Minecraft: Java Edition
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 163 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 47 | 75 | 96 | 116 |
| 1440p QHD | 87 | 139 | 175 | 223 |
| 1080p Full HD | 142 | 223 | 280 | 357 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Minecraft: Java Edition with AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 occupies the 1414th position out of 1727 tested combinations in Minecraft: Java Edition. This places the combo in the lower-mid tier of the database, indicating that while it is not a top performer, it sits comfortably above the bottom quarter of all tested systems. The ranking suggests that this pairing is not optimized for pushing the absolute highest frame rates in this specific title, but rather offers a balanced experience that can handle the game's demands at moderate settings.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo's rank of 1414 out of 1727 places it in the 18th percentile of all tested configurations. This is a notable position because Minecraft: Java Edition is known to be heavily dependent on single-threaded CPU performance, yet the data shows this pairing struggles to break into the upper echelons. The CPU's percentile vs all CPUs is 86, meaning it outperforms most processors, while the GPU's percentile is 58, indicating it is slightly above average. The disconnect between the strong CPU showing and the overall combo rank suggests that the RTX 2060 is the limiting factor in most scenarios, holding back the 5800XT from achieving higher frame rates. When compared to its nearest rivals, the CPU is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE, scoring 29774 versus 29740, a delta of 0.1%. It also trails the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS by just 0.3% and the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H by the same margin, while leading the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 by 0.3%. For the GPU, the RTX 2060 leads the AMD Radeon RX 7600S by 0.5% and the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 by 1.8%, but falls behind the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and AMD Radeon Pro 5700 by 1.7%. These tight margins indicate that within its performance class, this combo is competitive but not exceptional.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 is built on the Turing architecture using a 12 nm process and packs 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s. Its base clock is 1365 MHz with a boost clock of 1680 MHz, and the memory runs at an effective speed of 14 Gbps. The GPU features 1920 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output pipelines, along with 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores. In benchmark results, the GPU achieves a Passmark G3D score of 14111 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 71278, placing it in the 58th percentile of all GPUs. The data suggests that the RTX 2060's 6 GB of VRAM is sufficient for Minecraft: Java Edition at 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K Ultra settings, the frame rate drops to 46.9 FPS, indicating that the GPU's memory bandwidth and compute capacity are being taxed heavily. The GPU's FP32 performance of 6.451 TFLOPS is modest by modern standards, yet it still manages to deliver playable frame rates at lower resolutions. The texture rate of 201.6 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 80.64 GPixel/s are adequate for the blocky geometry of Minecraft, but the GPU's overall score of 16074 in average benchmarks places it in a tier where it can handle the game but not with headroom for future updates or heavy modding.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT is a Zen 3 architecture processor codenamed Vermeer, manufactured on a 7 nm process by TSMC. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The CPU has a substantial 32 MB of L3 cache, along with 64 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 cache per core. Its memory support is DDR4 with a dual-channel bus, providing a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU excels in single-threaded tasks, scoring 3359 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 959 in 3DMark single-thread, which is crucial for Minecraft: Java Edition's primary game logic thread. The multi-core performance is also strong, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23794 and a Passmark multithread score of 27988. The CPU's percentile vs all CPUs is 86, and its average benchmark score is 29774, placing it in the top tier of processors. However, the measured FPS data shows that at 1080p Low settings, the combo reaches 356.7 FPS, which is likely CPU-bound, as the GPU has less work to do. This indicates that the 5800XT's single-thread performance is sufficient to push frame rates very high, but the GPU becomes the bottleneck as settings and resolution increase. The CPU's 16 threads are more than enough for Minecraft, which typically uses only a few cores, so the extra headroom is not fully utilized in this game.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern of performance scaling across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers 356.7 FPS on Low settings, 279.8 FPS on Medium, 223 FPS on High, and 141.6 FPS on Ultra. This shows a steep drop from Low to Ultra, with the Ultra setting costing over 60% of the Low setting's performance. Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates are 222.7 FPS on Low, 175.3 FPS on Medium, 139.1 FPS on High, and 87 FPS on Ultra. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is significant, with the Low setting losing about 38% of its performance, indicating that the GPU is starting to become more involved. At 3840x2160, the frame rates are 115.7 FPS on Low, 96.1 FPS on Medium, 75.4 FPS on High, and 46.9 FPS on Ultra. The 4K Ultra result is the only one below 60 FPS, which is a critical threshold for smooth gameplay. The data shows that the combo can comfortably handle 1080p and 1440p at most settings, but 4K Ultra is beyond its capabilities. The progression from Low to Ultra at each resolution is consistent, with Ultra always being roughly half the frame rate of Low, suggesting that the game's settings have a multiplicative effect on GPU load.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to maintain a smooth 60 FPS experience?
A: The data shows that at 3840x2160 Ultra, the combo only achieves 46.9 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. To stay above 60 FPS, the user must play at 1440p High (139.1 FPS) or lower, or at 4K High (75.4 FPS), which is the only 4K setting that exceeds 60 FPS.
Q: How much performance does the Ultra preset cost compared to Low at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, the Low setting delivers 356.7 FPS, while Ultra delivers 141.6 FPS. This represents a 60.3% reduction in frame rate when moving from Low to Ultra, showing a substantial performance penalty for the highest visual quality.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 1080p Low settings?
A: The 1080p Low result of 356.7 FPS is extremely high, and given the CPU's strong single-thread score of 3359 in Cinebench R23, it is likely that the CPU is the primary driver of performance at this setting, with the GPU having minimal load.
Q: How does the combo's rank of 1414 compare to its component percentiles?
A: The CPU is in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, and the GPU is in the 58th percentile. However, the combo ranks in the 18th percentile of all combos for this game, indicating that the pairing is not well-suited for Minecraft's specific demands, likely due to the GPU bottleneck.
Q: What is the frame rate difference between 1440p and 4K at High settings?
A: At 2560x1440 High, the combo achieves 139.1 FPS, while at 3840x2160 High, it achieves 75.4 FPS. This is a 45.8% drop in performance when moving from 1440p to 4K, showing the significant impact of resolution on GPU load.
Q: Can this combo handle 4K at any settings above 60 FPS?
A: Yes, at 3840x2160 High, the combo achieves 75.4 FPS, and at Medium it achieves 96.1 FPS. Only the Ultra setting at 4K falls below 60 FPS, with a result of 46.9 FPS.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured data, the optimal experience for this combo is at 2560x1440 with High settings, which delivers 139.1 FPS. This setting provides a good balance between visual quality and performance, staying well above the 60 FPS threshold while offering enhanced graphics over Medium. At 1080p, the High setting at 223 FPS is also excellent, but the higher resolution of 1440p offers a better visual experience without sacrificing smoothness. For users who prioritize frame rate over visual fidelity, 1080p Low at 356.7 FPS is the fastest option, but the difference between Low and Medium at 1080p is notable (356.7 vs 279.8 FPS), so Medium is recommended for those who want a smoother look without a major performance hit. The Ultra setting is not recommended at any resolution, as it consistently halves the frame rate compared to High, and even at 1080p it drops to 141.6 FPS, which is still playable but not worth the visual trade-off. At 4K, the High setting at 75.4 FPS is the only viable option for smooth gameplay, while Medium at 96.1 FPS is even better if the user is willing to sacrifice some visual details. The data suggests that the sweet spot for this combo is 1440p High, offering a 139.1 FPS experience that is both visually appealing and highly responsive.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS data shows a clear scaling pattern as resolution increases from 1080p to 4K. At Low settings, the frame rate drops from 356.7 FPS at 1080p to 222.7 FPS at 1440p (a 37.6% decrease) and then to 115.7 FPS at 4K (a 48.1% decrease from 1440p). This indicates that the GPU is becoming increasingly stressed as the pixel count grows. At High settings, the drop is from 223 FPS at 1080p to 139.1 FPS at 1440p (a 37.6% decrease) and then to 75.4 FPS at 4K (a 45.8% decrease from 1440p). The pattern is consistent across all settings, with the drop from 1440p to 4K being slightly less severe than from 1080p to 1440p, suggesting that the GPU's memory bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s is a limiting factor at higher resolutions. The fact that 4K Ultra only achieves 46.9 FPS, while 4K Low achieves 115.7 FPS, shows that the GPU's compute capabilities are the primary bottleneck at 4K, rather than the CPU. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (3359 in Cinebench R23) allows it to keep up with the game's logic even at 1080p, but as resolution increases, the GPU's workload becomes dominant. This scaling behavior indicates that the combo is heavily GPU-limited at 4K, while at 1080p, the CPU can push frame rates to very high levels, but the GPU still manages to hold its own. The data implies that users should stick to 1440p or lower for the best balance of performance and visual fidelity, as the GPU's 6 GB of VRAM and 192-bit bus are not optimized for 4K gaming in this title.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 in Minecraft: Java Edition
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 115.7 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 96.1 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 75.4 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 46.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 222.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 175.3 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 139.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 87.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 356.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 279.8 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 223.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 141.6 |
Minecraft: Java Edition with Ryzen 7 5800XT + Other GPUs
See how Minecraft: Java Edition performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Minecraft: Java Edition with RTX 2060 + Other CPUs
See how Minecraft: Java Edition performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 5800XT + RTX 2060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.