Microsoft Flight Simulator
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 83 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 47 | 49 | 66 | 85 |
| 1440p QHD | 64 | 67 | 89 | 115 |
| 1080p Full HD | 79 | 83 | 111 | 142 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Microsoft Flight Simulator with Intel Core i5-12600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
# How This Combo Ranks
In the Microsoft Flight Simulator benchmark database, the Intel Core i5-12600KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti holds a combo rank of 1313 out of 3714 tested combinations. This places the pairing in the 65th percentile of all recorded combos, meaning roughly two-thirds of tested systems deliver higher average frame rates in this simulator. Given the demanding nature of the title and the hardware's mid-to-high tier positioning, this rank reflects a competent but not dominant configuration.
The CPU itself sits at the 79th percentile versus all processors, while the GPU rests at the 75th percentile versus all graphics cards. Both components are closely matched in their relative standing, which suggests a balanced pairing. The combo's overall rank is slightly lower than either component's individual percentile might imply, indicating that Microsoft Flight Simulator stresses the system in ways that the aggregate benchmark scores do not fully capture. The data shows that this specific combination performs well enough to handle the game at playable settings across common resolutions, but it will not top leaderboards among the 3714 tracked systems.
# GPU Role
The RTX 3070 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture with a GA104 chip fabricated on Samsung's 8 nm process. It packs 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units, along with 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1575 MHz with a boost clock of 1770 MHz, while the 8 GB of GDDR6X memory runs at an effective 19 Gbps across a 256-bit bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 608.3 GB/s. These specifications translate to a pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 339.8 GTexel/s, with FP32 compute pegged at 21.75 TFLOPS.
In Microsoft Flight Simulator, the GPU's role is substantial, particularly at higher resolutions and settings. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is a limiting factor at 4K with Ultra presets, where the simulator's extensive texture streaming can push memory usage close to the limit. Benchmark results indicate that the 47 FPS average at 3840x2160 Ultra is the lowest recorded figure for this combo, and the VRAM constraint likely contributes to this ceiling. At 1080p, the GPU has more headroom, and the 142 FPS average at Low settings shows the card can stretch well beyond typical refresh rates when the workload is lightened.
The RTX 3070 Ti's nearest rivals in the GPU benchmark database include the RTX 5070 Mobile (deltaPct 0.1), the Radeon RX 6800 (deltaPct -0.5), the RTX 2080 Ti (deltaPct 0.5), and the Radeon RX 6700 (deltaPct -1.6). These deltas are all within 1.6 percent, indicating that the 3070 Ti is bracketed tightly by these cards in overall compute. In Flight Simulator specifically, the measured frames align with this competitive positioning, as the card delivers solid but not exceptional results across the settings ladder.
# Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals how the workload shifts between the CPU and GPU as resolution changes. At 1080p, the combo averages 142 FPS on Low settings, 111 FPS on Medium, 83 FPS on High, and 79 FPS on Ultra. Moving to 1440p, those figures drop to 115, 89, 67, and 64 FPS respectively. At 4K, the averages fall to 85, 66, 49, and 47 FPS across the same settings order.
The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows an average reduction of roughly 19-20 percent across settings, which is consistent with a GPU-bound scenario where pixel count increases by about 78 percent but frame rates do not drop proportionally. This suggests that at 1080p, the CPU is partially limiting performance, especially at Low and Medium settings where the GPU has spare capacity. The jump from 1440p to 4K is steeper in relative terms for the lower presets: Low settings drop from 115 to 85 FPS (a 26 percent reduction), while Ultra drops from 64 to 47 FPS (a 27 percent reduction). This uniform scaling pattern indicates that the GPU becomes the dominant limiter at 4K across all settings, with the CPU no longer constraining the frame rate.
The 1080p Low result of 142 FPS versus the 4K Low result of 85 FPS represents a 40 percent drop, which is substantial but not as severe as the 4K Ultra result relative to 1080p Ultra (47 versus 79 FPS, a 41 percent drop). The consistency of these drops across the preset range reinforces that the RTX 3070 Ti is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, while the i5-12600KF's 10 cores and 16 threads provide enough headroom to avoid being the limiting factor once pixel throughput demands rise.
# Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its highest averages. Low settings produce 142 FPS, Medium hits 111 FPS with a min of 94 and max of 127, High reaches 83 FPS, and Ultra sits at 79 FPS. The gap between High and Ultra is just 4 FPS, suggesting that the Ultra preset's additional visual fidelity costs relatively little at this resolution, possibly because the CPU is still contributing to the frame pacing.
At 2560x1440, the averages are 115 FPS on Low, 89 FPS on Medium (min 76, max 103), 67 FPS on High, and 64 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset's min-max range of 76 to 103 FPS shows reasonable consistency, with a 27 FPS spread that indicates some scene-dependent variance typical of flight simulation over varied terrain. The High-to-Ultra delta narrows to 3 FPS at this resolution, continuing the pattern seen at 1080p.
At 3840x2160, Low averages 85 FPS, Medium averages 66 FPS (min 56, max 76), High averages 49 FPS, and Ultra averages 47 FPS. The Medium preset's min of 56 FPS is worth noting, as it indicates that even at this mid-tier setting, there are moments where frame rates dip close to the 50s, which could affect smoothness on high-refresh displays. The Ultra result of 47 FPS is the lowest recorded average for this combo, and it sits below the 60 FPS threshold that many users target for a smooth experience.
Across all resolutions, the Low preset consistently delivers the highest frame rates, with 1080p Low being the only configuration to exceed 140 FPS. The Medium preset offers a balanced point with min-max data available, providing the most complete picture of frame time consistency. High and Ultra presets produce similar results at each resolution, with the delta never exceeding 5 FPS.
# CPU Role
The Intel Core i5-12600KF is a 10-core, 16-thread processor from the Alder Lake-S family, based on the 10 nm process node. It runs at a base clock of 3.70 GHz with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The chip is unlocked for overclocking and uses the Intel Socket 1700 interface.
In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU demonstrates strong multi-threaded performance: Cinebench R23 multicore scores 23391, while the single-core test reaches 3302. Geekbench results show 12137 multicore and 2157 single-core, and 3DMark tests range from 1016 single-thread to 7956 for 16 threads. PassMark multithread scores 27575, with single-thread at 3925. These figures place the i5-12600KF at the 79th percentile versus all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 27799.
The nearest CPU rivals in the database include the Intel Core i9-10900K (deltaPct -0.3), the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE (deltaPct 0.3), the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (deltaPct -0.3), and the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D (deltaPct -0.3). All deltas are within 0.3 percent, indicating that the i5-12600KF is essentially tied with these processors in aggregate performance. The Ryzen 7 5800X3D is particularly relevant for gaming contexts, and the near-identical scores suggest the Intel chip holds its own even against a processor with 3D V-Cache.
In Microsoft Flight Simulator, the CPU's role is most evident at lower resolutions and settings. At 1080p Low, the 142 FPS average is likely close to what the CPU can feed the GPU, given that the GPU has ample headroom at this workload. The 1080p Medium result of 111 FPS, with a min of 94, shows that the CPU maintains reasonable frame pacing even when the scene complexity increases. The 4K results, by contrast, show less CPU influence, as the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck.
# Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the Medium preset offers the best balance of visual quality and performance for this combo. At 1080p, Medium delivers 111 FPS with a min of 94 and max of 127, providing smooth gameplay well above typical 60 Hz refresh rates. At 1440p, Medium averages 89 FPS with a min of 76, which remains comfortably playable on most displays. Even at 4K, Medium holds an average of 66 FPS with a min of 56, making it the only preset besides Low that keeps 4K averages above 60 FPS.
The High and Ultra presets show diminishing returns relative to their performance cost. At 1080p, the difference between Medium and High is 28 FPS (111 to 83), while High to Ultra only costs 4 FPS (83 to 79). This suggests that High provides most of the visual uplift over Medium at a moderate cost, while Ultra adds little beyond High. At 1440p, the same pattern holds: Medium to High drops from 89 to 67 FPS (a 22 FPS loss), while High to Ultra only drops 3 FPS to 64. At 4K, High falls to 49 FPS and Ultra to 47 FPS, both below the 60 FPS threshold, making them less desirable for smooth play.
For users prioritizing frame rate, the Low preset is the clear choice, delivering 142 FPS at 1080p and 115 FPS at 1440p. However, the visual compromise is significant, and the data indicates that Medium offers a much better experience for only a moderate FPS penalty. Given that the Medium preset provides min-max data confirming consistent frame times, it is the recommended setting across all three resolutions for this specific hardware combination.
# FAQ
Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo achieves in Microsoft Flight Simulator?
A: The highest recorded average is 142 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings. The next highest is 115 FPS at 2560x1440 with Low settings.
Q: How does the RTX 3070 Ti compare to its nearest GPU rivals in overall benchmark scores?
A: The RTX 3070 Ti has an average benchmark score of 29945. Its nearest rival, the RTX 5070 Mobile, scores 29928 (deltaPct 0.1), the Radeon RX 6800 scores 30095 (deltaPct -0.5), the RTX 2080 Ti scores 29783 (deltaPct 0.5), and the Radeon RX 6700 scores 30433 (deltaPct -1.6). All are within 1.6 percent.
Q: Does the CPU or GPU limit performance more at 4K resolution?
A: At 3840x2160, the GPU is the clear limiting factor. The FPS drops from 1080p to 4K are consistent across settings (roughly 40 percent), indicating the GPU's pixel throughput capacity is the bottleneck, while the CPU has sufficient headroom.
Q: What are the VRAM specifications of the RTX 3070 Ti?
A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 608.3 GB/s. The memory clock runs at an effective 19 Gbps.
Q: How does the i5-12600KF perform in Cinebench R23 tests?
A: The CPU scores 23391 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 3302 in single-core. These results contribute to its 79th percentile ranking versus all CPUs.
Q: Is the Ultra preset viable at 4K for this combo?
A: The Ultra preset at 3840x2160 averages 47 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth play. The Medium preset at 66 FPS is the recommended choice for 4K, as it maintains a playable average with a min of 56 FPS.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-12600KF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-12600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti in Microsoft Flight Simulator
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 85.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 66.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 49.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 47.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 115.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 89.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 67.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 64.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 142.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 111.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 83.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 79.0 |
Microsoft Flight Simulator with ii5-12600KF + Other GPUs
See how Microsoft Flight Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Microsoft Flight Simulator with RTX 3070 Ti + Other CPUs
See how Microsoft Flight Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-12600KF + RTX 3070 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.