Inside

Inside is a puzzle platformer released in 2016, and the measured FPS for the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT combination shows a system with wide headroom in every tested row. The slowest average in the dataset is 3840x2160 Ultra at 74.1 FPS, while the fastest is 1920x1080 Low at 233 FPS. With every measured row at or above 74.1 FPS, this pairing maintains strong frame rates across the tested settings and resolutions.

Settings Recommendations

At 1920x1080, the High preset is the best overall pick: it averages 177.4 FPS while applying more visual detail than Medium or Low. Low averages 233 and Medium averages 215, so those presets exist for users who want maximum frame rates, but High already leaves a strong margin for smooth play. Ultra at 1920x1080 averages 167.2, which is the lowest 1080p-class row but still higher than every 2560x1440 and 3840x2160 High/Ultra result. Users who value image quality can use Ultra without leaving a strong frame-rate range.

At 2560x1440, High is again the recommended preset. It averages 128 FPS, which is practical for a high-refresh 2560x1440 display, while Ultra averages 121.4 and is nearly as fast. Medium at 192.4 and Low at 209.1 are faster, but they strip out more graphical quality than necessary for a game that already runs this well. If the target resolution is 2560x1440 and the goal is a balance between sharpness and smoothness, High is the preset the data points to.

At 3840x2160, Medium becomes the standout setting. It averages 126 FPS, more than High at 77.9 and Ultra at 74.1, while still using a higher preset than Low. High and Ultra are both playable in absolute terms, so users who want maximum quality at 3840x2160 can choose either one. Medium is the sensible default for 3840x2160 because it holds the frame rate higher and avoids the visual cost of Low.

Overall, the measured rows favor High at 2560x1440 as the best all-around experience, with Medium at 3840x2160 as the best high-resolution alternative. At 1920x1080, High is the recommended preset for quality-oriented users, while Low and Medium are there for those chasing maximum FPS.

GPU Role

The Radeon RX 6750 XT is an RDNA 2.0 card built around the Navi 22 chip. It has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with 432.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. Its base clock is 2150 MHz, its game clock is 2495 MHz, and its boost clock is 2600 MHz. The card is rated at 250 W TDP and uses a dual-slot cooler with a 6-pin and an 8-pin power connector. This hardware places it at the 79th GPU percentile, with an average benchmark score of 35,327.

The relationship between the GPU's specifications and the Inside results is clear in the 3840x2160 rows. High averages 77.9 and Ultra averages 74.1, making them the two slowest entries in the dataset. Even so, neither is close to being a poor result for this game. The 12 GB frame buffer is not shown to be a limiting factor in these measurements; the card continues to handle the highest tested resolution and preset without losing playability.

In aggregate GPU benchmarks, the RX 6750 XT's average score of 35,327 sits near the AMD Radeon RX 5600M at 35,264 with deltaPct 0.2, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile at 35,435 with deltaPct -0.3, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 at 35,787 with deltaPct -1.3. That places it in a competitive band with those cards in the aggregate metric. For this game specifically, the measured FPS rows show a GPU that can take heavy settings without dropping into unplayable territory.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS drops consistently as resolution rises. At High, the average goes from 177.4 at 1920x1080 to 128 at 2560x1440 to 77.9 at 3840x2160. At Ultra, the same progression runs 167.2, 121.4, and 74.1. Low settings produce 233, 209.1, and 160.2, while Medium settings produce 215, 192.4, and 126.

The scaling pattern is the expected shape of a GPU-bound workload. The CPU's core count and clocks are fixed across these runs, yet frame rates fall sharply when resolution increases, which indicates the graphics card is the component responsible for the performance drop. Even at Low, the 3840x2160 row at 160.2 is much lower than the 1920x1080 Low row at 233. The 160.2 result at 3840x2160 Low is also close to the 167.2 result at 1920x1080 Ultra, showing that resolution and settings both place load on the same component.

Looking at the slowest rows, High at 3840x2160 is 77.9 and Ultra at 3840x2160 is 74.1. The fact that these are lower than every 2560x1440 row reinforces the conclusion that the GPU is the limiting component at high resolutions. A CPU limitation would not produce this consistent a response to pixel count.

How This Combo Ranks

This combo ranks 961 out of 1,671 measured combinations in Inside. That puts it just past the midpoint of the field, with more than half of tested combos producing higher raw frame rates and a substantial number producing lower ones. The rank is not a warning sign for this game. Every measured row in this dataset is at or above 74.1 FPS, so the ranking reflects the relative performance tier of this hardware rather than any playability problem.

The data is marked as measured, so the rank is not an estimate. It comes from actual benchmark rows, and the same rows show that the Ryzen 5 3600 + RX 6750 XT is a mid-pack combination for Inside. Many faster combos exist, but this one still delivers high average FPS at every tested resolution and preset.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 2 processor in the 3000 series. It runs at a 3.60 GHz base clock and a 4.20 GHz boost clock, with a 65 W TDP. Its cache includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3. It supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel mode with 51.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth and uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes. In aggregate CPU benchmarks, it scores 18,129 and sits at the 76th CPU percentile.

The nearest CPU rivals in the aggregate list are all close: the Intel Core i5-11400 at 18,150 with deltaPct -0.1, the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS at 18,101 with deltaPct 0.2, the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 at 18,158 with deltaPct -0.2, and the AMD EPYC 9274F at 18,189 with deltaPct -0.3. This is a capable mainstream CPU, and its 6-core/12-thread layout is more than enough for the measured Inside data.

The CPU role in this game is to feed the GPU. The fastest measured row is 1920x1080 Low at 233 FPS, which requires a CPU that can keep up with a high frame rate. When resolution rises to 3840x2160, the CPU's clocks and core count do not change, but FPS drops, indicating that the GPU takes over as the limiting factor. At 1920x1080, the setting spread from Low at 233 to Ultra at 167.2 also shows that the CPU is not the main constraint; if it were, changing visual settings would not move FPS by as much as the data shows.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The dataset provides average FPS for each row, with no minimum or maximum values listed. The full set of measured rows appears below.

| Resolution | Settings | Average FPS |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 233 |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 215 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 177.4 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 167.2 |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 209.1 |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 192.4 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 128 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 121.4 |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 160.2 |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 126 |

| 3840x2160 | High | 77.9 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 74.1 |

The fastest rows are the 1920x1080 Low and Medium results, while the slowest rows are the 3840x2160 High and Ultra results. The table shows that the combo loses performance mainly when the GPU is asked to render more pixels or apply heavier settings, which agrees with the GPU-limited interpretation.