Lockdown Protocol
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 124 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 53 | 71 | 81 | 115 |
| 1440p QHD | 82 | 110 | 126 | 177 |
| 1080p Full HD | 113 | 150 | 172 | 242 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Lockdown Protocol with AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT, In-Depth Analysis
# How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT lands at rank 837 out of 2828 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol. That places this configuration in the top 30% of all tested systems, a strong showing for a mid-range CPU paired with a high-end GPU. The data indicates this combo sits comfortably in the upper tier, though it is not among the elite few that dominate the leaderboard.
The CPU itself holds the 83rd percentile against all tested CPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly five out of every six processors in the database. The GPU follows closely with an 85th percentile ranking against all tested GPUs. When both components sit at similar percentile levels, the system tends to deliver balanced performance, and the measured frame rates confirm this equilibrium. The combo rank of 837 suggests that while neither component is the absolute fastest available, their pairing works harmoniously in this FPS title.
Looking at the nearest rival CPUs, the Ryzen 5 7400F posts an average benchmark score of 32750. The Intel Core i5-14600T scores 32707, a mere 0.1% difference. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H scores 32697, just 0.2% behind. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H edges ahead with 32812, a 0.2% advantage. Finally, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32662, trailing by 0.3%. These margins are razor-thin, indicating that the 7400F sits in a highly competitive performance band where thermal headroom and silicon lottery matter more than architectural superiority.
For the GPU, the RX 6800 XT records an average benchmark score of 48477. The NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile scores 47743, sitting 1.5% behind. The Intel Arc A550M scores 49737, a 2.5% lead. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 both score 49957 and 50001 respectively, representing 3% and 3% leads. These deltas reveal that the 6800 XT trades blows with contemporary mobile and workstation cards, though it falls short of the latest desktop flagships.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT brings substantial graphics horsepower to Lockdown Protocol. Its 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which proves critical for a fast-paced FPS where texture streaming and geometry loads can spike during intense firefights. The memory clock runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed, providing ample headroom for high-resolution textures without stuttering.
The GPU's base clock sits at 1825 MHz, with a game clock of 2015 MHz and a boost clock reaching 2250 MHz. These clocks allow the 4608 shading units to push 20.74 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The 288 texture mapping units and 128 raster operation units generate a texture rate of 648.0 GTexel/s and a pixel rate of 288.0 GPixel/s. In practical terms, this translates to smooth frame rendering even when the screen fills with particle effects from explosions or muzzle flash.
The 72 ray tracing cores support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), though Lockdown Protocol's measured data does not specifically isolate ray tracing performance. The GPU also supports OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern rendering APIs. The 7 nm process node from TSMC packs 26,800 million transistors into a 520 mm² die, which explains the 300 W TDP and the requirement for a 700 W suggested PSU.
In the measured FPS data, the GPU's influence becomes apparent when comparing settings at the same resolution. At 1080p, the gap between Low and Ultra presets spans from 242 FPS down to 113 FPS, a 129 FPS spread. This wide range indicates the GPU has enough headroom to handle even the most demanding settings, but the CPU begins to shoulder more responsibility as resolution drops. The GPU's 85th percentile ranking against all tested GPUs reinforces its position as a top-tier performer that can drive high refresh rate monitors without breaking a sweat.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals how the RX 6800 XT and Ryzen 5 7400F interact as resolution changes. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo produces 242 FPS. Moving to Medium drops that to 172 FPS, High yields 150 FPS, and Ultra brings 113 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a 53% performance reduction, indicating that even at lower resolutions, the GPU still has plenty of compute to spare.
At 1440p, the pattern shifts. Low settings deliver 177 FPS, Medium drops to 126 FPS, High reaches 110 FPS, and Ultra falls to 82 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 95 FPS, representing a 54% reduction. This consistency with the 1080p scaling suggests the GPU remains the dominant factor even as pixel count increases.
The 4K results tell a different story. Low settings produce 115 FPS, Medium drops to 81 FPS, High reaches 71 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 53 FPS. The Low-to-Ultra delta at 4K is 62 FPS, a 54% reduction. This percentage remains remarkably stable across all three resolutions, which indicates a balanced system where neither the CPU nor GPU becomes a bottleneck at any tested resolution.
However, the absolute numbers reveal the limiting component. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 242 FPS, which likely approaches the CPU's practical limit for frame generation in this game. The Ryzen 5 7400F's 6 cores and 12 threads, operating at a 4.70 GHz boost clock, can generate frames quickly, but there is a ceiling. At 4K Low, the system still manages 115 FPS, showing that the GPU's 512.0 GB/s bandwidth and 16 GB memory capacity handle the higher pixel count without catastrophic drops.
The data suggests that resolution scaling is nearly linear in percentage terms, but the limiting factor shifts. At 1080p, the CPU may constrain maximum frame rates, as evidenced by the 242 FPS ceiling. At 4K, the GPU becomes the primary constraint, with Ultra settings demanding more from the 4608 shading units than they can deliver at high frame rates. The 53 FPS result at 4K Ultra represents a playable but not exceptional experience for competitive FPS play.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS rows provide clear guidance for optimizing the Lockdown Protocol experience. At 1080p, the High preset delivers 150 FPS, which exceeds the refresh rate of most standard monitors. Medium yields 172 FPS, and Low reaches 242 FPS. For competitive play where every frame matters, the Low preset provides the highest headroom, but the visual compromise may not be necessary given the High preset's already strong performance.
At 1440p, the High preset produces 110 FPS, which remains above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay and approaches the 120 Hz refresh rate common on modern monitors. Medium offers 126 FPS, providing a slight buffer for demanding scenes. Low reaches 177 FPS, which suits esports-oriented players who prioritize responsiveness over visual fidelity. Ultra drops to 82 FPS, which remains playable but may introduce noticeable frame pacing issues during intense firefights.
The 4K results present a more nuanced picture. High settings yield 71 FPS, which is playable for casual sessions but may feel sluggish for competitive play. Medium provides 81 FPS with recorded minimums of 69 FPS and maximums of 94 FPS, indicating decent frame pacing stability. Low reaches 115 FPS, making it the only 4K preset that comfortably exceeds 100 FPS. Ultra falls to 53 FPS, which struggles to maintain smoothness.
For the best balance between visual quality and performance, the Medium preset emerges as the recommended choice across all resolutions. At 1080p Medium, the combo delivers 172 FPS with minimums of 146 FPS and maximums of 198 FPS, showing consistent frame delivery. At 1440p Medium, 126 FPS with minimums of 107 FPS and maximums of 145 FPS provides a solid competitive experience. At 4K Medium, 81 FPS with minimums of 69 FPS ensures no major dips below playable thresholds.
The High preset at 1440p offers 110 FPS and represents a reasonable alternative for users who prioritize visual details over the extra headroom Medium provides. For users with 240 Hz monitors, the Low preset at 1080p delivers 242 FPS, unlocking the full refresh rate potential. Ultimately, the data suggests that Medium provides the most consistent experience, with the minimum FPS figures ensuring fewer drops during intense gameplay sequences.
FAQ
Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7400F compare to its closest CPU rivals in overall benchmark scores?
A: The Ryzen 5 7400F scores 32750 on average. The Intel Core i5-14600T scores 32707, just 0.1% lower. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H scores 32697, 0.2% lower. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812, 0.2% higher, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32662, 0.3% lower.
Q: What is the best preset to use at 1440p for consistent frame rates?
A: The Medium preset at 1440p delivers 126 FPS average with minimums of 107 FPS and maximums of 145 FPS. This provides the best balance of visual quality and frame stability, with the minimum FPS staying well above typical competitive thresholds.
Q: Does the RX 6800 XT have enough VRAM for 4K gaming in Lockdown Protocol?
A: Yes, the 16 GB GDDR6 memory with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth handles 4K resolutions effectively. At 4K Medium, the combo produces 81 FPS average, and at 4K Low it reaches 115 FPS, demonstrating that the VRAM capacity is sufficient for this game's demands.
Q: How does the RX 6800 XT stack up against its nearest GPU rivals?
A: The RX 6800 XT scores 48477 on average. The NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile scores 47743, 1.5% lower. The Intel Arc A550M scores 49737, 2.5% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti scores 49957, 3% higher, and the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 scores 50001, 3% higher.
Q: What is the frame rate difference between 1080p and 4K at High settings?
A: At 1080p High, the combo produces 150 FPS. At 4K High, it produces 71 FPS. This represents a 53% reduction in average frame rate when moving from 1080p to 4K, indicating the GPU becomes increasingly stressed at higher resolutions.
Q: Is the Ryzen 5 7400F a capable processor for this game based on its specifications?
A: The Ryzen 5 7400F features 6 cores and 12 threads with a 3.70 GHz base clock and 4.70 GHz boost clock. Its 32 MB shared L3 cache and DDR5 memory support with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth provide adequate performance, evidenced by the 83rd percentile ranking against all CPUs.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F serves as the computational backbone of this combo, and its specifications directly influence Lockdown Protocol's performance. Built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Raphael codename, this 5 nm processor from TSMC contains 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. The 6 cores and 12 threads operate at a base clock of 3.70 GHz and boost to 4.70 GHz, providing the single-thread performance that FPS games demand.
The cache hierarchy plays a crucial role in game performance. Each core receives 64 KB of L1 cache and 1 MB of L2 cache, while a shared 32 MB L3 cache serves all cores. This cache configuration reduces memory latency for frequently accessed game data, which is particularly important in fast-paced shooters where hit detection and physics calculations occur rapidly. The dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth ensures the CPU can feed data to the GPU without creating a bottleneck.
The CPU's 65 W TDP reflects efficient power consumption, and its AMD Socket AM5 compatibility with PCIe Gen 5 (24 lanes) provides ample bandwidth for the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The 7400F's percentile ranking of 83 against all CPUs indicates it outperforms the majority of processors in the database. Its average benchmark score of 32750 places it in close competition with several Intel and AMD rivals, as detailed in the nearest rivals section.
In Lockdown Protocol specifically, the CPU's role becomes evident when examining the 1080p Low preset result of 242 FPS. This high frame rate suggests the CPU can generate frames faster than the GPU can render at lower resolutions. The PassMark single-thread score of 3689 and multithread score of 25645 confirm strong per-core performance, which is essential for game logic and AI calculations. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21765 and single-core score of 3072 further validate the CPU's capability in both lightly threaded and heavily threaded workloads.
The 4.70 GHz boost clock proves particularly valuable in Lockdown Protocol, where reaction times matter. The CPU's ability to maintain high clock speeds during gameplay ensures consistent frame pacing. The data shows that even at 4K Ultra, where the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at 53 FPS, the CPU still delivers frames without introducing stutter or irregularity. This indicates the 7400F provides sufficient headroom for the RX 6800 XT to operate at its full potential across all tested resolution and settings combinations.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 7400F
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT in Lockdown Protocol
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 115.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 81.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 71.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 53.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 177.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 126.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 110.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 82.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 242.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 172.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 150.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 113.0 |
Lockdown Protocol with Ryzen 5 7400F + Other GPUs
See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Lockdown Protocol with RX 6800 XT + Other CPUs
See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 7400F + RX 6800 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.