Hitman 2

The Intel Core i5-12600KF paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT delivers a solid, though not top-tier, Hitman 2 experience. Benchmark results show the combination scaling predictably across resolutions, with the CPU providing ample headroom at 1080p while the GPU becomes the principal constraint at 4K. At 1080p, the system is firmly CPU-bound in the best case, offering very high frame rates; at 4K Ultra, it drops to a playable but demanding 25 FPS. The data reveals a versatile combo that excels at 1440p High and 1080p Ultra, making it a strong choice for high-refresh-rate stealth play, while 4K requires significant settings compromises.

Resolution Scaling

The measured frame rates show a clear and steep decline as resolution increases, confirming that the GPU is the primary limiting component at

higher resolutions. At 1080p with Low settings, the system delivers an average of 173 FPS, which is exceptionally high and indicates that the

Intel Core i5-12600KF is fully capable of feeding the GPU in this scenario. Moving to 1440p Low, the average drops to 111 FPS, a reduction of

62 FPS (about 36%) from the 1080p result. At 4K Low, the average falls to 59 FPS, which is roughly half the 1440p number and only 34% of the

1080p Low score. This pattern shows that as pixel count increases, the graphics card's workload scales nearly linearly, and the CPU's role

diminishes.

The gap is even more pronounced at higher settings. At 1080p High, the average is 98 FPS, while 1440p High yields 63 FPS, and 4K High drops to

33 FPS. The 4K High result is only 34% of the 1080p High figure. The scaling is steeper than the resolution change alone would suggest, which

indicates that the Radeon RX 6700 XT is the limiting component at 4K, even at High preset. At 1440p, the system remains well-balanced: the

1440p High average of 63 FPS is still comfortably above 60, showing that the card has enough headroom for this resolution.

The data suggests that at 1080p, the system is almost entirely CPU-bound, as the FPS exceeds 130 at Medium and reaches 173 at Low. The CPU,

with its 10 cores and 16 threads, is not the constraint here. The GPU is the limiting factor at 4K, where even Low settings produce only 59

FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target. The 4K Ultra result of 25 FPS is a clear indicator that this combination is not designed for 4K

gaming with maxed settings; it is more of a 1080p and 1440p performer.

The measured data shows a consistent pattern: the combination is optimized for 1080p and 1440p, and at 4K the user must accept significant

settings reductions to achieve playable frame rates. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is particularly harsh, with average FPS dropping by more

than half across all settings. For example, 1440p Medium yields 83 FPS, but 4K Medium only 44 FPS, a 47% reduction. This underscores the

GPU's role as the decisive component at 4K.

FAQ

Q: How does the combo perform at 1080p with Medium settings?

A: The average frame rate is 130 FPS, with a minimum of 111 FPS and a maximum of 150 FPS. This is a very high and smooth performance,

indicating the CPU and GPU are well-matched for this resolution.

Q: What is the difference in FPS between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 1440p Low, the average FPS is 111, while at 1440p Ultra, it drops to 46 FPS. This represents a 65 FPS decrease, or approximately

a 41% reduction in performance, showing the heavy load of Ultra settings on the GPU.

Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this combination?

A: Yes, but only with significant settings reductions. At 4K Low, the average is 59 FPS, which is playable. At 4K Medium, it is 44 FPS,

and at 4K High, it is 33 FPS. 4K Ultra is not recommended, as it only averages 25 FPS.

Q: Which resolution provides the best balance of visual quality and performance?

A: 1440p High offers an average of 63 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, while providing better visual fidelity

than Low or Medium. It is a strong sweet spot for this hardware.

Q: What is the CPU's role in this game?

A: The Intel Core i5-12600KF, with its 10 cores and 16 threads, is not a bottleneck at 1080p. This is evidenced by the high frame rates

at 1080p Low (173 FPS) and High (98 FPS). The CPU is sufficient for this game, and the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions.

Q: How does the GPU's VRAM affect performance in Hitman 2?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 192-bit bus and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is more than sufficient for the game's settings,

as no VRAM-related stuttering or issues are indicated by the benchmark data. The memory bandwidth is ample for the card's compute

capabilities.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data provides clear guidance for the best experience at each resolution. For 1080p, the Ultra preset yields an average of 72

FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay. This is the best option for players with a 1080p monitor who want the

highest visual quality. If a higher refresh rate is desired, the High preset provides 98 FPS, and Medium 130 FPS, but Ultra at 72 FPS is

still excellent. The data shows that the GPU is not overburdened at 1080p, so Ultra is recommended for the best visual experience.

At 1440p, the High preset delivers an average of 63 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS mark. This is the recommended settings for 1440p,

because it provides a good balance of visual quality and performance. The Ultra preset drops to 46 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS

threshold and may result in noticeable stutter. The Medium preset yields 83 FPS, which is very smooth, but the visual quality is lower

than High. Therefore, High is the best choice for a 1440p monitor.

For 4K, the situation is more constrained. The Low preset 59 FPS is the only one that approaches 60 FPS, and it is the recommended starting

point. The Medium preset at 44 FPS is playable for slower paced games, but not ideal. High and Ultra at 33 and 25 FPS respectively are

not recommended. A 4K user should expect to play at Low settings to achieve a smooth experience, or accept lower frame rates for better

visuals.

The data suggests a settings hierarchy: 1080p Ultra (72 FPS), 1440p High (63 FPS), and 4K Low (59 FPS) are the best per-resolution choices.

These settings provide the highest frame rates that still maintain a playable experience. The trade-offs are clear: lower settings yield

higher FPS, but the visual quality drops. The 1080p Ultra and 1440p High are the optimal points for their respective resolutions.

The benchmark results indicate that the GPU's 12 GB VRAM is not a limiting factor in this game, as all settings perform as expected. The

data shows that the CPU is not a bottleneck, so the settings recommendations are based solely on GPU performance. The Radeon RX 6700 XT

can handle 1080p Ultra and 1440p High with ease, but 4K requires a significant compromise.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations for Hitman 2, this pairing of the Intel Core i5-12600KF and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT ranks 1978 out of

3711 tested combos. This places it in the upper half of all tested configurations, but not in the top tier. The percentile for the CPU is

79, indicating it outperforms most CPUs, and the GPU has a percentile of 72, which is also above average. However, the combined ranking

is influenced by the game's demands and the specific balance of the two components.

The rank of 1978 out of 3711 means that roughly 53% of tested combos perform better. This is a respectable result, but not a top-tier one.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 27799, which is close to its nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i9-10900K (27872), with a delta

of -0.3%. This indicates that the CPU's performance is very competitive with other high-end processors. The GPU's average score is 27425,

which is also close to its rivals, such as the RTX 4070 Mobile (27435) and RTX 3090 (27565), with deltas of 0% and -0.5% respectively.

This suggests that the GPU is also around the same level as its neighbors.

The combo's rank is not at the top, but it is far from the lower end. The data implies that this combination is a balanced mid-higher range

performer. The CPU is very strong, with a percentile of 79, and the GPU is solid, with a percentile of 72. The fact that the combo ranks

in the upper half suggests that the game is not bottlenecked by either component, but the overall performance is not the absolute best.

For a stealth game like Hitman 2, this level of performance is more than adequate for a smooth experience at most settings.

The ranking is also influenced by the fact that this is a measured data set, not just synthetic scores. The measured FPS shows that at 1080p

the combo can hit very high frame rates, but at 4K it struggles, which would lower its overall ranking compared to combos that are more

powerful. The rank is a single metric, but it is clear that this combo is a strong 1080p and 1440p performer, and a moderate 4K

performer. In the context of the 3711 combos, this is a solid result that puts it in the middle of the pack.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT plays a central role in this combination, and its characteristics are well-reflected in the measured FPS. The

GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory, a 192-bit bus, and a memory bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is sufficient for the

game's settings, as there is no data indicating any VRAM-related issues or stuttering. The card's base clock is 2321 MHz, with a boost

clock of 2581 MHz, and a game clock of 2424 MHz. These clocks indicate a high-performance card that can deliver the frame rates seen in

the benchmark.

The GPU's compute power is substantial, with 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The pixel rate is 165.2 GPixel/s and the texture

rate is 413.0 GTexel/s. These figures suggest a card that is well-suited for modern game rendering. The FP32 performance is 13.21 TFLOPS,

which is a strong indicator of its rasterization capabilities. The card is an RDNA 2.0 architecture, which is efficient and capable.

The TDP is 230 W, and it is a dual-slot card, which is typical for this performance class.

In Hitman 2, the GPU's role is to render the game's geometry, lighting, and effects. The measured FPS show that it is the limiting factor at

4K, as the data shows a steep drop-off from 1440p to 4K. For example, at 1440p High, the average is 63 FPS, but at 4K High, it is 33 FPS,

a 48% reduction. The 12 GB VRAM is not a constraint, as the game does not appear to exceed this capacity at any settings, given that the

FPS scales predictably with resolution. The GPU's memory bandwidth is also adequate, as the frame times are consistent.

The GPU's performance is also relative to its rivals. The nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile, which has an average

score of 27435, a 0% delta, and the RTX 3090, with a score of 27565 and a -0.5% delta. This indicates that the RX 6700 XT is within a

very close margin of performance to these higher-tier cards. The data shows that the GPU is a strong performer, and its role in the combo

is to provide the rendering power. It is not a weak link at 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K it is the primary constraint, as the CPU is

clearly not the bottleneck.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the combination's performance. At 1920x1080, the settings are as follows:

• Low: Average 173 FPS, no min/max recorded.
• Medium: Average 130 FPS, min 111 FPS, max 150 FPS.
• High: Average 98 FPS, no min/max recorded.
• Ultra: Average 72 FPS, no min/max recorded.

At 2560x1440, the data is:

• Low: Average 111 FPS.
• Medium: Average 83 FPS, min 71 FPS, max 96 FPS.
• High: Average 63 FPS.
• Ultra: Average 46 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the data is:

• Low: Average 59 FPS.
• Medium: Average 44 FPS, min 38 FPS, max 51 FPS.
• High: Average 33 FPS.
• Ultra: Average 25 FPS.

The FPS scaling is consistent with the resolution and settings. The largest relative drop is from 1440p to 4K, where the average FPS at

Medium drops from 83 to 44, a 47% reduction. The 1080p to 1440p drop is smaller, with Medium going from 130 to 83, a 36% reduction. This

indicates that the GPU is more stressed at 4K, and the CPU is not the limiting factor. The data also shows that the min and max FPS at

Medium settings are available, and for 1080p, the min is 111 and max 150, while at 1440p it is 71 to 96, and at 4K it is 38 to 51. These

ranges indicate a decent frame pacing, but the lower min FPS at 4K shows the GPU's limits.

The benchmark data is measured, not estimated, which adds to its reliability. The combination achieves a total of 12 rows of data, covering

three resolutions and four settings. This allows for a clear analysis of the scaling. The 1080p settings show that the GPU can handle

even Ultra at 72 FPS, which is a high frame rate. The 1440p is more balanced, with High at 63 FPS, and the 4K is only playable at Low.

The data shows a clear trend: the GPU is the primary performer, and the CPU provides enough headroom for the gaming.

The average FPS for the combination is 3, and the performance is consistent with the hardware's expected capabilities. The 12 GB VRAM is

not a constraint, and the GPU's clocks are sufficient for the game. The measure of the FPS, especially the min and max at Medium, show

that the frame times are stable, with a reasonable spread. The data suggests that the combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming,

where it can deliver high FPS. At 4K, the user must choose between Low and Medium settings for a playable experience. The breakdown

provides a clear guide for the user.