Inside

Inside

AVERAGE FPS
242
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 242 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 107 112 179 224
1440p QHD 170 178 285 356
1080p Full HD 236 248 388 420

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 224
3840x2160 Medium 179
3840x2160 High 112
3840x2160 Ultra 107
2560x1440 Low 356
2560x1440 Medium 285
2560x1440 High 178
2560x1440 Ultra 170
1920x1080 Low 420
1920x1080 Medium 388
1920x1080 High 248
1920x1080 Ultra 236

Inside with Intel Core Ultra 5 245 + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT pairing delivers exceptional performance in Inside, a 2016 Puzzle Platformer that is far more demanding on frame rates than its minimalist art style suggests. The combination ranks in the 91st percentile of all tested systems, and the measured data shows this duo is capable of obliterating even 4K Ultra settings with headroom to spare. The analysis below breaks down how each component contributes to this result, how the pairing compares to other tested configurations, and which settings provide the ideal experience.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is a 14-core, 14-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It operates at a base clock of 3.50 GHz and boosts up to 5.10 GHz, with 24 MB of shared L3 cache. For Inside, a game that is primarily a 2D side-scrolling puzzle platformer, the CPU’s role is less about brute multi-threaded throughput and more about maintaining high single-thread performance to feed the GPU at extremely high frame rates.

Benchmark data places this CPU in the 90th percentile of all processors, with an average benchmark score of 48,995. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (avg score 49,196, just 0.4% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (avg score 49,228, 0.5% ahead), and the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H (avg score 48,698, 0.6% behind). The closest competitor by score is the Intel Core i5-14600K, which trails by 0.8% with a score of 48,618. This indicates the Ultra 5 245 is a high-end performer that is essentially tied with several very strong desktop and workstation chips, making it more than capable of avoiding any bottleneck in a game like Inside.

The CPU’s single-core performance is particularly relevant here. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,648 points, combined with a PassMark single-thread score of 4,394, demonstrates excellent per-core efficiency. In Inside, where the game logic, physics for puzzle elements, and the rendering pipeline are all largely dependent on a few primary threads, this strong single-thread showing is crucial. The data supports the conclusion that the CPU is not the limiting factor at any resolution tested, allowing the GPU to operate at its full potential. Furthermore, the 14-core configuration provides massive headroom for any background tasks, ensuring that frame times remain stable even under system load, which is reflected in the consistent average FPS figures across all settings.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is the clear powerhouse in this pairing. Built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 31 chip, it features 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus, delivering 800.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its boost clock reaches 2394 MHz, with a game clock of 2025 MHz. This massive memory allocation and high bandwidth are significant for Inside, as the game’s dark, moody environments rely on high-resolution textures and lighting effects that can consume VRAM, though the 20 GB capacity far exceeds the needs of this title.

Interestingly, the GPU’s benchmark scores tell a complex story. Its PassMark G3D score is a robust 29,009, and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5,623. However, the GPU’s overall average benchmark score is 13,745, placing it in the 55th percentile of all GPUs. This is skewed by lower scores in compute-heavy tests like PassMark GPU Compute (16,828) and Geekbench OpenCL (12,756). Its nearest rivals, based on the average score, are the AMD Radeon 660M (13,812, 0.5% ahead) and the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile (13,821, 0.5% ahead), which are vastly inferior gaming parts. This anomaly is because the average benchmark score includes older DirectX tests where the RX 7900 XT scores low (e.g., PassMark DirectX 9 score of 322), pulling down its aggregate ranking. The data shows that in modern gaming workloads, the RX 7900 XT is in a different league than its "nearest rivals" by aggregate score.

In practice, the RX 7900 XT’s gaming performance is exceptional. With 5,376 shading units and 192 ROPs, it has the raw pixel-pushing power needed for high resolutions. The FP32 performance of 51.48 TFLOPS provides immense compute headroom. For Inside, this translates to the GPU being the dominant component in determining frame rates, but not because it is struggling. Instead, it is so powerful that it can render the game at over 100 FPS even at 4K Ultra, meaning the CPU and GPU are working in harmony to push frame rates far beyond what the game’s visuals would suggest.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT achieves a combo rank of 255 out of 2,887 tested combinations in Inside. This places it in the top 8.8% of all systems tested for this game, which is a strong result given the title’s age and the fact that many testers may use lower-end hardware. The rank indicates that this pairing is not just good, but exceptional for this specific workload.

The 91st percentile ranking is particularly noteworthy because Inside is not a demanding AAA title that would typically showcase high-end hardware. It is a puzzle platformer. The fact that this combo ranks so highly suggests that the game’s engine is well-optimized and is able to scale with high-end components, rewarding the substantial CPU and GPU investment. The data shows that this pairing is in the top tier of all tested combos, meaning it will deliver a flawless experience with no performance concerns whatsoever. The high rank reflects the balance between the CPU’s strong single-thread performance and the GPU’s massive rasterization throughput.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data confirms the exceptional performance of this pairing. At 1080p, the results are staggering. With Low settings, the average FPS is 420. At Medium, it drops to 388 FPS (with a min of 329 and max of 446). High settings yield 248 FPS, and Ultra settings still achieve 236 FPS. These numbers show that at 1080p, the system is likely CPU-bound at the very highest frame rates, but even at Ultra, the frame rate is more than four times higher than a typical 60Hz display’s refresh rate.

Moving to 1440p, the performance remains incredibly high. Low settings produce 356 FPS. Medium averages 285 FPS (min 242, max 328). High settings deliver 178 FPS, and Ultra settings still manage 170 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is noticeable but modest, indicating that the GPU is still well within its comfort zone. The 1440p Ultra result of 170 FPS is exceptional for a modern GPU, suggesting that the game is not heavily taxing the RX 7900 XT even at high resolutions.

At 4K (3840x2160), the performance is still outstanding. Low settings see an average of 224 FPS. Medium settings average 179 FPS (min 152, max 206). High settings drop to 112 FPS. Ultra settings settle at 107 FPS. The 4K results show a clear progression, with the GPU finally beginning to feel some pressure. At 4K Ultra, the 107 FPS average is still far above the 60 FPS target, proving that this combo can handle the most demanding visual settings at the highest resolution without any issues. The data shows that even at 4K Ultra, the system is not fully stressed, as the 4K Low to 4K Ultra drop is only 117 FPS, which is less than the drop from 1080p Low to 1080p Ultra (184 FPS).

Resolution Scaling

The resolution scaling data reveals a clear picture of where the bottleneck lies. From 1080p to 1440p, the average FPS across all settings drops by roughly 15-20% (e.g., 420 to 356 FPS at Low, 248 to 178 FPS at High). From 1440p to 4K, the drop is more significant, around 35-40% (e.g., 356 to 224 FPS at Low, 178 to 112 FPS at High). This scaling pattern is typical of a GPU-limited scenario at higher resolutions, but the absolute numbers are so high that it is clear the system has massive headroom.

At 1080p, the frame rates are so high (420 FPS at Low) that it is almost certain the CPU is the limiting factor. The CPU’s single-thread performance, while excellent, cannot push the rendering pipeline faster than a certain point. As resolution increases, the GPU takes over as the primary bottleneck, but even at 4K Ultra, the GPU is not fully saturated. The 4K Ultra score of 107 FPS is significantly higher than what most systems achieve at 1080p, demonstrating that the RX 7900 XT has immense untapped potential. The data suggests that the system is balanced enough that neither component is severely holding back the other, but at lower resolutions and settings, the CPU becomes the constraining factor, while at 4K Ultra, the GPU is the primary driver of performance.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured rows, the best experience is achieved at 4K Ultra settings. The 107 FPS average at 3840x2160 Ultra is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, and the visual fidelity of Inside benefits greatly from the high-resolution textures and effects. The data shows that there is no need to compromise on settings, as even the most demanding preset yields frame rates that are more than sufficient for a puzzle platformer where precise timing is not critical.

However, for players with high-refresh-rate monitors (144Hz or higher), the 1440p Ultra setting is the sweet spot. The 170 FPS average at 2560x1440 Ultra is nearly 50% higher than the 4K Ultra result, providing a visibly smoother experience. This is the recommended compromise between visual quality and frame rate. If a player prioritizes absolute smoothness over resolution, 1080p Ultra at 236 FPS is the optimal choice, delivering a flawless experience on any monitor.

The data shows that Medium settings are unnecessary for this hardware. The difference between Medium and Ultra at 1080p is only 152 FPS (388 vs 236), but the visual improvement from Medium to Ultra is substantial. At 4K, the gap is 72 FPS (179 vs 107), but again, both are above 100 FPS. The conclusion is unambiguous: there is no reason to lower settings below Ultra with this combination. The system has ample performance to run the game at maximum settings at any resolution, and the measured FPS figures confirm that it will never drop below 100 FPS even under the most demanding conditions. The only scenario where a lower setting might be considered is for competitive play, but Inside is a single-player puzzle game, making this irrelevant. The 4K Ultra preset is the definitive recommendation, as it provides the best visual experience without any meaningful performance compromise.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core Ultra 5 245

Cores / Threads 14 / 14
Base Clock 3500 MHz
Boost Clock 5100 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1851
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

VRAM 20 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2394 MHz MHz
TDP 300 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 5 245 + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT in Inside

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 224.0
3840x2160 Medium 179.0
3840x2160 High 112.0
3840x2160 Ultra 107.0
2560x1440 Low 356.0
2560x1440 Medium 285.0
2560x1440 High 178.0
2560x1440 Ultra 170.0
1920x1080 Low 420.0
1920x1080 Medium 388.0
1920x1080 High 248.0
1920x1080 Ultra 236.0

Inside with iUltra 5 245 + Other GPUs

See how Inside performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Inside with RX 7900 XT + Other CPUs

See how Inside performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with iUltra 5 245 + RX 7900 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.