Lockdown Protocol
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 86 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 37 | 49 | 56 | 79 |
| 1440p QHD | 57 | 76 | 87 | 123 |
| 1080p Full HD | 78 | 104 | 119 | 167 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Lockdown Protocol with AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, In-Depth Analysis
Lockdown Protocol presents a specific challenge for the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT combination. The measured frame rates across resolutions and settings reveal a system that is consistently capable of delivering playable performance, but with clear limitations at the highest graphical presets and resolutions. This analysis examines the CPU and GPU roles, settings recommendations, and performance scaling based solely on the provided benchmark data.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It operates with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The processor features 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 cache. It supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The CPU’s benchmark results show a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 and a single-core score of 3072, while its Passmark multi-thread score is 25645 and single-thread score is 3689. The processor holds a percentile rank of 83 against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32750.
In Lockdown Protocol, the CPU’s role is to maintain a stable frame pipeline, especially at lower resolutions where the GPU is less burdened. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 167 FPS on average. This high frame rate suggests that the Ryzen 5 7400F’s 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient to feed the Radeon RX 7600 XT without creating a significant bottleneck at this resolution and preset. The processor’s single-thread performance, indicated by its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3072, is likely a key factor in handling the game’s simulation and input logic, which typically relies on fewer threads. The boost clock of 4.70 GHz provides the necessary responsiveness for frame pacing.
Comparing the Ryzen 5 7400F to its nearest rivals in the benchmark database shows it sits in a tightly contested performance band. The Intel Core i5-14600T has an average score of 32707, which is a 0.1% difference from the AMD chip. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H scores 32697, also 0.2% higher. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812, which is 0.2% lower, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32662, 0.3% higher than the 7400F. These deltas are negligible, meaning the 7400F’s compute performance is essentially equivalent to these rivals. In a game like Lockdown Protocol, this level of CPU performance is unlikely to be the primary differentiator between systems; the GPU will dominate the frame rate outcome.
The data shows that moving from 1080p to 1440p at Low settings, the average FPS drops from 167 to 123, a 26% reduction. This drop is larger than what would be expected if the CPU were the sole limiting factor, indicating that the GPU is starting to take on more work. At 4K Low, the average is 79 FPS, another 36% drop from 1440p. This scaling pattern suggests that even with a powerful CPU, the resolution increase shifts the load to the graphics card. The Ryzen 5 7400F’s L3 cache of 32 MB and dual-channel memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s are adequate for feeding the GPU with game data, but they are not the primary constraint in this system. The processor’s performance is consistent, and the measured frame rates indicate that it does not hold back the Radeon RX 7600 XT until the GPU is fully saturated at higher resolutions and settings.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units, along with 32 ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1980 MHz, a game clock of 2470 MHz, and a boost clock of 2755 MHz. It is equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. The memory runs at an effective speed of 18 Gbps. The card’s compute capabilities include a FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6. It has a 190 W TDP and connects via PCIe 4.0 x8. In benchmark tests, the RX 7600 XT scores 17132 in Passmark G3D, 2348 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, and 92426 in Geekbench OpenCL. Its percentile rank is 60 against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17083.
The GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM is a notable feature for Lockdown Protocol, as the game’s asset streaming and texture data at high resolutions can be memory-intensive. The measured frame rates at 4K Ultra show an average of 37 FPS, which is a demanding scenario. The 288.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is a limiting factor, but the large VRAM capacity ensures that the GPU does not run out of memory, which would cause severe stuttering or texture pop-in. The RX 7600 XT’s nearest rivals in the benchmark database include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 with an average score of 17037 (0.3% lower), the AMD Radeon HD 7970M with a score of 17019 (0.4% lower), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 with a score of 17208 (0.7% higher), and the NVIDIA Tesla M4 with a score of 16932 (0.9% lower). These comparisons show that the RX 7600 XT’s raw compute performance is close to that of an RTX 3070, but the modern architecture and 16 GB VRAM give it an edge in memory capacity.
The GPU’s role in Lockdown Protocol is clearly the dominant factor in frame rate scaling. At 1080p High, the card produces 104 FPS, but at 4K High, it drops to 49 FPS. This 53% reduction in performance is typical of a GPU-bound scenario where pixel throughput and fill rate become the bottleneck. The card’s pixel rate of 176.3 GPixel/s and texture rate of 352.6 GTexel/s are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but at 4K, these rates are stretched. The boost clock of 2755 MHz helps mitigate some of the load, but the core count of 2048 shading units is not high enough to maintain high frame rates at 4K with Ultra settings. The data suggests that the RX 7600 XT is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it can deliver smooth performance, while 4K is only viable at lower settings.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS rows provide a clear picture of which settings offer the best experience for this combo. At 1080p, the Low preset yields an average of 167 FPS, which is extremely high and suitable for competitive play. The Medium preset drops to 119 FPS, with a minimum of 101 FPS and a maximum of 136 FPS. This is still a very smooth experience, and the visual upgrade from Low to Medium is likely worth the 48 FPS loss. The High preset at 1080p averages 104 FPS, which is also playable, but the Medium preset offers a better balance between performance and visual fidelity. The Ultra preset at 1080p averages 78 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold, but the drop from Medium is significant.
At 1440p, the Low preset averages 123 FPS, which is excellent for a higher resolution. The Medium preset averages 87 FPS, with a minimum of 74 FPS and a maximum of 100 FPS. This is a solid choice for most players, as it maintains a frame rate well above 60 FPS. The High preset at 1440p averages 76 FPS, which is still playable, but the Medium preset provides a more comfortable margin. The Ultra preset at 1440p averages 57 FPS, which dips below the 60 FPS mark, making it less ideal for a smooth experience.
At 4K, the options are more constrained. The Low preset averages 79 FPS, which is the only 4K setting that provides a consistently smooth experience. The Medium preset averages 56 FPS, with a minimum of 48 FPS, which can lead to noticeable stutters in fast-paced scenes. The High preset averages 49 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 37 FPS, both of which are below the 60 FPS target. For this combo, the best experience per the measured rows is to use the Medium preset at 1080p or 1440p, as it offers a strong balance between visual quality and frame rate. At 4K, the Low preset is the only viable option for competitive play, while Medium can be used for less demanding scenarios.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is ranked 1800 out of 2828 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol. This places it in the lower middle tier of all tested systems. The rank of 1800 out of 2828 means that approximately 36% of the tested combos perform worse, while 64% perform better. This is a modest ranking, reflecting the GPU’s mid-range position in the benchmark database with a percentile of 60. The CPU’s percentile of 83 is higher, but the GPU’s performance is the binding constraint in this game.
The combo’s ranking is influenced by the fact that Lockdown Protocol is a first-person shooter, which typically favors high frame rates. The RX 7600 XT’s average benchmark score of 17083 places it near the RTX 3070, which is a capable card, but the 128-bit memory bus and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth limit its performance at higher resolutions. The CPU’s strong single-thread score of 3689 in Passmark helps ensure that the system does not suffer from CPU-induced frame drops, but it cannot compensate for the GPU’s limitations. The rank of 1800 suggests that while this combo is playable, it is not a top-tier performer for this specific game. Users with this setup should expect to use medium settings at 1080p or 1440p to achieve a satisfying experience, as the data shows that higher settings and resolutions quickly degrade performance.
FAQ
Q: What is the average frame rate for this combo at 1080p with Medium settings?
A: The average frame rate is 119 FPS, with a minimum of 101 FPS and a maximum of 136 FPS.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in terms of average benchmark score?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F has an average benchmark score of 32750, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i5-14600T’s score of 32707.
Q: Is the 4K Ultra preset playable with this hardware?
A: No, the 4K Ultra preset yields an average of 37 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.
Q: What is the GPU’s VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth?
A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 128-bit bus and a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s.
Q: What is the combo’s rank among all tested combinations in Lockdown Protocol?
A: The combo is ranked 1800 out of 2828 tested combinations.
Q: At 1440p, which preset provides the highest frame rate above 60 FPS?
A: The Low preset provides the highest frame rate at 1440p with an average of 123 FPS, followed by Medium at 87 FPS and High at 76 FPS.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four settings. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers an average of 167 FPS. The Medium preset averages 119 FPS, with a minimum of 101 FPS and a maximum of 136 FPS. The High preset averages 104 FPS. The Ultra preset averages 78 FPS. This shows a clear progression where each step up in settings costs a significant amount of performance, but even Ultra remains playable.
At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 123 FPS. The Medium preset averages 87 FPS, with a minimum of 74 FPS and a maximum of 100 FPS. The High preset averages 76 FPS. The Ultra preset averages 57 FPS. The drop from Low to Medium is 36 FPS, which is substantial, but the Medium preset still provides a smooth experience. The High preset at 76 FPS is the last stop before dipping below 60 FPS, which occurs at Ultra.
At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 79 FPS. The Medium preset averages 56 FPS, with a minimum of 48 FPS and a maximum of 65 FPS. The High preset averages 49 FPS. The Ultra preset averages 37 FPS. The 4K resolution presents a significant challenge, as only the Low preset maintains an average above 60 FPS. The Medium preset’s minimum of 48 FPS indicates potential frame time spikes that could affect gameplay. The High and Ultra presets are not recommended for a consistent experience.
The data shows that the GPU is the primary scaling factor. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 167 FPS, but at 4K Low, it drops to 79 FPS, a 53% reduction. The CPU’s performance remains constant, so the frame rate drop is directly attributable to the GPU’s workload. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient to handle all settings, but the core clock and memory bandwidth are not enough to sustain high frame rates at 4K with high-quality presets.
Resolution Scaling
The transition from 1080p to 4K reveals how the limiting component changes as resolution increases. Starting at 1920x1080 with the High preset, the average FPS is 104. Moving to 2560x1440, the average FPS drops to 76, a 27% reduction. Moving to 3840x2160, the average FPS drops to 49, a 53% reduction from the 1440p figure and a 53% reduction from the original 1080p figure. This scaling pattern is characteristic of a GPU-bound system. The CPU’s workload in Lockdown Protocol is relatively constant across resolutions, as it primarily handles game logic and draw calls, which do not scale with pixel count.
The data indicates that the Radeon RX 7600 XT is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The card’s 2048 shading units and 288.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are insufficient to maintain high frame rates at 4K, even at the High preset. At 1080p, the GPU is less stressed, and the CPU’s 6-core, 12-thread configuration can keep up, allowing the system to reach 167 FPS at Low settings. The scaling from 1080p to 4K is not linear; the drop from 1440p to 4K is steeper than from 1080p to 1440p for most presets. For example, at Low settings, 1080p yields 167 FPS, 1440p yields 123 FPS, and 4K yields 79 FPS. The percentage drops are 26% and 36%, respectively, showing that the GPU struggles more as resolution increases.
This behavior suggests that for users who prioritize high frame rates, 1080p is the sweet spot, while 1440p is a viable alternative if settings are kept at Medium or lower. 4K is only practical with the Low preset, and even then, the 79 FPS average is close to the edge of what is considered smooth for a fast-paced FPS. The limiting component in this system is clearly the GPU, as the CPU’s performance is sufficient across all tested resolutions. The 128-bit memory bus and 16 GB VRAM provide ample capacity, but the bandwidth is not high enough to feed the GPU at 4K with high-quality textures and effects. The measured data confirms that this combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K reserved for less demanding titles or lower settings.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 7400F
AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT in Lockdown Protocol
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 79.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 56.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 49.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 37.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 123.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 87.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 76.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 57.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 167.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 119.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 104.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 78.0 |
Lockdown Protocol with Ryzen 5 7400F + Other GPUs
See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Lockdown Protocol with RX 7600 XT + Other CPUs
See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 7400F + RX 7600 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.