Inside

Inside

AVERAGE FPS
201
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 201 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 113 120 193 207
1440p QHD 185 185 226 243
1080p Full HD 209 210 252 274

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 207
3840x2160 Medium 193
3840x2160 High 120
3840x2160 Ultra 113
2560x1440 Low 243
2560x1440 Medium 226
2560x1440 High 185
2560x1440 Ultra 185
1920x1080 Low 274
1920x1080 Medium 252
1920x1080 High 210
1920x1080 Ultra 209

Inside with AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX combination delivers exceptionally high frame rates in Inside, a 2D puzzle platformer. The measured data shows this pairing is heavily GPU-bound at lower resolutions and surprisingly capable at 4K, with average frame rates that far exceed display refresh rates in most configurations. This analysis breaks down the optimal settings, performance scaling, and how this specific combo ranks against the broader database of tested hardware configurations.

Settings Recommendations

For a game like Inside, where the visual atmosphere is central to the experience, the "High" preset offers the best balance of image quality and performance. At 1920x1080, the High preset delivers an average of 209.7 FPS, which is nearly identical to the Ultra preset's 208.9 FPS. The data shows that the jump from High to Ultra costs less than 1% performance at 1080p, but Ultra typically includes additional post-processing effects that may alter the intended art style. The Medium preset at 1080p provides 252.3 FPS, but the visual downgrade is noticeable for a game that relies on lighting and shadow.

The High preset becomes the clear recommendation at higher resolutions. At 2560x1440, High averages 185.2 FPS, while Ultra drops to 184.7 FPS — effectively a tie. However, at 3840x2160, the gap widens: High maintains a robust 120.2 FPS, whereas Ultra falls to 112.5 FPS. The 4K Ultra setting still clears 100 FPS, but the marginal visual improvement over High does not justify the 6.4% performance hit. Low settings are unnecessary on this hardware, as the 207.2 FPS at 4K Low versus 120.2 FPS at 4K High shows that High still provides more than double the refresh rate of most standard 60 Hz displays.

For players with high-refresh-rate monitors, the Medium preset at 1440p is the sweet spot, delivering 225.8 FPS. This configuration provides a significant frame rate cushion over High while retaining enough visual fidelity for the game's dim, atmospheric environments. The data indicates that Ultra should be avoided at 4K unless absolute maximum quality is prioritized over frame rate stability.

FAQ

*Q: Does the Ryzen 7 5700X3D bottleneck the RX 7900 XTX in Inside?*

A: No. The measured frame rates scale consistently with resolution, indicating the GPU is the primary limiting factor. At 1080p Low the combo reaches 274 FPS, which is the highest recorded value across all settings, suggesting the CPU can feed the GPU well beyond typical display refresh rates.

Q: How much faster is the 1080p High preset compared to 4K High?

A: The 1080p High setting averages 209.7 FPS, which is 74.5% higher than the 4K High result of 120.2 FPS. This performance gap highlights the significant load increase at 4K resolution.

Q: Is the Ultra preset viable at 4K?

A: Yes, the Ultra preset at 3840x2160 averages 112.5 FPS. This is above the 100 FPS threshold, making it playable on high-refresh-rate displays, though it falls behind the 120.2 FPS achieved by the High preset.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, Low averages 243.4 FPS while Ultra averages 184.7 FPS. The Ultra preset is 24.1% slower, a substantial penalty for visual settings that may be indiscernible in a game with such a muted color palette.

*Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations for Inside?*

A: The combo ranks 496th out of 1671 tested combinations, placing it in the top 29.7% of all systems tested for this game.

Q: Does the 5700X3D's cache help in this game?

A: The processor's 96 MB of shared L3 cache likely contributes to the high minimum frame rates observed across all settings. However, the measured data does not isolate cache effects, and the performance is consistently high regardless of resolution.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX achieves a combo rank of 496 out of 1671 tested configurations in Inside. This places the pairing in the 70th percentile of all tested combos, which is a strong showing for a game that is not typically used for high-end stress testing. The rank reflects the system's ability to maintain high frame rates even at 4K, where many lesser GPUs would struggle to reach 60 FPS.

The CPU itself ranks in the 82nd percentile of all processors, with an average benchmark score of 24673. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-1360P, scores 24627, a delta of just 0.2% — essentially a statistical tie. The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D scores 24605, also within 0.3% of the 5700X3D. This suggests the processor is not a performance outlier for this workload, and the GPU is doing the heavy lifting.

The GPU ranks in the 85th percentile of all graphics cards, with an average benchmark score of 44019. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro 580, scores 44195, which is 0.4% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile scores 43667, 0.8% lower. This indicates the RX 7900 XTX is a top-tier card, and the combo rank is likely limited by the game's modest system requirements rather than any hardware deficiency.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data reveals a consistent pattern across all resolutions. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers 274 FPS, which is the peak performance for this combo. Medium follows at 252.3 FPS, High at 209.7 FPS, and Ultra at 208.9 FPS. The drop from Low to Ultra is 23.8%, reflecting the increasing pixel shader workload.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates remain high but show a clear step down. Low averages 243.4 FPS, Medium 225.8 FPS, High 185.2 FPS, and Ultra 184.7 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 24.1%, similar to the 1080p spread. The High and Ultra presets are nearly identical, differing by just 0.3%.

At 3840x2160, the resolution scaling becomes more pronounced. Low averages 207.2 FPS, Medium 193.2 FPS, High 120.2 FPS, and Ultra 112.5 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is 45.7%, showing that the 4K resolution amplifies the cost of higher quality settings. The jump from Medium to High is particularly steep, a 37.8% decrease, which suggests the High preset enables more computationally expensive effects like volumetric lighting or ambient occlusion.

Resolution Scaling

The data shows that Inside scales predictably with resolution, but the limiting component shifts depending on the settings. From 1080p Low to 4K Low, the frame rate drops from 274 FPS to 207.2 FPS, a 24.4% decrease. This relatively modest drop indicates that at Low settings, the CPU is still able to feed the GPU effectively, and the bottleneck is primarily the GPU's fill rate.

At High settings, the scaling is more dramatic. The 1080p High result of 209.7 FPS falls to 1440p High's 185.2 FPS (an 11.7% drop), and then to 4K High's 120.2 FPS (a 35.1% drop from 1440p). The increasing frame rate loss at higher resolutions confirms the GPU is the limiting factor at these settings. The RX 7900 XTX, with its 24 GB of GDDR6 memory and 960.0 GB/s bandwidth, has ample resources, but the pixel shading workload at 4K is substantial.

The Ultra preset shows the steepest scaling curve. From 1080p Ultra at 208.9 FPS, the 1440p result drops to 184.7 FPS (an 11.6% decrease), and the 4K result falls to 112.5 FPS (a 39.1% decrease from 1440p). This pattern indicates that the Ultra preset at 4K is pushing the GPU to its limits, but the frame rate remains playable.

The fact that 1080p Low (274 FPS) is only 24.4% faster than 4K Low (207.2 FPS) suggests that at Low settings, the CPU may start to become a secondary bottleneck. The Ryzen 7 5700X3D's single-thread performance, with a Geekbench single-core score of 1922, is adequate, but the game's engine may not scale perfectly with the 8-core, 16-thread configuration. Nevertheless, the combination never drops below 112.5 FPS, making it a capable system for any display configuration up to 4K.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D

Cores / Threads 8 / 16
Base Clock 3000 MHz
Boost Clock 4100 MHz
TDP 105W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

VRAM 24 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2498 MHz MHz
TDP 355 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX in Inside

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 207.2
3840x2160 Medium 193.2
3840x2160 High 120.2
3840x2160 Ultra 112.5
2560x1440 Low 243.4
2560x1440 Medium 225.8
2560x1440 High 185.2
2560x1440 Ultra 184.7
1920x1080 Low 274.0
1920x1080 Medium 252.3
1920x1080 High 209.7
1920x1080 Ultra 208.9

Inside with Ryzen 7 5700X3D + Other GPUs

See how Inside performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Inside with RX 7900 XTX + Other CPUs

See how Inside performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 7 5700X3D + RX 7900 XTX

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.