Inside
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 200 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 85 | 88 | 146 | 179 |
| 1440p QHD | 138 | 145 | 232 | 286 |
| 1080p Full HD | 190 | 197 | 316 | 398 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Inside with AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti combination ranks 509th out of 1,671 tested combos for Inside, placing it in the top 30.5% of all configurations. This is a strong showing for a game that is nearly a decade old, indicating that the pairing is more than sufficient to handle the title’s demands. The data suggests that the RTX 3070 Ti, while not a top-tier card by current standards, is the primary driver of performance here, and the 9950X3D’s massive 128 MB of shared L3 cache and 16 cores ensure that the CPU never becomes the bottleneck at any resolution.
How This Combo Ranks
The benchmark data places this specific CPU-GPU pairing at rank 509 out of 1,671 tested combos for Inside. This position, in the 69.5th percentile, reflects a configuration that delivers high frame rates across all tested settings. The ranking is likely influenced by the GPU’s performance ceiling, as the RTX 3070 Ti holds a 74th percentile ranking among all GPUs, while the CPU is in the 96th percentile. The disparity suggests that the GPU is the limiting factor in most scenarios, but the CPU’s headroom ensures that frame times remain consistent.
When looking at the CPU’s synthetic benchmarks, the 9950X3D scores 59,712 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 8,430 in single-core. This places it 1.8% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X and 2.2% ahead of the Intel Core i7-14700KF in average benchmark score. The GPU, meanwhile, is within 0.8% of the AMD Radeon RX 6700 and 0.9% of the NVIDIA Quadro M5000 in average score, indicating that the RTX 3070 Ti is a mid-range performer. The combination of a top-tier CPU with a mid-range GPU results in a system that is well-balanced for this game, where the GPU workload is relatively light.
The data shows that even at 4K Ultra settings, the combo achieves an average of 84.8 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. This suggests that the ranking could be higher if more demanding titles were considered, but for Inside, this configuration is overkill in most respects. The rank of 509 is therefore a reflection of the GPU’s limitations in other, more demanding games, not a deficiency in this specific title.
FAQ
*Q: What is the highest average FPS achieved by this combo in Inside?*
A: The highest average FPS recorded is 398.3 at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D has an average benchmark score of 71,660, which is 1.8% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X’s score of 70,420.
Q: What is the lowest average FPS recorded in the measured data?
A: The lowest average FPS is 84.8, achieved at 3840x2160 resolution with Ultra settings.
Q: Does the resolution scaling suggest a CPU or GPU bottleneck?
A: The frame rate drops significantly from 1080p to 4K, indicating a GPU bottleneck, as the CPU has ample headroom with its 16 cores and 32 threads.
Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?
A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti features 8 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 608.3 GB/s.
Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?
A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D has a boost clock of 5.70 GHz, with a base clock of 4.30 GHz.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of how the game scales with graphical settings. At 1920x1080, the difference between Low and Ultra settings is substantial, with an average FPS of 398.3 at Low and 190.4 at Ultra. The Medium setting offers a balanced 316 FPS, which is more than sufficient for any high-refresh-rate monitor. For the best experience at 1080p, High settings at 196.7 FPS are recommended, as they offer a significant visual improvement over Low while still maintaining frame rates well above 144 FPS.
Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain high, with Low settings achieving 286.1 FPS and Ultra dropping to 138.1 FPS. The Medium setting at 231.8 FPS is a sweet spot for 1440p, providing a smooth experience on 144Hz monitors without the visual compromises of Low settings. For those with 4K displays, the data shows that High settings at 87.5 FPS are playable, but Ultra at 84.8 FPS is nearly identical in performance. Given the minimal difference between High and Ultra at 4K, High is the recommended choice to ensure a stable frame rate, as the 2.7 FPS gain from dropping to High is marginal.
The best experience per the measured rows is achieved at 2560x1440 with Medium settings, offering 231.8 FPS. This resolution and setting combination provides a high level of visual fidelity while maintaining frame rates that exceed the refresh rate of most gaming monitors. The data indicates that the GPU is capable of handling the game at maximum settings at 1080p, but the returns diminish at higher resolutions, where the GPU becomes the limiting factor.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the RTX 3070 Ti delivers exceptional performance, with average FPS ranging from 190.4 at Ultra to 398.3 at Low. The High setting produces 196.7 FPS, while Medium achieves 316 FPS. These numbers indicate that the game is not demanding on the GPU at this resolution, and the CPU’s powerful single-thread performance, evidenced by its 3,540 score in Cinebench R20 single-core, ensures no frame drops.
At 2560x1440, the performance scales predictably, with average FPS dropping to 138.1 at Ultra, 145.1 at High, 231.8 at Medium, and 286.1 at Low. The 50% increase in pixel count from 1080p results in a corresponding decrease in frame rates, but the system still maintains high playability. The GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR6X memory and 608.3 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for this workload, as the game does not require large texture pools.
At 3840x2160, the GPU begins to show its limits, with average FPS falling to 84.8 at Ultra and 87.5 at High. Medium settings produce 146.4 FPS, while Low settings achieve 178.6 FPS. The data shows a clear scaling pattern, where the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at 4K, but the frame rates remain above 60 FPS even at Ultra settings. This confirms the CPU’s ability to feed the GPU efficiently, as the 9950X3D’s 128 MB of L3 cache reduces memory latency, allowing the GPU to work at its full potential.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a classic GPU-bound scenario. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 398.3 at 1080p to 286.1 at 1440p and 178.6 at 4K. This represents a 28.2% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a 37.5% drop from 1440p to 4K. The scaling is consistent with the pixel count increase, indicating that the GPU is the limiting factor.
At Ultra settings, the drop is more pronounced, with 190.4 FPS at 1080p falling to 138.1 at 1440p and 84.8 at 4K. This represents a 27.5% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a 38.6% drop from 1440p to 4K. The larger percentage drop at 4K suggests that the GPU is being pushed harder at higher settings, but the CPU is not a bottleneck, as its performance metrics are far above what this game requires.
The data indicates that the limiting component is the GPU, as the CPU’s 16 cores and 32 threads are underutilized in this title. The 9950X3D’s 3DMark single-thread score of 1,292 and multi-thread score of 17,184 show that it has ample processing power for the game’s physics and logic, leaving the GPU to handle the rendering workload. This is a common pattern in older games, where the CPU is not the primary constraint.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, with a base clock of 4.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz. Its 128 MB of shared L3 cache is a significant advantage for gaming, as it reduces memory latency and improves data access speeds. In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU scores 59,712 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 8,430 in single-core, placing it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs.
For Inside, a 2016 puzzle platformer, the CPU’s role is minimal, as the game is not heavily threaded. The data shows that the CPU is not a bottleneck at any resolution, as the frame rates are consistently high even at 4K. The 9950X3D’s single-thread performance, evidenced by its 3,540 score in Cinebench R20 single-core, is more than sufficient for the game’s logic, while its multi-thread capabilities are largely unused.
The CPU’s 16 cores and 32 threads are overkill for this title, but they ensure that the system has headroom for future games or multitasking. The processor’s 5.70 GHz boost clock provides high single-thread performance, which is critical for games that rely on a single main thread. The data shows that the CPU’s performance is not a limiting factor, as the frame rates are determined by the GPU’s capabilities at higher resolutions. The RTX 3070 Ti’s 21.75 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is the primary driver of frame rates, and the CPU’s role is to ensure that the GPU is fed with data without delays.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti in Inside
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 178.6 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 146.4 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 87.5 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 84.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 286.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 231.8 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 145.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 138.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 398.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 316.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 196.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 190.4 |
Inside with Ryzen 9 9950X3D + Other GPUs
See how Inside performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Inside with RTX 3070 Ti + Other CPUs
See how Inside performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 9 9950X3D + RTX 3070 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.