Minimum
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 93 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 33 | 43 | 51 | 67 |
| 1440p QHD | 61 | 80 | 95 | 124 |
| 1080p Full HD | 94 | 124 | 147 | 192 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Minimum with AMD Ryzen 5 4600G + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G paired with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti delivers a highly playable experience in Minimum, but the data reveals a clear performance ceiling dictated by the GPU at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the combination is exceptionally strong, pushing well past 120 FPS on most presets, while 4K Ultra drops to a demanding 33 FPS average, indicating that the GTX 1080 Ti is the primary bottleneck in this configuration.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data shows a predictable but steep performance decline as resolution increases, a classic sign of GPU-bound rendering. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves a 192 FPS average, which is an excellent baseline for competitive play. Moving to 2560x1440 at the same Low preset reduces the average to 124 FPS, a drop of 68 FPS or roughly 35%. The scaling continues to 3840x2160, where the Low preset yields just 67 FPS, representing a 65% reduction from the 1080p figure.
This scaling pattern strongly indicates that the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is the limiting component at higher resolutions. The Ryzen 5 4600G, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, provides sufficient headroom to feed the GPU at 1080p, as evidenced by the 192 FPS Low result. However, the 4K Ultra average of 33 FPS shows the GPU struggling with the pixel count, not the CPU. The transition from 1440p High (80 FPS) to 4K High (43 FPS) is a 46% reduction, which is consistent with the GPU hitting its memory bandwidth and shading limits.
The data also shows that the gap between settings widens at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the difference between Low (192 FPS) and Ultra (94 FPS) is 98 FPS. At 4K, the same preset gap is only 34 FPS (67 vs 33). This compression suggests that at 4K, the GPU is so heavily loaded that the settings changes have a relatively smaller impact on the final framerate, as the pixel fill rate becomes the dominant factor.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to achieve a 60 FPS average?
A: The data shows that 2560x1440 on High settings yields an 80 FPS average, while 3840x2160 on Medium drops to 51 FPS. To maintain a 60 FPS floor, 1440p is the highest resolution that comfortably does so across most presets, with the Ultra preset at 1440p still hitting 61 FPS.
Q: How does the GTX 1080 Ti's performance compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 15548, placing it just 0.2% above the AMD Radeon R9 M380 (15521) and 1.7% above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (15290). It sits 0.8% below the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 (15679), showing it is closely matched with those cards in synthetic tests.
Q: Is the Ryzen 5 4600G holding back the GPU in this game?
A: At 1080p, the evidence suggests no. The combo reaches 192 FPS on Low, which indicates the CPU is capable of high frame generation. The bottleneck becomes apparent only at 4K Ultra (33 FPS), where the GPU's pixel throughput is the limiting factor, not the CPU's 3DMark max threads score of 4889.
Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded across all tested settings?
A: The only measured minimum FPS values are for the Medium preset. At 1920x1080, the minimum is 125 FPS; at 2560x1440, it is 81 FPS; and at 3840x2160, it is 43 FPS. This shows that even the lowest dips on Medium at 1080p are well above the refresh rate of most standard monitors.
Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance compare to its direct competitors?
A: The Ryzen 5 4600G has an average benchmark score of 17507. It is 0.1% faster than the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE (17482) and 0.6% faster than the Intel Core 7 150U (17395). It trails the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE by 0.6% (17614) and the Intel Core i3-14100T by 0.8% (17648).
Q: Does the 11 GB VRAM of the GTX 1080 Ti cause any issues at 4K?
A: The measured data does not indicate VRAM-related stutters or crashes. At 3840x2160, the combination produces playable averages of 67 FPS on Low and 43 FPS on High. The 11 GB of GDDR5X memory and 484.4 GB/s bandwidth appear sufficient for this title, as the performance drop at 4K is linear with resolution scaling rather than a sudden cliff.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti combination ranks 2082 out of 3712 tested combinations in Minimum. This places it in the 44th percentile of all combos, meaning it outperforms 44% of the systems tested. Given the game's 2014 release date, this ranking is respectable but not top-tier, as many newer CPUs and GPUs will naturally outperform this pairing.
The ranking reflects the balance of the components. The CPU's percentile of 71 versus all CPUs is solid, while the GPU's percentile of 58 against all GPUs is slightly lower. This asymmetry explains the overall mid-pack ranking; the GTX 1080 Ti is a capable card, but it is not the strongest component of this pairing. The synthetic benchmark scores confirm this: the CPU's average of 17507 is 0.1% above its nearest rival, while the GPU's average of 15548 is only 1.7% above the RTX 2060.
In practical terms, this rank means that while the combo excels at 1080p and handles 1440p well, it will fall behind systems with more modern GPUs at 4K. The 33 FPS average at 4K Ultra is a clear indicator that this combo is not designed for maximum eye candy at that resolution, but it remains a strong performer for high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its strongest results. The Low preset achieves an average of 192 FPS, which drops to 147 FPS on Medium (with a minimum of 125 and maximum of 169). The High preset yields 124 FPS, and Ultra drops to 94 FPS. All four presets at this resolution are well above the 60 FPS threshold, making 1080p the sweet spot for this hardware.
Stepping up to 2560x1440, performance remains strong but shows the GPU working harder. Low yields 124 FPS, Medium averages 95 FPS (minimum 81, maximum 109), High drops to 80 FPS, and Ultra falls to 61 FPS. The Ultra result is exactly at the 60 FPS standard, making it playable but with no headroom for demanding scenes.
At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. Low averages 67 FPS, which is still playable, but Medium drops to 51 FPS (minimum 43, maximum 59). High averages 43 FPS, and Ultra falls to 33 FPS. These numbers indicate that 4K is only viable on Low settings for a consistently smooth experience, while higher presets require a tolerance for sub-60 FPS gameplay.
The Medium preset is the only one with complete min/max data across all resolutions, showing a consistent pattern. The gap between average and minimum FPS widens with resolution: 22 FPS at 1080p, 14 FPS at 1440p, and 8 FPS at 4K. This narrowing variance suggests that at 4K, the frame rate is consistently GPU-limited, whereas at 1080p, there is more fluctuation as the CPU and GPU trade off.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is the dominant component in this pairing, and its specifications directly explain the measured results. With 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 88 ROPs, the GPU's raw compute capability is substantial, yet it is the memory subsystem that stands out. The 11 GB of GDDR5X memory on a 352-bit bus provides 484.4 GB/s of bandwidth, which is critical for high-resolution textures.
The GPU's clock speeds are 1481 MHz base and 1582 MHz boost, which are relatively modest for a card of this class. However, the Pascal architecture's efficiency allows it to deliver a peak FP32 performance of 11.34 TFLOPS. This raw throughput translates directly to the 192 FPS at 1080p Low, where the shading units are the primary driver. At 4K Ultra, the pixel rate of 139.2 GPixel/s becomes the limiting factor, explaining the 33 FPS average.
The VRAM capacity of 11 GB is more than sufficient for Minimum, as the game's 2014 release date means it was designed for GPUs with far less memory. The lack of any minimum FPS data for the High and Ultra presets suggests that the card does not suffer from memory pressure stutters; the performance degradation is purely a function of compute and bandwidth limits. The GPU's benchmark scores show it is 58th percentile against all GPUs, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2231 and a Passmark G3D score of 18600, confirming its mid-range standing in modern terms.
Settings Recommendations
For players targeting the highest frame rates, the 1920x1080 Low preset is the clear choice, delivering 192 FPS. This is ideal for competitive play where response time is paramount. If visual fidelity is a priority at 1080p, the High preset at 124 FPS offers an excellent balance, providing a significant visual upgrade over Low while maintaining a frame rate that exceeds most 120 Hz monitors.
At 2560x1440, the data recommends the High preset, which averages 80 FPS. This provides a smooth experience on 144 Hz monitors while offering better image quality than the Low preset's 124 FPS. The Ultra preset at 61 FPS is technically playable, but it leaves almost no margin for frame drops in busy scenes, making High the safer choice for consistent performance.
For 4K gaming, the settings recommendations are more restrictive. The Low preset at 67 FPS is the only option that consistently hits the 60 FPS threshold. The Medium preset at 51 FPS may be acceptable for slower-paced gameplay, but the High (43 FPS) and Ultra (33 FPS) presets are not recommended for a smooth experience. Given the data, 4K gaming with this combo should be limited to Low or Medium settings, with the understanding that the GTX 1080 Ti is better suited to 1080p and 1440p workloads.
The overall best experience across all resolutions is the 1440p High preset, which balances the GPU's capabilities with visual quality, delivering an 80 FPS average that is smooth and responsive. This represents the optimal point where the CPU and GPU work in harmony, avoiding the frame rate collapse seen at 4K Ultra.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 4600G + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti in Minimum
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 67.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 51.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 43.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 33.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 124.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 95.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 80.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 61.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 192.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 147.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 124.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 94.0 |
Minimum with Ryzen 5 4600G + Other GPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Minimum with GTX 1080 Ti + Other CPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 4600G + GTX 1080 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.