Inside

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 combination delivers an exceptionally strong performance profile for Inside, a 2016 Puzzle Platformer. The measured data shows this pairing is capable of pushing frame rates far beyond standard display refresh rates at every resolution tested, with the most demanding 4K Ultra preset still averaging 76 FPS. This places the combo in the 1595th rank out of 3716 tested combinations within the game’s database, indicating a top-tier result for this title.

FAQ

Q: What is the average frame rate at 1080p with Ultra settings?

A: The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with the Ultra preset is 169 FPS. This is the lowest average at that resolution, but it remains well above the threshold for smooth, high-refresh-rate gameplay.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has an average benchmark score of 25005. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, scores 24964, representing a marginal 0.2% difference. The data indicates the 8400F is also within 0.4% of the Intel Core i7-13620H's score.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 features 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The memory clock is listed as 1750 MHz, with 28 Gbps effective speed.

Q: At which resolution does the frame rate drop below 100 FPS on High settings?

A: The data shows the frame rate drops below 100 FPS at 3840x2160. At this resolution, the High preset averages 80 FPS. In contrast, the High preset delivers 128 FPS at 2560x1440 and 178 FPS at 1920x1080.

Q: What is the processor's architecture and core count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is built on the Zen 4 architecture, specifically the Phoenix codename, and utilizes a 4 nm process from TSMC. It has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the performance percentile ranking for the GPU?

A: The RTX 5060 holds a percentile rank of 72 among all GPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score is 26331, which places it near the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, which has a score of 26011 and a deltaPct of 1.2%.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is the primary driver of the exceptional frame rates observed in Inside. The GPU’s architecture, Blackwell 2.0, is fabricated on a 5 nm process and contains 21,900 million transistors. Its core configuration includes 3840 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output pipelines. The boost clock is rated at 2497 MHz, with a base clock of 2280 MHz.

The memory subsystem is a key factor for performance. With 8 GB of GDDR7 memory and a 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, the card has ample throughput for a game of this era. The 128-bit bus width is relatively narrow by modern standards, but the high-bandwidth GDDR7 memory compensates, ensuring that texture streaming and frame buffer operations are not bottlenecks. The GPU’s FP32 performance is rated at 19.18 TFLOPS, which provides substantial compute power for the game's rendering workloads.

In the context of Inside, the GPU is clearly the dominant component. The game is a 2D side-scroller, but its use of dynamic lighting, shadowing, and post-processing effects scales heavily with GPU compute. The benchmark results support this, as the frame rate scales predictably with resolution when the CPU is not a limiting factor. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 26331 and its 72nd percentile ranking confirm its position as a capable mid-range part, but the data from Inside shows it performing at the top of its class for this specific workload. The RTX 5060's nearest rivals, such as the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT with a 1.2% deltaPct difference, suggest similar silicon-level performance, yet the measured FPS in this game shows the 5060 achieving very high absolute numbers.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear and consistent scaling pattern across the three tested resolutions. At 1920x1080, the RTX 5060 has significant headroom, with the Low preset hitting an average of 338 FPS and the Medium preset at 284 FPS. This indicates that at 1080p, the GPU is not fully saturated, and the frame rate is likely being capped by other factors, possibly CPU draw-call limits or game engine physics.

Moving to 2560x1440, there is a noticeable drop in performance, but the numbers remain exceptionally high. The Low preset averages 255 FPS, and the Medium preset averages 204 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a reduction of roughly 25% for the Low and Medium presets, which is a typical cost for a 78% increase in pixel count. This linear scaling indicates that the GPU is still managing the workload efficiently without hitting memory or bandwidth walls.

At 3840x2160, the performance cost becomes more pronounced. The Low preset drops to an average of 161 FPS, and the Medium preset falls to 128 FPS. The scaling from 1440p to 4K, which is a 2.25x increase in pixels, results in a 37% drop for the Low preset and a 37% drop for the Medium preset. This suggests that the GPU is beginning to approach its limits, but the 8 GB VRAM buffer is sufficient to prevent any severe stuttering or texture pop-in, as evidenced by the stable average FPS. The High and Ultra presets at 4K drop below 100 FPS, with averages of 80 and 76 FPS respectively, showing that while playable, the highest visual quality settings at 4K require a reduction in frame rate expectations.

The scaling pattern confirms that the RTX 5060 is a 1440p-class card for this title. At 1080p and 1440p, it delivers performance that far exceeds the needs of standard 60 Hz or even 144 Hz displays. At 4K, it remains viable for high-refresh-rate monitors only if settings are lowered to Medium or below.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The benchmark data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four quality presets. The most striking result is at 1920x1080 with Low settings, where the average FPS reaches 338. The Medium preset at the same resolution averages 284 FPS, with a minimum of 242 FPS and a maximum of 327 FPS, showing a tight frame time distribution. The High preset at 1080p averages 178 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 169 FPS, representing a 50% drop from the Low setting but still offering buttery-smooth gameplay.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains stellar. The Low preset averages 255 FPS, which is a 25% reduction from the 1080p Low result. The Medium preset averages 204 FPS, with a min-max range of 174 to 235 FPS. The High and Ultra presets deliver 128 FPS and 122 FPS respectively. The delta between High and Ultra at 1440p is only 6 FPS, suggesting that the Ultra preset’s additional effects are not particularly taxing on the GPU at this resolution.

The 3840x2160 resolution is where the card starts to show its limits. The Low preset is the only one that breaks the 144 Hz barrier, averaging 161 FPS. The Medium preset averages 128 FPS, with a range of 109 to 148 FPS, which is still suitable for high-refresh-rate gaming. However, the High preset drops to 80 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 76 FPS. These numbers are perfectly playable on a standard 60 Hz monitor but will not fully utilize a 120 Hz or 144 Hz display. The minimal gap between High and Ultra at 4K (4 FPS) suggests that the bottleneck at this resolution is shifting more toward memory bandwidth and shader complexity, rather than raw fill rate.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F plays a supporting role in this benchmark, but its specifications are more than adequate to avoid bottlenecking the RTX 5060. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread part based on the Zen 4 (Phoenix) architecture, with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. It operates on the AMD Socket AM5 platform and supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel configuration, offering a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

In synthetic benchmarks, the 8400F shows strong single-threaded and multi-threaded capabilities. Its Cinebench R23 scores are 2943 for single-core and 20851 for multi-core. The PassMark single-thread score is 3685, and the multithread score is 24389. These numbers place the CPU in the 77th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25005. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, has a nearly identical average score of 24964, a 0.2% difference.

For Inside, the CPU's role is primarily to manage game logic, physics calculations, and draw calls. The game is not known for being CPU-intensive, and the 8400F's high boost clock of 4.70 GHz ensures that single-threaded performance is sufficient to feed the GPU with data. The 16 MB of shared L3 cache is modest, but the game's asset sizes do not seem to require a larger cache pool, as the frame rates are consistently high. The 3DMark scores further corroborate this; the 2-thread score is 1874, and the 4-thread score is 3563, indicating that even with limited thread usage, the CPU performs efficiently.

The data suggests that the CPU is not the limiting component in any of the measured scenarios. Even at 1080p with Low settings, where the GPU load is lightest, the CPU manages to keep the frame rate above 330 FPS. This implies that the 8400F has ample headroom for this game and would likely only become a bottleneck if paired with a much more powerful GPU in a different title.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combination depend heavily on the target display resolution and refresh rate. For users with a 1920x1080 monitor, the Ultra preset is the clear choice, as it averages 169 FPS. This is more than sufficient for any 144 Hz display and provides the best visual fidelity without sacrificing smoothness. The High preset at 178 FPS offers a marginal frame rate increase but at a noticeable reduction in visual quality.

For 2560x1440 gaming, the Ultra preset is again recommended, averaging 122 FPS. This is just above the 120 Hz threshold, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. The High preset at 128 FPS is statistically similar, but the Ultra preset’s additional graphical effects come at a negligible cost of only 6 FPS, making it the better value in terms of visual experience per frame.

At 3840x2160, the recommendation changes. The Ultra preset averages 76 FPS, which is playable but not optimal for high-refresh-rate displays. The Medium preset, however, averages 128 FPS and provides a balanced experience. With a minimum FPS of 109, it ensures a stable frame time, making it the best choice for 4K gaming. The High preset at 80 FPS is a middle ground, but the step down to Medium offers a 60% increase in frame rate for a noticeable but not drastic reduction in visual effects.

In summary, the "best experience" per the measured rows is to use the Ultra preset at 1080p and 1440p, and the Medium preset at 4K. This combination yields frame rates that are either at or above the refresh rate thresholds of common gaming monitors, while maximizing the visual quality that the RTX 5060 can deliver without dipping into sub-60 FPS territory. The data does not show any benefit to using the Low preset beyond curiosity, as even the Ultra settings at 1440p produce frame rates that are far above what is needed for competitive or immersive play.