Lockdown Protocol
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 83 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 34 | 46 | 56 | 75 |
| 1440p QHD | 56 | 70 | 86 | 118 |
| 1080p Full HD | 75 | 101 | 113 | 162 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Lockdown Protocol with Intel Core i5-14600KF + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT, In-Depth Analysis
Lockdown Protocol places a significant load on both processing and rendering hardware, and the Intel Core i5-14600KF with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT represents a balanced pairing, though the data reveals a clear division of labor. This combination lands at rank 1147 out of 1637 tested combos, placing it in the lower-middle tier of the database. The benchmark results indicate that while the CPU has substantial headroom for this FPS title, the GPU is the primary constraint on frame rates, especially at higher resolutions.
CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The Intel Core i5-14600KF is a 14-core, 20-thread processor from the Raptor Lake architecture, built on a 10 nm process. Its base clock is 3.50 GHz, with a boost clock reaching 5.30 GHz, and it carries 24 MB of shared L3 cache. In the context of Lockdown Protocol, a fast-paced FPS, the high boost clock is likely the more critical factor for maintaining responsive frame times. The processor's synthetic benchmarks support this; a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4643 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2778 indicate robust per-thread performance, which is often more relevant for game logic and physics than raw multi-threading.
The multi-core performance is also substantial, as shown by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32889 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 15636. This suggests the CPU won't be a bottleneck, even when the game engine is managing numerous entities or complex calculations. The `percentileVsAllCpus` of 93 indicates that the i5-14600KF outperforms 93% of all CPUs in the benchmark database, putting it in the upper echelon of processors. When compared to its nearest rivals, the data shows it is 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14600K, 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, and 1.4% ahead of the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H in average benchmark score. It trails the AMD EPYC 4345P by only 0.5%. These tight margins underscore that the i5-14600KF is a top-tier gaming and productivity chip, whose capabilities are unlikely to be fully exercised by the frame rates observed in this game at most settings.
GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is the other half of this pairing, and its role is far more decisive in determining the final frame rates. This GPU is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with a 7 nm process and features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2000 MHz, with a game clock of 2359 MHz and a boost clock of 2589 MHz. The GPU's compute power is rated at 10.60 TFLOPS for FP32 operations. In Lockdown Protocol, these specifications translate to a capable 1080p and 1440p experience, but the 8 GB VRAM capacity is a potential limitation at higher resolutions and settings.
The `percentileVsAllGpus` of 71 places the RX 6600 XT in the 71st percentile of all GPUs, which is significantly lower than the CPU's 93rd percentile. This disparity is the core narrative of the combo's performance. The GPU's benchmark scores show it is a mid-range performer; for instance, it scores 16461 in Passmark G3D and 1804 in 3DMark Steel Nomad. Its nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti, which it beats by 0.1%, and the AMD Radeon R9 M395X, which it beats by 0.4%. Interestingly, it trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 by 0.9% and the AMD FirePro S7150 by 1.5%. This indicates that while the RX 6600 XT is a solid choice, it is not a high-end part, and its performance ceiling will be reached before that of the i5-14600KF.
Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component
The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of how the system scales across resolutions. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 161.6 FPS. This high frame rate suggests the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU quickly, but the GPU is still the limiting factor, as even at this low settings preset, the frame rate is finite and not unlimited. Moving up to 1440p Low, the average drops to 118 FPS, a decrease of 43.6 FPS (approximately 27%). At 4K Low, the average falls further to 75.2 FPS, a 42.8 FPS drop from 1440p (approximately 36%). This pattern of diminishing returns with each resolution increase is a classic sign of GPU-bound performance.
The scaling becomes even more pronounced at higher settings. At 1080p Ultra, the average FPS is 75.4. At 1440p Ultra, it drops to 55.9 FPS, and at 4K Ultra, it bottoms out at 33.7 FPS. The percentage drop from 1080p to 1440p is roughly 26%, and from 1440p to 4K is roughly 40%. Similarly, at High settings, the transition from 1080p (100.6 FPS) to 1440p (70.1 FPS) is a 30% reduction, and then to 4K (45.6 FPS) is another 35% reduction. These steep declines, particularly at 4K, definitively point to the RX 6600 XT as the limiting component. The CPU, with its high single-threaded performance, is not the bottleneck; the GPU simply runs out of pixel-pushing and shading power as the resolution increases.
How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos
The combined performance of the i5-14600KF and RX 6600 XT in Lockdown Protocol is ranked 1147 out of 1637 tested combos. This rank is a crucial indicator of where this system stands in the broader ecosystem. Being in the 70th percentile (rank 1147 out of 1637) means that about 30% of the tested configurations perform worse, and 70% perform better. This is a stark contrast to the individual component percentiles, where the CPU is in the 93rd percentile and the GPU is in the 71st.
This discrepancy between component percentiles and the final combo rank suggests that the overall system performance is dragged down by the GPU. The data implies that pairing this powerful CPU with a stronger GPU would yield a significantly higher combo rank. The i5-14600KF is not the limiting factor; the RX 6600 XT is. Therefore, this combo rank is not a reflection of CPU inadequacy, but rather a direct consequence of the GPU's mid-range standing. The benchmark results show a system that is well-balanced for 1080p gaming, but one that will struggle to maintain high frame rates at 4K, placing it below many other combinations that feature more potent graphics cards.
Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers
The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive look at the system's performance across a matrix of resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system is very capable. The Low preset yields an average of 161.6 FPS, which is excellent for competitive play. The High preset averages 100.6 FPS, and the Medium preset averages 112.7 FPS. Interestingly, the High preset (100.6 FPS) is lower than the Medium preset (112.7 FPS), which is expected. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, producing an average of 75.4 FPS, which is still very playable.
At 2560x1440, the performance begins to drop more noticeably. The Low preset averages 118 FPS, which is still very smooth. The Medium preset averages 86.2 FPS, and the High preset averages 70.1 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to an average of 55.9 FPS, which is on the edge of smooth gameplay for some users. At 3840x2160, the system's limitations are clear. The Low preset averages 75.2 FPS, which is playable, but the Medium preset drops to 55.9 FPS. The High preset averages 45.6 FPS, and the Ultra preset is nearly unplayable at an average of 33.7 FPS. This data shows that the GPU is the primary constraint, with frame rates roughly halving from 1080p to 4K at most settings.
Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend heavily on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For 1080p gaming, the High preset at 100.6 FPS offers an excellent balance of visual fidelity and performance. The Medium preset at 112.7 FPS provides a slight performance boost for competitive play, while the Low preset at 161.6 FPS is ideal for maximizing frame rate. The Ultra preset at 75.4 FPS is still smooth, but the visual gains over High may not justify the 25% performance drop.
For 1440p, the High preset at 70.1 FPS is the sweet spot for a solid experience, while the Medium preset at 86.2 FPS is better for those prioritizing smoothness. The Low preset at 118 FPS is excellent for high-refresh-rate monitors, but the Ultra preset at 55.9 FPS is only suitable for slower-paced games or for users who prefer visual quality over frame rate. At 4K, the data suggests the system is not well-suited for demanding settings. The Low preset at 75.2 FPS is the only setting that delivers a consistently smooth experience. The Medium preset at 55.9 FPS is borderline, and the High and Ultra presets (45.6 FPS and 33.7 FPS respectively) are not recommended for a responsive FPS experience. For most users, a 1080p High or 1440p Medium preset will provide the best balance of visual quality and gameplay fluidity.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU and GPU combo in Lockdown Protocol?
A: The data indicates that 1920x1080 is the optimal resolution, where the combo achieves over 100 FPS on High settings (100.6 FPS) and 161.6 FPS on Low settings. Performance at 2560x1440 is also playable, but the frame rates drop significantly at 3840x2160.
Q: Is the Intel Core i5-14600KF or the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT the bottleneck in this game?
A: The benchmark data clearly shows the GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU is in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 71st percentile. The steep FPS drops at higher resolutions, particularly at 4K, are characteristic of GPU-bound performance.
Q: How does the RX 6600 XT compare to its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070?
A: The data shows the RX 6600 XT trails the RTX 3070 by 0.9% in average benchmark score. While this is a small difference in synthetic tests, in-game performance may vary.
Q: What is the combo's overall rank among tested configurations?
A: This specific combination of the i5-14600KF and RX 6600 XT is ranked 1147 out of 1637 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the performance table.
Q: Can this system handle Ultra settings at any resolution?
A: At 1080p, the Ultra preset produces an average of 75.4 FPS, which is playable. However, at 1440p Ultra, the average drops to 55.9 FPS, and at 4K Ultra, it falls to 33.7 FPS, which is not ideal for a fast-paced FPS.
Q: How does the CPU's performance compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X?
A: The Intel Core i5-14600KF is 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X in average benchmark score, indicating a near-identical level of overall processing power.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-14600KF
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-14600KF + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT in Lockdown Protocol
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 75.2 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 55.9 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 45.6 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 33.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 118.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 86.2 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 70.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 55.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 161.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 112.7 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 100.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 75.4 |
Lockdown Protocol with ii5-14600KF + Other GPUs
See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Lockdown Protocol with RX 6600 XT + Other CPUs
See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-14600KF + RX 6600 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.