Hard West

Hard West

AVERAGE FPS
147
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 147 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 51 69 89 109
1440p QHD 98 131 170 207
1080p Full HD 155 206 230 247

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 109
3840x2160 Medium 89
3840x2160 High 69
3840x2160 Ultra 51
2560x1440 Low 207
2560x1440 Medium 170
2560x1440 High 131
2560x1440 Ultra 98
1920x1080 Low 247
1920x1080 Medium 230
1920x1080 High 206
1920x1080 Ultra 155

Hard West with Intel Core i5-12400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 delivers a distinctly GPU-bound experience in Hard West, with frame rates scaling predictably from resolution to resolution. The data indicates that the RTX 4080 is the primary driver of performance, while the six-core processor provides ample headroom. Across all tested settings, the combination produces playable results, but the most balanced experience emerges at the Medium preset, which offers a substantial frame rate uplift over High settings while maintaining the smoothness expected of a turn-based tactics title.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data shows that the Medium preset provides the best balance between visual fidelity and performance for this combination. At 1920x1080, Medium delivers an average of 230 FPS, which is 24 FPS higher than High (206 FPS) and only 17 FPS lower than Low (247 FPS). The Medium preset also includes the only complete min/max data points in the entire dataset — at 1080p it ranges from 196 to 265 FPS, and at 1440p from 144 to 195 FPS — indicating stable frame delivery without extreme dips. The 1440p Medium result of 170 FPS represents a 30% improvement over High at the same resolution (131 FPS), making it the most efficient upgrade path.

Ultra settings, by contrast, produce a steep performance penalty. At 3840x2160, Ultra averages just 51 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS threshold many players consider the baseline for fluid motion. Even at 1080p, Ultra (155 FPS) costs 75 FPS compared to Medium (230 FPS) — a 33% reduction that is difficult to justify for a turn-based game where the visual gains are marginal. For 4K displays, the Low preset (109 FPS) is the only configuration that comfortably exceeds 100 FPS, while Medium (89 FPS) remains playable but with less headroom.

The data suggests prioritizing Medium at 1080p or 1440p for the optimal experience. At 4K, users must choose between Low for high frame rates or High for visual quality, as Ultra's 51 FPS average falls below the ideal playability threshold. The 1440p Medium configuration (170 FPS) emerges as the standout choice — it provides 65% of the 4K Ultra resolution's pixel count but delivers over three times the frame rate.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is the dominant component in this pairing, and the benchmark results reflect its substantial compute resources. With 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, the card offers 716.8 GB/s of bandwidth, which proves more than sufficient for Hard West's modest requirements. The GPU's 9728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 render output units provide the raw throughput needed to push high frame rates, with the boost clock reaching 2505 MHz.

The GPU's performance characteristics are evident in the resolution scaling. At 1080p, the RTX 4080 achieves 247 FPS on Low settings, but this drops to 155 FPS on Ultra — a 37% reduction that highlights the impact of increased shading complexity. The pattern continues at 1440p, where Low (207 FPS) exceeds Ultra (98 FPS) by more than double. At 4K, the gap narrows proportionally: Low produces 109 FPS while Ultra falls to 51 FPS, demonstrating that the GPU remains the bottleneck even at the highest pixel counts.

The RTX 4080's 48.74 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 280.6 GPixel/s pixel rate are clearly sufficient for Hard West, as evidenced by the 4K High result of 69 FPS. The card's performance relative to its nearest rivals — the RTX 4080 SUPER (0.1% higher average score) and the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (1.1% lower) — suggests that this GPU sits near the top of the current stack. The 86th percentile ranking among all GPUs confirms that this card is positioned well above the median, and the data shows no evidence of VRAM capacity being a limiting factor at any settings level.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-12400F provides a solid foundation for the RTX 4080, with 6 cores and 12 threads running at base and boost clocks of 2.50 GHz and 4.40 GHz respectively. The processor's 18 MB of shared L3 cache and 1.25 MB per-core L2 cache deliver adequate data locality for a turn-based tactics game, which typically does not demand extreme thread counts or memory bandwidth. The CPU's 65 W TDP and Intel Socket 1700 compatibility suggest a mainstream positioning that aligns with the GPU's high-end status.

Benchmark data shows the i5-12400F achieving a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,380 and a single-core score of 1,680, placing it in the 73rd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (0% delta) and the Intel Core 3 201E (-0.1% delta), indicating that this processor performs on par with recent mobile and entry-level desktop parts. The PassMark multi-thread score of 19,433 and single-thread score of 3,481 further characterize the CPU as a capable mid-range performer.

In the context of Hard West, the CPU's role appears secondary. The frame rate differences between Low and Ultra settings at each resolution are consistent with GPU-bound behavior — for instance, at 1440p, the jump from Low (207 FPS) to Medium (170 FPS) represents an 18% reduction, which tracks with increased GPU workload rather than CPU limitations. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 5,895 and max-thread score of 5,912 suggest that the CPU has sufficient multi-threading headroom, and the single-thread score of 909 indicates strong per-core performance that avoids bottlenecking the GPU at lower resolutions. The data shows no scenario where CPU performance constrains the frame rate — even at 1080p Low (247 FPS), the GPU continues to scale with settings changes.

FAQ

Q: What is the best settings preset for this CPU-GPU combination in Hard West?

A: The Medium preset at 1920x1080 provides the best experience, averaging 230 FPS with a measured range of 196 to 265 FPS. At 2560x1440, Medium still delivers 170 FPS with a range of 144 to 195 FPS, making it the most consistent performer across resolutions.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 perform at 4K resolution?

A: At 3840x2160, the GPU averages 109 FPS on Low, 89 FPS on Medium, 69 FPS on High, and 51 FPS on Ultra. Only the Low and Medium presets exceed 60 FPS, while Ultra falls below the playability threshold.

Q: Is the Core i5-12400F a bottleneck for the RTX 4080 in this game?

A: The data does not indicate CPU bottlenecking. The frame rate scaling from Low to Ultra at each resolution follows GPU workload patterns, and the CPU's 73rd percentile ranking with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,380 provides ample headroom for this turn-based title.

Q: What is the difference between High and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, High averages 131 FPS while Ultra drops to 98 FPS — a 33 FPS or 25% reduction. The same pattern appears at 1080p, where High (206 FPS) outperforms Ultra (155 FPS) by 51 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 compare to its nearest rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The RTX 4080's average benchmark score of 54,247 is 0.1% lower than the RTX 4080 SUPER (54,209) and 1.1% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (54,828). This places it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: Does the 16 GB VRAM capacity affect performance in Hard West?

A: No — the measured results show no evidence of VRAM limitations. The 16 GB GDDR6X memory with 716.8 GB/s bandwidth exceeds the game's requirements, as frame rates scale smoothly with settings changes without unexpected drops.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate progression from 1080p to 4K reveals a classic GPU-bound scaling pattern. At Medium settings, the average FPS drops from 230 at 1920x1080 to 170 at 2560x1440 (a 26% reduction) and further to 89 at 3840x2160 (a 61% reduction from 1080p). This scaling aligns closely with pixel count increases: 1440p has 1.78 times the pixels of 1080p, and 4K has 4 times the pixels — the performance deltas of 26% and 61% are less than proportional, indicating that the GPU's memory bandwidth and compute resources partially mitigate the load.

The Low preset shows a similar trajectory: 247 FPS at 1080p, 207 FPS at 1440p (a 16% drop), and 109 FPS at 4K (a 56% drop from 1080p). High settings follow the pattern with 206 FPS, 131 FPS, and 69 FPS respectively — the 1440p to 4K transition (47% reduction) is the steepest, reflecting the increased shading and texture work at higher resolutions. Ultra settings exhibit the most dramatic scaling: 155 FPS at 1080p, 98 FPS at 1440p (37% drop), and 51 FPS at 4K (67% drop from 1080p).

The data suggests that the RTX 4080 remains the limiting component across all resolutions. The consistent gap between Low and Ultra at each resolution — 92 FPS at 1080p, 109 FPS at 1440p, and 58 FPS at 4K — indicates that the GPU's workload scales predictably with settings, while the CPU maintains sufficient throughput. The 4K Ultra result of 51 FPS is the only configuration that falls below 60 FPS, confirming that the GPU's capabilities are fully utilized at the highest pixel counts.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the configuration delivers its highest frame rates. Low settings average 247 FPS, Medium averages 230 FPS with a range of 196 to 265 FPS, High averages 206 FPS, and Ultra averages 155 FPS. The 92 FPS spread between Low and Ultra demonstrates the GPU's headroom at this resolution, where even the most demanding preset maintains a frame rate well above display refresh rates.

Stepping up to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows the expected reduction. Low averages 207 FPS, Medium averages 170 FPS with a range of 144 to 195 FPS, High averages 131 FPS, and Ultra drops to 98 FPS. The Medium preset's minimum of 144 FPS is notable — it aligns exactly with common 144 Hz monitor refresh rates, ensuring a tear-free experience for most users.

At 3840x2160, the data reveals the GPU's limits. Low averages 109 FPS, Medium averages 89 FPS with a range of 76 to 103 FPS, High averages 69 FPS, and Ultra falls to 51 FPS. The Medium preset's minimum of 76 FPS is the only sub-100 FPS minimum recorded across all resolutions, indicating that 4K Medium is the lowest playable configuration. The 58 FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is the smallest absolute gap of any resolution, suggesting that the GPU is approaching its throughput ceiling.

The min/max data points, available only for Medium settings, provide insight into frame time consistency. At 1080p, the 196-265 FPS range represents a 35% variance from min to max, while at 1440p the 144-195 FPS range shows a 35% variance, and at 4K the 76-103 FPS range shows a 36% variance. This consistency across resolutions indicates stable performance without unexpected spikes or stutters.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i5-12400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 combination ranks 316th out of 3,722 tested combos in Hard West, placing it in the top 8.5% of all configurations. This ranking reflects the GPU's high-end positioning — the RTX 4080 sits in the 86th percentile among all GPUs, and its average benchmark score of 54,247 exceeds the vast majority of graphics cards. The CPU's 73rd percentile ranking contributes positively but does not boost the combination higher, as the i5-12400F's performance aligns with mid-range processors.

The combination's rank suggests that while the RTX 4080 is a top-tier GPU, the i5-12400F anchors the overall performance to a level below what flagship CPUs would achieve. The CPU's nearest rivals — the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (0% delta), Intel Core 3 201E (-0.1% delta), and Intel Core i5-1335U (0.3% delta) — all fall within a tight performance band, indicating that the i5-12400F provides exactly the compute level expected of its market segment. For Hard West, this proves sufficient, as the game's turn-based nature does not demand extreme CPU throughput.

Compared to other combos in the database, this pairing's 316th rank out of 3,722 indicates that 3,406 configurations perform better. Given that the RTX 4080's GPU benchmark percentile (86th) is notably higher than the combo's overall rank percentile (91.5th), the data suggests that other factors — likely CPU selection — prevent this combo from achieving a higher position. Nevertheless, the measured FPS results show exceptional performance across all resolutions, with even the most demanding 4K Ultra preset maintaining playable frame rates.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i5-12400F

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 2500 MHz
Boost Clock 4400 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

VRAM 16 GB GDDR6X
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2505 MHz MHz
TDP 320 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i5-12400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 in Hard West

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 109.0
3840x2160 Medium 89.0
3840x2160 High 69.0
3840x2160 Ultra 51.0
2560x1440 Low 207.0
2560x1440 Medium 170.0
2560x1440 High 131.0
2560x1440 Ultra 98.0
1920x1080 Low 247.0
1920x1080 Medium 230.0
1920x1080 High 206.0
1920x1080 Ultra 155.0

Hard West with ii5-12400F + Other GPUs

See how Hard West performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Hard West with RTX 4080 + Other CPUs

See how Hard West performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii5-12400F + RTX 4080

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.