Inside

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER delivers a robust experience in Inside, consistently exceeding 60 FPS at 4K Ultra and reaching extremely high refresh rates at 1080p. The data indicates this combination ranks in the 29th percentile of tested combos, placing it in the upper tier of systems capable of running this puzzle platformer flawlessly. The benchmark results show a system that is well-balanced for the game's demands, though the scaling patterns reveal distinct roles for the CPU and GPU depending on resolution and settings.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, clocked at a base of 3.80 GHz and a boost of 4.60 GHz. With a 65W TDP and 16 MB of L3 cache, this CPU provides ample headroom for a game like Inside, which is not typically considered a multi-threaded stress test. The benchmark data supports this: the CPU's multi-threaded performance is solid, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20755, but its single-thread score of 2930 is what matters most for this genre.

In the measured FPS results, the CPU’s influence is most evident at 1080p with Low settings, where the system achieves 278 FPS. This high frame rate indicates that the CPU is capable of feeding frames well beyond standard display refresh rates. The 5700G's 3dmark single-thread score of 899, while not directly comparable to in-game performance, contextualizes its strength in lightly-threaded workloads. Compared to its nearest rivals, the CPU's average benchmark score of 25626 is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (25706, deltaPct -0.3), indicating that the 5700G holds its own in general compute tasks that would support game logic and physics calculations.

The processor's role becomes less critical as resolution increases. At 4K, the gap between Low (126.1 FPS) and High (62.1 FPS) settings is a factor of 2x, driven more by GPU workload than CPU limitations. However, the 5700G's 8 cores and 16 threads ensure that even with background tasks, the game's frame pacing remains stable. The PassMark multi-thread score of 24419 and data encryption score of 20325 further illustrate a processor that will not bottleneck the RTX 2060 SUPER in this title, as the game's demands are well within the CPU's substantial single and multi-core capabilities.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER, with its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus (448.0 GB/s bandwidth), is the primary driver of visual fidelity in Inside. Its base clock of 1470 MHz and boost clock of 1650 MHz, combined with 2176 shading units, provide the raw throughput needed for the game's lighting and shadow effects. The GPU's 34 RT cores and 272 Tensor cores are present, but for this title, the traditional rasterization performance is what the measured FPS reflects.

The VRAM capacity is not a limiting factor in any of the tested configurations. Even at 4K Ultra, the game does not appear to exceed the 8 GB allocation, as the average FPS remains playable at 62.8. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 16462 places it in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs, and its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN, has an average score of 19706 with a deltaPct of 0.3. This proximity in synthetic benchmarks suggests that the RTX 2060 SUPER's performance in Inside is consistent with its expected tier.

The GPU's role is most pronounced at higher resolutions and settings. At 4K High, the system drops to 62.1 FPS, a significant reduction from the 98.3 FPS at Medium. This scaling indicates that the GPU is the limiting component at 4K, as the rendering load increases with pixel count and texture detail. The boost clock behavior is typical for Turing architecture, maintaining high frequencies under load, which is reflected in the consistent frame rates across repeated runs. The 2060 SUPER's 175W TDP and dual-slot design suggest it can sustain these clocks without thermal throttling in a standard chassis, ensuring that the measured FPS is representative of sustained performance.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured data shows a clear pattern of frame rate degradation as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160, which is expected for a GPU-bound scenario. At Low settings, the system achieves 278 FPS at 1080p, dropping to 200.2 FPS at 1440p (a 28% reduction), and further to 126.1 FPS at 4K (a 55% reduction from 1440p). This steep decline at 4K is a hallmark of GPU limitation, as the number of pixels rendered quadruples from 1080p to 4K.

The scaling at Ultra settings tells a similar story but with lower absolute numbers. Starting at 135.2 FPS at 1080p, it falls to 97.3 FPS at 1440p (a 28% drop) and then to 62.8 FPS at 4K (a 35% drop from 1440p). The consistency of the percentage drops across settings suggests that the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth are the primary constraints at higher resolutions, rather than any CPU bottleneck. The RTX 2060 SUPER's 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K, the demand on the memory subsystem increases, which is reflected in the halving of FPS from Low to Ultra at 4K.

Interestingly, the gap between 1080p and 1440p is consistent across all settings, with a roughly 28-30% reduction in FPS. This linear scaling indicates that the CPU is not introducing a bottleneck at these resolutions, as the frame rate drops proportionally with the pixel count. The data suggests that for this specific combo, the GPU is the limiting component at all resolutions above 1080p, while at 1080p, the CPU and GPU are more evenly matched, allowing for the exceptionally high frame rates observed at Low and Medium settings.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER combination ranks 1192 out of 1671 tested combos for Inside. This places it in the 71st percentile of all tested systems, meaning it outperforms roughly 71% of the combos in the database. This is a strong showing for a mid-range setup, indicating that the system is well-suited for this game's requirements.

The rank is influenced by the fact that Inside is not a demanding title by modern standards, and many high-end combos will achieve frame rates well beyond what is necessary. However, the 5700G + 2060 SUPER combo's ability to hit 62.8 FPS at 4K Ultra is a notable achievement, as many systems in the database may struggle to maintain 60 FPS at that resolution and settings combination. The combo's performance at 1080p, with 135.2 FPS at Ultra, puts it in the upper echelon for competitive play or high-refresh-rate displays.

The data shows that this combo is not a top-tier performer, but it is far from a weak link. The rank of 1192 suggests that there are over 400 combos that perform better, likely featuring newer GPUs with higher rasterization throughput. However, the RTX 2060 SUPER's 63rd percentile ranking among all GPUs, combined with the 5700G's 83rd percentile among CPUs, indicates a balanced pairing that maximizes the potential of both components for this specific game. The combo's performance is consistent with what the individual component benchmarks would predict, with no unexpected bottlenecks or limitations unique to this pairing.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

For the best balance of visual quality and frame rate, the Medium preset at 1440p is the standout recommendation based on the measured data. At this configuration, the system achieves 162.7 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay and provides a significant headroom for any potential frame drops. The jump from Medium to High at 1440p costs a substantial 60.2 FPS (from 162.7 to 102.5), making Medium the sweet spot for high refresh rate gaming without sacrificing too much visual fidelity.

At 4K, the choice is more nuanced. The Ultra preset delivers 62.8 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS target, but the High preset is nearly identical at 62.1 FPS. The data shows that High and Ultra are essentially equivalent in performance at 4K, so players should opt for Ultra to gain the extra visual polish without a measurable FPS penalty. However, if a player prioritizes frame rate over visual detail, the Medium preset at 4K offers 98.3 FPS, a 56% improvement over Ultra, making it a viable option for those with 120Hz 4K displays.

For 1080p, the situation is straightforward. The Low preset achieves 278 FPS, which is overkill for most displays, while the Ultra preset at 135.2 FPS is more than sufficient for a 144Hz monitor. Given that the jump from High (139.4 FPS) to Ultra (135.2 FPS) is only a 4.2 FPS difference, players with a 144Hz display should use Ultra settings to get the best visual experience without dropping below their refresh rate. The data indicates that the Medium preset at 1080p (223.8 FPS) offers diminishing returns over Ultra, so Ultra is the recommended choice for this resolution.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The complete measured FPS data for this combo is as follows:

1920x1080:

• Low: 278 FPS
• Medium: 223.8 FPS
• High: 139.4 FPS
• Ultra: 135.2 FPS

2560x1440:

• Low: 200.2 FPS
• Medium: 162.7 FPS
• High: 102.5 FPS
• Ultra: 97.3 FPS

3840x2160:

• Low: 126.1 FPS
• Medium: 98.3 FPS
• High: 62.1 FPS
• Ultra: 62.8 FPS

These numbers reveal a few key insights. First, the difference between High and Ultra settings is minimal across all resolutions, with a maximum delta of 4.2 FPS at 1080p. This suggests that the Ultra preset does not introduce a significant additional load compared to High, likely due to negligible differences in shadow quality or post-processing effects that are not heavily taxing on the RTX 2060 SUPER.

Second, the scaling from Low to Medium is substantial, with an average improvement of 24% at 1080p, 19% at 1440p, and 22% at 4K. This indicates that the Medium preset offers the most significant visual upgrade per FPS cost. Third, the 4K High and Ultra results are nearly identical (62.1 vs 62.8 FPS), which is unusual and suggests that the game may be hitting a hard performance cap at this resolution, possibly due to the CPU feeding the GPU as fast as it can process frames.

FAQ

*Q: Can this combo run Inside at 4K 60 FPS?*

A: Yes, the measured data shows an average of 62.8 FPS at 4K Ultra and 62.1 FPS at 4K High, both exceeding the 60 FPS target.

Q: What is the best resolution for high refresh rate gaming with this setup?

A: At 1080p, the system achieves 278 FPS on Low and 135.2 FPS on Ultra, making it suitable for 144Hz or even 240Hz displays at lower settings.

Q: How does the RTX 2060 SUPER compare to its nearest rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The RTX 2060 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 19774, which is 0.3% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN (19706), indicating nearly identical raw performance.

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 5700G a bottleneck for the RTX 2060 SUPER in this game?

A: The data suggests no significant bottleneck, as the system achieves 278 FPS at 1080p Low, indicating the CPU can feed frames well beyond the GPU's capacity at that resolution.

Q: What is the FPS difference between High and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: The difference is 5.2 FPS, with High achieving 102.5 FPS and Ultra achieving 97.3 FPS, making the visual upgrade of Ultra nearly free in performance terms.

*Q: How does this combo rank among all tested systems for Inside?*

A: It ranks 1192 out of 1671 combos, placing it in the upper 29% of tested systems and indicating solid performance for this title.