Minimum

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT occupies the 876th position out of 1733 tested combinations in Minimum. This places the combo just below the midpoint of the database, indicating that while it is not a top-tier configuration, it sits comfortably ahead of a substantial portion of the field. The percentile rankings of the individual components reinforce this positioning: the CPU sits at the 78th percentile among all processors, while the GPU achieves the 79th percentile among all graphics cards. The data suggests a well-balanced pairing where neither component dramatically outclasses the other, resulting in a system that should handle the game’s demands without a glaring bottleneck.

Examining the nearest rivals for the CPU reveals just how tight the competition is at this performance level. The Ryzen 5 5600G’s average benchmark score of 19983 is virtually identical to the Intel Core i7-11600H, which trails by a mere 0.2%, and the AMD EPYC 7713P, which leads by the same fractional margin. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is only 0.3% ahead, while the Intel Core i7-11800H sits 0.2% behind. This clustering of scores within a fraction of a percent indicates that the 5600G is operating in an extremely dense performance neighborhood. For the GPU, the RX 6750 XT’s average score of 35327 places it 0.2% ahead of the Radeon RX 5600M, 0.3% behind the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, 0.9% behind the Radeon 880M, and 1.3% behind the GeForce RTX 3080. The margin between the RX 6750 XT and the RTX 3080 is the largest gap in this group, yet it remains a relatively small single-digit percentage difference.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 876 out of 1733 puts it in the 50.6th percentile of all tested systems, meaning it outperforms slightly more than half of the configurations in the database. This is a solidly mid-pack result, though the individual component percentiles suggest the hardware is capable of more than this specific pairing delivers. The CPU’s 78th percentile and GPU’s 79th percentile both point to hardware that should, in theory, rank higher than the combined system does. This discrepancy hints that Minimum may be sensitive to factors beyond raw compute power, such as memory bandwidth or driver overhead, which could be limiting the final outcome.

When looking at the CPU’s nearest rivals, the data shows that the 5600G is effectively in a dead heat with several other processors. The 0.2% deltaPct between the 5600G and the Intel Core i7-11600H, as well as the identical 0.2% gap to the Intel Core i7-11800H, means these chips are statistically indistinguishable in average benchmark performance. The 0.3% lead over the Threadripper PRO 5995WX is also negligible in real-world terms. For the GPU, the RX 6750 XT’s position is similarly tight, with the 0.2% lead over the RX 5600M being the closest comparison, and the 1.3% deficit to the RTX 3080 representing the largest variance in this group.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data reveals a clear hierarchy across the four settings presets at each resolution. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers a commanding 215.8 FPS, which is 30% higher than the Medium preset’s 166.3 FPS and 59% higher than the High preset’s 135.3 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to 107.1 FPS, which is still well above playable thresholds but represents a 50% reduction from the Low setting. For players prioritizing maximum frame rates, the Low preset is the obvious choice, offering nearly double the FPS of Ultra.

At 2560x1440, the pattern shifts slightly. The Low preset delivers 136.5 FPS, which is 30% higher than Medium’s 105.2 FPS and 56% higher than High’s 87.3 FPS. The Ultra preset falls to 65.2 FPS, which is still smooth but begins to approach the lower boundary of high-refresh-rate gaming. The 3840x2160 resolution shows the most dramatic scaling, with Low producing 74.5 FPS, Medium dropping to 55.5 FPS, High at 45.7 FPS, and Ultra falling to 34.1 FPS. The data suggests that for a balanced experience, the Medium preset offers the best compromise at 1080p and 1440p, providing frame rates that exceed 100 FPS while presumably retaining better visual fidelity than Low. At 4K, the Low preset is the only setting that maintains a frame rate above 60 FPS.

FAQ

Q: How does the combo’s overall rank translate to real-world performance?

A: The 876th rank out of 1733 combos places this system in the upper half of the database. The CPU’s 78th percentile and GPU’s 79th percentile are consistent with this mid-pack ranking, though the slight gap between component percentiles and system rank suggests Minimum may not fully utilize the available hardware.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo?

A: At 1920x1080, the combo delivers over 100 FPS on every preset, including 215.8 FPS on Low. The 2560x1440 resolution is also viable, with all presets except Ultra exceeding 85 FPS. The 3840x2160 resolution is only playable on Low, where it hits 74.5 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest competitors?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600G’s average benchmark score of 19983 is within 0.3% of all four nearest rivals. It is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i7-11600H and 0.3% behind the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX, making these processors effectively equivalent in average performance.

Q: Is the GPU a bottleneck at any settings?

A: The RX 6750 XT’s percentile ranking of 79 suggests it is a capable component. At 1080p Low, the 215.8 FPS result indicates the GPU is not limiting, but at 4K Ultra the 34.1 FPS figure suggests GPU-bound performance, as the rendering load increases by 300% from 1080p to 4K.

Q: What frame rate can be expected at High settings in 1440p?

A: The measured data shows 87.3 FPS at 2560x1440 with the High preset. This is 35% lower than the Low preset’s 136.5 FPS but 34% higher than the Ultra preset’s 65.2 FPS, positioning High as a middle-ground option.

Q: How does the GPU’s benchmark score relate to its competition?

A: The RX 6750 XT’s average score of 35327 places it 0.2% ahead of the Radeon RX 5600M and 1.3% behind the GeForce RTX 3080. The 0.3% gap to the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile and 0.9% to the Radeon 880M indicate these cards are closely matched.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The data provides a complete picture of performance across three resolutions and four settings. At 1920x1080, the Low preset leads with 215.8 FPS, followed by Medium at 166.3 FPS, High at 135.3 FPS, and Ultra at 107.1 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 108.7 FPS, representing a 50% performance drop for the highest visual quality. At 2560x1440, the order remains the same: Low at 136.5 FPS, Medium at 105.2 FPS, High at 87.3 FPS, and Ultra at 65.2 FPS. The transition from 1080p to 1440p reduces FPS by 37% on Low, 37% on Medium, 35% on High, and 39% on Ultra.

At 3840x2160, the results become more constrained. Low produces 74.5 FPS, Medium drops to 55.5 FPS, High falls to 45.7 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 34.1 FPS. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is steep: Low drops by 45%, Medium by 47%, High by 48%, and Ultra by 48%. This consistent percentage drop across settings indicates that the GPU is the primary limiter at higher resolutions, as the relative performance loss is uniform regardless of quality preset.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with a Navi 22 chip manufactured on TSMC’s 7 nm process. The GPU contains 17,200 million transistors on a 335 mm² die and features 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. The memory subsystem consists of 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Clock speeds are substantial, with a base of 2150 MHz, a game clock of 2495 MHz, and a boost of 2600 MHz.

The GPU’s benchmark results demonstrate its position in the market. The Passmark G3D score of 20700 and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2548 indicate strong DirectX 12 performance, which is relevant for Minimum’s rendering workload. The 79th percentile ranking among all GPUs places it ahead of the majority of graphics cards. The nearest rival data shows the RX 6750 XT is 0.2% ahead of the Radeon RX 5600M and 1.3% behind the GeForce RTX 3080. Given that the 4K Ultra preset yields only 34.1 FPS, the data implies that the GPU’s 13.31 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are insufficient for maximum settings at 4K, but the 1080p results show ample headroom.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture with the Cezanne codename. It operates at a base clock of 3.90 GHz and boosts up to 4.40 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The CPU features 16 MB of L3 cache and supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth. The 7 nm process from TSMC packs 10,700 million transistors into a 180 mm² die.

The CPU’s benchmark scores show a strong multi-threaded performance profile. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16758 and the Passmark multi-thread score of 19717 indicate solid parallel processing capability. The single-thread scores are equally important: the 3DMark single-thread score of 872 and the Passmark single-thread score of 3177 demonstrate good per-core performance. The 78th percentile ranking places it in the upper quartile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals, the Intel Core i7-11600H and i7-11800H, have average scores within 0.2% of the 5600G, suggesting that the CPU is not a limiting factor in Minimum’s performance. The 1080p Low preset’s 215.8 FPS indicates the CPU can feed frames quickly, while the consistent FPS drops at higher resolutions point to the GPU as the primary constraint.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS data reveals a clear pattern in how performance scales with resolution. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440, the average FPS across all settings drops by approximately 37%. This is expected, as the pixel count increases by 78% (from 2.07 million to 3.69 million pixels). The scaling from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160 is more severe, with an average drop of 47%, corresponding to a 125% increase in pixel count (to 8.29 million pixels). The fact that the FPS drop is proportionally larger than the pixel increase suggests diminishing returns in GPU efficiency at higher resolutions.

This scaling behavior indicates that the GPU is the primary limiting component at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient to maintain high frame rates, as evidenced by the 215.8 FPS on Low settings. However, at 4K, the GPU’s rendering load becomes the bottleneck, with the Ultra preset falling to 34.1 FPS. The uniform percentage drop across settings at 4K (48% from 1440p) further confirms that the GPU is saturated, as the relative performance loss is consistent regardless of quality preset. The RX 6750 XT’s 12 GB of VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are likely sufficient for the game’s textures, but the compute throughput at 4K is insufficient for high frame rates, making the 1080p and 1440p resolutions the sweet spot for this combination.