Inside

Inside is a puzzle platformer from 2016, and the measured data for the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti combo places it at rank 1444 out of 1671 tested combinations. This indicates that while the system is fully capable of running the game smoothly, it sits in the lower half of the database’s tested hardware pool, largely due to the GPU’s age. The benchmark results reveal a configuration where the CPU has ample headroom, but the graphics card dictates the overall performance ceiling, particularly at higher resolutions and settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the combo’s overall rank in the database for Inside?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti combination ranks 1444 out of 1671 tested combos, placing it in the 86th percentile of tested systems for this game.

Q: How does the GTX 1660 Ti compare to its closest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The GTX 1660 Ti has an average benchmark score of 13925. It is 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 570X, 0.8% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile, and 0.8% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680, while being 0.7% behind the NVIDIA Tesla K10.

Q: What is the best measured FPS result for this combo?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 216.3, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This suggests the game is highly scalable on the low end.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to limit performance in Inside?

A: The data points to the GPU as the primary limiter. The Ryzen 7 5700X’s high multi-threaded scores and the relatively small FPS drops between resolutions when settings are lowered indicate the CPU is not the bottleneck.

Q: What is the GTX 1660 Ti’s memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The GPU features 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. This is sufficient for the game’s textures at 1080p and 1440p.

Q: How does the CPU’s single-thread performance compare to its multi-thread performance?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700X scores 3193 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 22620 in multi-core. This indicates strong single-thread capability for game logic, but an even more dominant multi-thread presence (roughly 7x higher score) that is underutilized in this title.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s position at 1444 out of 1671 tested combinations places it firmly in the lower third of the database’s performance ladder for Inside. This rank is not a reflection of the CPU, which performs admirably, but rather a consequence of the GPU’s age and market segment. The GTX 1660 Ti, with a percentile rank of 55 against all GPUs, is a mid-range part from the GeForce 16-series, and its average benchmark score of 13925 shows it trading blows with cards like the RX 570X and GTX 680.

The Ryzen 7 5700X, by contrast, is a much more modern and powerful component. Its percentile rank of 83 against all CPUs is significantly higher than the GPU’s. The CPU’s nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i9-11900KF and AMD Ryzen 5 7600X, have average scores that are within 0.2% of the 5700X, showing that it is competitive with top-tier processors from its generation. This disparity in relative strength between the CPU and GPU is the defining characteristic of this pairing. The benchmark results suggest that the system is well-balanced for CPU-intensive tasks, but for a game like Inside, the GPU will be the component that determines the playable settings and resolutions.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is the deciding factor in this combo’s performance. Its Turing architecture, built on a 12 nm process, provides a base clock of 1500 MHz and a boost clock of 1770 MHz. The 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus yields a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s, which is adequate for the game’s art style. The GPU’s FP32 performance is 5.437 TFLOPS, and its pixel rate is 84.96 GPixel/s, with a texture rate of 169.9 GTexel/s.

These specifications explain the measured FPS scaling. At 1080p Low, the GPU can push 216.3 FPS, but this drops to 103.5 FPS at Ultra, a reduction of over half. This is a classic sign of a GPU that is being stressed by increasing shader complexity and texture quality. The 6 GB VRAM is not likely a limitation at 1080p, but the rendering load is. The fact that the GPU is end-of-life and has a successor in the GeForce 20-series further contextualizes its performance ceiling. It is a capable card for 1080p gaming, but the data shows it struggles to maintain high frame rates at 4K with higher presets.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a detailed picture of the combo’s capabilities across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system is exceptionally fast. With Low settings, the average FPS is 216.3. Moving to Medium reduces this to 176.6, and High drops it to 108.9. Ultra is the most demanding, yielding an average of 103.5 FPS. These are all playable frame rates, with even the Ultra preset remaining above 100 FPS.

Stepping up to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows clear scaling. Low settings produce an average of 159.2 FPS, while Medium delivers 129 FPS. High settings drop to 79.7 FPS, and Ultra falls to 72.6 FPS. The 1440p results are still very smooth, but the gap between Low and Ultra becomes more pronounced. At 3840x2160, the GPU begins to show its limits. Low settings still manage 98.6 FPS, but Medium drops to 79.1 FPS. High settings yield 50.7 FPS, and Ultra is the only preset that dips below 60 FPS, with an average of 45.2 FPS. This data shows a clear performance hierarchy, with 1080p being the sweet spot for high refresh rate displays and 4K requiring significant compromises in settings.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X is a powerful processor that is not the limiting factor in this game. With 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture, it has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The CPU’s benchmarks confirm its strength; it scores 22620 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3193 in single-core. Its L3 cache is 32 MB shared, which helps with game data access.

Inside is not a CPU-intensive title, and the data supports this. The FPS differences between resolutions are almost entirely driven by the GPU’s workload. For example, at 1080p Low, the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU enough data to reach 216.3 FPS. At 4K Ultra, the FPS drops to 45.2, but this is due to the GPU being overwhelmed, not the CPU. The Ryzen 7 5700X has a TDP of 65 W and uses the AM4 socket, and its nearest rivals in performance are the Intel Core i9-11900KF and AMD Ryzen 5 7600X, all scoring within 0.2% of each other. This suggests that even a faster CPU would not yield a meaningful FPS increase in this scenario, as the GPU is the bottleneck.

Settings Recommendations

For a balanced experience, the High preset at 1920x1080 is the recommended choice. It delivers an average FPS of 108.9, which is ideal for most monitors and provides a significant visual improvement over Medium. The Ultra preset at 1080p is also viable, with an average of 103.5 FPS, but the marginal visual gain over High does not justify the performance cost for a game like Inside. If the user has a 144 Hz monitor, the Medium preset at 1080p, with an average of 176.6 FPS, is the best way to fully utilize the display’s refresh rate.

At 2560x1440, the High preset is again the most balanced, offering 79.7 FPS. This is a smooth experience for a puzzle platformer. The Medium preset at 1440p is also good, with 129 FPS, but High provides a better visual experience without dropping below 60 FPS. For 4K, the data suggests that the Low preset is the only way to achieve a truly smooth experience, with an average of 98.6 FPS. The Medium preset at 4K, at 79.1 FPS, is also playable, but High and Ultra dip below 60 FPS. The best experience overall is on a 1080p monitor with High or Ultra settings, where the game runs flawlessly.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K is a clear indicator of the GPU’s role as the limiting component. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 216.3 at 1080p to 159.2 at 1440p and 98.6 at 4K. This is a reduction of approximately 26% from 1080p to 1440p and a further 38% from 1440p to 4K. This scaling is expected, as the number of pixels increases by 1.78x from 1080p to 1440p and 2.25x from 1440p to 4K.

The pattern is similar for the other presets. At High settings, the FPS drops from 108.9 at 1080p to 79.7 at 1440p and 50.7 at 4K. At Ultra, it drops from 103.5 to 72.6 and then to 45.2. The fact that the FPS drops are proportional to the pixel count, rather than being a flat penalty, indicates that the GPU is the bottleneck. If the CPU were the limiting factor, the FPS would be more consistent across resolutions, especially at lower settings. The data shows that the GTX 1660 Ti is being pushed to its limits at 4K, and the Ryzen 7 5700X has more than enough headroom to handle the game’s logic at any resolution.