Minimum
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 81 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 27 | 38 | 48 | 58 |
| 1440p QHD | 54 | 70 | 84 | 110 |
| 1080p Full HD | 82 | 106 | 128 | 167 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Minimum with AMD Ryzen 5 3600 + AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT pairing delivers a playable but resolution-sensitive experience in Minimum. This 2014 third-person shooter runs well at 1080p, but the data shows a steep performance cliff as resolution climbs. The combination ranks 1309th out of 1733 tested combos in this game, placing it in the lower half of all systems measured.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is dramatic and tells a clear story about where the bottleneck lies. At High settings, the system produces 105.7 FPS at 1920x1080, drops to 69.7 FPS at 2560x1440, and falls to 37.5 FPS at 3840x2160. That is a 64.5% reduction from 1080p to 4K, which indicates the GPU becomes increasingly dominant as pixel count rises.
The scaling pattern is consistent across all settings presets. At Low settings, the system hits 167.3 FPS at 1080p, 110.4 FPS at 1440p, and 57.8 FPS at 4K. The 4K result is barely above half of the 1440p figure, confirming that the RX 5700 XT’s rendering capacity is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The 1080p numbers are high enough that CPU overhead likely plays a more meaningful role there, but the 3600’s six-core, twelve-thread configuration keeps frame rates well above playable thresholds.
One notable observation is the gap between Low and Ultra settings at each resolution. At 4K, Low produces 57.8 FPS while Ultra produces 26.7 FPS — a 31.1 FPS spread. At 1080p, the same settings gap is 85.4 FPS (167.3 vs 81.9). This widening delta at lower resolutions suggests the GPU has headroom to render higher settings when pixel count is moderate, but at 4K even Low settings strain the hardware.
GPU Role
The Radeon RX 5700 XT is built on the RDNA 1.0 architecture with a Navi 10 chip fabricated on a 7 nm process. It carries 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective), while the GPU base clock is 1605 MHz and boost reaches 1905 MHz with a game clock of 1755 MHz.
Benchmark results place this GPU at the 68th percentile among all graphics cards, with an average benchmark score of 24731. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (scoring 24763, a 0.1% difference), the Intel Arc A350M (24647, 0.3% behind), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile (24592, 0.6% behind). These scores indicate the RX 5700 XT sits in a competitive mid-range tier, which aligns with the measured FPS results.
The 8 GB VRAM capacity is relevant for Minimum’s 4K Ultra preset, which yields only 26.7 FPS. While VRAM size alone does not explain that low number — the GPU’s raw compute is also stretched — the 256-bit memory interface and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for this game’s textures at 4K, based on the data. The 121.9 GPixel/s pixel rate and 304.8 GTexel/s texture rate are the more likely constraints at high resolutions.
FAQ
*Q: Can this system run Minimum at 4K?*
A: Yes, but only at lower settings. The measured data shows 57.8 FPS at 4K Low and 48.2 FPS at 4K Medium, while High yields 37.5 FPS and Ultra drops to 26.7 FPS. For smooth 4K play, Low or Medium settings are required.
Q: What is the best resolution for this pairing?
A: 1920x1080 is the strongest choice. The system delivers 105.7 FPS at High and 167.3 FPS at Low, with even Ultra reaching 81.9 FPS. At 1440p, High produces 69.7 FPS, which is playable but less comfortable.
Q: How does the RX 5700 XT compare to its closest rivals?
A: The GPU scores 24731 on average, sitting 0.1% below the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (24763) and 0.2% above the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS’s integrated graphics (not applicable here). It is 0.3% ahead of the Intel Arc A350M (24647) and 0.6% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile (24592).
Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU in this game?
A: The Ryzen 5 3600 has a single-thread score of 696 in 3DMark and 2124 in Cinebench R23, which is adequate for most gaming loads. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K suggests the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions, but the CPU’s 6-core, 12-thread design is not a major constraint in this title.
Q: What settings preset offers the most balanced experience at 1440p?
A: Medium settings at 2560x1440 produce 84 FPS, which is a good middle ground. High drops to 69.7 FPS, and Low reaches 110.4 FPS, so Medium provides a solid visual upgrade over Low without sacrificing smoothness.
Q: Is the 8 GB VRAM sufficient for this game?
A: Yes. The RX 5700 XT’s 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth handles Minimum’s memory demands at all tested resolutions and settings. The performance drops at 4K are more attributable to compute limits than VRAM capacity.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system’s performance is strong across all presets. Low settings produce 167.3 FPS, Medium yields 127.8 FPS, High reaches 105.7 FPS, and Ultra holds 81.9 FPS. These numbers indicate a smooth experience even at the highest quality preset, with no risk of falling below typical 60 FPS targets.
Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain respectable but show the GPU working harder. Low delivers 110.4 FPS, Medium produces 84 FPS, High drops to 69.7 FPS, and Ultra falls to 53.8 FPS. The Ultra preset dips below 60 FPS, which may be noticeable on a high-refresh monitor.
At 3840x2160, the RX 5700 XT is clearly overextended. Low achieves 57.8 FPS, which is just under a 60 FPS target, Medium produces 48.2 FPS, High yields 37.5 FPS, and Ultra plummets to 26.7 FPS. For 4K gaming, only the Low preset is close to acceptable, and even that requires a compromise on visual fidelity.
The scaling from 1080p Low (167.3 FPS) to 1440p Low (110.4 FPS) represents a 34% reduction, while moving from 1440p Low to 4K Low (57.8 FPS) cuts performance by 47.6%. This nonlinear drop is typical of GPU-bound scenarios where pixel count growth outpaces the hardware’s fill rate capabilities.
Settings Recommendations
For 1080p, the data supports using Ultra settings. The 81.9 FPS average at that preset is comfortably above 60 FPS, and the visual quality improvement over High (105.7 FPS) or Medium (127.8 FPS) is worth the modest frame rate cost. Players with 144 Hz monitors could prefer High for the 105.7 FPS result, but Ultra remains viable.
At 1440p, Medium settings provide the best balance. The 84 FPS average is smooth, while High (69.7 FPS) is playable but leaves less headroom for demanding scenes. Low (110.4 FPS) sacrifices too much visual quality for a marginal gain over Medium. Ultra (53.8 FPS) falls below the 60 FPS threshold, making it less desirable for consistent gameplay.
For 4K, the recommendation is Low settings. The 57.8 FPS result is just short of a 60 FPS target, and Medium (48.2 FPS) introduces noticeable stutter potential. High (37.5 FPS) and Ultra (26.7 FPS) are not recommended for serious play, as the frame rates are too low for responsive third-person shooting. Players prioritizing 4K should accept Low settings or consider a resolution drop to 1440p.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 3000 series, built on Zen 2 architecture with a 7 nm process. Its base clock is 3.60 GHz and boost reaches 4.20 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The CPU sits at the 76th percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 18129.
In Minimum, the CPU’s role is secondary to the GPU at higher resolutions, but it provides adequate support at 1080p. The 3DMark single-thread score of 696 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2124 indicate solid per-core performance. The multithreaded results are strong — Cinebench R23 multicore hits 15045 — which helps if the game uses additional threads for physics or AI.
The nearest CPU rivals are tightly clustered. The Intel Core i5-11400 scores 18150 (0.1% higher), the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS scores 18101 (0.2% lower), the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 scores 18158 (0.2% higher), and the AMD EPYC 9274F scores 18189 (0.3% higher). This grouping shows the 3600 is competitive with modern mid-range options, though none of these rivals would dramatically change the FPS results in this game given the GPU bottleneck at higher resolutions.
The 32 MB shared L3 cache is ample for gaming workloads, and the dual-channel DDR4 memory support with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth is standard for this class. The CPU’s 7 nm process and 3,800 million transistors on a 74 mm² die keep power efficiency high, which matters for system thermals during extended sessions of Minimum.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 3600 + AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT in Minimum
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 57.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 48.2 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 37.5 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 26.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 110.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 84.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 69.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 53.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 167.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 127.8 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 105.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 81.9 |
Minimum with Ryzen 5 3600 + Other GPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Minimum with RX 5700 XT + Other CPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 3600 + RX 5700 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.