Inside

Inside

AVERAGE FPS
142
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 142 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 59 65 104 127
1440p QHD 96 99 162 205
1080p Full HD 133 142 228 281

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 127
3840x2160 Medium 104
3840x2160 High 65
3840x2160 Ultra 59
2560x1440 Low 205
2560x1440 Medium 162
2560x1440 High 99
2560x1440 Ultra 96
1920x1080 Low 281
1920x1080 Medium 228
1920x1080 High 142
1920x1080 Ultra 133

Inside with Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, In-Depth Analysis

# Inside — Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti delivers a thoroughly playable experience across all tested settings in Inside, with the measured data showing that this combination ranks 1128th out of 1671 tested combos. The results indicate a system that is GPU-limited at higher resolutions but CPU-capable enough to push very high frame rates at 1080p, making the RTX 3060 Ti the primary determinant of performance in this puzzle platformer.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a classic GPU-bound scenario, with the RTX 3060 Ti becoming the limiting component as pixel count rises. At High settings, the average FPS drops from 142.3 at 1920x1080 to 98.8 at 2560x1440, a reduction of roughly 30%, and then falls further to 64.6 at 3840x2160 — meaning 4K High delivers less than half the 1080p High frame rate. This steep decline indicates that the GPU's 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are increasingly taxed as resolution scales.

The pattern is even more pronounced at Ultra settings, where the drop from 132.8 FPS at 1080p to 96.1 at 1440p and finally 58.5 at 4K shows a consistent ~45% loss from 1080p to 4K. Low settings tell a different story: the 280.9 FPS at 1080p falls to 205.1 at 1440p and 127 at 4K, with the 1080p-to-4K ratio of 2.2x suggesting that even at minimal graphical load, the GPU still governs performance. The data shows no resolution where the 265K becomes the bottleneck — at 4K Ultra, the 58.5 FPS average is clearly GPU-constrained, while the 20-core processor sits largely idle.

GPU Role

The RTX 3060 Ti's specifications directly explain the measured results. With 4864 shading units, 152 texture mapping units, and 80 ROPs operating at a boost clock of 1665 MHz, the GPU delivers 16.20 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. Its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is sufficient for Inside's art style at 1080p and 1440p but becomes a limiting factor at 4K Ultra where the 58.5 FPS average suggests memory pressure.

The GPU's 69th percentile ranking among all GPUs places it in the mid-range tier, and its nearest rivals — the AMD Radeon RX 6700M at -0.2%, the RX 6600 at -0.5%, and the Radeon 890M at -0.5% — all sit within a narrow band of performance. This tight clustering explains why the 3060 Ti behaves consistently across the resolution ladder: it is a well-balanced mid-range card that shows its limits only at 4K Ultra. The 133.2 GPixel/s pixel rate and 253.1 GTexel/s texture rate are adequate for Inside's 2D side-scrolling visuals, but the 4K Ultra frame rate of 58.5 FPS indicates the GPU is working near its ceiling.

How This Combo Ranks

At rank 1128 out of 1671 combos, this pairing sits in the lower-mid tier of the database, which is expected given the RTX 3060 Ti's 69th percentile GPU score and the 265K's 97th percentile CPU score. The combination's ranking is dragged down by the GPU, not the processor — the 265K is a top-tier CPU that scores within -0.2% of the Core Ultra 7 265KF and -0.2% of the Core i9-14900KF in average benchmark scores, while the 3060 Ti trails the RX 6700M by just 0.2% in GPU benchmarks.

The ranking of 1128th out of 1671 means that roughly 32% of tested combos outperform this pairing, but the absolute frame rates tell a more positive story. At 1080p, every settings preset exceeds 132 FPS, and even 4K Low hits 127 FPS. The data suggests that the rank is more reflective of the GPU's overall compute capabilities than its real-world performance in this specific game, where the 3060 Ti proves capable of high frame rates at all resolutions except 4K Ultra.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data clearly favors Medium settings as the optimal balance between visual quality and frame rate. At 1080p, Medium delivers 228.2 FPS compared to 280.9 FPS on Low and 142.3 FPS on High — the jump from Low to Medium costs only 52.7 FPS while the jump from Medium to High costs 85.9 FPS, making Medium the most efficient tier. At 1440p, Medium's 161.5 FPS is nearly double the 96.1 FPS of Ultra, and at 4K, Medium's 104 FPS is comfortably above the 64.6 FPS of High and the 58.5 FPS of Ultra.

For players targeting 60 FPS, 4K Ultra is barely playable at 58.5 FPS, but 4K High at 64.6 FPS provides a safer margin. The 1440p Ultra result of 96.1 FPS is also viable for high-refresh displays, while 1080p Ultra at 132.8 FPS suits 144Hz monitors. Low settings are only necessary for extreme frame rates — the 280.9 FPS at 1080p Low is the only preset that approaches 300 FPS, which may benefit competitive play in this puzzle platformer.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Inside at 4K with playable frame rates?

A: Yes, at 4K High the average FPS is 64.6, and at 4K Medium it reaches 104 FPS. However, 4K Ultra drops to 58.5 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What is the best resolution for high refresh rate gaming?

A: At 1080p, even Ultra settings deliver 132.8 FPS, while Medium reaches 228.2 FPS and Low hits 280.9 FPS. The 1440p Medium result of 161.5 FPS also supports high-refresh displays.

Q: How does the RTX 3060 Ti compare to its closest rivals?

A: The GPU scores within -0.2% of the AMD Radeon RX 6700M, -0.5% of the RX 6600, and -0.5% of the Radeon 890M in average benchmark scores, indicating near-identical performance.

Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K a bottleneck in this game?

A: No. The 265K outperforms the Core i9-14900KF by 0.2% and the Core i9-14900K by 0.9% in average scores, and the frame rate scaling across resolutions indicates the GPU is the limiting factor.

Q: What settings should I use for a 144Hz monitor at 1440p?

A: Medium settings at 161.5 FPS is the only 1440p preset that exceeds 144 FPS. High at 98.8 FPS and Ultra at 96.1 FPS fall short of 144Hz.

Q: Does the 8 GB VRAM limit performance at 4K?

A: The data shows a significant drop from 4K Medium at 104 FPS to 4K Ultra at 58.5 FPS, with the 8 GB GDDR6 buffer likely contributing to the 45.5 FPS deficit at maximum settings.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is a 20-core, 20-thread Arrow Lake-S processor with a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, built on TSMC's 3 nm process. Its 30 MB of shared L3 cache and 102.4 GB/s dual-channel DDR5 memory bandwidth provide ample headroom for Inside's light CPU demands. The processor's 97th percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms its high-end status, with average benchmark scores within 0.2% of the Core Ultra 7 265KF and Core i9-14900KF.

In this game, the CPU's role is minimal. The measured FPS results show no evidence of CPU limitation — at 1080p Low, the system achieves 280.9 FPS, which is likely near the game's engine limit rather than a CPU ceiling. The 265K's single-thread performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 7060, ensures that even the most demanding frame rate scenarios in Inside are not processor-bound. The 20 cores and 20 threads are far more than this puzzle platformer requires, making the 265K a future-proof choice even as it sits largely underutilized in this title.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The complete measured FPS data across all resolutions and settings is as follows:

1920x1080:

  • Low: 280.9 FPS average
  • Medium: 228.2 FPS average
  • High: 142.3 FPS average
  • Ultra: 132.8 FPS average

2560x1440:

  • Low: 205.1 FPS average
  • Medium: 161.5 FPS average
  • High: 98.8 FPS average
  • Ultra: 96.1 FPS average

3840x2160:

  • Low: 127 FPS average
  • Medium: 104 FPS average
  • High: 64.6 FPS average
  • Ultra: 58.5 FPS average

The scaling pattern is consistent: each step from Low to Ultra costs roughly 40-50% of the frame rate at any given resolution. The 1080p-to-4K scaling factors range from 2.2x at Low settings (280.9 to 127) to 2.3x at Ultra (132.8 to 58.5), indicating that the RTX 3060 Ti's performance degrades proportionally with pixel count regardless of settings. The 1440p results sit almost exactly halfway between 1080p and 4K in most cases, confirming the GPU's linear scaling behavior in this title. For the best experience, the data points to 1080p Medium or 1440p Medium as the sweet spots, with 4K Medium as a viable option for those prioritizing resolution over maximum frame rates.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

Cores / Threads 20 / 20
Base Clock 3900 MHz
Boost Clock 5500 MHz
TDP 125W
Socket Intel Socket 1851
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 1665 MHz MHz
TDP 200 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti in Inside

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 127.0
3840x2160 Medium 104.0
3840x2160 High 64.6
3840x2160 Ultra 58.5
2560x1440 Low 205.1
2560x1440 Medium 161.5
2560x1440 High 98.8
2560x1440 Ultra 96.1
1920x1080 Low 280.9
1920x1080 Medium 228.2
1920x1080 High 142.3
1920x1080 Ultra 132.8

Inside with iUltra 7 265K + Other GPUs

See how Inside performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Inside with RTX 3060 Ti + Other CPUs

See how Inside performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with iUltra 7 265K + RTX 3060 Ti

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.