Microsoft Flight Simulator

Microsoft Flight Simulator

AVERAGE FPS
100
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 100 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 55 59 80 103
1440p QHD 77 82 110 140
1080p Full HD 98 105 139 156

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 103
3840x2160 Medium 80
3840x2160 High 59
3840x2160 Ultra 55
2560x1440 Low 140
2560x1440 Medium 110
2560x1440 High 82
2560x1440 Ultra 77
1920x1080 Low 156
1920x1080 Medium 139
1920x1080 High 105
1920x1080 Ultra 98

Microsoft Flight Simulator with AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT pairing delivers a remarkably strong experience in Microsoft Flight Simulator, with the data showing that the combination ranks in the 78th percentile of all tested combos. The benchmark results indicate that the optimal balance of visual fidelity and frame rate is found at 1440p with High settings, where the system produces an average of 82 FPS, comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth flight simulation. While 4K Ultra is technically playable at 54.8 FPS, the data suggests that the 4K High preset at 59.4 FPS is the better choice for those prioritizing resolution without sacrificing fluidity, as it offers a more stable experience with nearly identical visual quality demands.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS rows show a clear hierarchy: the Ultra preset is only recommended for users with high-refresh-rate displays at 1080p, where it achieves 98.3 FPS. At 1440p, the Ultra preset drops to 76.7 FPS, which is still smooth, but the High preset at 82 FPS offers a better balance of image quality and headroom for complex scenery. For 4K displays, the data strongly suggests avoiding the Ultra preset entirely, as the 54.8 FPS average falls below the ideal smoothness threshold; the High preset at 59.4 FPS is the maximum viable option, while the Medium preset at 80 FPS provides the most consistent experience for 4K users who prioritize frame pacing over extreme detail. The Low preset is a fallback rather than a recommendation; even at 4K it produces 102.6 FPS, but the visual compromise is substantial. The sweet spot across all resolutions is the Medium preset, which delivers 139.1 FPS at 1080p, 109.6 FPS at 1440p, and 80 FPS at 4K—the data indicates this setting offers the most predictable performance scaling across the board.

GPU Role

The Radeon RX 7900 XT is the dominant component in this pairing, evidenced by its 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus providing 800.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is particularly relevant for Microsoft Flight Simulator, which loads vast texture datasets for terrain and aircraft. The GPU's boost clock of 2394 MHz and game clock of 2025 MHz allow it to sustain high throughput, reflected in the PassMark G3D score of 29009, which places it in the 82nd percentile of all GPUs. The data shows that the GPU's headroom is the primary reason the system can push 155.5 FPS at 1080p Low; the frame rate ceiling at lower settings is clearly GPU-bound, as the CPU is not the limiting factor in those scenarios. The GPU's FP32 performance of 51.48 TFLOPS and 84 RT cores also suggest that the card has substantial raw compute reserves, which explains why the frame rate differences between Medium and High settings are relatively modest compared to the jump from High to Ultra.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo ranks 396th out of 1795 tested combinations, placing it in the top 22% of all systems in the database. This ranking is notable because it outperforms many combinations with newer or more expensive components. The CPU's average benchmark score of 24673 puts it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-1360P with a deltaPct of 0.2 and the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D with a deltaPct of 0.3, indicating that the 5700X3D is essentially tied with these newer parts in synthetic tests. The GPU's average benchmark score of 38358 also sits in the 82nd percentile, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile as its closest rival at a deltaPct of 0. This alignment of CPU and GPU percentiles explains why the combo ranks so favorably; there is no obvious bottleneck pulling down the overall result. The data suggests that this pairing is particularly well-suited to flight simulation, where the combination of strong single-thread performance and high memory bandwidth pays dividends.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1080p, the measured average FPS ranges from 155.5 on Low to 98.3 on Ultra. The Medium preset at 139.1 FPS shows only a 10.5% drop from Low, while High at 105.4 FPS is a significant 24% step down from Medium. This pattern indicates that the High preset introduces substantial visual effects that cost performance, but the Ultra preset at 98.3 FPS is only 6.7% slower than High, suggesting diminishing returns on the highest settings. At 1440p, the scale shifts: Low produces 140.2 FPS, Medium 109.6 FPS, High 82 FPS, and Ultra 76.7 FPS. The gap between Medium and High widens to 25.2%, while High to Ultra is a smaller 6.5% drop. At 4K, the numbers compress further: Low yields 102.6 FPS, Medium 80 FPS, High 59.4 FPS, and Ultra 54.8 FPS. The 4K data shows that the GPU is the limiting factor, as the absolute difference between Medium and High is 20.6 FPS, which is the largest single-settings jump in the entire dataset.

Resolution Scaling

Moving from 1080p to 1440p at High settings incurs a 22.2% performance penalty, dropping from 105.4 FPS to 82 FPS. The scaling from 1440p to 4K at High is more severe, with a 27.6% drop from 82 FPS to 59.4 FPS. This asymmetric scaling pattern is a clear indicator that the GPU is becoming the bottleneck as resolution increases. At Low settings, the scaling is more linear: 155.5 FPS at 1080p drops to 140.2 FPS at 1440p (a 9.8% penalty), then to 102.6 FPS at 4K (a 26.8% penalty). The relatively small penalty between 1080p and 1440p at Low settings suggests that the CPU is still contributing to frame generation at those lower loads, but the large 4K drop reveals the GPU's limits. The data shows that the system is CPU-bound at 1080p Low, where the 155.5 FPS ceiling is likely constrained by the CPU's single-thread performance, but at 4K Ultra, the 54.8 FPS result is purely GPU-bound. The 2.8x difference between 1080p Low and 4K Ultra illustrates the substantial workload increase that the GPU must handle.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D provides 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.10 GHz. The processor's 96 MB of shared L3 cache is the standout feature for flight simulation, as this large cache reduces memory latency for the simulation's complex world data. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22366 and single-core score of 3157 demonstrate strong overall throughput, but the data reveals that the CPU's role in Microsoft Flight Simulator is more nuanced. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 155.5 FPS, which is likely near the CPU's frame generation limit given its single-thread score; at 4K Low, the 102.6 FPS result is significantly lower, indicating the GPU is now the constraint. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 26318 and the 3DMark 16-thread score of 6764 show that it can handle the simulation's background tasks, but the game's primary thread benefits heavily from the 3D V-Cache. The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking, with an average benchmark score of 24673, puts it just 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i7-1360P, confirming that it remains competitive despite being a 2024 release built on the aging AM4 platform.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Microsoft Flight Simulator?

A: The data shows that 1440p with High settings at 82 FPS provides the best balance, as it exceeds 60 FPS while retaining solid visual quality. At 4K, the High preset drops to 59.4 FPS, which is borderline, while 1080p High at 105.4 FPS leaves performance headroom unused.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700X3D has an average benchmark score of 24673, which is 0.2% higher than the Intel Core i7-1360P and 0.3% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D. It trails the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 by 0.6%, indicating near-identical performance among these parts.

Q: Is the GPU the limiting factor at 4K Ultra settings?

A: Yes, the 4K Ultra result of 54.8 FPS is the lowest in the dataset, and the 20.6 FPS gap between Medium and High at 4K confirms that the GPU's compute resources are exhausted at higher settings. The GPU's 20 GB memory and 800.0 GB/s bandwidth are not enough to sustain Ultra settings at this resolution.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p?

A: The system achieves 155.5 FPS on Low and 98.3 FPS on Ultra at 1080p, a 36.8% reduction. The Medium preset at 139.1 FPS is much closer to Low, while the High preset at 105.4 FPS is closer to Ultra, showing that the High and Ultra presets carry most of the visual cost.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested systems in this game?

A: The combo ranks 396th out of 1795 tested combinations, placing it in the top 22.1% of all systems. This ranking is strong because both the CPU and GPU sit in the 82nd percentile of their respective categories, avoiding a major bottleneck.

Q: Does the CPU's large L3 cache impact in-game performance?

A: The 96 MB shared L3 cache is a defining feature of the 5700X3D, and benchmark scores like the Cinebench R23 single-core result of 3157 suggest it aids latency-sensitive workloads. In this game, the 1080p Low result of 155.5 FPS is likely aided by this cache, as the CPU can feed frames faster than at higher resolutions where the GPU becomes the constraint.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D

Cores / Threads 8 / 16
Base Clock 3000 MHz
Boost Clock 4100 MHz
TDP 105W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

VRAM 20 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2394 MHz MHz
TDP 300 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT in Microsoft Flight Simulator

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 102.6
3840x2160 Medium 80.0
3840x2160 High 59.4
3840x2160 Ultra 54.8
2560x1440 Low 140.2
2560x1440 Medium 109.6
2560x1440 High 82.0
2560x1440 Ultra 76.7
1920x1080 Low 155.5
1920x1080 Medium 139.1
1920x1080 High 105.4
1920x1080 Ultra 98.3

Microsoft Flight Simulator with Ryzen 7 5700X3D + Other GPUs

See how Microsoft Flight Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Microsoft Flight Simulator with RX 7900 XT + Other CPUs

See how Microsoft Flight Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 7 5700X3D + RX 7900 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.