Minimum
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 80 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 28 | 37 | 44 | 58 |
| 1440p QHD | 53 | 69 | 82 | 107 |
| 1080p Full HD | 82 | 107 | 127 | 166 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Minimum with AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D + AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D paired with the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT is a combination that targets 1080p and 1440p gaming, but its performance in Minimum, a 2014 Third-Person Shooter, shows clear limitations at higher resolutions. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS data to explain where this combo excels and where it falls short, comparing it directly to its nearest rival components.
FAQ
*Q: How well does this combo perform in Minimum compared to all other tested combinations?*
A: This combo ranks 2164 out of 2939 tested combos, placing it in the 27th percentile overall. While this might sound low, it still delivers playable frame rates at 1080p and 1440p on most settings, indicating it is a mid-to-low tier pairing for this specific title.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the primary bottleneck at 4K resolution?
A: The data strongly suggests the GPU is the limiting factor. At 4K, the average FPS drops to 37 on High settings, while lowering the resolution to 1080p on the same settings more than doubles the frame rate to 107 FPS. This scaling pattern is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario.
Q: Can this system achieve a consistent 60 FPS experience at 1440p?
A: Yes, but with caveats. At 1440p Medium, the combo averages 82 FPS with a minimum of 70 FPS, ensuring a smooth experience. At 1440p High, the average is 69 FPS, which is still above 60 FPS but with less headroom. However, at 1440p Ultra, the average drops to 53 FPS, which falls short of a locked 60 FPS target.
Q: What is the best resolution and settings combination for a high-refresh-rate monitor?
A: For a 144Hz or higher refresh rate, 1080p Low is the only setting that provides an average FPS (166) significantly above 144. At 1080p Medium, the average of 127 FPS is still excellent for most high-refresh displays, but it won't fully saturate a 144Hz panel. 1080p High, at 107 FPS, is a solid choice for a 120Hz monitor.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The Ryzen 5 5500X3D's average benchmark score of 37018 places it in a dead heat with its nearest rivals. It is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and Intel Core Ultra 5 225, but 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 and 0.3% behind the Intel Core i9-12900T. These differences are negligible in real-world gaming.
Q: Is the RX 5700 XT's 8GB VRAM an issue for this game?
A: The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory is not a bottleneck in Minimum. The data shows a linear progression of performance drops as settings increase from Low to Ultra, which is typical of GPU compute limitations rather than memory capacity exhaustion. The memory bandwidth is 448.0 GB/s.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo's rank of 2164 out of 2939 tested combinations places it in the lower half of all systems tested for Minimum. This ranking is a direct reflection of the GPU's age and performance class. The RX 5700 XT has a percentile rank of 59 among all GPUs, meaning it outperforms 59% of them in synthetic benchmarks. However, the CPU is much stronger, with a percentile rank of 85 among all CPUs.
This creates an interesting dynamic. The Ryzen 5 5500X3D is a modern, capable processor, but it is paired with a GPU that was released years prior. The benchmark data confirms that the GPU is the component that holds the system back, especially at higher resolutions. The rank of 2164 suggests that while the system is not a top-tier performer, it is not a complete slouch either. It lands in a zone where it can handle older or less demanding titles like Minimum at medium settings, but it will struggle with more recent AAA games at high graphical presets.
The gap between the CPU and GPU performance is significant. The CPU's high percentile ranking suggests it has plenty of headroom, meaning the system's overall performance is almost entirely dictated by the GPU. This is a classic case of an unbalanced pairing, where a future GPU upgrade would provide a massive boost to frame rates without requiring a new processor. For a game like Minimum, this combo is functional and can deliver playable experiences, but it is far from the top of the leaderboard.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT is the workhorse of this pairing, and its specifications directly dictate the measured performance. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The GPU has a base clock of 1605 MHz, a game clock of 1755 MHz, and a boost clock of 1905 MHz. These clocks are relatively high for its generation, but the underlying RDNA 1.0 architecture is now several generations old.
In Minimum, the GPU's role becomes the primary bottleneck as resolution and settings increase. The measured FPS data illustrates this clearly: at 1080p Low, the GPU can push an average of 166 FPS. At 1080p Ultra, that average drops to 82 FPS. This is a 50% reduction in performance from the lowest to the highest settings, a penalty that is consistent with the GPU being fully loaded. The same trend is visible at 1440p, where the average FPS drops from 107 on Low to 53 on Ultra.
The GPU's VRAM capacity of 8 GB is not the limiting factor here. The consistent scaling of FPS with settings suggests that the GPU's compute units, not its memory buffer, are being saturated. The 2560 shading units and 160 texture mapping units are doing the heavy lifting, and they are simply not fast enough to maintain high frame rates at 4K Ultra, where the average is a mere 28 FPS. The GPU's synthetic benchmark scores, such as the Passmark G3D score of 16277, place it right alongside the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, confirming its mid-range performance tier.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of how this combo handles Minimum across different resolutions and settings. Here is the exact breakdown:
1920x1080 (1080p)
- Low: Average 166 FPS.
- Medium: Average 127 FPS (min 108, max 147).
- High: Average 107 FPS.
- Ultra: Average 82 FPS.
2560x1440 (1440p)
- Low: Average 107 FPS.
- Medium: Average 82 FPS (min 70, max 94).
- High: Average 69 FPS.
- Ultra: Average 53 FPS.
3840x2160 (4K)
- Low: Average 58 FPS.
- Medium: Average 44 FPS (min 38, max 51).
- High: Average 37 FPS.
- Ultra: Average 28 FPS.
The data shows a clear hierarchy. At 1080p, the combo is capable of excellent performance, with even the Ultra preset averaging 82 FPS, which is smooth for most gamers. The Medium preset, with an average of 127 FPS and a minimum of 108 FPS, is the sweet spot for a high-refresh-rate experience. At 1440p, the system is still viable, with the High preset averaging 69 FPS, just shy of a perfect 60 FPS lock. However, the Ultra preset at 1440p falls below the 60 FPS threshold, averaging 53 FPS.
The 4K results are the most telling. Even on Low settings, the average FPS is 58, and it degrades rapidly to 28 FPS on Ultra. This makes 4K gaming an unrealistic target for this combo unless the player is willing to accept significant compromises in visual fidelity. The minimum FPS figures reported for the Medium settings at each resolution show that the frame pacing is relatively stable, but the overall averages are what dictate the playability.
Resolution Scaling
The transition from 1080p to 4K reveals the fundamental bottleneck of this system. At 1080p High, the combo averages 107 FPS. Moving to 1440p High, the average drops to 69 FPS, a reduction of 35.5%. This is a significant drop, but it is expected as the GPU has to render 78% more pixels. Moving to 4K High, the average plummets to 37 FPS, a further 46% reduction from the 1440p figure. This steep decline from 1440p to 4K is a classic sign of a GPU that is running out of pixel-pushing power.
This scaling behavior indicates that the CPU is not the limiting factor. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect the FPS to remain relatively flat as resolution increases, because the CPU's workload (draw calls, game logic) stays the same. However, the FPS drops dramatically with resolution, which means the GPU is the component that is being overwhelmed. The Ryzen 5 5500X3D, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, is more than capable of feeding the RX 5700 XT at 1080p and 1440p, but the GPU cannot keep up with the demands of 4K.
This is a clear case of a GPU-bound system. The data suggests that the RX 5700 XT has a performance ceiling around 107 FPS at 1080p High. Lowering the resolution to 1080p Low does not yield a proportional increase in FPS (166 FPS), showing that there is some CPU overhead, but the GPU's performance is the primary constraint. For the best experience, users should stick to 1080p or 1440p, where the GPU can still deliver playable frame rates.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture. It has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz. Its key feature is the large 96 MB of shared L3 cache, which is a significant advantage in gaming workloads. The CPU's synthetic benchmark scores are strong, with a Passmark multithread score of 20363 and a single-thread score of 2941. These numbers place it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, far above the GPU's 59th percentile.
In Minimum, the CPU's role is to keep the GPU fed with data. At 1080p Low, the CPU is able to push the GPU to an average of 166 FPS. This is a high frame rate that shows the CPU is not holding the system back at lower resolutions. However, the CPU's performance is not the sole determinant of the final FPS. The data shows that at 1080p, the FPS scales down as settings increase, which is a GPU-side effect.
The CPU's nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks are the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F, AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450, Intel Core Ultra 5 225, and Intel Core i9-12900T. All of these processors have average scores within 0.3% of the 5500X3D, meaning they would all perform nearly identically in Minimum when paired with the same GPU. This confirms that the CPU is not a differentiating factor in this specific game.
The CPU's 96 MB L3 cache is a notable asset, but its impact is not clearly visible in the FPS data for Minimum, which is an older title that may not be as cache-sensitive as modern games. The CPU's higher synthetic benchmark scores compared to the GPU indicate that it has more headroom. If a user were to upgrade the GPU, the CPU would likely be able to support a significant performance increase without becoming a new bottleneck. For now, the CPU is doing its job, but the system's overall performance is capped by the RX 5700 XT.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D + AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT in Minimum
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 58.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 44.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 37.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 28.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 107.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 82.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 69.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 53.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 166.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 127.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 107.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 82.0 |
Minimum with Ryzen 5 5500X3D + Other GPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Minimum with RX 5700 XT + Other CPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 5500X3D + RX 5700 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.