Inside

The Intel Core i5-14400F and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER pairing delivers a highly capable experience for Inside, a Puzzle Platformer. The data shows this combo ranks 1480th out of 1671 tested combinations, placing it in the lower-middle tier of the database, but the measured frame rates reveal that this position is more than adequate for the game’s demands. The benchmark results indicate a system that can easily handle the game at high refresh rates, with the primary trade-off being a need to adjust settings for 4K play.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core i5-14400F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, built on the Raptor Lake architecture. It operates with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. Its 20 MB of shared L3 cache and support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory make it a versatile modern chip. In synthetic benchmarks, the processor achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21914 and a single-core score of 3093, which places it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs tested. This performance is nearly identical to its nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i7-12800H, which has an average score of 32513 with a 0% delta, and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7645, which is only 0.2% behind.

For Inside, the CPU’s role is less demanding than in many other genres. The game is a side-scrolling puzzle platformer with a limited number of on-screen physics objects and AI-driven characters. The benchmark results confirm this, as the frame rate scales primarily with resolution and graphics settings rather than showing CPU-bound limitations. Even at 1080p with Low settings, where the GPU load is lightest, the system achieves 215.1 FPS, indicating that the i5-14400F’s strong single-thread performance is more than sufficient to feed the GTX 1660 SUPER. The processor’s 16 threads handle background tasks and system processes without interfering with game performance, ensuring consistent frame pacing. The data suggests that the CPU is not a bottleneck in this configuration; rather, it provides a stable platform that allows the GPU to operate at its full potential.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is a Turing-architecture GPU with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s. It has a base clock of 1530 MHz and a boost clock of 1785 MHz, with a memory clock running at 14 Gbps effective. The GPU’s 1408 shading units and 48 ROPs deliver a passmark G3D score of 12699, placing it in the 55th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 and the Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics, both with an average score around 14314 and a deltaPct of -0.2%, meaning the GTX 1660 SUPER performs nearly identically to these integrated and entry-level discrete solutions.

In Inside, the GPU is the primary driver of performance, especially at higher resolutions. The game’s art style, which features a heavy use of shadow and lighting effects, responds directly to the graphics settings. At 1080p, the GTX 1660 SUPER delivers excellent results: 215.1 FPS on Low, 175.4 FPS on Medium, 108 FPS on High, and 103.3 FPS on Ultra. The 6 GB VRAM is sufficient for the game’s textures at 1080p and 1440p, as the frame times remain stable on the High and Ultra presets. At 4K, the GPU’s limitations become apparent, with the High preset yielding 47.2 FPS and Ultra dropping to 49.5 FPS. The 336.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate for the game’s data transfer needs, but the core clock and shading unit count cap the pixel throughput at 4K, resulting in sub-60 FPS performance on the highest settings.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

The measured FPS data clearly indicates that the optimal balance of visual quality and performance for this combo is the Medium preset. At 1080p, Medium yields 175.4 FPS, which is a 62.4% improvement over the High preset’s 108 FPS. This frame rate is well above the threshold for high-refresh-rate monitors and provides a smooth experience with minimal visual compromise. Moving to 1440p, Medium delivers 121.9 FPS, which is still excellent and only slightly below the High preset’s 77.3 FPS in terms of visual fidelity. The Ultra preset offers diminishing returns: at 1080p it produces 103.3 FPS, only 4.7 FPS less than High, but at 1440p it drops to 76.9 FPS, which is still playable but not as fluid as Medium.

For 4K, the data suggests that players should avoid the High and Ultra presets entirely, as they both hover around 47-49 FPS. The Low preset at 4K produces 96.4 FPS, making it the only viable option for 4K gaming on this hardware. However, the visual downgrade from Low to Medium at 4K is significant, and the Medium preset’s 77.9 FPS is a better compromise for those who prioritize smoothness over detail. The recommendation is to play at 1080p or 1440p on Medium for the best experience, as this preset offers the highest frame rate per unit of visual fidelity. For 4K, the Low preset is the only way to maintain a high refresh rate, while Medium is acceptable for those who prefer a more polished image at 60 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

This combination of the Intel Core i5-14400F and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER holds a rank of 1480 out of 1671 tested combos in Inside. This places it in the bottom 11% of all configurations, which might seem alarming at first glance, but the actual gameplay metrics tell a different story. The rank is likely influenced by the fact that many tested combos use much higher-end GPUs, such as the RTX 40-series or RX 7000-series cards, which dominate the top of the ladder. The GTX 1660 SUPER, being an older Turing card that is now end-of-life, is naturally positioned lower in the ranking.

Despite the low rank, the data shows that this combo is perfectly viable for the game. The 1080p Medium result of 175.4 FPS is nearly three times the 60 FPS target and is competitive with many mid-range GPUs. The bottleneck is almost entirely on the GPU side, as the CPU’s performance is comparable to newer i7 parts. The rank of 1480 suggests that this is a budget-oriented setup, but it does not indicate a poor experience. The measured frame rates demonstrate that the combo is well-suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with only 4K requiring a significant settings reduction. In essence, the rank is a reflection of the GPU’s age, not its ability to run this specific title.

FAQ

*Q: Can this combo run Inside at 4K smoothly?*

A: The data shows that 4K performance is limited. At the Low preset, the average FPS is 96.4, which is smooth. However, at the Medium preset, the FPS drops to 77.9, and at High and Ultra, it falls to 47.2 and 49.5 FPS respectively. For a consistent 60 FPS experience at 4K, the Low preset is recommended.

Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The benchmark results indicate that 1440p is the sweet spot. The Medium preset at 1440p yields 121.9 FPS, which is very smooth and visually appealing. At 1080p, the Medium preset yields 175.4 FPS, which is better for high-refresh-rate monitors, but 1440p offers a greater visual clarity without a significant FPS penalty.

Q: Is the Ultra preset worth using with the GTX 1660 SUPER?

A: The data shows that Ultra provides a minimal FPS gain over High. At 1080p, Ultra produces 103.3 FPS compared to High’s 108 FPS, which is a negligible difference of 4.5%. At 1440p, the difference is even smaller (76.9 vs 77.3 FPS). The visual improvements from Ultra are not worth the slight performance drop, so High is a more efficient choice.

Q: How does the CPU affect performance in this game?

A: The i5-14400F’s strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 score of 3093) ensures that it is not a bottleneck in Inside. The frame rates scale with GPU load, indicating that the CPU consistently provides enough data for the GTX 1660 SUPER to operate at its maximum, even at 1080p Low where the game is most CPU-bound.

Q: Is the 6 GB VRAM on the GTX 1660 SUPER sufficient for this game?

A: Yes, the benchmark data shows stable performance across all settings, with no indication of VRAM-related stuttering. The 6 GB of GDDR6 memory is more than enough for Inside’s textures and effects, even at 4K, as the frame rate drops are due to core clock limits rather than memory capacity.

Q: What is the performance difference between the Low and High presets?

A: At 1080p, the Low preset yields 215.1 FPS, while High yields 108 FPS, a difference of 107.1 FPS. At 1440p, the difference is 78.1 FPS (155.4 vs 77.3). At 4K, the gap narrows to 49.2 FPS (96.4 vs 47.2). The Low preset is twice as fast as High at 1080p, but the visual quality is significantly reduced.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of the combo’s capabilities. At 1920x1080, the system delivers a wide range of performance depending on the preset. The Low setting produces an average of 215.1 FPS, which is the highest frame rate recorded for this combo. The Medium setting yields 175.4 FPS, offering a substantial drop in FPS but a noticeable increase in visual quality. The High setting produces 108 FPS, and the Ultra setting is only slightly lower at 103.3 FPS, indicating a diminishing return on the highest presets.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains strong. The Low setting achieves 155.4 FPS, which is still well above the 120 FPS mark for high-refresh-rate gaming. The Medium setting drops to 121.9 FPS, which is still excellent. The High and Ultra settings produce 77.3 FPS and 76.9 FPS respectively, showing that the GPU is becoming more of a limiting factor at this resolution, but the frame rates are still perfectly playable.

At 3840x2160, the GPU’s limits are clearly visible. The Low setting yields 96.4 FPS, which is surprisingly high and suggests the game is not overly demanding at low quality. The Medium setting produces 77.9 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for fast-paced sections. The High and Ultra settings produce 47.2 FPS and 49.5 FPS respectively, which are below the 60 FPS threshold and may result in a less smooth experience. The data confirms that 4K is only viable on the Low or Medium presets for this hardware combination.