Hitman 2

# Hitman 2 with Intel Core Ultra 5 245 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 produces a mid-range gaming combination that handles Hitman 2 with clear resolution-dependent scaling. This 2018 stealth title, running on contemporary hardware, shows a system that excels at 1080p, remains playable at 1440p, but struggles to maintain smooth frame rates at 4K on higher presets. The data reveals a configuration where the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck as resolution climbs, while the 14-core Arrow Lake processor provides ample headroom for the game's CPU demands.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution to play Hitman 2 with this hardware?

A: According to the measured FPS data, 1920x1080 delivers the strongest performance across all settings, ranging from 72 FPS at Ultra to 171 FPS at Low. At 2560x1440, the High preset maintains 62 FPS, which remains smooth, while 4K drops to 33 FPS at High and 24 FPS at Ultra, making higher resolutions less viable for consistent gameplay.

Q: How does the RTX 4060 compare to its nearest rivals in benchmark scores?

A: The RTX 4060 has an average benchmark score of 17,639, sitting just 0.2% behind the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (17,666) and 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon 780M (17,588). The GPU's percentile ranking places it at 61% of all GPUs, indicating it performs above the median but below high-end enthusiast cards.

Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 sufficient for Hitman 2's CPU requirements?

A: Yes, the CPU data strongly supports this pairing. The Ultra 5 245 scores 32,924 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 4,648 in single-core, with a PassMark multithread score of 38,706. Its 90th percentile ranking among all CPUs means it provides far more processing power than Hitman 2, a 2018 title, requires.

Q: What is the difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset achieves 110 FPS average, while Ultra drops to 46 FPS. This represents a 64 FPS difference between the lowest and highest quality settings, with Medium (82 FPS) and High (62 FPS) falling between those extremes.

Q: Does the RTX 4060's 8 GB VRAM limit performance at high resolutions?

A: The measured data shows a significant frame rate drop at 3840x2160, where even the High preset only reaches 33 FPS. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 272.0 GB/s bandwidth appears insufficient for smooth 4K gameplay in Hitman 2, as evidenced by the Ultra preset falling to 24 FPS.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations for Hitman 2?

A: The combination ranks 1,606th out of 3,001 tested combos, placing it just above the median of all hardware pairings tested for this game. This mid-pack ranking reflects the GPU's 61st percentile standing rather than the CPU's 90th percentile performance.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 serves as the primary graphics processor in this configuration, built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5 nm process node from TSMC. The GPU contains 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die, with 3,072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units. Clock speeds reach 1,830 MHz base and 2,460 MHz boost, enabling a peak FP32 throughput of 15.11 TFLOPS.

Memory configuration consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory subsystem becomes a limiting factor in Hitman 2 at higher resolutions, as the game's asset streaming demands exceed what the 8 GB capacity can efficiently support at 3840x2160. The GPU's 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and DLSS features, though Hitman 2's standard rendering pipeline does not heavily utilize these specialized units.

The RTX 4060's benchmark performance shows a PassMark G3D score of 19,545 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,302. Its 61st percentile ranking among all GPUs positions it as a mainstream performer. In the context of Hitman 2, the GPU's raw rasterization power determines frame rates more than its AI or ray tracing capabilities. The measured FPS data confirms this: at 1080p, the GPU delivers 171 FPS on Low settings, but this drops to 72 FPS at Ultra, showing the graphics card's fill rate and shader throughput are the deciding factors.

The 115 W TDP and dual-slot cooler design make this a power-efficient option, but the 300 W suggested PSU indicates the system requires adequate power delivery. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides sufficient bandwidth for the GPU's 8 GB frame buffer, and the 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support modern display configurations.

Resolution Scaling

Frame rate scaling across resolutions reveals a predictable pattern where the GPU becomes progressively more stressed as pixel count increases. From 1920x1080 to 2560x1440, the High preset drops from 97 FPS to 62 FPS, a 36% reduction. Moving from 1440p to 3840x2160 at High settings yields 33 FPS, representing another 47% drop. This steep decline indicates the RTX 4060's rendering capabilities are stretched beyond their optimal range at 4K.

The Low preset demonstrates similar scaling characteristics: 171 FPS at 1080p, 110 FPS at 1440p, and 58 FPS at 4K. The fact that even the lowest quality settings cannot maintain 60 FPS at 4K confirms the GPU is the limiting component at this resolution. In contrast, the Ultra preset shows the most dramatic scaling, from 72 FPS at 1080p to 46 FPS at 1440p and 24 FPS at 4K—a threefold decrease from the lowest to highest resolution.

The Medium preset provides the most complete data set with minimum and maximum frame times. At 1080p, Medium averages 129 FPS with a range of 109 to 148 FPS. At 1440p, this drops to 82 FPS with a 70 to 95 FPS range. At 4K, Medium averages 44 FPS with 37 to 50 FPS minimums and maximums. The consistent frame time ranges suggest stable performance without severe stuttering, even when the average frame rate falls below ideal levels.

This scaling behavior identifies the RTX 4060 as the limiting component starting at 1440p. The CPU, with its high single-thread and multi-thread scores, does not appear to constrain performance at any resolution. The 171 FPS result at 1080p Low indicates the CPU can feed frames faster than the GPU can render them, while the 24 FPS at 4K Ultra shows the GPU struggling with the increased pixel workload.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the RTX 4060 delivers its strongest performance across all four presets. Low settings achieve 171 FPS average, providing maximum frame rates for competitive or high-refresh-rate displays. Medium settings reduce this to 129 FPS with a minimum of 109 FPS and maximum of 148 FPS, maintaining smooth gameplay with improved visual quality. High settings produce 97 FPS, offering a balanced experience with enhanced textures and effects. Ultra settings yield 72 FPS, still comfortably above 60 FPS for most displays, though the visual upgrade from High may not justify the 25 FPS cost.

At 2560x1440, performance remains respectable but begins to show GPU limitations. Low settings maintain 110 FPS, still excellent for 1440p gaming. Medium settings average 82 FPS with a 70 to 95 FPS range, providing smooth gameplay with moderate visual enhancements. High settings drop to 62 FPS, right at the threshold for 60 Hz displays, while Ultra falls to 46 FPS, which may cause noticeable judder in fast-moving scenes. The progression from Low to Ultra at 1440p shows a 64 FPS spread, indicating the GPU has less headroom than at 1080p.

At 3840x2160, the RTX 4060 struggles to maintain playable frame rates on higher presets. Low settings achieve 58 FPS, barely above 60 FPS threshold and playable but not ideal. Medium settings average 44 FPS with a 37 to 50 FPS range, dipping below 40 FPS in demanding scenes. High settings produce only 33 FPS, and Ultra falls to 24 FPS, making these presets unsuitable for smooth 4K gaming. The 4K results show the GPU's 8 GB memory and 128-bit bus insufficient for Hitman 2's 4K asset loads.

The complete data set reveals that the Medium preset at 1440p offers the best balance of visual quality and performance, with 82 FPS average and tight frame time consistency. The Ultra preset at 1080p provides the highest quality experience that remains smooth at 72 FPS, while 4K gameplay should be limited to Low settings for acceptable performance.

Settings Recommendations

For 1080p displays, the Ultra preset at 72 FPS delivers the most visually rich experience while maintaining smooth gameplay. Players with high-refresh-rate monitors may prefer Medium settings at 129 FPS, which still looks good while doubling the frame rate over Ultra. The High preset at 97 FPS offers a middle ground, but the diminishing visual returns between High and Ultra make Ultra the better choice for those prioritizing image quality.

At 1440p, the High preset at 62 FPS provides the best overall experience, maintaining 60+ FPS with substantial visual fidelity improvements over Medium. The Medium preset at 82 FPS is the safer choice for those sensitive to frame drops, as the 70 FPS minimum ensures consistent smoothness. The Ultra preset at 46 FPS should be avoided on standard 60 Hz displays, as the frame pacing will be noticeable during camera movements and crowded scenes.

For 4K gaming, the Low preset at 58 FPS is the only viable option for smooth gameplay, though it sacrifices significant visual quality. The Medium preset at 44 FPS represents the maximum quality tolerable for slower-paced stealth sections, but action sequences will suffer from reduced frame rates. High and Ultra presets at 33 FPS and 24 FPS respectively are essentially unplayable for most users.

The data suggests that players should prioritize 1440p with High settings as the optimal configuration for this hardware. This combination delivers 62 FPS with strong visual quality, leveraging the CPU's performance headroom while keeping the GPU within its efficient operating range. The 1080p Ultra preset at 72 FPS serves as an alternative for those who value maximum visual fidelity over resolution, while 4K should be reserved for static scenes or screenshots rather than active gameplay.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 provides substantial processing power that far exceeds Hitman 2's demands. This 14-core, 14-thread Arrow Lake processor operates at 3.50 GHz base and 5.10 GHz boost clocks, built on a 3 nm process from TSMC. The CPU's cache hierarchy includes 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3, which helps maintain low latency for game logic and physics calculations.

Benchmark results demonstrate the CPU's strength: Cinebench R23 scores reach 32,924 multi-core and 4,648 single-core, while PassMark multithread tests show 38,706. The 90th percentile ranking among all CPUs places it well above most gaming processors, and its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, which scores just 0.5% higher, and the Intel Core i5-14600K at 0.8% higher. This performance margin means the CPU will not bottleneck the RTX 4060 in Hitman 2.

Hitman 2's AI-driven stealth mechanics and crowd simulations benefit from the Ultra 5 245's multi-core capabilities. The 14 cores handle background threads, physics calculations, and NPC behavior without impacting frame delivery. The 5.10 GHz boost clock ensures strong single-thread performance for the main game thread, which remains critical for consistent frame times.

The CPU's 65 W TDP and DDR5 memory support with dual-channel configuration provide efficient data throughput. The 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth complements the GPU's 272.0 GB/s, ensuring the system can feed data to the graphics card without stalling. The PassMark data compression score of 400,942 and encryption score of 30,236 indicate the CPU handles data-intensive tasks well, though these are not directly gaming-related.

The measured FPS data confirms the CPU is not a limiting factor. At 1080p Low, the 171 FPS result shows the CPU can drive frame rates far beyond what the GPU can render at higher settings. The CPU's 90th percentile performance combined with the GPU's 61st percentile creates an imbalanced pairing where the processor has significant headroom. This means future GPU upgrades could improve Hitman 2 performance without requiring a CPU change, as the Ultra 5 245 has ample capacity to feed faster graphics cards.