Microsoft Flight Simulator
This combination offers playable performance with an average of 48 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 27 | 26 | 35 | 50 |
| 1440p QHD | 40 | 40 | 53 | 67 |
| 1080p Full HD | 48 | 49 | 64 | 81 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Microsoft Flight Simulator with AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070, In-Depth Analysis
Microsoft Flight Simulator is a demanding title, and pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 produces a specific performance profile that is heavily dictated by resolution and settings. The data shows a system that can deliver smooth frame rates at 1080p with the right adjustments, but one that struggles significantly as resolution increases and quality settings are pushed. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS data to give a clear picture of what to expect from this combination.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals a clear and predictable trend: performance degrades sharply as resolution climbs from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 81 FPS, which is the highest score recorded across all tests. This indicates that at this resolution and setting, the system has enough headroom to maintain a fluid experience. Moving up to 2560x1440 with Low settings drops the average to 66.9 FPS, a 17% decrease, while at 4K with Low settings, the average falls further to 50.3 FPS.
The scaling pattern becomes more severe when looking at higher quality presets. At 1080p with High settings, the average is 48.9 FPS. This number drops to 39.7 FPS at 1440p and then plummets to 26.2 FPS at 4K with the same High preset. This trend strongly suggests that the GTX 1070 becomes the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR5 memory and 256.3 GB/s bandwidth are likely being saturated by the increased pixel count and texture data, causing a significant bottleneck. The CPU, while powerful, is not able to compensate for the GPU's inability to keep up with the render workload at 4K.
The difference between Low and Ultra settings at 4K is stark, with the average FPS dropping from 50.3 to 27.4. This shows that the cost of enabling the full visual fidelity is roughly a 46% reduction in frame rate. At 1080p, the gap between Low (81 FPS) and Ultra (47.9 FPS) is also substantial, representing a 41% loss. This indicates that while the CPU is strong enough to handle the simulation logic, the GPU is heavily taxed by the graphical demands of the game, particularly as pixel count and effects increase.
How This Combo Ranks
In the grand scheme of tested hardware combinations, this pairing sits in a low position. The combo rank for Microsoft Flight Simulator is 1511 out of 1795 tested combos, placing it in the bottom 16% of results. This low ranking is primarily a consequence of the GPU's age and performance tier. The GTX 1070, while a capable card in its day, is now outclassed by more modern hardware.
The CPU, however, is a different story. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F performs well above average in general benchmarks, with a percentile rank of 82 among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-11850H (0.1% faster) and the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (0.4% faster), showing it is a competitive processor. The data indicates the CPU is not the source of the combo's low overall rank. Instead, the GPU drags the system down. The GTX 1070's percentile rank among all GPUs is 51, and its nearest rivals include the GTX 1650 SUPER (1.4% faster) and the Quadro K4200 (0.7% slower). This shows the GPU is a mid-pack performer at best, and in a game as demanding as Microsoft Flight Simulator, it is not enough to push the combo into a higher percentile.
Settings Recommendations
Given the measured data, the optimal experience for this hardware combination is found at 1920x1080. At this resolution, the Low preset delivers an impressive 81 FPS average, ensuring a very smooth and responsive flight experience. For users who want better visual quality, the Medium preset at 1080p still offers a playable 63.9 FPS average, which is a reasonable compromise between fidelity and performance. The High preset at 1080p, with an average of 48.9 FPS, is borderline, but may be acceptable for users who prioritize visuals over maximum smoothness.
At 2560x1440, the situation becomes more challenging. The Low preset provides a good 66.9 FPS, making it the only viable option for a consistently smooth experience at this resolution. The Medium preset drops to 53.4 FPS, which might be tolerable for some, but the High and Ultra presets fall below 40 FPS, making them less desirable for a game where precise control is important. At 3840x2160, the system is not capable of delivering a smooth experience on any preset above Low. Even the Low preset only manages 50.3 FPS, and the High and Ultra presets are effectively unplayable with averages of 26.2 and 27.4 FPS respectively. The recommendation is clear: stick to 1080p for the best balance of performance and visual quality, and use the Medium preset as a starting point before adjusting individual settings.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Microsoft Flight Simulator smoothly at 4K?
A: No. At 3840x2160, the highest average FPS recorded is 50.3 on the Low preset. High and Ultra presets at 4K produce averages of 26.2 and 27.4 FPS, which are not smooth enough for a playable experience.
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo?
A: The data shows 1920x1080 is the best choice. It is the only resolution where the system achieves a high average FPS across multiple presets, including 81 FPS on Low and 63.9 FPS on Medium.
Q: How does the GTX 1070's memory configuration affect the game?
A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR5 memory with a 256-bit bus width. The benchmark results suggest this configuration is a limiting factor at higher resolutions, as the 4K scores drop dramatically compared to 1080p.
Q: Is the Ryzen 5 7500F a strong enough CPU for this game?
A: Yes. The CPU's benchmark scores are strong, with a percentile rank of 82. Its nearest rivals are within a 0.4% performance delta, indicating it is not the bottleneck in this combo.
Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?
A: The average FPS drops from 81 on Low to 47.9 on Ultra at 1920x1080. This is a significant 41% reduction in frame rate for the highest visual quality preset.
Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested systems?
A: It ranks 1511 out of 1795 combos for this game. This places it in the lower portion of results, primarily due to the GPU's mid-range performance.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 is the defining component in this system's performance, and its age is evident in the results. With a base clock of 1506 MHz and a boost clock of 1683 MHz, the card is based on the Pascal architecture and features 1920 shading units. Its 8 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 256.3 GB/s. These specifications are now dated, and the benchmark results show the card struggling to maintain high frame rates in this flight simulator.
The GPU's role as the primary bottleneck is most apparent in the resolution scaling data. The frame rate drops are more severe when moving from 1440p to 4K than from 1080p to 1440p, indicating that the card is hitting a memory bandwidth or fill-rate wall. The 4K results, which hover in the 26-50 FPS range depending on settings, are a clear indication that the GTX 1070 does not have the raw power to drive this game at high pixel counts. Its performance in synthetic benchmarks shows it is a mid-tier card, with a percentile rank of 51 among all GPUs, and its nearest rivals are the GTX 1650 SUPER and the Quadro K4200. This reinforces the idea that it is a capable 1080p card that is out of its depth at higher resolutions in a demanding title like this.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F provides a solid foundation for this system, but its performance is largely masked by the GPU's limitations. This processor features 6 cores and 12 threads with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. Built on the Zen 4 architecture with a 5 nm process, it has 32 MB of shared L3 cache and supports DDR5 memory. In synthetic benchmarks, this CPU is a strong performer, scoring 22799 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3218 in single-core.
The CPU's role in this game is to handle the complex flight simulation logic and physics, which it does well. Its percentile rank of 82 and its close rival scores (e.g., Intel Core i7-11850H at 0.1% difference) show that it is a top-tier performer. However, in this specific combo, the CPU's potential is not fully realized because the GTX 1070 cannot feed it enough frames to keep it busy. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 81 FPS, which is a good result, but the CPU could likely push even higher with a more powerful GPU. The data suggests that if the GPU were upgraded, the Ryzen 5 7500F would have no trouble keeping up, as it is clearly not the limiting factor in this pairing.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 in Microsoft Flight Simulator
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 50.3 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 34.9 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 27.4 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 26.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 66.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 53.4 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 39.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 39.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 81.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 63.9 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 48.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 47.9 |
Microsoft Flight Simulator with GTX 1070 + Other CPUs
See how Microsoft Flight Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 7500F + GTX 1070
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.