid-pack positioning. A 2014 third-person shooter with modern resolutions and settings will stress the GPU heavily, and the RX 5700 XT's RDNA 1.0 architecture, while competent, is outclassed by newer designs. The data shows this combo is best suited for 1080p gaming, where it can achieve playable frame rates across all settings, and acceptable 1440p performance on lower presets.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael. It operates on the AMD Socket AM5 platform with dual-channel DDR5 memory support and a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The CPU has a 65 W TDP and is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die.

In this game, the CPU's role is largely secondary to the GPU. The benchmark results show that at 1080p, frame rates scale primarily with GPU settings — from 82 FPS at Ultra to 166 FPS at Low. The CPU's capability is demonstrated by the fact that it can sustain these frame rates without bottlenecking; the 12 threads and 4.70 GHz boost clock are sufficient to keep the GPU fed.

The CPU's single-thread performance is particularly relevant for a 2014 game title, which likely relies on fewer threads. The Cinebench R20 single-core score of 1290 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3072 indicate strong per-core performance. The PassMark single-thread score of 3689 reinforces this — the Ryzen 5 7400F should not be the limiting factor in this game at any tested resolution.

That said, the CPU's role becomes more visible when examining the 1080p Low result of 166 FPS. This is the only data point where the CPU might approach its limit, but even here, the frame rate is high enough to suggest headroom remains. The 6-core, 12-thread configuration with 32 MB L3 cache is more than adequate for this workload, and the data confirms that upgrading the GPU would yield far greater performance gains than upgrading the CPU in this pairing.

Measured FPS Breakdown

1920x1080 (1080p):

• Low: 166 FPS average
• Medium: 127 FPS average (min 108, max 147)
• High: 107 FPS average
• Ultra: 82 FPS average

At 1080p, this combo delivers excellent performance. The Low preset exceeds 160 FPS, which is ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. Medium maintains a solid 127 FPS with a minimum of 108, ensuring smooth gameplay even during intense scenes. High settings drop to 107 FPS, still comfortably above 60 FPS. Ultra settings at 82 FPS remain playable, though the gap between High and Ultra suggests diminishing returns on fidelity for the frame rate cost.

2560x1440 (1440p):

• Low: 107 FPS average
• Medium: 82 FPS average (min 70, max 94)
• High: 69 FPS average
• Ultra: 53 FPS average

At 1440p, the combo starts to show its limits. Low settings maintain a healthy 107 FPS, matching the 1080p High result exactly. Medium averages 82 FPS with a 70 FPS minimum, which is still smooth but with less headroom. High settings at 69 FPS are playable but approaching the threshold where frame drops become noticeable. Ultra drops to 53 FPS, which is borderline for fast-paced third-person shooter gameplay.

3840x2160 (4K):

• Low: 58 FPS average
• Medium: 44 FPS average (min 38, max 51)
• High: 37 FPS average
• Ultra: 28 FPS average

At 4K, the combo is clearly GPU-limited. Only the Low preset achieves near-60 FPS, and even that result (58 FPS) is marginal. Medium settings average 44 FPS with a 38 FPS minimum, which will feel stuttery in action sequences. High and Ultra settings at 37 FPS and 28 FPS respectively are not recommended for competitive play. The data shows that 4K gaming with this hardware requires significant compromises in visual quality to maintain acceptable frame rates.

The overall pattern is consistent: this combo excels at 1080p, handles 1440p with moderate settings, and struggles at 4K. For the best experience in this title, 1080p with Medium or High settings offers the optimal balance, while 1440p users should stick to Low or Medium presets to stay above 60 FPS.