Inside

Inside is a puzzle platformer from 2016, and the benchmark data for the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti reveals a fascinating performance profile. The measured frame rates across different resolutions and settings tell a clear story about where the bottlenecks lie, how the hardware scales, and what kind of experience players can expect from this specific configuration. This analysis will break down the data to interpret what these numbers mean for gameplay, from the demanding 4K Ultra preset down to the high-refresh-rate 1080p Low setting.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K provides a clear window into the system's performance dynamics. At the High preset, the average FPS drops from 198 at 1920x1080 to 143 at 2560x1440, and further down to 90 at 3840x2160. This is a reduction of approximately 55% from 1080p to 1440p, and another 37% from 1440p to 4K. The performance curve is steep and consistent, indicating that the GPU is the primary scaling factor as resolution increases.

Looking at the Low preset, the scaling is even more dramatic. The system achieves 397 FPS at 1080p, which drops to 285 FPS at 1440p, and then to 179 FPS at 4K. The percentage drops here are roughly 28% and 37% respectively. The fact that the Low preset at 1080p hits nearly 400 FPS suggests the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU an enormous amount of data, but the GPU's workload still scales significantly with pixel count. The gap between the Low preset and other presets at the same resolution also widens with higher resolution, pointing to the GPU being the limiting factor.

The data shows that the RTX 3070 Ti is the dominant component in this pairing for Inside. The CPU, with its 14 cores and 14 threads, appears to be more than sufficient to keep up, even at the lowest settings where the frame rates become extremely high. The benchmark results suggest that the system is well-balanced for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p, but the GPU will be the component that determines performance at higher resolutions. The scaling pattern indicates a classic GPU-bound scenario, where increasing the resolution places a proportionally higher demand on the graphics card's processing capabilities.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti features 8 GB of GDDR6X memory running on a 256-bit bus with a bandwidth of 608.3 GB/s. The card's boost clock is rated at 1770 MHz. In the context of Inside, a game with a relatively simple visual style, the 8 GB VRAM capacity is more than adequate for all tested settings and resolutions. None of the measured frame rates suggest a memory capacity bottleneck, as the performance drops are consistent with compute-bound scaling rather than a sudden stutter or frame time spike that would indicate VRAM exhaustion.

The GPU's raw compute power is substantial, with a FP32 performance of 21.75 TFLOPS. This is reflected in the benchmark results, where even at 4K Ultra, the card manages an average of 85 FPS. The card's performance in this game places it in the 75th percentile of all GPUs, and it sits close to rivals like the AMD Radeon RX 6800 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti in average benchmark scores. The data indicates that the RTX 3070 Ti is not being pushed to its absolute limits in this title, as the frame rates remain very high even at the most demanding settings.

The GPU's role in Inside is clearly to render the game's atmospheric 2.5D environments and lighting effects. The measured FPS at 4K High (90 FPS) and 4K Ultra (85 FPS) shows that the card can handle the highest resolution with high fidelity, but the drop to the Low preset at 4K (179 FPS) demonstrates how much headroom is available when graphical load is reduced. The data implies that the GPU is the key to achieving higher frame rates at higher resolutions, and its performance characteristics are a perfect match for a game that is not overly demanding on modern hardware.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti ranks 799th out of 2,887 tested combos in Inside. This puts the combo in the top 27.7% of all systems tested for this game. This is a strong ranking, indicating that this specific pairing of CPU and GPU is well-suited for the game's demands. The rank reflects the balance between the two components, and the fact that it is not in the absolute top tier suggests there are more powerful combinations, but this setup is clearly above average.

The CPU itself is in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 46,062. Its nearest rivals in terms of average score are the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, the Intel Core i9-13900HX, and AMD EPYC processors, all within a 0.2% performance delta. This shows that the Ultra 5 235 is a top-tier processor for gaming workloads. The GPU, in the 75th percentile, is also respectable, but it is the lower-performing component of the two in this pairing. The combo rank is therefore likely held back by the GPU, as the CPU has more performance headroom relative to its own class.

The data suggests that this combo is well-optimized for Inside, delivering high frame rates across all settings. The 799th rank out of 2,887 indicates that while many systems perform better, this configuration is in the top quarter of all tested setups. It reflects the efficiency of both components in this specific gaming scenario. The ranking implies that a user with this combo will have a very smooth experience, and the only way to significantly improve would be to pair an even stronger GPU with this CPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the maximum average FPS this combo can achieve in Inside at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080 with the Low preset, the system achieves an average of 397 FPS. This is the highest average FPS recorded in the measured data.

Q: Does the system maintain playable frame rates at 4K with the Ultra preset?

A: Yes, at 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset, the average FPS is 85. While this is the lowest average FPS in the dataset, it is still comfortably above 60 FPS, indicating a playable experience.

Q: How much of a performance drop is there between 1080p and 4K at the High preset?

A: At the High preset, the average FPS drops from 198 at 1920x1080 to 90 at 3840x2160. This represents a drop of 108 FPS, or a reduction of roughly 55% in frame rate.

Q: Which component is the limiting factor in this system for Inside?

A: The benchmark data indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor. The frame rates scale significantly with resolution, which is a classic sign of a GPU-bound workload. The CPU appears to have enough headroom to support even the highest frame rates recorded.

Q: What is the lowest average FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The lowest average FPS is 85, which occurs at 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset. This is the most demanding settings combination tested.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations for this game?

A: This specific CPU and GPU combination ranks 799th out of 2,887 tested combos in Inside, placing it in the top 27.7% of all tested systems.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured frame rates provide a complete picture of the system's performance across all combinations of resolution and settings.

At 1920x1080, the system delivers high frame rates across all presets. The Low preset achieves an average of 397 FPS, which is the highest in the dataset. The Medium preset reaches an average of 317 FPS, with a minimum of 270 FPS and a maximum of 365 FPS. The High preset averages 198 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 189 FPS. All settings at 1080p are well above 144 FPS, making this resolution ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains very strong. The Low preset averages 285 FPS, while the Medium preset averages 228 FPS, with a minimum of 194 FPS and a maximum of 263 FPS. The High preset averages 143 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 136 FPS. This resolution offers a good balance between image quality and performance, with all presets maintaining an average above 130 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the GPU begins to feel the pressure. The Low preset still provides a high average of 179 FPS. The Medium preset averages 143 FPS, with a minimum of 122 FPS and a maximum of 165 FPS. The High preset drops to an average of 90 FPS, and the Ultra preset is the most demanding, averaging 85 FPS. Even at 4K, the system remains playable at all settings, though the Ultra preset brings the frame rate closer to the 60 FPS threshold.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 is a 14-core, 14-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. With a TDP of 65 watts, it is a power-efficient desktop processor. The CPU's performance in benchmarks is exceptional, scoring 14,769 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 2,085 in single-core. This processing power is more than sufficient for a game like Inside, which is not known to be heavily CPU-bound.

The data shows that the CPU is not the bottleneck in this system. At 1080p with the Low preset, the system achieves 397 FPS, which is an extremely high frame rate that would stress many CPUs. The fact that the Ultra 5 235 can maintain this performance without being the limiting factor indicates it has ample headroom. The CPU's 24 MB of shared L3 cache and support for DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s contribute to its ability to feed the GPU quickly.

The CPU's role in this combo is to provide a stable and fast foundation for the GPU. Its high single-core performance, as seen in the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,085, is particularly important for gaming. The benchmark results show that this processor can handle the game's logic and physics without introducing frame rate dips, allowing the GPU to operate at its fullest potential. The processor's 89th percentile ranking confirms it is a high-end part that pairs well with a mid-to-high-end GPU like the RTX 3070 Ti.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS data, the best experience depends on the user's display resolution and refresh rate. For 1080p users with a 144Hz or 240Hz monitor, the High preset is a strong recommendation. It delivers an average of 198 FPS, which is well above 144Hz and close to 240Hz, offering a great balance of visual fidelity and performance. The Ultra preset at 189 FPS is also viable, but the marginal visual improvement over High may not justify the 9 FPS drop.

For 1440p users, the High preset is the sweet spot, delivering an average of 143 FPS. This is ideal for 144Hz monitors, providing a smooth and immersive experience. The Ultra preset at 136 FPS is also playable, but the High preset offers a slightly higher frame rate for a likely imperceptible difference in visual quality. For users with 60Hz monitors at 1440p, even the Ultra preset at 136 FPS is overkill, and they could consider the Medium preset to save power, though the visual difference is minimal.

For 4K users, the data suggests that the Medium preset is the best choice. It delivers an average of 143 FPS, which is excellent for 4K gaming. The High preset at 90 FPS is also very playable, but the Medium preset's higher frame rate makes it a better option for a smoother experience. The Ultra preset at 85 FPS is the most demanding, and while it is still above 60 FPS, the performance drop from High is significant. The Low preset at 4K, with an average of 179 FPS, is an option for those prioritizing frame rate above all else, but it would compromise the visual experience. The Medium preset at all resolutions provides a solid baseline, with its frame rate being consistently high and its visual quality a step up from Low.