Lockdown Protocol

Lockdown Protocol, a 2024 FPS title, shows a wide performance spread across settings for the Intel Core i5-10400F and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT combination. The measured data reveals a system that is highly capable at mainstream resolutions but begins to show its limits at 4K with maximum eye candy. The benchmarks indicate a clear hierarchy where the GPU is the primary driver of frame rates in most tested configurations.

Settings Recommendations

The benchmark results make a strong case for the High preset as the overall best experience across all tested resolutions. At 1920x1080, High settings deliver 125.3 FPS average, which is a substantial 30.9 FPS advantage over the Ultra preset's 94.4 FPS. This gap suggests that the jump from High to Ultra incurs a significant performance cost without a proportional benefit in frame pacing, making High the sweet spot for high-refresh-rate monitors. The data shows that while Low settings push the average to 199.2 FPS at 1080p, the visual compromise is rarely necessary given the High preset already exceeds 120 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the High preset again proves optimal, producing 92.1 FPS average. This is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay and leaves headroom for demanding scenes. The Medium preset at 1440p yields 102.6 FPS, but the incremental gain over High is modest (10.5 FPS) and likely not worth the reduction in visual fidelity. The Ultra preset at 1440p drops to 68.8 FPS, which is playable but begins to approach the lower bounds of what competitive FPS players would consider acceptable.

For 4K gaming at 3840x2160, the situation changes. The High preset averages 56.4 FPS, which is borderline for a fast-paced shooter. The Medium preset offers a better balance at this resolution, delivering 66.7 FPS. This is 10.3 FPS higher than High and still represents a playable experience. The Ultra preset at 4K is the outlier, falling to 41.8 FPS, which is too low for consistent competitive play. The Low preset at 4K achieves 94.2 FPS, but the visual degradation is severe. Therefore, Medium is the recommended preset for 4K, as it maintains a playable frame rate while preserving more visual detail than Low.

FAQ

Q: How does the i5-10400F pairing with the RX 6750 XT perform at 1080p Ultra settings?

A: The combination delivers an average of 94.4 FPS at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings. This is a playable frame rate, but it is 30.9 FPS lower than the High preset at the same resolution, indicating that Ultra settings impose a notable performance penalty.

Q: Is the system capable of 1440p gaming?

A: Yes, the data shows strong 1440p performance. At 2560x1440 with High settings, the average frame rate is 92.1 FPS. Even the demanding Ultra preset maintains a respectable 68.8 FPS average at this resolution.

Q: What is the best resolution for this hardware in Lockdown Protocol?

A: Based on the measured FPS, 1920x1080 offers the highest frame rates, with the High preset hitting 125.3 FPS. However, 2560x1440 at High settings (92.1 FPS) provides a strong balance of visual quality and performance for users with higher-resolution monitors.

Q: How does the RX 6750 XT's VRAM capacity influence the game's performance?

A: The GPU features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This capacity is sufficient for the tested presets, as the data shows consistent scaling from Low to Ultra without any indication of memory-related stutters or crashes.

Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU in this game?

A: The benchmark results suggest the GPU is the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions. For example, moving from 1080p High (125.3 FPS) to 1440p High (92.1 FPS) results in a 33.2 FPS drop, which is characteristic of GPU-bound performance. The CPU's 6-core, 12-thread configuration appears adequate for the game's demands.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 4K?

A: At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 94.2 FPS, while the Ultra preset only manages 41.8 FPS. This represents a 52.4 FPS difference, highlighting the extreme cost of enabling maximum graphical features at 4K resolution on this hardware.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is the dominant component in this pairing for Lockdown Protocol. Its performance profile, characterized by a 12 GB GDDR6 frame buffer and a 192-bit memory interface, directly supports the high texture and geometry loads typical of a modern FPS. The GPU's specifications, including 2560 shading units and 64 ROPs, are well-suited to the game's rendering requirements. The measured FPS data shows that the graphics card scales predictably with resolution and settings, indicating that it is the active bottleneck in most scenarios.

The GPU's clock behavior, with a base clock of 2150 MHz and a boost clock of 2600 MHz, allows it to maintain high throughput across different loads. The benchmark results show that at 1080p, the card can push frame rates beyond 125 FPS on High settings, demonstrating its raw rasterization power. The 12 GB VRAM capacity is a key asset, as it prevents memory pressure at 1440p and 4K, even on Ultra settings where texture detail is highest. The average benchmark scores for the GPU place it in the 79th percentile of all GPUs, underscoring its competitive standing. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 5600M, scores only 0.2% lower, showing the 6750 XT is at the top of its performance tier.

How This Combo Ranks

In the comprehensive database of tested hardware combinations for Lockdown Protocol, this specific pairing of the Intel Core i5-10400F and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT ranks 842nd out of 1637 combos. This places it in the upper half of all tested systems, indicating that it is a solid mid-range performer. The rank reflects the balance between the CPU and GPU, where the i5-10400F provides a sufficient foundation without bottlenecking the graphics card's output in the tested scenarios.

The CPU itself sits in the 73rd percentile of all processors, with an average benchmark score of 14168. Its nearest rivals, such as the AMD EPYC 7552 (0.4% faster) and the Intel Core i5-8500 (1.1% slower), show that the i5-10400F is a very consistent performer in its class. The GPU, in the 79th percentile, is slightly stronger relative to its peers, reinforcing the notion that the graphics card is the more influential component in this pairing. The combo's rank suggests that while it is not a top-tier enthusiast setup, it is well within the range of what most players would consider a high-performance system, especially for 1080p and 1440p gaming.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear and expected scaling pattern as resolution increases. At 1920x1080 with High settings, the system achieves 125.3 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 at the same settings drops the average to 92.1 FPS, a reduction of 33.2 FPS or roughly 26.5%. Moving further to 3840x2160 at High settings yields 56.4 FPS, a further drop of 35.7 FPS from the 1440p result. This linear scaling pattern is a classic indication of a GPU-bound workload, where the rendering resolution directly impacts the fill rate requirements.

The data for the Low preset tells a similar story but with higher absolute numbers. At 1080p Low, the system hits 199.2 FPS. At 1440p Low, it drops to 147.1 FPS, a 52.1 FPS decrease. At 4K Low, the average is 94.2 FPS, another 52.9 FPS drop. The consistency of the FPS drops between resolution steps, regardless of settings, confirms that the GPU is the limiting component. The CPU's performance, which is sufficient to support these frame rates, does not become a bottleneck until well beyond the tested resolutions. The scaling from 1080p to 4K on Ultra settings, from 94.4 FPS down to 41.8 FPS, shows that the game's most demanding settings place a heavy load on the GPU's compute and memory subsystems, making 4K Ultra impractical for competitive play on this hardware.