Microsoft Flight Simulator
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 111 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 65 | 67 | 88 | 114 |
| 1440p QHD | 84 | 88 | 119 | 156 |
| 1080p Full HD | 108 | 111 | 152 | 184 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Microsoft Flight Simulator with AMD Ryzen 7 5800X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
Settings Recommendations
The measured frame rates for Microsoft Flight Simulator with this AMD Ryzen 7 5800X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti combination reveal a clear hierarchy across the four preset levels. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers an average of 183.9 FPS, which is the highest measured value in the entire dataset. Medium follows at 152.3 FPS, High at 111.4 FPS, and Ultra at 108.1 FPS. The step from High to Ultra costs only 3.3 FPS at 1080p, making Ultra the more sensible choice for users who prioritize visual fidelity without sacrificing meaningful performance.
Moving to 2560x1440, the pattern shifts slightly. Low produces 156.1 FPS, Medium 118.9 FPS, High 87.8 FPS, and Ultra 83.6 FPS. Here, the gap between High and Ultra narrows to 4.2 FPS, while the drop from Medium to High is a substantial 31.1 FPS. At 3840x2160, the measured values are 114.3 FPS (Low), 88.3 FPS (Medium), 67 FPS (High), and 65.4 FPS (Ultra). The difference between High and Ultra at 4K is only 1.6 FPS, which is negligible in practice.
The data suggests that the Medium preset offers the most balanced experience across all three resolutions. At 1080p, Medium provides 152.3 FPS, which is 31.6 FPS higher than High while still maintaining a substantial visual upgrade over Low. At 1440p, Medium's 118.9 FPS comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS threshold, and at 4K, Medium's 88.3 FPS leaves ample headroom. For users with high-refresh-rate displays at 1080p, the Low preset at 183.9 FPS is the only option that fully saturates a 144Hz panel, but Medium remains the recommended starting point for most configurations.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti achieves a combo rank of 209 out of 1795 tested combinations in Microsoft Flight Simulator. This places the pairing in the top 11.6% of all recorded configurations, indicating that it is a strong performer for this specific flight simulator. The rank reflects the aggregate performance across all measured settings and resolutions, not just a single favorable scenario.
Breaking down the individual components, the CPU sits at the 84th percentile among all tested processors, while the GPU ranks at the 85th percentile among all tested graphics cards. Both components are near the upper quartile of their respective categories, which explains the strong overall combo placement. The CPU's average benchmark score of 27606 is nearly identical to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800, which scores 27535, a delta of just 0.3%. The Intel Core i7-13700H trails by 0.4% with a score of 27716, while the Intel Core i5-12600KF is 0.8% behind at 27827. The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE rounds out the immediate competition at 27708, also 0.4% off.
On the GPU side, the RTX 4070 Ti's average benchmark score of 44900 is within 1.6% of its nearest rivals. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile scores 45152, a 0.6% difference, while the Intel Arc A730M scores 45592, trailing by 1.5%. The AMD Radeon Pro 580 is 1.6% ahead at 44195, and the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT scores 45642, which is 1.6% behind. These narrow margins indicate that the RTX 4070 Ti sits in a tightly contested performance band, but the in-game results show it is well-suited to Microsoft Flight Simulator's rendering demands.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD104 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It contains 35,800 million transistors across a 294 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2310 MHz and a boost clock of 2610 MHz, with memory clocked at 1313 MHz, translating to 21 Gbps effective. The memory subsystem consists of 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s.
In Microsoft Flight Simulator, the GPU's role becomes more pronounced as resolution increases. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra settings is 75.8 FPS (183.9 versus 108.1), while at 4K, the same settings comparison shows a 48.9 FPS difference (114.3 versus 65.4). This pattern indicates that the GPU is handling a growing share of the workload at higher resolutions, but the CPU still contributes significantly at lower settings. The RTX 4070 Ti's 7680 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output pipelines provide the raw throughput needed for the simulator's complex scenery rendering. The 60 RT cores and 240 tensor cores are also present, though the measured data does not isolate ray tracing or DLSS effects.
The GPU's pixel rate of 208.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 626.4 GTexel/s are substantial, but the 12 GB VRAM capacity is a notable consideration for a game that streams large terrain and aircraft models. The 504.2 GB/s bandwidth ensures that texture data can be fed to the rendering pipeline without bottlenecking, which is evident in the 4K results where the High preset still achieves 67 FPS.
FAQ
Q: What is the highest average FPS achievable at 1080p with this combination?
A: The Low preset delivers the highest measured average of 183.9 FPS at 1920x1080, followed by Medium at 152.3 FPS, High at 111.4 FPS, and Ultra at 108.1 FPS.
Q: How does the 4K Ultra performance compare to 4K Low?
A: At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset averages 65.4 FPS, while Low averages 114.3 FPS. This represents a 48.9 FPS difference between the two extremes, showing that the GPU has significant headroom at lower settings.
Q: What is the combo's overall rank among tested configurations?
A: This CPU-GPU pairing ranks 209 out of 1795 tested combos in Microsoft Flight Simulator, placing it in the top 11.6% of all recorded results.
Q: Which preset shows the smallest performance gap between High and Ultra?
A: At 4K, the difference is only 1.6 FPS (67 FPS for High versus 65.4 FPS for Ultra). At 1440p, the gap is 4.2 FPS, and at 1080p, it is 3.3 FPS.
Q: How does the RTX 4070 Ti's average benchmark score compare to its nearest rival?
A: The GPU scores 44900 on average, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile scores 45152, a 0.6% difference. The Intel Arc A730M is 1.5% behind at 45592.
Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X sits at the 84th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 27606 across all tested workloads.
Resolution Scaling
The measured frame rates reveal a consistent scaling pattern as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At the Low preset, the transition from 1080p to 1440p results in a drop from 183.9 FPS to 156.1 FPS, a reduction of 27.8 FPS. Moving from 1440p to 4K further reduces performance to 114.3 FPS, another 41.8 FPS loss. The cumulative drop from 1080p to 4K at Low settings is 69.6 FPS, or 37.8% of the 1080p value.
At the Medium preset, the scaling is similar but with slightly different magnitudes. 1080p yields 152.3 FPS, 1440p drops to 118.9 FPS, and 4K falls to 88.3 FPS. The total reduction from 1080p to 4K is 64 FPS, or 42.0%. For the High preset, the values are 111.4 FPS at 1080p, 87.8 FPS at 1440p, and 67 FPS at 4K. This represents a 44.4 FPS total drop, or 39.9%. The Ultra preset shows 108.1 FPS at 1080p, 83.6 FPS at 1440p, and 65.4 FPS at 4K, for a total reduction of 42.7 FPS, or 39.5%.
The percentage losses across resolutions are relatively consistent, hovering around 40% regardless of preset. This uniformity suggests that the bottleneck shifts proportionally between CPU and GPU as resolution changes. At 1080p, the CPU's 8-core, 16-thread configuration with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz is likely the primary limiter, as the GPU has more than enough throughput to render simpler scenes. As resolution increases to 4K, the GPU's fill rate and bandwidth become more critical, and the RTX 4070 Ti's 504.2 GB/s bandwidth and 208.8 GPixel/s pixel rate start to constrain performance. The fact that the 4K Ultra score of 65.4 FPS is still above 60 FPS indicates that neither component is severely bottlenecked, but the scaling curve points to the GPU as the dominant factor at higher resolutions.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is a Zen 3 architecture processor codenamed Vermeer, built on a 7 nm process at TSMC. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is dual-channel DDR4 with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and the CPU connects via PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes.
In Microsoft Flight Simulator, the CPU's role is most evident at lower resolutions and settings. At 1080p Low, the combination achieves 183.9 FPS, which is a very high frame rate that requires strong single-thread performance to drive the game's simulation logic and draw calls. The CPU's single-thread benchmark scores are notable: 943 in 3DMark single-thread, 335 in Cinebench R15 single-core, 1397 in Cinebench R20 single-core, and 3327 in Cinebench R23 single-core. These scores indicate solid per-core performance that is sufficient for the simulator's main thread.
The multi-threaded capabilities are also relevant, as Microsoft Flight Simulator can utilize multiple cores for tasks like terrain loading and AI traffic. The CPU scores 7586 in 3DMark 16-thread and 7578 in 3DMark max-thread tests, along with 9899 in Cinebench R20 multicore and 23571 in Cinebench R23 multicore. The 16 threads allow the CPU to handle background tasks without impacting the main rendering thread, which is evident in the relatively small FPS drops when moving from Low to Medium settings at 1080p (31.6 FPS difference).
The CPU's 84th percentile ranking among all processors places it above the median, and its nearest rivals show very tight competition. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 is 0.3% ahead in average score, while the Intel Core i7-13700H and AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE are each 0.4% behind. The Intel Core i5-12600KF trails by 0.8%. These small deltas mean that in-game performance differences between these CPUs would be minimal, and the measured FPS data confirms that the RTX 4070 Ti is the more impactful component when resolution and settings are increased. The 105 W TDP of the 5800X is modest for a desktop processor, allowing it to sustain boost clocks without thermal throttling, which is beneficial for long flight sessions where the simulator runs continuously.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 5800X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti in Microsoft Flight Simulator
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 114.3 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 88.3 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 67.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 65.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 156.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 118.9 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 87.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 83.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 183.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 152.3 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 111.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 108.1 |
Microsoft Flight Simulator with Ryzen 7 5800X + Other GPUs
See how Microsoft Flight Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Microsoft Flight Simulator with RTX 4070 Ti + Other CPUs
See how Microsoft Flight Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 5800X + RTX 4070 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.