Microsoft Flight Simulator

Microsoft Flight Simulator

AVERAGE FPS
81
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 81 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 46 49 64 79
1440p QHD 64 65 87 111
1080p Full HD 76 81 110 139

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 79
3840x2160 Medium 64
3840x2160 High 49
3840x2160 Ultra 46
2560x1440 Low 111
2560x1440 Medium 87
2560x1440 High 65
2560x1440 Ultra 64
1920x1080 Low 139
1920x1080 Medium 110
1920x1080 High 81
1920x1080 Ultra 76

Microsoft Flight Simulator with AMD Ryzen 7 5700X + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT delivers a strong, balanced performance profile in Microsoft Flight Simulator, landing in the 732nd position out of 1,795 tested combos. The data reveals a system that scales predictably across resolutions and settings, with clear performance ceilings and floors that help identify where each component takes the lead.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a consistent and expected drop as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At High settings, the combo produces 80.8 FPS at 1080p, which falls to 65.1 FPS at 1440p and further to 49 FPS at 4K. This represents a 39.3% reduction from 1080p to 4K at High settings, indicating that the GPU is increasingly the limiting factor as pixel count grows.

The pattern becomes more pronounced at Ultra settings. The system delivers 76 FPS at 1080p, drops to 63.7 FPS at 1440p, and bottoms out at 45.5 FPS at 4K. The delta between 1080p and 4K at Ultra is 40.1%, nearly identical to the High setting drop. This consistency suggests the scaling is largely resolution-driven rather than settings-driven, which points to the RX 7700 XT being the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions.

Low settings tell a different story. At 1080p Low, the system hits 139.2 FPS, which is nearly double the 4K High result. The 4K Low figure of 79 FPS is notably higher than the 1440p High result of 65.1 FPS, showing that lowering settings can recover more performance than dropping resolution in many cases. The scaling from 1080p Low to 4K Low is a 43.2% reduction, the largest percentage drop across all settings, which reinforces that the GPU is heavily taxed at 4K even with minimal graphical load.

The 1440p results sit comfortably in the middle ground. Medium settings at 1440p yield 86.7 FPS, which is higher than 4K Low at 79 FPS. This indicates that for users targeting high frame rates, dropping to 1440p and using Medium or High settings offers a better balance than pushing 4K with lower quality presets. The limiting component at 1440p appears to be a mix of CPU and GPU, as the frame rates remain high enough that neither component is fully saturated.

Settings Recommendations

The measured rows suggest that Medium settings offer the best experience per the data, particularly at 1440p and 1080p. At 1080p Medium, the system produces 109.6 FPS, which comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS threshold and leaves headroom for demanding flight scenarios. Moving to 1440p Medium drops this to 86.7 FPS, still well above playable levels. The jump from Medium to High at 1440p costs 21.6 FPS (86.7 to 65.1), a significant penalty for what is typically a modest visual improvement in flight simulators.

At 4K, Medium settings provide 63.5 FPS, which is the only 4K preset that maintains a playable frame rate above 60. High at 4K drops to 49 FPS, and Ultra falls to 45.5 FPS. For users with 4K displays, Medium is the recommended preset based on the measured data. Low at 4K offers 79 FPS, but the visual quality reduction is likely too severe for a game that relies heavily on scenery detail and readability.

The 1080p Ultra result of 76 FPS is respectable, but the 33.6 FPS difference between Ultra and Medium at 1080p suggests that the extra graphical fidelity comes at a steep cost. Given that Medium at 1440p produces 86.7 FPS, users with 1440p monitors should prioritize Medium or High settings rather than pushing Ultra, which only manages 63.7 FPS at that resolution.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo ranks 732nd out of 1,795 tested configurations, placing it in the upper 40% of all tested systems. This is a solid mid-tier result for Microsoft Flight Simulator, a game known for being demanding on both CPU and GPU. The rank reflects the balance between the Ryzen 7 5700X's 8-core, 16-thread configuration and the RX 7700 XT's 12 GB of VRAM and RDNA 3.0 architecture.

The CPU's benchmark scores contextualize this ranking. The Ryzen 7 5700X scores 22,620 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 3,193 in single-core, with a percentile ranking of 83 against all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-11900KF with a score of 26,196 (0.1% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X at 26,272 (-0.2% delta). These close margins indicate that the 5700X is competitive with newer and more expensive processors in synthetic benchmarks.

The GPU's percentile ranking of 73 places it below the CPU in relative performance. The RX 7700 XT's average benchmark score of 30,097 sits nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 at 30,109 (0% delta) and the AMD Radeon RX 570 at 30,158 (-0.2% delta). This suggests the GPU is the weaker link in the pairing, which aligns with the resolution scaling analysis showing GPU limitations at 4K.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers 139.2 FPS on Low, 109.6 FPS on Medium, 80.8 FPS on High, and 76 FPS on Ultra. The gap between Low and Medium is 29.6 FPS, while the gap between High and Ultra is only 4.8 FPS, indicating diminishing returns at the top end. The 1080p results show that the CPU can feed the GPU adequately at lower resolutions, as frame rates scale consistently with settings.

At 2560x1440, the results are 111.2 FPS on Low, 86.7 FPS on Medium, 65.1 FPS on High, and 63.7 FPS on Ultra. The High to Ultra delta narrows to just 1.4 FPS, suggesting that the Ultra preset at 1440p is heavily GPU-bound with little additional headroom. The 1440p Low result of 111.2 FPS is close to the 1080p Medium result of 109.6 FPS, showing that resolution and settings trade-offs produce similar outcomes.

At 3840x2160, the system produces 79 FPS on Low, 63.5 FPS on Medium, 49 FPS on High, and 45.5 FPS on Ultra. The 4K results show the steepest penalties for settings increases. The difference between Low and Medium at 4K is 15.5 FPS, while Medium to High costs 14.5 FPS, and High to Ultra costs only 3.5 FPS. The 4K Ultra result of 45.5 FPS is the lowest measured frame rate in the entire dataset.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has 3,456 shading units, 216 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, running at a boost clock of 2544 MHz and a game clock of 2171 MHz. The 5 nm process node and RDNA 3.0 architecture provide 35.17 TFLOPS of FP32 performance.

The 12 GB VRAM capacity is significant for Microsoft Flight Simulator, which loads large texture sets for terrain and aircraft. At 4K Ultra, the game demands substantial memory bandwidth, and the 432.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient to avoid major stuttering, though the 45.5 FPS result indicates compute limitations rather than memory constraints. The GPU's benchmark scores show it performing near the RTX 5060 in synthetic tests, but the flight simulator's specific workload favors raw shader throughput over ray tracing capabilities.

The GPU's 73rd percentile ranking against all GPUs places it below the CPU's 83rd percentile, confirming that the RX 7700 XT is the performance ceiling in this pairing. At 1080p, the GPU is not the limiting factor, as frame rates exceed 100 FPS on Medium and Low. But at 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, with even Low settings only reaching 79 FPS. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,316 reflects this mid-range positioning.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X provides 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The 32 MB of shared L3 cache and 51.2 GB/s dual-channel DDR4 memory bandwidth support the CPU's strong single-thread and multi-thread performance. The 65 W TDP keeps thermals manageable, allowing sustained boost clocks under load.

The CPU's benchmark results show a well-rounded profile. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22,620 and single-core score of 3,193 indicate strong performance for both parallel and single-threaded workloads. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 6,858 and 2-thread score of 1,821 show good scaling across thread counts. The PassMark multithread score of 26,612 and single-thread score of 3,385 align with the CPU's 83rd percentile ranking.

In Microsoft Flight Simulator, the CPU handles simulation logic, physics, and AI traffic, which are heavily single-threaded in many cases. The 5700X's single-core performance is sufficient to avoid bottlenecking the GPU at 1080p, where frame rates reach 139.2 FPS on Low. However, at 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and the CPU's role diminishes. The nearest rival data shows the 5700X performing within 0.2% of the Ryzen 5 7600X and Intel Core i9-11900KF in average benchmark scores, indicating that the CPU is not holding back the overall system in this game.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 7 5700X

Cores / Threads 8 / 16
Base Clock 3400 MHz
Boost Clock 4600 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

VRAM 12 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2544 MHz MHz
TDP 245 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 5700X + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT in Microsoft Flight Simulator

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 79.0
3840x2160 Medium 63.5
3840x2160 High 49.0
3840x2160 Ultra 45.5
2560x1440 Low 111.2
2560x1440 Medium 86.7
2560x1440 High 65.1
2560x1440 Ultra 63.7
1920x1080 Low 139.2
1920x1080 Medium 109.6
1920x1080 High 80.8
1920x1080 Ultra 76.0

Microsoft Flight Simulator with Ryzen 7 5700X + Other GPUs

See how Microsoft Flight Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Microsoft Flight Simulator with RX 7700 XT + Other CPUs

See how Microsoft Flight Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 7 5700X + RX 7700 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.