Inside

Inside is a 2016 puzzle platformer that is anything but demanding by modern standards, and the benchmark results for the Intel Core i5-14400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 combination confirm this. The data shows a system that is dramatically overqualified for the task, delivering frame rates that far exceed the refresh rates of most displays across all tested resolutions and settings. The following analysis breaks down the measured performance, focusing on how the CPU and GPU contribute to a gaming experience characterized by massive headroom.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance ranking of the Intel Core i5-14400F + RTX 4070 combo in Inside?

A: The combo ranks 824th out of 3716 tested combinations, placing it in the top 22% of all systems tested for this game.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals in general benchmark scores?

A: The i5-14400F has an average benchmark score of 32279cars. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, scores 32233, making the Intel processor a mere 0.1% faster. It is also 0.2% faster than the Intel Core i9-11900 and 0.5% faster than the Intel Core i7-12800H, while being 0.2% slower than the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS.

Q: What is the GPU's standing relative to other graphics cards in its benchmark class?

A: The RTX 4070 has an average benchmark score of 37648 and is in the 81st percentile of all GPUs. Its closest rival, the NVIDIA Tesla P4, scores 37628, a negligible 0.1% difference. It is also 0.4% faster than the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 and 1.3% faster than the AMD Radeon PRO W6400, but 1.3% slower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile.

Q: What is the lowest average frame rate recorded for this combo in Inside?

A: The lowest average frame rate is 99 FPS, which occurs at 4K resolution with the Ultra preset. This is still well above the standard 60 FPS target and indicates a very fluid experience even at the most demanding settings.

Q: Is there a significant performance difference between the Low and Ultra presets at 1080p?

A: Yes, the difference is substantial. At 1080p, the Low preset averages 339 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 219 FPS. This represents a 120 FPS drop (approximately 35%) when moving from the lowest to the highest quality settings.

Q: Does the system maintain playable frame rates at 4K?

A: Absolutely. Even at 4K with the Ultra preset, the system maintains an average of 99 FPS. The High preset at 4K yields 104 FPS, and the Medium preset reaches 166 FPS, showing that the GPU has ample power for high-refresh-rate 4K gaming in this title.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-14400F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, with 20 MB of shared L3 cache. In a game like Inside, which is a 2D puzzle platformer with relatively simple physics and AI, the CPU's role is less about raw multi-threaded throughput and more about maintaining a high single-thread performance to feed the GPU. The processor's single-core performance, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3055 and Geekbench single-core score of 2058, is more than sufficient for this task.

The data implies that the CPU is never a bottleneck in this specific game, even at lower resolutions where the GPU has less work to do. The general benchmark results show the CPU is in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32279. This places it in a performance tier alongside the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, which it edges out by a negligible 0.1%, and the Intel Core i9-11900, which it beats by 0.2%. The high frame rates at 1080p, such as the 339 FPS average on Low settings, are indicative of a CPU that can process game logic and draw calls quickly enough to not limit the frame output.

The i5-14400F's architecture is Raptor Lake-R, built on a 10 nm process node. While this is not the most current-generation process, the processor's high boost clock of 4.70 GHz is a key factor in its strong gaming performance. For a game like Inside, which was released in 2016able to take advantage of a single fast core, the i5-14400F's specifications are more than adequate. The benchmark results consistently show that the system's frame rates are dominated by the GPU's performance and the chosen settings, not by any CPU limitation.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is the primary driver of performance in Inside, given the game's low CPU overhead. The GPU features 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. Its memory clock is listed as 1313 MHz with a 21 Gbps effective rate. The GPU is based on the Ada Lovelace architecture and is built on a 5 nm process by TSMC. With a boost clock of 2475 MHz, the RTX 4070 has a substantial amount of compute power, which is reflected in its FP32 performance of 29.15 TFLOPS.

The game's visual style, while atmospheric, is not graphically intensive by modern standards. However, the benchmark results show that the GPU is still the determining factor for performance scaling. As resolution increases, the frame rates drop, which is a classic sign of GPU-bound rendering. At 1080p High, the average FPS is 230, but at 4K High, it drops to 104 FPS. This indicates that the GPU is working significantly harder at higher resolutions to fill more pixels.

The RTX 4070's 12 GB of VRAM is more than enough for a game like Inside, which likely uses a fraction of that capacity even at 4K. The GPU's general benchmark scores are strong, placing it in the 81st percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 37648. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA Tesla P4, is virtually identical in score (37628), while the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is slightly behind at 37507. The performance data for this specific game suggests that the RTX 4070 is never stressed to its limits, as even the most demanding preset at 4K yields an average of 99 FPS.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The benchmark data provides a clear picture of performance across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the system is massively overperforming. The Low preset averages 339 FPS, while the Medium preset achieves 313 FPS with a minimum of 266 FPS and a maximum of 360 FPS. The High preset averages 230 FPS, and the Ultra preset still manages a very high 219 FPS. These numbers suggest that the bottleneck at 1080p is rarely the GPU, and the CPU is easily keeping up.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains exceptionally high. The Low preset averages 304 FPS, which is a slight drop from the 1080p result but still incredibly smooth. The Medium preset averages 264 FPS (min 225, max 304), the High preset averages 165 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 157 FPS. The gap between High and Ultra is relatively small (8 FPS), suggesting diminishing returns on the highest settings.

At 3840x2160, the GPU begins to show more strain, though the results are still excellent. The Low preset averages 208 FPS, which is still a high-refresh-rate experience. The Medium preset averages 166 FPS (min 141, max 191). The High preset averages 104 FPS, and the Ultra preset brings up the rear with an average of 99 FPS. The difference between the Low and Ultra presets at 4K is 109 FPS, showing a significant impact from settings on the GPU load at this high resolution.

Resolution Scaling

The data shows a clear and expected trend: as resolution increases, average FPS decreases. For the High preset, the FPS drops from 230 at 1080p to 165 at 1440p, and then to 104 at 4K. This is a reduction of 65 FPS (28%) from 1080p to 1440p, and a further reduction of 61 FPS (37%) from 1440p to 4K. This scaling pattern is characteristic of a system that is GPU-bound at higher resolutions.

The Low preset shows a similar trend but with less severe percentage drops. It goes from 339 FPS at 1080p to 304 FPS at 1440p (a 35 FPS drop), and then down to 208 FPS at 4K (a 96 FPS drop). The absolute drop from 1080p to 4K is 131 FPS, which is more than a 38% reduction. This indicates that even at Low settings, the pixel fill rate requirement at 4K is a significant load for the GPU.

The Medium preset, which has min/max data, shows a drop from 313 FPS at 1080p to 264 FPS at 1440p, and then to 166 FPS at 4K. The minimum FPS also scales down, from 266 at 1080p to 225 at 1440pholia, and finally to 141 at 4K. This consistent scaling across all presets confirms that the limiting component in this system is the GPU's ability to render at higher resolutions. The CPU's performance is effectively constant, meaning the frame rate is dictated by the GPU's workload.

Settings Recommendations

Given the extraordinary performance headroom, the recommendation is to prioritize visual quality. The data shows that even the most demanding preset, Ultra, provides an average of 219 FPS at 1080p and 157 FPS at 1440p. These are excellent frame rates that exceed the refresh rate of most high-end monitors. For 4K gaming, the Ultra preset provides an average of 99 FPS, which is a solid 60+ FPS experience, but the High preset at 104 FPS offers a slightly better frame rate.

For users with a 1080p or 1440p monitor with a high refresh rate (144Hz or higher), the Ultra preset is the obvious choice, as it provides the best visual quality without sacrificing smoothness. The difference between High and Ultra is minimal in terms of FPS, but the visual upgrade can be noticeable. At 4K, the choice is a bit more nuanced. The High preset offers a 5 FPS advantage over Ultra, which is negligible. However, if a user is aiming for a locked 100+ FPS experience, the High preset is the safer bet, while the Ultra preset is perfectly playable for those who prefer maximum detail.

The Medium preset, while offering high FPS, does not provide a compelling reason to choose it over High or Ultra, given the system's capabilities. The Low preset is not recommended for this hardware, as it unnecessarily sacrifices visual fidelity without providing a meaningful performance benefit for most use cases. In summary, the data suggests that the Ultra preset is the best experience for 1080p and 1440p, while the High preset is the most balanced option for 4K.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i5-14400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 combination ranks 824th out of 3716 tested combos in Inside. This puts it in the 78th percentile of all tested systems, meaning it performs better than the majority of combinations. This high rank confirms the sheer power of the RTX 4070 and the i5-14400F, which are both high-end components.

The rank is particularly notable because Inside is a game with low system requirements. The fact that this combo ranks as high as it does indicates that the benchmark database includes many systems with less powerful components. The 824th rank out of 3716 suggests that a significant number of tested systems are capable of running this game perfectly well, but this particular combo is near the top of the pile due to its high-end nature.

The CPU's percentile rank of 83 and the GPU's percentile rank of 81 are consistent with the combo's overall rank. The system is not the absolute best, but it is firmly in the upper echelon of performers. The data shows a system that provides a flawless experience in this game, with frame rates that are limited by the display's refresh rate rather than the hardware's capabilities. In summary, the combo ranks as a top-tier performer for Inside, offering a level of performance that far exceeds the game's demands.