Lockdown Protocol
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 161 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 69 | 92 | 105 | 148 |
| 1440p QHD | 107 | 142 | 163 | 230 |
| 1080p Full HD | 146 | 194 | 223 | 313 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Lockdown Protocol with Intel Core Ultra 5 235 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti places at rank 232 out of 2828 tested combinations in Lockdown Protocol. This positions the combo in the top 8.2% of all systems evaluated, a strong showing that reflects the balance between a recent mid-range processor and a high-end current-generation graphics card. The percentile ranking of the CPU at 89 and the GPU at 86 corroborates this placement, indicating both components sit comfortably above the vast majority of individual parts in the database.
Benchmark results show this pairing outperforms a significant majority of alternatives, but the gap to the very top is notable. The RTX 5070 Ti's average benchmark score of 49957 places it just 0.1% behind the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, a statistical tie, while it leads the Intel Arc A550M by 0.4% and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT by 3.1%. However, the RX 6900 XT holds a 2% advantage over the 5070 Ti in aggregate GPU tests. On the CPU side, the Core Ultra 5 235's average score of 46062 is within 0.2% of the AMD EPYC 7303 and 0.1% of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, yet it lags the Intel Core i9-13900HX by a negligible 0.1%. These margins are razor-thin, meaning the combo's rank is less about raw component supremacy and more about how this specific pairing translates into Lockdown Protocol's frame rates.
The data indicates that the combo's rank is earned through consistency rather than extremes. At 1080p Low, it delivers 313 FPS, which is an exceptional figure for competitive play, but at 4K Ultra it drops to 69 FPS, showing the limits of even this hardware at maximum fidelity. The rank of 232 suggests there are 231 combinations that achieve better overall performance, likely featuring higher-tier CPUs or GPUs, but this setup remains a formidable option for high-refresh-rate gaming at mainstream resolutions.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using a 5 nm process at TSMC, housing 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. Its memory subsystem is a highlight: 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus yields a bandwidth of 896.0 GB/s, which is ample for Lockdown Protocol's texture-heavy environments and particle effects. The GPU's base clock of 2295 MHz boosts to 2452 MHz, and with 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, it has the raw throughput to drive high resolutions. The pixel rate of 235.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 686.6 GTexel/s provide the fill rates necessary for smooth rendering at 4K.
In Lockdown Protocol, the GPU's role is dominant, as evidenced by the FPS scaling across settings. At 1440p, moving from Low to Ultra reduces average FPS from 230 to 107, a 53% drop that is almost entirely GPU-driven. The 16 GB VRAM capacity ensures that even Ultra settings at 4K do not hit memory ceilings, as the 69 FPS average at 3840x2160 Ultra is a compute-bound figure rather than a capacity limitation. The 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores provide headroom for ray tracing and DLSS features, though the measured data does not include those modes.
The GPU's benchmark scores reinforce its capability. PassMark G3D shows a score of 32974, while 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 yields 6604. Geekbench Vulkan and OpenCL scores of 225122 and 212363, respectively, indicate strong compute performance. The RTX 5070 Ti's nearest rival, the RX Vega 64, is 0.1% ahead in average score, but the Vega 64 lacks the modern feature set and memory bandwidth of the 5070 Ti. The 5070 Ti's 3.1% lead over the RX 6800 XT and 0.4% over the Intel Arc A550M show it is competitive within its class, though the RX 6900 XT's 2% advantage suggests AMD's previous flagship still has some bite in raw rasterization.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 is a 14-core, 14-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process at TSMC. It has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The CPU's 14 cores are split between performance and efficiency cores, though the fact pack does not specify the exact distribution.
In Lockdown Protocol, the CPU's role is secondary to the GPU but still relevant at lower resolutions. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 313 FPS, which is a figure that likely approaches CPU limits given the high frame rate. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4516 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2085 indicate strong per-core performance, which is crucial for the game's main thread. Multi-threaded performance is also solid, with Cinebench R23 multi-core at 14769 and PassMark multi-thread at 37816, ensuring background tasks do not interfere with gameplay.
The CPU's percentile rank of 89 places it ahead of most processors, and its nearest rivals are within 0.2% in average score. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is 0.1% ahead, while the Intel Core i9-13900HX is 0.1% behind, and the AMD EPYC 4364P and EPYC 7303 are 0.2% ahead. These deltas are negligible in gaming, meaning the Core Ultra 5 235 provides consistent performance without bottlenecking the RTX 5070 Ti in most scenarios. However, at 1080p Low with 313 FPS, the CPU may be the limiting factor, as the GPU could theoretically render more frames if the processor could feed it faster.
The 14 threads are notable because Lockdown Protocol, like many FPS titles, may not fully utilize all cores, but the high single-thread performance ensures the primary game thread is well-served. The 24 MB of L3 cache helps with data locality, and the DDR5 memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s is sufficient for the CPU's needs. The CPU's 3 nm process node contributes to power efficiency, allowing sustained turbo clocks without thermal throttling, which is beneficial for long gaming sessions.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data covers three resolutions and four settings presets, providing a comprehensive view of performance. At 1920x1080, the average FPS ranges from 313 at Low to 146 at Ultra. The Medium preset shows an average of 223 FPS with a minimum of 189 and maximum of 256, indicating good frame pacing. High at 1080p yields 194 FPS. These figures show that at 1080p, the combo is capable of driving high-refresh-rate monitors even at maximum settings.
Moving to 2560x1440, the averages are 230 FPS at Low, 163 FPS at Medium (with min/max of 139/188), 142 FPS at High, and 107 FPS at Ultra. The 1440p Medium results show a tighter frame time distribution compared to 1080p, with a 49 FPS spread between minimum and maximum. At 1440p Ultra, the 107 FPS average is still above 100, making it viable for smooth gameplay on 144Hz displays, though not maxing out the refresh rate.
At 3840x2160, the averages drop to 148 FPS at Low, 105 FPS at Medium (with min/max of 90/121), 92 FPS at High, and 69 FPS at Ultra. The 4K Medium result shows a 31 FPS spread between minimum and maximum, indicating some frame time variance. The 4K Ultra average of 69 FPS is playable but below the 90 FPS threshold that many competitive players prefer. The 4K Low result of 148 FPS demonstrates that even at 4K, the GPU has headroom when settings are reduced.
Across all resolutions, the Low preset delivers roughly double the FPS of Ultra. At 1080p, Low is 313 FPS versus 146 FPS at Ultra, a 114% increase. At 1440p, Low is 230 FPS versus 107 FPS at Ultra, a 115% increase. At 4K, Low is 148 FPS versus 69 FPS at Ultra, a 114% increase. This consistent ratio suggests that the GPU is the primary scaling factor across all resolutions, and the CPU does not become a bottleneck at any setting combination.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for competitive play with this combo?
A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves 313 FPS, which is ideal for high-refresh-rate competitive monitors. Even at 1440p Low, it delivers 230 FPS, making either resolution viable for esports-level play.
Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming?
A: Yes, it can. At 4K High, the average FPS is 92, and at 4K Medium it is 105 FPS. For players willing to use Low settings, 148 FPS is achievable at 4K, though Ultra settings drop to 69 FPS.
Q: How does the RTX 5070 Ti compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The RTX 5070 Ti's average benchmark score of 49957 is 0.1% behind the RX Vega 64 and 0.4% ahead of the Intel Arc A550M. It leads the RX 6800 XT by 3.1% but trails the RX 6900 XT by 2%.
Q: Is the CPU a bottleneck at any resolution?
A: At 1080p Low with 313 FPS, the CPU's single-thread performance may be limiting, as the GPU could potentially render more frames. At higher resolutions and settings, the GPU becomes the dominant factor.
Q: What are the frame time characteristics at 1440p Medium?
A: At 2560x1440 Medium, the average FPS is 163 with a minimum of 139 and maximum of 188, giving a 49 FPS spread. This indicates reasonably consistent frame pacing for a 163 FPS average.
Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance affect gameplay?
A: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14769 and PassMark multi-thread score of 37816 ensure that background tasks do not interfere with gameplay, though the game itself likely relies more on single-thread performance.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings preset depends on the player's priority. For maximum frame rates, the Low preset is the clear choice, delivering 313 FPS at 1080p, 230 FPS at 1440p, and 148 FPS at 4K. These figures are well above the 144Hz refresh rate common in gaming monitors, making Low the best option for competitive play where frame rate is paramount.
For players who prioritize visual quality while maintaining high frame rates, the High preset is recommended for 1080p and 1440p. At 1080p High, the average of 194 FPS still exceeds 144Hz, and at 1440p High, the 142 FPS average is close to that threshold. At 4K, High delivers 92 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for fast-paced action.
The Medium preset offers a balanced experience, particularly at 1440p where it achieves 163 FPS with a minimum of 139. At 1080p Medium, 223 FPS is excellent, and at 4K, 105 FPS is a good compromise between visuals and performance. The Ultra preset is only recommended for 1080p, where 146 FPS remains playable, while 1440p Ultra at 107 FPS and 4K Ultra at 69 FPS may not provide the smoothness competitive players desire.
Given the data, the Medium preset at 1440p provides the best overall experience, offering a 163 FPS average with a 139 FPS minimum, ensuring no significant drops below 144Hz. This combination balances visual fidelity with performance, making it the most versatile choice for the majority of players.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K reveals important insights about the limiting component. At Low settings, the average FPS decreases from 313 at 1080p to 230 at 1440p (a 27% reduction) and then to 148 at 4K (a 36% reduction from 1440p). At Ultra settings, the averages are 146 at 1080p, 107 at 1440p (a 27% reduction), and 69 at 4K (a 36% reduction from 1440p). This consistent pattern indicates that the GPU is the primary scaling factor across all settings.
The relatively uniform percentage drops from 1080p to 1440p and from 1440p to 4K suggest that the CPU does not become a bottleneck at any resolution. If the CPU were limiting, the FPS would plateau at higher resolutions, but the data shows continued scaling. At 1080p Low, the 313 FPS figure is likely near the CPU's maximum frame output, as indicated by the CPU's single-thread performance, but at higher resolutions, the GPU takes over as the limiting factor.
The scaling from 1440p to 4K at Low settings (230 to 148 FPS) represents a 36% reduction, which is slightly less than the 27% reduction from 1080p to 1440p. This non-linear scaling is typical of GPU-bound scenarios, where pixel count increases but other factors like memory bandwidth and shader efficiency play a role. The 896.0 GB/s memory bandwidth of the RTX 5070 Ti helps mitigate the 4K pixel load, as evidenced by the 148 FPS at 4K Low.
The data indicates that the RTX 5070 Ti is the dominant component in this combo for Lockdown Protocol, with the CPU providing sufficient headroom to avoid bottlenecks except at the lowest resolution and settings. Players seeking maximum frame rates should focus on GPU settings, while those at 1080p may see minor CPU limitations at the very highest FPS figures. Overall, this combo scales predictably with resolution, making it a versatile choice for various display configurations.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 5 235
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 5 235 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti in Lockdown Protocol
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 148.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 105.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 92.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 69.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 230.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 163.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 142.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 107.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 313.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 223.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 194.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 146.0 |
Lockdown Protocol with iUltra 5 235 + Other GPUs
See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Lockdown Protocol with RTX 5070 Ti + Other CPUs
See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 5 235 + RTX 5070 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.