Minecraft: Java Edition
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 137 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 40 | 61 | 76 | 96 |
| 1440p QHD | 73 | 119 | 147 | 188 |
| 1080p Full HD | 121 | 188 | 237 | 299 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Minecraft: Java Edition with AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D paired with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER delivers a fascinating performance profile in Minecraft: Java Edition, one where the CPU's immense power is frequently masked by the GPU's limitations. The data from this combination reveals a system that can push exceptionally high frame rates at lower resolutions but begins to buckle under the weight of higher pixel counts and graphical presets, painting a clear picture of a classic bottleneck scenario.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate scaling across resolutions tells a definitive story about where the performance ceiling lies. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 298.9 FPS average, a figure that demonstrates the Ryzen 7 9800X3D's capability to feed frames rapidly. Dropping to 1440p Low yields 188 FPS, a significant 37% reduction, while 4K Low produces 96.3 FPS, representing a 68% drop from the 1080p figure. This steep decline indicates that the GTX 1660 SUPER is being overwhelmed by the increasing pixel workload.
The pattern becomes even more pronounced when examining the Ultra settings tier. At 1080p Ultra, the system manages 120.9 FPS, which is still highly playable but represents a 60% reduction from the Low preset at the same resolution. Moving to 1440p Ultra sees the average fall to 72.9 FPS, and at 4K Ultra, the system drops to a mere 40.3 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at Ultra shows a 40% performance loss, while the jump to 4K Ultra costs another 45% of the frame rate.
What these numbers suggest is that the CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1212 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4800 are more than sufficient to handle Minecraft's primary thread at 1080p. The limiting factor emerges as resolution increases; the GTX 1660 SUPER's 5.027 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 336.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth simply cannot sustain the fill rate demanded by higher resolutions. The GPU's pixel rate of 85.68 GPixel/s and texture rate of 157.1 GTexel/s become the constraining specs, particularly when the game's draw distance and entity rendering scale with resolution.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER, built on the Turing architecture with a TU116 chip, provides the graphical foundation for this pairing. Its 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus delivers 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which proves adequate for Minecraft's texture-heavy workloads at 1080p but becomes strained at higher resolutions. The GPU's base clock of 1530 MHz and boost clock of 1785 MHz represent the operational frequencies that determine how quickly it can process the game's rendering commands.
The VRAM allocation appears sufficient for this title, as Minecraft's block-based rendering does not typically consume massive memory pools. However, the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 12699 places it at the 55th percentile among all GPUs, indicating it is a mid-range performer. The benchmark results show that the GPU's DirectX 11 score of 104 and DirectX 12 score of 50 in PassMark tests suggest moderate API performance, which aligns with the observed frame rates in Minecraft's Java environment.
The GPU's 1408 shading units and 48 ROPs are the primary processing elements that handle the game's pixel and geometry work. At 1080p Medium settings, the combo reaches 236.5 FPS, but this drops to 147.4 FPS at 1440p Medium and 76 FPS at 4K Medium. The scaling pattern indicates that the GPU's compute resources are being taxed proportionally to the pixel count, with the 4K Medium result being nearly half the 1080p Medium figure.
FAQ
Q: Is the Ryzen 7 9800X3D bottlenecking the GTX 1660 SUPER in this game?
A: No, the data indicates the opposite. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34004 and single-core score of 4800 are exceptionally high, and the system still reaches 298.9 FPS at 1080p Low. The performance drops at higher resolutions point to the GPU being the limiting factor.
Q: What is the best resolution to play at with this combo?
A: At 1080p, the system provides excellent performance across all settings, with even Ultra settings achieving 120.9 FPS. At 1440p, High settings deliver 119.2 FPS, which remains smooth, but Ultra settings drop to 72.9 FPS. At 4K, only Low settings (96.3 FPS) provide a playable experience above 60 FPS.
Q: How does the GTX 1660 SUPER compare to its closest rivals?
A: The GPU's average benchmark score of 14286 is remarkably close to its nearest rivals, with the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 scoring 14314 (0.2% higher), the Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics scoring 14315 (0.2% higher), and the AMD Radeon Vega 11 scoring 14352 (0.5% higher). The AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT leads this group with 14389, just 0.7% ahead.
Q: Can this system handle Minecraft at 4K with playable frame rates?
A: At 4K, the system achieves 60.7 FPS on High settings, which is borderline playable. However, 4K Ultra drops to 40.3 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold many players prefer. For consistent 4K performance, lower settings are required, with Medium producing 76 FPS.
Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?
A: The difference is substantial. At 1080p, Low settings produce 298.9 FPS, Medium produces 236.5 FPS (21% lower), High produces 188.2 FPS (37% lower), and Ultra produces 120.9 FPS (60% lower than Low). This demonstrates that the GPU's workload increases significantly with each settings tier.
Q: How does the Ryzen 7 9800X3D's performance compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 37780 is nearly identical to its closest competitors. The Intel Xeon 6353P scores 37811 (0.1% higher), the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 scores 37831 (0.1% higher), the Intel Core i9-13900HK scores 38020 (0.6% higher), and the Intel Core i5-13600KF scores 38028 (0.7% higher).
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system delivers its strongest performance across all settings. The Low preset achieves 298.9 FPS, which represents the absolute ceiling for this configuration in the tested scenarios. Medium settings produce 236.5 FPS, High settings yield 188.2 FPS, and Ultra settings still maintain a solid 120.9 FPS. These numbers show that even at the most demanding 1080p settings, the frame rate remains far above the 60 FPS target, indicating that the CPU is providing ample headroom.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance begins to show the GPU's limitations more clearly. Low settings produce 188 FPS, which is still excellent for competitive play. Medium settings deliver 147.4 FPS, High settings achieve 119.2 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 72.9 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a 37% reduction at Low, 38% at Medium, 37% at High, and 40% at Ultra, demonstrating a consistent performance penalty across all settings.
At 3840x2160, the 4K resolution proves challenging for the GTX 1660 SUPER. Low settings produce 96.3 FPS, which is playable but requires compromise. Medium settings deliver 76 FPS, High settings achieve 60.7 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to 40.3 FPS. The 4K results reveal a stark contrast with 1080p: the system loses 68% of its performance at Low settings, 68% at Medium, 68% at High, and 67% at Ultra when moving from 1080p to 4K.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER ranks 1542nd out of 1727 tested combos in this game, placing it in the lower 11th percentile of all configurations. This ranking is primarily driven by the GPU's mid-range capabilities, as the CPU is among the top performers in its class. The CPU's percentile rank of 90% among all CPUs contrasts sharply with the GPU's 55th percentile rank, creating an imbalance that holds the combo back in the overall standings.
The ranking suggests that while this system is capable of delivering excellent frame rates at 1080p, it cannot compete with higher-end GPU pairings at 1440p and 4K resolutions. The combo's position in the rankings reflects its performance ceiling rather than its practical usability; in actual gameplay at 1080p, the system outperforms many higher-ranked combinations that may have more balanced CPU-GPU pairings but lower effective frame rates in Minecraft's CPU-bound scenarios.
The data shows that the Ryzen 7 9800X3D's exceptional single-thread performance, evidenced by its 3DMark single-thread score of 1212 and PassMark single-thread score of 4430, provides a strong foundation for Minecraft's Java-based engine. However, the GTX 1660 SUPER's mid-range specifications ultimately limit the system's ability to scale to higher resolutions and settings, resulting in a combo that excels at 1080p but struggles to maintain high frame rates at 4K Ultra.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER in Minecraft: Java Edition
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 96.3 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 76.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 60.7 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 40.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 188.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 147.4 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 119.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 72.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 298.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 236.5 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 188.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 120.9 |
Minecraft: Java Edition with Ryzen 7 9800X3D + Other GPUs
See how Minecraft: Java Edition performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Minecraft: Java Edition with GTX 1660 SUPER + Other CPUs
See how Minecraft: Java Edition performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 9800X3D + GTX 1660 SUPER
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.