Lockdown Protocol
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 67 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 29 | 41 | 43 | 62 |
| 1440p QHD | 43 | 61 | 66 | 97 |
| 1080p Full HD | 63 | 82 | 91 | 129 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Lockdown Protocol with Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070, In-Depth Analysis
Lockdown Protocol is a fast-paced FPS that punishes slow reactions, so frame pacing and raw headroom matter more than peak eye candy. The pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K with the GeForce GTX 1070 produces a predictable bottleneck pattern: the CPU is never the limiting factor at any resolution, while the GPU dictates performance tiers. The data shows a system that is playable at 1080p and 1440p with adjusted settings, but one that struggles to maintain a smooth experience at 4K Ultra.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS values reveal a classic GPU-bound scaling curve. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 at High settings drops the average frame rate from 81.5 FPS to 60.9 FPS, a loss of roughly 25%, which is consistent with a 77% increase in pixel count. The jump to 3840x2160 is harsher: the average falls to 40.9 FPS, a further 33% reduction from 1440p. This steep decline indicates that the GTX 1070's pixel throughput and memory bandwidth are being saturated well before the CPU's capabilities are challenged.
The scaling behavior at different quality presets confirms this. At Low settings, the 1080p result is 129.4 FPS, while 1440p produces 97.1 FPS and 4K drops to 61.7 FPS. The gap between 1080p and 4K Low is 67.7 FPS, a 52% reduction. At Ultra settings, the same resolution spread yields 62.6 FPS at 1080p, 43.4 FPS at 1440p, and 28.5 FPS at 4K—a 54% drop from 1080p to 4K. This consistent percentage loss across presets underscores that resolution, not settings complexity, is the primary driver of performance loss.
The limiting component is unambiguously the GPU. Since the Core Ultra 7 265K has 20 cores and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, it provides far more headroom than this game demands at any of the tested resolutions. The fact that the FPS deltas between 1440p and 4K are larger than the deltas between 1080p and 1440p is a textbook sign of a graphics card running out of fill rate and memory bandwidth (256.3 GB/s). If the CPU were the constraint, the FPS would remain relatively flat across resolutions, which is not what the measured data shows.
How This Combo Ranks
Within the benchmark database for Lockdown Protocol, this combination of CPU and GPU ranks 1394 out of 1637 tested combos. That places it in the lower 15% of all pairings, which is a sobering statistic for a system built around a high-end 2024 processor. The ranking reflects the severe mismatch between the CPU's potential and the GPU's age, as the GTX 1070 was released in 2016 and is now end-of-life. For a game that is sensitive to frame rate, this rank suggests that most other tested combinations—likely with newer or higher-tier graphics cards—deliver better average FPS.
The percentile data reinforces this. The Core Ultra 7 265K sits in the 97th percentile among all CPUs, while the GTX 1070 sits in the 51st percentile among all GPUs. That 46-percentile gap is one of the largest imbalances you will see in a typical pairing. The combo rank being near the bottom of the list is not a reflection of poor CPU performance—the processor is a top-tier product—but rather a direct consequence of the GPU being an average performer by today's standards. The data indicates that this combo is best suited for esports-style play at lower resolutions, not for maxing out graphical fidelity.
To contextualize the CPU's standing, the nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks are the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF, which scores 0.2% higher, and the Intel Core i9-14900KF, also 0.2% higher. The Intel Core i9-14900K is 0.9% higher, and the AMD EPYC 7413 is 1.2% higher. These are negligible differences, meaning the 265K is effectively tied with the fastest consumer chips available. The GPU's nearest rivals include the Quadro K4200 (0.7% higher score) and the GTX 880M (1.3% lower), which are workstation and laptop parts, respectively. This shows the GTX 1070 is squarely in the middle of the performance pack, with no meaningful headroom over its immediate competitors.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is a 20-core, 20-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, with 30 MB of shared L3 cache. In synthetic benchmarks, it scores 50,009 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 7,060 in single-core, placing it in the 97th percentile of all CPUs. For Lockdown Protocol, an FPS title that typically relies on single-thread performance, the single-core score is the more relevant metric. A score of 7,060 is exceptionally high, meaning the CPU can easily feed the GPU with draw calls and physics calculations without becoming a bottleneck.
The data supports this conclusion. At 1080p Low settings, the combo achieves 129.4 FPS, which is a high frame rate that would stress many CPUs, yet the Core Ultra 7 265K has no trouble maintaining it. The fact that the FPS scales down proportionally as resolution increases—rather than plateauing—indicates the CPU is not the limiting factor. Even at 4K Ultra, where the average FPS is 28.5, the CPU is likely idle waiting for the GPU to finish rendering each frame. The 20 threads and 5.50 GHz boost clock provide substantial headroom for background tasks, streaming, or voice chat while gaming.
The memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s (dual-channel DDR5) is ample for this workload. The L3 cache of 30 MB is also generous, reducing the frequency of memory accesses. In practical terms, this CPU will never be the reason for a frame rate drop in Lockdown Protocol, regardless of the graphics settings or resolution chosen. The measured FPS is purely a function of the GPU's capability.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers playable frame rates across all settings. Low settings produce an average of 129.4 FPS, which is excellent for a competitive shooter. Medium settings yield 91.3 FPS, High settings drop to 81.5 FPS, and Ultra settings bottom out at 62.6 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is 66.8 FPS, a 52% reduction. For a 144 Hz monitor, Low and Medium are viable, while High is acceptable for a 60-75 Hz display. Ultra is borderline, but still above the 60 FPS threshold.
At 2560x1440, the frame rates become more modest. Low settings deliver 97.1 FPS, which is still smooth. Medium produces 65.5 FPS, High drops to 60.9 FPS, and Ultra falls to 43.4 FPS. The step from Low to Medium is a 31.6 FPS loss, which is significant. For 1440p gaming, Low or Medium settings are recommended to maintain a consistent 60+ FPS. High settings are marginal, and Ultra is not advisable for fast-paced action.
At 3840x2160, the GTX 1070 struggles. Low settings yield 61.7 FPS, which is technically playable but leaves no headroom for dips. Medium drops to 43.1 FPS, High to 40.9 FPS, and Ultra to 28.5 FPS. The 4K results are consistently below the 60 FPS target except for Low settings, which barely clear it. For 4K, the data suggests that this combo is only suitable for Low settings, and even then, the experience will feel less responsive than at lower resolutions. The gap between 1080p Low and 4K Low is 67.7 FPS, highlighting the GPU's inability to handle the pixel count.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 is a Pascal-architecture card with 1,920 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. It has 8 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 256.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 1506 MHz with a boost of 1683 MHz, and it offers 6.463 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. In the database, it holds the 51st percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 12,331. Its nearest rival, the GTX 880M, scores 1.3% lower, while the GTX 1650 SUPER scores 1.4% higher. This places the 1070 in a crowded mid-range segment.
For Lockdown Protocol, the GPU's role is dominant. The measured FPS at 1080p Ultra (62.6 FPS) is exactly what you would expect from a card in the 51st percentile. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p at most settings, but the 256.3 GB/s bandwidth becomes a bottleneck at 4K, where the pixel fill rate and memory pressure increase dramatically. The 64 ROPs are also a limiting factor at high resolutions, as they handle the final pixel output. The data shows that the card's performance degrades predictably with resolution, confirming that it is the primary constraint.
The GPU's age is evident in its feature set. It supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, but lacks dedicated ray tracing or tensor cores. Lockdown Protocol, being a competitive FPS, likely does not rely heavily on ray tracing, so this is not a major drawback. The card's power draw is 150 W, which is modest, but its end-of-life status means driver optimization for new titles may be limited. For this game, the GTX 1070 delivers acceptable performance at 1080p and 1440p with tweaked settings, but it cannot push high frame rates at 4K.
FAQ
Q: Is this combo capable of 60 FPS at 1080p?
A: Yes, at every tested setting. The minimum average is 62.6 FPS at Ultra, while Low settings hit 129.4 FPS, Medium 91.3 FPS, and High 81.5 FPS.
Q: Can I play at 1440p with this setup?
A: Yes, but only at Low or Medium settings for a consistent 60+ FPS. Low averages 97.1 FPS, Medium 65.5 FPS, and High 60.9 FPS. Ultra drops to 43.4 FPS, which is not ideal for a fast-paced shooter.
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo?
A: 1920x1080 is the sweet spot. All settings exceed 60 FPS, and Low settings provide 129.4 FPS, which is suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors.
Q: Why does performance drop so much at 4K?
A: The GTX 1070's 256.3 GB/s memory bandwidth and 64 ROPs are insufficient for the pixel count. The average FPS at 4K High is 40.9, and at Ultra it is 28.5, indicating a severe GPU bottleneck.
Q: Is the CPU holding back the GPU?
A: No. The Core Ultra 7 265K scores in the 97th percentile among CPUs, with a single-core score of 7,060 in Cinebench R23. The FPS scales down with resolution, which is a sign of GPU limitation, not CPU.
Q: How does this combo rank compared to others?
A: It ranks 1394 out of 1637 tested combos for this game. The GPU is in the 51st percentile, while the CPU is in the 97th, showing a large performance imbalance that limits the overall ranking.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 in Lockdown Protocol
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 61.7 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 43.1 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 40.9 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 28.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 97.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 65.5 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 60.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 43.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 129.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 91.3 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 81.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 62.6 |
Lockdown Protocol with GTX 1070 + Other CPUs
See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 7 265K + GTX 1070
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.