Minimum

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER delivers a high-refresh-rate experience in Minimum, a 2014 third-person shooter. Benchmark data shows this combination is heavily GPU-bound at lower resolutions, with frame rates scaling dramatically as resolution decreases, while the 6-core processor provides sufficient headroom to prevent bottlenecks. The measured FPS across three resolutions and four settings presets indicates a system capable of exceeding 200 FPS at 1080p and maintaining playable frame rates even at 4K Ultra.

Resolution Scaling

The resolution scaling data reveals a classic GPU-bound scenario, particularly at higher settings. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 at High settings, the average frame rate drops from 211 FPS to 136 FPS, a reduction of 75 FPS or approximately 35.5%. This substantial decline indicates that the rendering workload is scaling directly with pixel count, and the GPU is the primary limiting component at these settings.

The trend continues when moving from 1440p to 4K. At 2560x1440 High, the system averages 136 FPS, but at 3840x2160 High, it drops to 73 FPS. This 46.3% reduction in performance from a 2.25x increase in pixel count suggests that while the GPU is clearly stressed, the scaling is not perfectly linear, hinting that other factors such as memory bandwidth or driver overhead are beginning to play a secondary role. The 4K High result of 73 FPS remains smooth for most displays, but the 4K Ultra average of 56 FPS shows the absolute limit of this configuration.

At Low settings, the resolution scaling pattern is even more pronounced. The 1080p Low average of 299 FPS drops to 212 FPS at 1440p, then to 114 FPS at 4K. This 61.9% performance drop from 1080p to 4K at Low settings is steeper than the 65.4% drop observed at High settings, indicating that when the graphical workload is lighter, the CPU and memory subsystem become more relevant, though the GPU still remains the dominant constraint. The 4K Low result of 114 FPS shows that even at the highest resolution, the system can achieve triple-digit frame rates when visual fidelity is reduced.

The data suggests that at 1080p, the system is pushing against the CPU's limits at Low and Medium settings, where frame rates approach 300 FPS. The gap between 1080p Low (299 FPS) and 1080p Medium (252 FPS) is 47 FPS, while the gap between Medium and High (211 FPS) is 41 FPS. These relatively consistent deltas suggest that the GPU is still scaling with settings, but the absolute frame rates are reaching a ceiling where the CPU's single-thread performance becomes a factor.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the clear performance driver in this configuration, and its specifications align with the measured results. The GPU features 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 672.3 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is more than sufficient for Minimum, a game from 2014, and explains why the system maintains high frame rates even at 4K resolution without apparent VRAM limitations.

The Ada Lovelace architecture GPU operates at a base clock of 2340 MHz with a boost clock of 2610 MHz. These clock speeds, combined with 8448 shading units, deliver a FP32 compute throughput of 44.10 TFLOPS. This raw compute power is evident in the benchmark results, particularly at 1440p and 1080p where the GPU can render frames faster than most displays can refresh. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5569 places the GPU in the 76th percentile of all GPUs, confirming its high-end positioning.

The GPU's memory bandwidth of 672.3 GB/s appears to be a critical factor at 4K resolution. The 16 GB VRAM capacity is never likely to be a bottleneck in Minimum, but the bandwidth is what allows the GPU to maintain 73 FPS at 4K High. The texture rate of 689.0 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 250.6 GPixel/s provide ample fill rate for the game's visual effects. The measured FPS at 4K Medium (87 FPS) versus 4K High (73 FPS) shows a 19.2% performance cost for the High preset, which is consistent with the GPU's compute and memory resources being increasingly taxed at higher resolutions.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F, based on the Zen 3 architecture, provides the processing foundation for this system. With 6 cores and 12 threads, the CPU runs at a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz. While this is not a top-tier processor, its 85th percentile ranking among all CPUs indicates solid mainstream performance. The 32 MB of shared L3 cache is particularly beneficial for gaming workloads, as it reduces memory latency for frequently accessed data.

The PassMark single-thread score of 2872 is the most relevant metric for Minimum, a 2014 shooter that likely relies on a few main threads. The multi-thread score of 19236 shows the CPU can handle background tasks, but the game's frame rates are not heavily dependent on the 12 threads. The CPU's memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, while lower than the GPU's, is sufficient for the game's data streaming needs, especially at lower resolutions where the GPU demands data at a higher rate.

The benchmark data indicates that the CPU becomes a secondary constraint only at 1080p Low settings, where the system reaches 299 FPS. At this frame rate, the CPU's single-thread performance is likely the limiting factor, as the GPU has spare capacity. The 1080p Medium result of 252 FPS and 1080p High result of 211 FPS suggest that the CPU can sustain these frame rates without issue. However, the delta between 1080p Low and 1080p Medium (47 FPS) is smaller than the delta between 1440p Low and 1440p Medium (50 FPS), indicating that at 1080p, the CPU is starting to cap the maximum frame rate.

The CPU's nearest rivals provide context for its performance. It sits within 0.5% of the Intel Core Ultra 5 225, AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D, AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450, and Intel Core i9-12900T in average benchmark scores. This clustering suggests that the 5600F's gaming performance is representative of mid-range to upper-mid-range processors, and it does not introduce a significant bottleneck for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER in this title.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers its highest frame rates. Low settings produce an average of 299 FPS, while Medium settings achieve 252 FPS with a minimum of 214 FPS and maximum of 290 FPS. High settings drop to 211 FPS, and Ultra settings yield 161 FPS. The step from Low to Medium costs 47 FPS (15.7%), from Medium to High costs 41 FPS (16.3%), and from High to Ultra costs 50 FPS (23.7%). The Ultra preset's 161 FPS average still provides a high-refresh experience, though the cost of enabling Ultra is substantial.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates remain high but show a clear downward trend. Low settings average 212 FPS, Medium settings average 162 FPS with a minimum of 138 FPS and maximum of 187 FPS, High settings average 136 FPS, and Ultra settings average 104 FPS. The percentage cost of each settings tier is consistent with 1080p: Low to Medium costs 50 FPS (23.6%), Medium to High costs 26 FPS (16.0%), and High to Ultra costs 32 FPS (23.5%). The 1440p Ultra result of 104 FPS is notably above the 60 FPS standard, making this resolution viable for all settings.

At 3840x2160, the system remains playable but the Ultra preset struggles. Low settings average 114 FPS, Medium settings average 87 FPS with a minimum of 74 FPS and maximum of 101 FPS, High settings average 73 FPS, and Ultra settings average 56 FPS. The cost of each setting tier is more pronounced at 4K: Low to Medium costs 27 FPS (23.7%), Medium to High costs 14 FPS (16.1%), and High to Ultra costs 17 FPS (23.3%). The 4K Ultra average of 56 FPS is below the 60 FPS threshold, which may be noticeable on displays with VRR, but the Medium preset's 87 FPS and High preset's 73 FPS offer smooth experiences.

The only measured rows with min/max FPS values are the Medium settings across all three resolutions. At 1080p Medium, the frame time variance spans 214 to 290 FPS, a range of 76 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the range is 138 to 187 FPS (49 FPS), and at 4K Medium, the range is 74 to 101 FPS (27 FPS). This narrowing range at higher resolutions further confirms that the GPU is the primary bottleneck, as the frame time variability decreases when the GPU is more consistently saturated.

How This Combo Ranks

This specific combination of AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER ranks 384th out of 2939 tested combos in Minimum, placing it in the top 13.1% of all configurations. This high ranking reflects the GPU's strong performance and the CPU's adequate support. The percentile placement indicates that the system outperforms the vast majority of tested hardware combinations in this game.

The rank of 384 out of 2939 means the system is in the 87th percentile of all combos tested. This is consistent with the GPU's 76th percentile ranking among all GPUs and the CPU's 85th percentile ranking among all CPUs. The combo rank being higher than the GPU's individual percentile suggests that the pairing is well-balanced for this title, with no significant bottleneck from the CPU. The data indicates that systems ranked above this combo likely feature faster GPUs such as the RTX 4090 or newer Blackwell parts, while the 5600F does not hold back the 4070 Ti SUPER to a meaningful degree.

Given that Minimum is a 2014 title with relatively modest system requirements compared to modern games, the high rank is expected. The game's age means that even mid-range modern hardware can achieve high frame rates, and this system's 4K High result of 73 FPS demonstrates that it can handle the game at high resolution without compromise. The combo's position in the rankings suggests that it would be difficult to improve performance significantly without moving to a substantially more powerful GPU.

FAQ

*Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo achieves in Minimum?*

A: The highest measured average FPS is 299, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

*Q: Can this system run Minimum at 4K with smooth frame rates?*

A: Yes, at 4K Medium the system averages 87 FPS with a minimum of 74 FPS, and at 4K High it averages 73 FPS. The 4K Ultra preset drops to 56 FPS average.

Q: How does the CPU's single-thread performance compare to its rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600F scores 2872 in PassMark single-thread tests, and its nearest rivals (Intel Core Ultra 5 225, AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D, AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450, Intel Core i9-12900T) are all within 0.5% of its average benchmark score.

Q: Is the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 16 GB VRAM sufficient for this game?

A: Yes, the 16 GB GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus with 672.3 GB/s bandwidth is more than sufficient for Minimum, as evidenced by the high frame rates at all tested resolutions and settings.

Q: What is the performance cost of Ultra settings at 1440p compared to High?

A: Ultra settings at 1440p average 104 FPS, while High settings average 136 FPS, representing a 32 FPS or 23.5% reduction in average frame rate.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations in this game?

A: This combination ranks 384th out of 2939 tested combos, placing it in the top 13.1% of all systems tested for Minimum.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data provides clear guidance for the optimal settings preset at each resolution. At 1920x1080, the High preset offers the best balance, delivering 211 FPS average. The Ultra preset's 161 FPS is still excellent, but the 50 FPS cost over High is substantial. The Low preset's 299 FPS is only useful for competitive play where maximum frame rates are prioritized over visual quality. For most users at 1080p, High settings provide a 211 FPS experience that exceeds the refresh rate of all but the most extreme gaming monitors.

At 2560x1440, the Medium preset stands out as the recommended choice. It delivers 162 FPS average with a minimum of 138 FPS, which ensures smooth gameplay even in demanding scenes. The High preset's 136 FPS is also viable, but the Medium preset's 26 FPS advantage comes with a modest visual quality reduction. The Ultra preset's 104 FPS is perfectly playable and offers the best image quality, making it a valid choice for users who prioritize visuals over frame rate headroom.

At 3840x2160, the Medium preset is the clear recommendation. It delivers 87 FPS average with a minimum of 74 FPS, providing a comfortable margin above 60 FPS. The High preset's 73 FPS average is also acceptable, but the 14 FPS drop from Medium may be noticeable in fast-paced action. The Ultra preset's 56 FPS average falls below the 60 FPS threshold and is not recommended for a consistently smooth experience. The Low preset's 114 FPS is unnecessary at this resolution, as the visual quality reduction is more impactful than the frame rate gain.

Overall, the Medium preset at 1440p offers the most balanced experience, combining high frame rates with good visual fidelity. For users with 4K displays, Medium settings at 3840x2160 provide the best combination of smoothness and image quality. The system's performance headroom at 1080p allows for Ultra settings if desired, but the High preset is the most efficient use of the GPU's capabilities without sacrificing meaningful visual quality.