Inside

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT delivers a performance profile in Inside that is heavily dictated by resolution and graphics presets. The measured data shows a system capable of extreme frame rates at 1080p, with performance scaling down predictably as pixel count increases. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS figures, contextualizes them against the component benchmarks, and examines the specific roles of the CPU and GPU in this title.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS data for this combo reveals a clear pattern of GPU-bound scaling as resolution increases. At 1920x1080 with High settings, the system produces an average of 214 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 High drops the average to 154 FPS, a reduction of 60 FPS (approximately 28%). The jump to 3840x2160 High further reduces the average to 97 FPS, which is another 57 FPS lower (approximately 37% drop from 1440p). This steep decline indicates that the rendering load at higher resolutions is significantly taxing the GPU, while the CPU has ample headroom to feed frames at lower resolutions.

The scaling pattern is consistent across all presets. At Low settings, the average FPS goes from 317 at 1080p, to 284 at 1440p, and finally to 193 at 4K. This shows a 39% drop from 1080p to 4K. The Medium preset shows a similar trajectory: 293 FPS at 1080p, 246 FPS at 1440p, and 154 FPS at 4K. The Ultra preset, which is the most demanding, sees averages of 203 FPS at 1080p, 146 FPS at 1440p, and 92 FPS at 4K. These figures demonstrate that the performance ceiling at 1080p is extremely high, but the 4K results, while still very playable, are capped by the GPU's ability to process the larger frame buffer.

The fact that the FPS drop from 1080p to 1440p is substantial (around 60-70 FPS for most presets) suggests that the RX 6800 XT is the limiting component even at 1440p, as the workload scales with pixel count. The data indicates that the Ryzen 9 5900X, with its high multi-threaded capabilities, is not the bottleneck at any tested resolution. The consistent frame drops correlate directly with the increase in rendered pixels, pointing to the GPU as the primary performance limiter for this title. The 4K results, while lower, still remain above 90 FPS for all presets, indicating a robust performance level even at the highest pixel density tested.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data provides clear guidance on the optimal settings for this hardware configuration. At 1920x1080, all presets deliver excellent performance, with even the most demanding Ultra preset achieving an average of 203 FPS. This is well above the typical refresh rate of high-end monitors, making Ultra the recommended choice for 1080p users. The difference between High and Ultra is only 11 FPS (214 vs 203), but the visual fidelity gains from Ultra are typically worth the minor performance cost at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the recommendation shifts towards High settings. The High preset delivers an average of 154 FPS, which is excellent for smooth gameplay. The Ultra preset drops to 146 FPS, a smaller relative decrease than at 1080p. While both are playable, High offers a better balance, as the 8 FPS difference between High and Ultra may not justify the increased graphical load. The Medium preset at 246 FPS is unnecessarily high, leaving significant performance on the table that could be used for better visuals.

For 3840x2160, the data suggests that the High preset is the sweet spot. It delivers an average of 97 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS standard for most 4K displays. The Ultra preset drops to 92 FPS, which is still smooth but leaves less headroom. The Medium preset at 154 FPS is viable, but High offers a better visual experience with only a 57 FPS penalty. The Low preset at 193 FPS is excessive for 4K, and the visual compromise is not recommended. The data shows that High is the most balanced choice for 4K, providing a high frame rate while maintaining graphical quality.

FAQ

*Q: What is the maximum average FPS this combo can achieve in Inside?*

A: The highest measured average FPS is 317, which occurs at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This shows the system's peak capability when the GPU load is minimized.

Q: How does the 4K Ultra performance compare to the 1080p Ultra performance?

A: At 3840x2160 Ultra, the average FPS is 92. At 1920x1080 Ultra, the average FPS is 203. This represents a performance reduction of 111 FPS (approximately 55%) when moving from 1080p to 4K at the Ultra preset.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this game?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the primary limiter. The FPS drops significantly as resolution increases, which is a classic sign of GPU-bound performance. The CPU's high benchmark scores, such as a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16262, suggest it has ample headroom.

Q: What is the performance difference between High and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the High preset averages 154 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 146 FPS. The difference is 8 FPS, making High the more efficient choice for a minimal visual impact.

Q: Are there any frame rate dips recorded in the data?

A: Yes, the Medium preset is the only one with recorded minimum and maximum FPS values. At 1920x1080, the range is 249 to 337 FPS. At 2560x1440, it is 209 to 283 FPS. At 3840x2160, it is 131 to 178 FPS. This data shows the frame time variance is low, indicating stable performance.

Q: How does this combo rank among other tested configurations?

A: The combo ranks 1078 out of 3716 tested combinations in Inside. This places it in the upper percentile, indicating strong overall performance relative to other hardware pairings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following is a detailed breakdown of the measured average FPS for each resolution and settings preset.

1920x1080:

• Low: Average FPS of 317. This is the highest score recorded for this combo.
• Medium: Average FPS of 293, with a recorded range of 249 to 337 FPS.
• High: Average FPS of 214.
• Ultra: Average FPS of 203.

2560x1440:

• Low: Average FPS of 284.
• Medium: Average FPS of 246, with a recorded range of 209 to 283 FPS.
• High: Average FPS of 154.
• Ultra: Average FPS of 146.

3840x2160:

• Low: Average FPS of 193.
• Medium: Average FPS of 154, with a recorded range of 131 to 178 FPS.
• High: Average FPS of 97.
• Ultra: Average FPS of 92.

The data shows a consistent hierarchy: Lower settings yield higher frame rates, and lower resolutions yield higher frame rates. The performance gap between Low and Ultra is substantial at every resolution, with Ultra typically being about 36-40% slower than Low. The gap between High and Ultra is smaller, usually around 5-10 FPS, suggesting diminishing returns on the highest preset. The Medium preset consistently falls in between, offering a balanced option. The minimum and maximum FPS data for the Medium preset shows that frame pacing is consistent, with no large spikes or drops.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested hardware combinations for Inside, this pairing of the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT holds a rank of 1078 out of 3716 combos. This places it in the top 29% of all tested configurations. This ranking is strong, indicating that this hardware combo is well-suited for this title, though there is a significant number of higher-performing setups.

The ranking is likely driven by the high performance of the GPU, which has a percentile rank of 85 against all GPUs. The CPU also has a high percentile rank of 87 against all CPUs. The combination of two high-percentile components results in a system that excels in this game. The measured FPS data supports this ranking, as the system easily exceeds 60 FPS at 4K Ultra and provides exceptional frame rates at lower resolutions.

The nearest rivals for the GPU include the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile, which scores 1.5% higher on average benchmarks, and the Intel Arc A550M, which scores 2.5% lower. The CPU's nearest rivals are the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H and Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, which have average scores within 0.4% of the Ryzen 9 5900X. These close benchmark scores suggest that the performance of this combo is competitive with other high-end hardware, and the in-game rank of 1078 reflects its strong standing.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture. It has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. These specifications contribute to its high multi-threaded performance, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16262 and Geekbench multi-core score of 14118. Its single-thread performance is also robust, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1527.

In the context of Inside, a puzzle platformer, the game's engine is not designed to heavily utilize many cores. The data suggests that the CPU is not a bottleneck, as the FPS scales consistently with GPU load. The CPU's high single-thread performance, shown by a Passmark single-thread score of 3469, ensures that the game's main logic thread can be processed quickly. The high boost clock of 4.80 GHz is beneficial for this type of workload, which often relies on a single core for game logic.

The CPU's 64 MB of L3 cache is also a factor. This large cache can hold more game data, reducing the need to access slower system memory. This contributes to the low frame times observed in the Medium preset data. The Ryzen 9 5900X is more than capable of feeding the RX 6800 XT with data, and its performance is not a limiting factor in this title. The data shows that the CPU's role is to provide a stable platform, which it does effectively, allowing the GPU to be the primary determinant of frame rate.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT is a high-end graphics card based on the RDNA 2.0 architecture. It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. The GPU has a base clock of 1825 MHz and a boost clock of 2250 MHz. These specifications make it a powerful card, as reflected in its Passmark G3D score of 24980.

The GPU's role in Inside is the dominant factor in determining frame rates. The data shows that as resolution increases, FPS decreases proportionally, which is the expected behavior for a GPU-bound workload. The 16 GB of VRAM is more than sufficient for this game, even at 4K Ultra, as the game's assets are not demanding. The high memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s ensures that texture data can be quickly accessed, contributing to the smooth performance.

The GPU's performance in this title is strong, but its benchmark scores show it is not the absolute fastest. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile and the Intel Arc A550M, which are within a few percentage points in average benchmark scores. However, the measured FPS data shows that the RX 6800 XT provides an excellent experience in Inside, with no preset or resolution causing the frame rate to drop below 92 FPS. The GPU's boost clock of 2250 MHz ensures high sustained performance, and its 4608 shading units are more than enough to handle the game's rendering requirements. The data confirms that the RX 6800 XT is the primary performance driver in this combo, with its capabilities defining the overall experience.