Inside

Inside is a puzzle platformer built on restrained, side-scrolling visuals, and the measured data for the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT shows a combination that is decisively capable of delivering high refresh rates at every tested resolution. The benchmark results place this pairing at rank 2117 out of 2887 tested combos for this title, which is a respectable mid-pack standing given the GPU’s age and the CPU’s modern architecture. The data reveals that the graphics card, not the processor, is the primary constraint at higher settings, but the overall experience remains smooth and highly playable across the board.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance rank of this CPU and GPU combo in Inside?

A: The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT holds a rank of 2117 out of 2887 tested combos for this game. This places it in the 73rd percentile of tested configurations, indicating that while it is not at the top of the charts, it outperforms a significant majority of other system pairings tested for Inside.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265 has an average benchmark score of 64640. Its closest rival, the AMD EPYC 4464P, scores 64823, which is 0.3% higher. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F scores 64438, putting it 0.3% behind this CPU. The AMD EPYC 7343 scores 64202, which is 0.7% lower, and the AMD EPYC 9124 scores 65104, which is 0.7% higher than the Core Ultra 7 265.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT's performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Radeon RX 5700 XT has an average benchmark score of 16361. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, scores 16351, which is 0.1% lower. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell scores 16408, which is 0.3% higher. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 scores 16415, also 0.3% higher, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 scores 16504, which is 0.9% higher than the RX 5700 XT.

Q: What is the best measured average FPS for this combo at 1920x1080?

A: The highest average FPS recorded at 1920x1080 is 275, achieved with the Low settings preset. With Medium settings, the average drops to 220 FPS, and with High settings, it is 137 FPS. The Ultra preset yields an average of 131 FPS.

Q: Does the game run at 60 FPS at 4K with this hardware?

A: Yes, the data shows that at 3840x2160, the average FPS is 62 on High settings and 59 on Ultra settings. The Medium preset reaches an average of 99 FPS, and the Low preset achieves 124 FPS, all of which are above the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What are the clock speeds of the GPU and CPU in this combo?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT has a base clock of 1605 MHz, a game clock of 1755 MHz, and a boost clock of 1905 MHz. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT combination is positioned at rank 2117 out of 2887 tested combos for Inside. This rank indicates that the pairing is in the upper-middle segment of all tested systems, and the data suggests that the results are primarily driven by the GPU's capabilities rather than the CPU. The Core Ultra 7 265 is a high-end desktop processor with a 93rd percentile ranking against all CPUs, while the RX 5700 XT sits at the 59th percentile against all GPUs. This disparity is reflected in the game's performance, where the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions and settings.

In terms of raw compute, the CPU's average benchmark score of 64640 is remarkably close to its nearest rivals, with all four competitors within a 1% delta. This indicates that the processor is performing exactly as expected for its class, providing a stable platform that is unlikely to bottleneck the GPU in a game like Inside, which is not typically CPU-intensive. The GPU's average benchmark score of 16361 also aligns closely with its nearest rivals, with the largest delta being 0.9% against the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2. This suggests the RX 5700 XT is delivering consistent performance relative to its peers.

The combo’s rank of 2117 means that roughly 73% of all tested combinations perform worse in Inside, while 27% perform better. This is a solid result for a 2019 GPU paired with a 2025 CPU, and the measured FPS data confirms that the combination is well-suited for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p, while still being capable of a playable 4K experience. The data shows that the pairing is balanced enough to avoid severe bottlenecks, but the GPU’s age is evident at the highest settings, where frame rates dip closer to the 60 FPS mark.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT is built on the RDNA 1.0 architecture and features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is a key factor in the game’s performance, as Inside’s side-scrolling visuals can be demanding on fill rate and memory throughput at higher resolutions. The GPU’s 2560 shading units and 64 ROPs are responsible for pixel processing, and its pixel rate of 121.9 GPixel/s and texture rate of 304.8 GTexel/s define how quickly it can render frames. The boost clock of 1905 MHz is the highest operating frequency, with a game clock of 1755 MHz representing typical sustained performance during gameplay.

In Inside, the GPU’s role is dominant, as the measured FPS scales directly with the settings preset at each resolution. At 3840x2160, the Low preset yields an average of 124 FPS, while Medium produces 99 FPS, High produces 62 FPS, and Ultra produces 59 FPS. This pattern shows a clear correlation between the GPU’s workload and the resulting frame rate, with the Ultra preset pushing the RX 5700 XT to its limits. The GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM is likely sufficient for this game, even at 4K, as the data does not indicate any memory-related stuttering or performance cliffs.

The RX 5700 XT’s percentile rank of 59 against all GPUs means it is a mid-range performer by modern standards, but its benchmark scores show it is competitive with other cards in its class. The data for Inside reveals that the GPU can handle 1440p High settings at an average of 99 FPS, which is an excellent result. The card’s FP32 performance of 9.754 TFLOPS provides the compute headroom needed for the game’s physics and rendering effects. Overall, the GPU is the primary driver of the measured FPS in this combo, and the results demonstrate that it remains a viable option for this title, especially when settings are adjusted appropriately.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combo provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves a very high average of 275 FPS, which is more than enough for any high-refresh-rate monitor. The Medium preset delivers an average of 220 FPS, with a minimum of 187 FPS and a maximum of 253 FPS, indicating smooth performance with minimal frame time variance. High settings drop the average to 137 FPS, while Ultra settings bring it down to 131 FPS. The gap between High and Ultra is small, suggesting that the Ultra preset adds visual features that have a modest performance cost at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, the Low preset still delivers a very high average of 198 FPS, which is excellent for 1440p gaming. Medium settings produce an average of 158 FPS, with a minimum of 134 FPS and a maximum of 182 FPS, showing consistency in frame delivery. High settings reduce the average to 99 FPS, which is still well above the 60 FPS standard. The Ultra preset at 1440p yields an average of 94 FPS, which is a surprisingly small drop from High, indicating that the GPU is not overly taxed by the additional settings at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the performance scales down as expected. The Low preset delivers an average of 124 FPS, which is very impressive for 4K. Medium settings produce an average of 99 FPS, with a minimum of 84 FPS and a maximum of 114 FPS, ensuring a mostly smooth experience. High settings drop the average to 62 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS threshold, while Ultra settings result in an average of 59 FPS, which is slightly below 60 FPS. The data shows that 4K Ultra is the only configuration that fails to maintain a 60 FPS average, but it is still very close, and the 4K Medium preset offers a strong balance of visuals and performance.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings preset depends on the user’s resolution and frame rate target. For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset at 131 FPS is the recommended choice, as it provides the best visual fidelity while still maintaining a frame rate that exceeds 120 FPS. The High preset at 137 FPS offers nearly identical performance, but Ultra is preferred for its enhanced visual quality. For users with a 240 Hz monitor, the Medium preset at 220 FPS is also a strong option, but the small difference between High and Ultra makes Ultra the best value in terms of visuals per frame.

At 2560x1440, the High preset at 99 FPS is the optimal choice, as it provides a great balance between visual quality and performance, comfortably exceeding 60 FPS and approaching 100 FPS. The Ultra preset at 94 FPS is also viable, and the difference between High and Ultra is minor, so users can choose either based on their preference for visual effects. The Medium preset at 158 FPS is ideal for those with high-refresh-rate 1440p monitors, as it delivers a very high frame rate while still looking good. The Low preset at 198 FPS is only recommended for competitive play where frame rate is the top priority.

For 3840x2160, the Medium preset at 99 FPS is the clear recommendation, as it delivers a high frame rate that is well above 60 FPS while still providing a decent level of visual detail. The High preset at 62 FPS is also playable and offers better visuals, but it drops the frame rate to just above the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset at 59 FPS is not recommended for 4K, as it falls below the 60 FPS average, which could lead to perceptible drops in frame pacing. The Low preset at 124 FPS is suitable for those who prioritize frame rate above all else, but it sacrifices significant visual quality. Overall, the data suggests that Medium at 4K, High at 1440p, and Ultra at 1080p are the best settings presets for this combo.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is a 20-core, 20-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process node. It has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The CPU features a large cache hierarchy, including 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration provides ample resources for gaming, even though Inside is not a heavily threaded title. The CPU’s benchmark scores are impressive, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42216 and a single-core score of 5960, indicating strong performance across both multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads.

In the context of Inside, the CPU’s role is to ensure that the GPU is fed with enough data to maintain high frame rates. The measured FPS data shows that the CPU is not a bottleneck at any resolution or settings preset, as the GPU is clearly the limiting factor at higher settings. For example, at 1920x1080 Low, the CPU is likely capable of pushing frame rates well above the measured 275 FPS average, but the GPU’s rendering limits prevent it from going higher. The Core Ultra 7 265’s high single-core performance, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5960, is particularly important for games that rely on a single main thread, though Inside’s side-scrolling nature may not stress the CPU heavily.

The CPU’s percentile rank of 93 against all CPUs places it in the top tier of processors, and its nearest rivals are all server-class chips with similar average scores. The Core Ultra 7 265’s performance in synthetic benchmarks like PassMark shows a multithread score of 49682 and a single-thread score of 4689, which are strong results. In terms of the game, the CPU provides more than enough headroom, and the data indicates that the primary factor limiting performance is the RX 5700 XT’s rendering capabilities. The CPU’s memory support for DDR5 and dual-channel configuration further ensures that memory bandwidth is not a constraint, allowing the GPU to operate at its full potential. The measured results confirm that this CPU is a capable partner for this GPU in Inside, delivering a smooth and responsive experience across all tested configurations.