Inside

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 paired with the AMD Radeon 8050S delivers a highly capable 1080p and 1440p experience in Inside, with the data showing that the combination is firmly CPU-bound at lower resolutions and transitions to a GPU-bound state only at 4K. The measured frame rates indicate that this integrated graphics solution punches well above its weight, offering performance that rivals dedicated mobile GPUs while maintaining playability even at the highest settings. The benchmark results show a clear hierarchy where the Ultra preset is the most demanding, and the scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a balanced system that loses significant performance only when pushing 4K Ultra.

Resolution Scaling

The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is the most telling indicator of where the bottleneck lies for this combo. At High settings, the average frame rate falls from 138 FPS at 1920x1080 to 99 FPS at 2560x1440, and then further to 62 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a 28% reduction from 1080p to 1440p, and a 55% reduction from 1080p to 4K. The 4K High result of 62 FPS is still comfortably playable, but it shows that the Radeon 8050S is being pushed hard at that resolution.

The scaling pattern becomes more dramatic when examining the Low preset, where the system hits 275 FPS at 1080p, 198 FPS at 1440p, and 124 FPS at 4K. The 4K Low figure is exactly double the 1080p High result, which suggests that at Low settings the system is heavily CPU-limited at 1080p and only begins to show GPU limitations as resolution increases. The 28% drop from 1080p to 1440p Low is proportionally smaller than the 37% drop from 1440p to 4K Low, indicating that the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions.

Medium settings tell a similar story with a twist. At 1080p Medium, the combo produces 220 FPS average with a minimum of 187 FPS and a maximum of 253 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the average drops to 158 FPS with a minimum of 135 FPS and maximum of 182 FPS. The 4K Medium result of 100 FPS average with 85 FPS minimum shows that the system can maintain a smooth experience even at the highest resolution with moderate settings. The frame time consistency, as evidenced by the min/max spread, remains tight across all resolutions, which is crucial for a puzzle platformer where precise timing matters.

Ultra settings reveal the true cost of maximum fidelity. The combo achieves 131 FPS at 1080p, 94 FPS at 1440p, and 59 FPS at 4K. The 4K Ultra result of 59 FPS is the only measured configuration that dips below the 60 FPS threshold, and it does so by just one frame. This suggests that the Radeon 8050S is capable of handling Ultra settings at 4K, but just barely. The scaling from 1080p Ultra to 4K Ultra shows a 55% reduction, identical to the High preset scaling, which indicates that the GPU load scales consistently regardless of the quality preset.

The data reveals that this combo is balanced for 1440p gaming. At that resolution, the system delivers 99 FPS on High and 158 FPS on Medium, both of which are excellent for a smooth experience. The 1080p results are extremely high across all presets, suggesting that the CPU is often waiting on the GPU even at that resolution. The 4K results are playable but require setting expectations: High and Medium presets maintain 60+ FPS, while Ultra falls just short.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, built on a 4 nm process with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. This processor is a powerhouse, sitting in the 95th percentile of all CPUs according to the benchmark database. Its multi-threaded capabilities are substantial, as evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35314 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 20992, while single-thread performance is equally strong with a Geekbench single-core score of 2464.

In Inside, a puzzle platformer that is not typically demanding on CPU resources, this processor is rarely the limiting factor. The measured frame rates at 1080p Low (275 FPS) and 1080p Medium (220 FPS) are so high that they approach the practical limits of what the display and game engine can deliver. The CPU's single-core performance, reflected in a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2044 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4147, ensures that the game's logic and physics calculations are handled without introducing bottlenecks.

The processor's memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s via quad-channel LPDDR5X is a critical factor for this integrated graphics configuration. Since the Radeon 8050S shares system memory, the CPU's memory controller directly impacts GPU performance. The high bandwidth helps maintain consistent frame rates even at 4K resolutions, where memory bandwidth demands increase significantly. The 64 MB of shared L3 cache also contributes to reducing latency for both CPU and GPU operations.

When compared to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 shows a slight advantage over the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX, with an average benchmark score of 77740 versus 76513, a 1.6% delta. It also edges out the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P by the same 1.6% margin. However, the Intel Core i9-14900K holds a 1.7% advantage over the Ryzen AI Max+ 395, with an average score of 79097. The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX trails by 2.0%, with an average score of 76212.

The data shows that the CPU's role in Inside is to provide a stable foundation that never becomes a bottleneck. At 1080p, the frame rates are so high that they exceed what most displays can show, indicating that the CPU is not limiting performance. As resolution increases, the GPU takes over as the primary constraint, and the CPU's strong single-thread performance ensures that frame pacing remains consistent. The 16 cores and 32 threads are more than sufficient for this game, and the processor's 95th percentile ranking suggests it will handle far more demanding workloads with ease.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon 8050S is an integrated graphics processor built on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, featuring 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operations pipelines. It operates at a base clock of 1295 MHz with a boost clock of 2800 MHz, delivering 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The GPU sits in the 89th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 62108, which places it in the upper echelon of integrated graphics solutions.

In Inside, the GPU's role becomes increasingly important as resolution increases. At 1080p, the GPU is capable of delivering extremely high frame rates across all presets, ranging from 275 FPS at Low to 131 FPS at Ultra. These results indicate that the GPU has ample headroom at this resolution, and the game is likely limited by other factors such as the CPU or engine frame rate cap. The 4K results, however, show the GPU being pushed to its limits, with 124 FPS at Low and 59 FPS at Ultra.

The Radeon 8050S uses system-shared memory, which means its memory bandwidth is dependent on the system configuration. In this case, the CPU's quad-channel LPDDR5X memory provides 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is more than sufficient for a puzzle platformer. The GPU's 32 ray tracing cores support DirectX 12 Ultimate, though this game does not utilize ray tracing, so those cores remain idle. The 64 ROPs and 128 TMUs are well-balanced for this game's rendering requirements, which are relatively modest compared to modern AAA titles.

The GPU's benchmark results show it performing nearly identically to the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, with a delta of just 0.3% (62108 versus 61896). However, it trails the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 by 2.5%, the AMD Radeon RX 7600M by 2.6%, and the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP by 2.7%. These small deltas suggest that the Radeon 8050S is competitive with mid-range dedicated mobile GPUs, which is remarkable for an integrated solution.

The GPU's performance in Inside is characterized by its ability to maintain high frame rates at 1440p and playable frame rates at 4K. At 1440p High, the combo delivers 99 FPS, which is more than adequate for a smooth experience. The 4K Medium result of 100 FPS is particularly impressive, showing that the GPU can handle the resolution increase without significant performance degradation when settings are moderated. The 4K Ultra result of 59 FPS is the only configuration that falls below 60 FPS, indicating that the GPU's limits are reached at the highest settings and resolution combination.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured frame rates, the Medium preset offers the best balance of visual quality and performance across all resolutions. At 1080p Medium, the combo delivers 220 FPS average with a minimum of 187 FPS, which is far above the threshold for smooth gameplay. At 1440p Medium, the average drops to 158 FPS with a minimum of 135 FPS, still providing an excellent experience. Even at 4K Medium, the system maintains 100 FPS average with an 85 FPS minimum, which is well within the playable range.

The High preset is the recommended choice for users who prioritize visual fidelity over maximum frame rates. At 1080p High, the combo produces 138 FPS, which is still very smooth. At 1440p High, the average drops to 99 FPS, which is acceptable for most players. The 4K High result of 62 FPS is playable but leaves little headroom for demanding scenes. The Ultra preset should be avoided at 4K, as it produces 59 FPS average, which may result in occasional stutters.

For competitive play or users with high refresh rate displays, the Low preset is the optimal choice. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 275 FPS, which exceeds the refresh rate of most gaming monitors. At 1440p Low, the average of 198 FPS is still exceptionally high. The 4K Low result of 124 FPS demonstrates that even at the highest resolution, the Low preset provides a frame rate well above the 60 FPS threshold.

The data suggests that the Medium preset is the "sweet spot" for this combo, offering a significant visual upgrade over Low while maintaining frame rates that are more than double the 60 FPS target at 1080p and 1440p. The gap between Medium and High is noticeable, with High costing roughly 37% of the average frame rate at 1080p (220 to 138 FPS) and 37% at 1440p (158 to 99 FPS). The gap between High and Ultra is smaller, suggesting diminishing returns from High to Ultra.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 paired with the AMD Radeon 8050S ranks 2105 out of 2887 tested combos in Inside, placing it in the 27th percentile of all tested configurations. This ranking reflects the fact that while the CPU is exceptionally powerful (95th percentile), the GPU is relatively modest (89th percentile), and the combination is not optimized for maximum frame rates in this game. The ranking is influenced by the fact that many other tested combos include high-end dedicated GPUs that significantly outperform the Radeon 8050S.

Despite the middling overall rank, the actual measured performance is quite good. The combo achieves 138 FPS at 1080p High, which is comparable to many systems with dedicated mid-range GPUs. The 4K Ultra result of 59 FPS is particularly noteworthy, as it demonstrates that this integrated solution can handle the most demanding configuration in this game. The rank of 2105 out of 2887 suggests that while there are many faster combos, the majority of tested configurations (about 73%) are slower than this one.

The CPU's performance relative to its rivals provides context for the overall combo rank. The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 outperforms the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX by 1.6% and the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P by 1.6%, while trailing the Intel Core i9-14900K by 1.7% and leading the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX by 2.0%. The GPU's performance is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, with a 0.3% delta, and trails the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 by 2.5%, the AMD Radeon RX 7600M by 2.6%, and the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP by 2.7%.

The combo's rank in Inside is likely influenced by the game's relatively low system requirements. Since Inside is a puzzle platformer from 2016, it does not heavily stress modern hardware. This means that the GPU's performance is more important than the CPU's, and the Radeon 8050S, while capable, is not at the top of the GPU hierarchy. The combo's rank of 2105 out of 2887 indicates that it is positioned in the upper-middle tier of tested configurations, with roughly 782 combos performing better and 2105 performing worse.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution to play Inside with this combo?*

A: The data shows that 2560x1440 is the optimal resolution for this combo. At High settings, it delivers 99 FPS average, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold. At Medium settings, it achieves 158 FPS average, providing an excellent balance of visual quality and performance. The 1080p results are extremely high but may exceed display capabilities, while 4K results are playable but require settings management.

*Q: Can this combo handle 4K Ultra settings in Inside?*

A: The measured data shows the combo delivers 59 FPS average at 3840x2160 Ultra settings. This is just below the 60 FPS threshold, which means it is technically playable but may experience occasional frame drops during demanding scenes. For a consistently smooth experience at 4K, the High settings preset (62 FPS) or Medium preset (100 FPS) are recommended.

Q: How does the CPU performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has an average benchmark score of 77740, which is 1.6% higher than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX and the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P. It trails the Intel Core i9-14900K by 1.7% and leads the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX by 2.0%. This places it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: Is the GPU performance sufficient for this game?

A: Yes, the AMD Radeon 8050S delivers playable frame rates at all tested configurations. The lowest result is 59 FPS at 4K Ultra, which is just below the 60 FPS target. The GPU's average benchmark score of 62108 places it in the 89th percentile, and it performs within 3% of several dedicated mobile GPUs including the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56, AMD Radeon RX 7600M, and AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP.

Q: What preset provides the highest frame rate at 1080p?

A: The Low preset provides the highest measured frame rate at 1080p, achieving 275 FPS average. The Medium preset follows with 220 FPS average, High with 138 FPS, and Ultra with 131 FPS. The Low preset is recommended for users with high refresh rate displays, while Medium offers the best balance of quality and performance.

Q: Does the combo maintain consistent frame rates across all resolutions?

A: The data shows good frame time consistency, particularly at Medium settings where minimum frame rates are recorded. At 1080p Medium, the minimum is 187 FPS versus a 220 FPS average. At 1440p Medium, the minimum is 135 FPS versus a 158 FPS average. At 4K Medium, the minimum is 85 FPS versus a 100 FPS average. The gaps between average and minimum frame rates are consistent, indicating stable performance.