Lockdown Protocol

Lockdown Protocol

AVERAGE FPS
154
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 154 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 67 90 103 144
1440p QHD 104 139 159 224
1080p Full HD 142 189 217 264

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 144
3840x2160 Medium 103
3840x2160 High 90
3840x2160 Ultra 67
2560x1440 Low 224
2560x1440 Medium 159
2560x1440 High 139
2560x1440 Ultra 104
1920x1080 Low 264
1920x1080 Medium 217
1920x1080 High 189
1920x1080 Ultra 142

Lockdown Protocol with AMD Ryzen 5 5600X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, In-Depth Analysis

Lockdown Protocol, a cooperative FPS released on 2024-03-11, presents a demanding workload for the tested combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. The dataset marks all recorded values as measured (dataIsMeasured true), covering 4K, 1440p, and 1080p across Low, Medium, High, and Ultra presets. The combination ranks 535th out of 3,714 tested combos, while the CPU sits at the 75th percentile of all CPUs and the GPU at the 84th percentile of all GPUs. Among the tested system combinations, this one positions clearly above the median, and the measured frame rates show a platform capable of strong performance at every resolution, albeit with different behavior on lower or higher graphics presets.

Settings Recommendations

Across all three tested resolutions, the Medium preset offers the most consistent balance of rendering quality and frame rate. At 1080p, Medium produces an average of 217 fps with a measured minimum of 184 and a maximum of 249. That contrasts with Compact Ultra, which yields 142 avg FPS at 1920x1080, so Medium retains a comfortable 75 FPS average advantage over Ultra. The High provision at 1080p reduces the average to 189, so the curve between Medium and Ultra suggests that the GPU is scaling predictably upward as we iterate preset strength, with Medium acting as the efficient touchpoint.

At 1440p, the same pattern holds. Medium achieves an average 159 FPS with min/max of 135/183; High sits at 139, and High draws in at 104. Choosing Medium over High only sacrifices 0 clicks in this dataset, making Medium the smart default for a majority of playable frames. At 4K, Medium is the strongest non-Low preset: 103 FPS, with min/max of 88/118, whereas High drops to 109 and Ultra to 67. The best pure frame rate at 4K is 144 via the Low preset, but most players will prefer the subjective quality that the separate preset tiers provide, and the Medium preset's average of 103 is still well ahead of the 90 seen on High.

Therefore, the data suggests Medium for day-to-day play. Ultra should be reserved for players who value maximum quality and are content with higher hundred frame rates—142 at 1080p, 104 at 1440p, 67 at 4K. The Low is a competitive option for players seeking the highest possible framerate across the board: 264 and 1440 are 224 and 144 FPS, respectively, and 4K Low still reaches 144. Community feedback anecdotes aside, these measurements rank Medium as the recommended preset when frame pacing and the fraction of detail in the frame are weighed together.

FAQ

Q: At which resolution and present does the average FPS reach its highest and its lowest of the everything?

A: The highest average is 264 FPS at 1920x1080 Low, while the lowest is 67 FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra in the measured list.

Q: How does the 1080p Medium compare to 1080p High?

A: Environment pixel density: Machine 1920x1080 Medium averages 217 FPS with a minimum of 184 and a maximum of 249, while 1920x1080 High averages 189 FPS. That results in a 28 FPS gap in the speaker's favor.

Q: What do these results indicate about the system's ability to run the game at 4K?

A: At 3840x2160, the measured averages are 144 on Low, 103 on Medium, 90 on High, and 67 on Ultra, so the system is capable of 4K outright even on comparably dense visuals, though the Ultra does apply the most severe.

Q: How many cores and threads does the CPU provide, and what are its clock rates?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600X has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a 3.70 GHz base shall achieve a 4.60 GHz boost.

Q: What is the average benchmark score noted for the GPU, and how does it compare to its closest rival in the data?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti averages a GPU benchmark score of 44,795, which places it within a 0.5% delta in either direction of its nearest listed competitor. That point is a -0.5% delta relative to the average of the factor at the listed of the nearest GPU.

Q: Where does the overall GPU comed region land in the global CPU per-top percentiles?

A: The system's rank in Lockdown Protocol is 535th out of 3,714 tested combos.

How This Combo Ranks

For Lockdown Protocol, the tested AMD Ryzen 5 5600X + GeForce RTX 4070 Ti builds so firmly sits at position 535 out of 3,714 known test combos. That places it in the top 500 range, which racks to some meaningfully individual helpers are occupied by much faster or more expensive CPU and GPU pairings. The field of 3714 covers many system kinds, so this pairing lands close to the frontier for high-FPS competitive play while remaining comfortably above the mid-rank mass of the data pool.

The data set the CPU at the 75th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it beats roughly three-quarters of all processors logged on the database in terms of average performance. In terms of the CPU's own competitor set, the Ryzen 5 5600X posts an average CPU score of 21771. Direct comparison shows it sitting within 0.1% of the AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (avg 21749), within 0.5% of the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U (avg 21874) and the Intel Core i7-11700 (avg 21891), and within a fraction point of the AMD EPYC 9554P (avg 21899). None of those CPUs materially outdistance this one in the aggregate, so the brother side is basically a tie in overall CPU potential.

On the GPU side, the RTX 4070 Ti averages 44,795 points conditioning and holds the 84th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest listed rivals in the database are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile (avg score 45152, -0.8% relative), the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT (avg 45384, -1.3% relative), the NVIDIA RTX A6000 (avg 44078, +1.6% relative), and the Intel Arc A730M (avg 45592, -1.7% relative). So the 4070 Ti is effectively mid-hill within that Hadoop of competitors, all of them within ±2% of each other. In Lockdown Prognocol, this combination nearly executes its run, and the CPU while the GPU packs the near-term aggregate. The combination landing 535th out of 3714 matches these percentile standings: the CPU stays in the top quarter, the GPU in the top niche, and the way those two pieces cooperate in the game is the defining leverage.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the range of presets produce these averages: Low 264, Medium 217 (min 184, max 249), High 189, and Ultra 142. That's a drop of 47 frames between Medium and High, and another 46 frames between High and Ultra. The shape of the curve contains no sharp cliffs until Ultra, meaning the load on the system increases fondly with each preset step. For optics, the 1080p results show the strongest absolute fps values across the entire sweep, which is expected because pixel redwork is lowest.

At 2560x1440, the measured rows are Low 224, Medium 159 (min 135, max 183), High 139, and Ultra 104. The spread from Low to Ultra is 120 fps from 224 to 104. Both Medium Full and High Loss appear in the cluster of 139– –159, while Low and Ultra bracket that cluster. The minimum framerate at Medium 1440p is 135, which still leaves a comfortable buffer above the monitor mindset for most competitive settings.

At 3840x2160, the values fall to: Low 144, Medium 103 (min 87, max 118), High 90, and Ultra 67. On 4K, the lowest measured with the Ultra preset is 67, while the Medium constant preserves an average of 103. The framerate curve from Low to Ultra at 4K is a drop of 77 frames, but from High to Ultra the reduction is a further 23. This breakdown shows that 4K1:90 High still yields 90 FPS, which is usable, and it is the Moster 4K present with the steepest performance unit. Medium 4K F grade stir reaches 100+ frames with ratio while still carrying enough detail for the visual experience.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS movement from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 is non-trivial and differs slightly by preset. On the Medium setting, the series runs 217 → 159 → 103 across the three step resolution steps. That is a distinct decay from 1080 to 1440 and a further clear fall holding the 4K mark. On High, the values are 100, 110, 139 → 90, a gentler slope. The Low preset shows 264 → 224 → 144, which shows that even a Low at 4K keeps the playable to 144 FPS on this system.

By comparing the scale from 1080p to 4K on each preset, the GPU has the most scalable drop when the load increases. The difference Drive Example: 1080p Low 264 vs 4K Low 144 — that cutting to horizontal in a going down. 1080p High 90 vs 4K High 215? Wait the pack gives 189 and 90 — that is a decisive reduction of 99 frames, which in itself implies the resolution scaling is moderately strong. Since the CPU is the second component in the mix, the GPU likes the heavy lifting at 4K. One must not summarize mid-sentence. It warns that another Titan of the layer can shine.

With only a 4-core multiplier, tackling the resolution physics large volume indicates the The 4070 Ti, rated at 40.09 TFLOPS FP32 and 504.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth, gets up to the 1440p and the 4K scaling for which it was designed. The CPU, loaded with strong GPU throughput, does not report as first in lines to the GPU loading across these staircases. At 1920x1080, the Low, Medium, and High set all produce 100+ framerates, which is a classic sign that the CPU is pushing with little headroom—meaning the CPU and GPU are in good equilibrium during this load. From all the MANY final reviews, the resolution scaling is consistent — as the pixel, the GPU performs the heavier workload and the x.x average nominal rows tumble with each pixel doubling by the ratio of 1:0.5 at low to roughly 1:0.5 at high.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600X is based on Zen 3 architecture ("Vermeer") fabricated on Tesla's 7 nm node using 4,150 million transistors. It integrates six cores and twelve threads, with a base of 3.70 GHz and boost up to 4.60 GHz. That moderate clock density vperc: in this game the average frames encompass 217–27 weigh heavily at the lower resolutions such as 1080p where the CPU feeds the GPU at a lean rate. The multicore scores reflect a solid mid-the-range performance: the CPU mierly scores 1,188 FPS placements while it only benches 1,154 multi-core in Cinebench R23 visited; the single-core R23 is 1,541 and the Geekbench multi/single are 9,173/1,989. The 3DMark single-thread test still scores 917, while the max thread score is 5,588.

Because the CPU mb 6 physical cores and 12 threads, Lockdown Protocol sees them

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 3700 MHz
Boost Clock 4600 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

VRAM 12 GB GDDR6X
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2610 MHz MHz
TDP 285 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 5600X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti in Lockdown Protocol

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 144.0
3840x2160 Medium 103.0
3840x2160 High 90.0
3840x2160 Ultra 67.0
2560x1440 Low 224.0
2560x1440 Medium 159.0
2560x1440 High 139.0
2560x1440 Ultra 104.0
1920x1080 Low 264.0
1920x1080 Medium 217.0
1920x1080 High 189.0
1920x1080 Ultra 142.0

Lockdown Protocol with Ryzen 5 5600X + Other GPUs

See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Lockdown Protocol with RTX 4070 Ti + Other CPUs

See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 5600X + RTX 4070 Ti

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.