Inside

Inside is a puzzle platformer that is far more demanding than its minimalist presentation suggests, and the data for the Intel Core i5-12400 + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT combo shows a system that utterly demolishes this title. The measured frame rates are so high across all resolutions and settings that the game becomes a showcase for high-refresh-rate displays rather than a graphical challenge. This combination of a 6-core Alder Lake processor and a 16 GB RDNA 4.0 graphics card produces results that are consistently in the triple digits, making any form of performance anxiety irrelevant for this specific title.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average frame rate this combo achieves in Inside?

A: The peak measured average FPS is 317, achieved at 1920x1080 with the Low preset. This indicates the CPU and GPU have massive headroom at lower resolutions.

Q: Is this combo capable of 4K gaming in Inside?

A: Yes, absolutely. At 3840x2160, the average frame rate is 104 FPS on High and 99 FPS on Ultra, both of which are well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.

Q: How does the Core i5-12400 perform in synthetic benchmarks relevant to gaming?

A: The CPU scores 910 points in 3DMark single-thread and 5,890 points in 3DMark max threads. It also achieves a Geekbench single-core score of 1,848 and a multi-core score of 8,564, indicating strong per-core performance that benefits game logic.

Q: What is the performance difference between the Low and Ultra presets at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the average FPS drops from 284 on Low to 157 on Ultra. This represents a significant 45% reduction in frame rate, but the Ultra preset still delivers an exceptionally smooth experience.

Q: Does the RX 9070 XT have enough memory bandwidth for high resolutions?

A: The GPU features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth. This is more than sufficient for the textures and effects in Inside at any resolution.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations for Inside?

A: The combo ranks 919th out of 3,716 tested combinations, placing it in the top 25% of all systems benchmarked for this game.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT is the dominant component in this pairing, and its specifications make it overkill for Inside. The GPU is built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture with 4,096 shading units and a boost clock of 2970 MHz, which translates to a peak FP32 performance of 48.66 TFLOPS. The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory running at an effective 20.1 Gbps provides a bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s, which is more than ample for a game that is primarily 2D with 3D depth layers.

The data shows that the GPU's raw power is barely taxed. At 3840x2160, the most demanding resolution tested, the Ultra preset still yields an average of 99 FPS. The jump from Ultra to High at 4K only increases the average to 104 FPS, a modest 5% gain, suggesting that the Ultra preset is not heavily reliant on GPU resources that the card lacks. The real performance scaling is seen when lowering settings; dropping to Medium at 4K pushes the average to 166 FPS, and Low achieves 207 FPS. This pattern indicates that the GPU is far from a bottleneck at any setting, and the frame rate is more likely limited by the game engine's draw call overhead or CPU single-thread performance.

The card's 128 ROPs and 256 TMUs contribute to a pixel rate of 380.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 760.3 GTexel/s. These figures are far beyond what a puzzle platformer requires, even at 4K resolution. The measured results confirm this, as even the lowest average FPS of 99 at 4K Ultra is still exceptionally smooth. For this title, the RX 9070 XT behaves like a high-end card that has been paired with a low-demand workload, leaving the user with the ability to run the game at maximum settings and still have enough headroom for background tasks or streaming.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, there is no scenario where the user must compromise on visual quality to achieve playable frame rates in Inside. The lowest average FPS recorded is 99 at 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset, which is still well above the standard 60 FPS target. Therefore, the optimal recommendation is to use the Ultra preset at any resolution, as it provides the best visual experience without sacrificing performance.

However, for users with high-refresh-rate monitors, the data suggests that the Medium preset offers the best balance of visual fidelity and frame rate headroom. At 2560x1440, the Medium preset achieves an average of 262 FPS with a minimum of 223 FPS, ensuring that there are no noticeable drops even in complex scenes. At 1920x1080, Medium yields 293 FPS average with a minimum of 249 FPS, which is ideal for a 240 Hz display. The High preset is also viable, but the jump from High to Ultra at 1440p only costs 8 FPS (157 vs 165), making Ultra the better choice for visual purists.

For 4K users, the Ultra preset at 99 FPS is perfectly playable on a 120 Hz display, but the Medium preset at 166 FPS provides a smoother experience that is more aligned with modern high-refresh-rate panels. The Low preset offers the highest frame rates but sacrifices too much visual quality for a game that is already not visually intensive. In summary, the Ultra preset is recommended for most users, while Medium is suggested for those prioritizing maximum frame rate consistency on high-refresh displays.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo performs exceptionally well across all settings. The Low preset delivers an average of 317 FPS, which is the highest measurement in the entire dataset. The Medium preset provides an average of 293 FPS with a minimum of 249 FPS and a maximum of 337 FPS, indicating excellent frame time consistency. The High preset averages 230 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 219 FPS. The performance delta between Low and Ultra is 98 FPS, or roughly 31%, which is a significant gap but still leaves the Ultra preset well above any playability threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales as expected. The Low preset achieves an average of 284 FPS, while Medium produces 262 FPS with a minimum of 223 FPS and a maximum of 302 FPS. The High preset averages 165 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 157 FPS. The difference between High and Ultra is minimal at only 8 FPS, suggesting that the Ultra preset's additional effects are not heavily taxing the GPU. The minimum FPS recorded for Medium at this resolution is 223, which is still higher than the average FPS of most other systems at 1080p.

At 3840x2160, the frame rates remain impressively high. The Low preset averages 207 FPS, and the Medium preset averages 166 FPS with a minimum of 141 FPS and a maximum of 191 FPS. The High preset achieves 104 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 99 FPS. The most notable observation is the significant drop from Medium to High, which is 62 FPS, or 37%. This suggests that the High preset introduces a substantial increase in GPU workload, likely related to shadow quality or post-processing effects, but the card still handles it without issue.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i5-12400 + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT combo holds the 919th position out of 3,716 tested configurations for Inside. This ranking places it in the 75th percentile of all tested systems, meaning it outperforms approximately 75% of the combinations in the database for this specific game. While this might sound modest, it is important to consider that Inside is not a demanding title, and many lower-end systems can achieve high frame rates, leading to a crowded leaderboard where the differences between ranks are minimal.

The GPU's percentile versus all GPUs is 55, which seems low, but this is likely skewed by the inclusion of older and lower-end cards in the benchmark database. The CPU's percentile versus all CPUs is 72, indicating that the i5-12400 is a solid mid-range performer. The combination of these two components results in a system that is well-balanced for this game, with neither component acting as a significant bottleneck. The rank of 919 is a reflection of the fact that Inside is easy to run, and the vast majority of systems, even those with much weaker hardware, can achieve playable frame rates. This combo's high FPS numbers confirm that it is in the upper echelon of performance, even if its rank is not in the top 100.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-12400 plays a supporting but crucial role in this combo. It features 6 cores and 12 threads based on the Alder Lake architecture, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The CPU has 18 MB of shared L3 cache and supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, though the measured performance does not specify which memory type was used. Its single-thread performance, as indicated by a 3DMark single-thread score of 910 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,257, is strong and sufficient for the game's logic and physics calculations.

The benchmark data shows that the CPU is not a limiting factor in Inside. At 1080p, where the GPU load is lighter, the frame rates are still exceptionally high, with the Low preset hitting 317 FPS. This indicates that the CPU can feed the GPU with enough data to maintain such high frame rates. The multi-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15,989, ensures that background tasks or streaming will not impact gameplay. The CPU's percentile versus all CPUs is 72, which is respectable, and its nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 7643 and Intel Core i7-1355U, with negligible performance differences.

In this game, the CPU's role is to maintain consistent frame pacing, especially during the game's more complex scenes with many interactive elements. The 6 cores are more than enough for a puzzle platformer, and the high boost clock ensures that single-threaded tasks are handled quickly. The data shows that the CPU does not bottleneck the GPU at any resolution, as the frame rates scale predictably with GPU load when moving from Low to Ultra presets. For a game like Inside, the i5-12400 provides more than enough processing power, ensuring that the RX 9070 XT is the primary driver of performance.