Inside

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D and Radeon RX 6750 XT combination delivers exceptional performance in Inside, a 2016 Puzzle Platformer, proving that this pairing is far more than capable of maxing out the game. The data shows a system that maintains high frame rates across all resolutions, with the most demanding 4K Ultra setting still producing an average of 76 FPS. This combo ranks in the 50th percentile of all tested configurations, indicating that while it is not the absolute top-tier, it offers a balanced experience that will satisfy most gamers seeking high-refresh-rate or high-fidelity gameplay.

FAQ

*Q: What is the overall performance ranking of this CPU and GPU combo in Inside?*

A: The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT ranks 1863 out of 3716 tested combos for this game, placing it in the 50th percentile of all configurations.

Q: What is the highest average frame rate achieved by this combo?

A: The highest average frame rate recorded is 272 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This indicates the game is extremely lightweight on the CPU and GPU at this setting.

Q: Does the combo maintain playable frame rates at 4K resolution?

A: Yes, at 3840x2160 (4K), the average frame rates remain high. With High settings, the system produces an average of 80 FPS, and with Medium settings, it averages 128 FPS, ensuring a smooth experience even at this demanding resolution.

Q: How does the CPU's performance compare to its closest rival?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700X3D has an average benchmark score of 24709, which is essentially tied with its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D, which scores 24728. This represents a negligible 0.1% difference in performance.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and how does it relate to the game's results?

A: The GPU features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This substantial memory allocation and high bandwidth ensure that Inside's assets are easily handled, preventing any memory-related bottlenecks even at 4K resolution.

Q: What is the CPU's single-threaded performance relative to its rivals?

A: The CPU scores 2970 in the Passmark single-thread test. Its nearest rivals, the Intel Core i5-12450HX and Intel Core i5-11600, have higher average benchmark scores by 0.5% and 0.6% respectively, but the 5700X3D's performance is within a 1% margin of all its listed rivals.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is the primary driver of the high frame rates observed in Inside. Its architecture is RDNA 2.0, built on a 7 nm process, and it operates with a base clock of 2150 MHz and a boost clock of 2600 MHz. The "game" clock is specified at 2495 MHz, which is the typical frequency expected during gaming workloads. These high clock speeds are crucial for a game like Inside, which relies on consistent frame pacing for its physics-based puzzles and atmospheric rendering.

The GPU's memory subsystem is equally important for the 4K results. With 12 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 192-bit memory bus, the card provides 432.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. This is a significant factor in the 4K performance, as higher resolutions require the GPU to access and process larger texture and geometry data sets. The available bandwidth ensures that the GPU's 2560 shading units and 64 ROPs are kept fed with data, preventing stalls and maintaining the high average frame rates seen in the benchmark results. The GPU's compute power, rated at 13.31 TFLOPS FP32, is more than sufficient to handle the game's shader complexity, even at Ultra settings.

The data shows a clear relationship between GPU load and settings. At 4K with Ultra settings, the average FPS drops to 76, which is the lowest score in the dataset. This indicates that the GPU is being pushed to its limits at this specific configuration. However, the fact that it still stays above 60 FPS confirms its capability. The performance scaling from High to Low settings at 4K, jumping from 80 FPS to 160 FPS, highlights how much headroom the GPU has when graphical loads are reduced, further proving that the GPU is the dominant component in this pairing for this title.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate data for this combo shows a predictable scaling pattern as resolution increases, but the magnitude of the drop is moderate, indicating a balanced system. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 on High settings, the average FPS decreases from 177 to 127, a reduction of 50 FPS. This shows that the GPU is taking on a significantly higher pixel load at 1440p, but the CPU is still keeping up.

The most significant scaling occurs when moving from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160. At High settings, the average FPS drops from 127 to 80, a 47 FPS decrease. This steep decline is typical of 4K resolution, where the number of pixels is more than double that of 1440p. This pattern suggests that at 4K, the Radeon RX 6750 XT becomes the limiting factor, as the sheer volume of pixel work begins to saturate its capabilities. The CPU, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, is unlikely to be the bottleneck at these higher resolutions.

The scaling on Low settings is even more telling. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 272 FPS, and at 1440p Low, it still manages 244 FPS. However, at 4K Low, the average drops to 160 FPS. This is a substantial drop from 1440p, reinforcing that the GPU's fill rate is the primary constraint at 4K. The system demonstrates that it can easily handle high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K, users will need to rely on the game's optimization or accept slightly lower frame rates, though they remain well above standard 60 FPS displays.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The benchmark results for Inside show a comprehensive set of measurements across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the performance is exceptionally high. Low settings yield an average of 272 FPS, while Medium settings produce 251 FPS, with a minimum of 213 FPS and a maximum of 289 FPS. High settings average 177 FPS, and even Ultra settings maintain a strong 168 FPS average. This indicates that at 1080p, the combo is entirely CPU-bound in some scenarios, as the frame rates are so high that the GPU is not the limiting factor.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains excellent but begins to show the GPU's workload. Low settings average 244 FPS, Medium settings average 203 FPS with a minimum of 173 and maximum of 234 FPS. High settings produce 127 FPS, and Ultra settings average 121 FPS. The drop from Low to High is significant, showing the impact of increased graphical fidelity on the GPU. The gap between High and Ultra is smaller, a difference of only 6 FPS, suggesting that the Ultra preset's additional effects are not as demanding as the jump from Low to High.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the workhorse. Low settings average 160 FPS, which is still very high. Medium settings average 128 FPS, with a minimum of 109 FPS and a maximum of 147 FPS, providing a very stable experience. High settings average 80 FPS, and Ultra settings average 76 FPS. The difference between Medium and High is a substantial 48 FPS, indicating a major shift in rendering complexity. The drop from High to Ultra is minimal at just 4 FPS, showing that the Ultra preset is only slightly more demanding than High at this resolution. The minimum FPS of 109 at 4K Medium confirms that even in the most complex scenes, the system maintains a high level of fluidity.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 1863 out of 3716 tested configurations places it squarely in the middle of the performance spectrum. This is not a top-tier enthusiast setup, but it is far from a low-end one. The rank indicates that a majority of tested combos are either faster or slower, but the 50th percentile standing means this pairing represents a solid, mainstream performance level.

The CPU's own ranking relative to all CPUs is in the 77th percentile, which is quite strong. This suggests that the processor is a high-performing component. However, the GPU's percentile rank is 71st, which is slightly lower. When combined, the system's overall rank is lower than the CPU's percentile rank, suggesting that the GPU is holding the combo back from achieving a higher position in the rankings for Inside. The data implies that if a more powerful GPU were paired with the Ryzen 7 5700X3D, the combo's rank in this game would likely improve.

The GPU's nearest rivals in terms of average benchmark score include the AMD Radeon R9 M395X, which is 0.5% slower, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile, which is 1.1% slower. This shows that the RX 6750 XT is competitive with a mobile flagship from a previous generation. The CPU's rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D, are within 0.1% of its performance, making the 5700X3D a very competitive choice. The combo rank of 1863 is a product of these two components' performances, and the data shows that while neither is a market leader, their combination is effective for this game.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D plays a supporting but critical role in these benchmark results. With 8 cores and 16 threads, it provides ample multi-threading capabilities for the game's logic and physics calculations. Its architecture is Zen 3, built on a 7 nm process, and it operates at a base clock of 3.00 GHz with a boost clock of 4.10 GHz. The CPU features a large 96 MB shared L3 cache, which is a key characteristic of the X3D series and is designed to improve gaming performance by reducing memory latency.

The CPU's single-thread performance is solid, scoring 2970 in the Passmark single-thread test and 804 in the 3dmark single-thread test. While its nearest rivals, the Intel Core i5-12450HX and i5-11600, have slightly higher average benchmark scores by 0.5% and 0.6% respectively, the difference is negligible. In a game like Inside, which is not typically CPU-intensive, this level of performance is more than sufficient to prevent a CPU bottleneck.

The multi-threaded performance is also strong, with scores like 22366 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 26318 in Passmark multithread. This headroom ensures that even if the game spawns numerous background processes or the operating system demands resources, the CPU will not be a limiting factor. The benchmark data confirms that the CPU is not the bottleneck. For instance, the FPS jump from 1080p Low (272 FPS) to 4K Low (160 FPS) shows that the game is becoming more GPU-bound as resolution increases. The CPU is capable of feeding the GPU data fast enough to achieve these high frame rates, and its role is to ensure consistent frame delivery, which is evident in the high minimum FPS values recorded at Medium settings across all resolutions.